Tamil vs Kannada. Which one is the ol...
Naveen kumar

Ashburn, VA

#728 Aug 17, 2014
This is the paper work made recently by Neelakaran and a man who know 5 to 7 languages and he mentioned many times in sanskrit vs tamil topix that he knew Tamil,malayalam,hindi,german,f rench,spanish,and a little bit chineese. and he have told in below link open and see his paper work he told that they dont have signs for kha,ga,gha,cha,jha,tha,da,dha, pha,ba,bha,sha,,ha,ksha etc... he said they have T and Ith signs. U can check this paper link recently posted b4 few days in sanskrit vs tamil topix. http://i57.tinypic.com/8xn1ip.jpg
Naveen kumar

Ashburn, VA

#729 Aug 17, 2014
Indian people, this is 2014 u still dont hang with that british created tamil stories b4 hundreds of years. Their history not based from puranas and archeology. Dont fall in dump by reading british created stories on Tamil. There is nothing calld tamil. It is a combination of major telugu and few sinhala words calld Tamil. Growup Indians Growup.
Naveen kumar

Ashburn, VA

#730 Aug 17, 2014
Indians growup, dont trust those british created fake Tamil stories. I know very well about this fake Tamil.
Naveen kumar

Ashburn, VA

#731 Aug 17, 2014
See indians, Tamil script was designed for their sounds and pronounciations. They dont have signs for kha,ga,gha,cha,jha,tha,da,dha, pha,ba,bha,sha,ha,ksha. If there are no vowels diacritics then consonants should must absent for those vowels diacritics. They dont have kha,kkha,khi,khee to kam kaha, like that they dont hav for all those absent letters. Sameway they dont have conjuctive consonants for lakhs of pronounciations. At recent years and now a days they know about absent letters in tamil so they using a single tamil letter to pronounce for other absent letters. They using Ith sound as Tha. Hope indians know about fake Tamil
Naveen kumar

Ashburn, VA

#732 Aug 17, 2014
See people, A script or sound/letter cann't be constructed when we dont have a sound or pronounciation in our tongue or brain. The reason why they dont have many letters bcoz they r tribal people who imported from African after A.D.s with half sounds in their tongue. Their script and language everything born in India. Even in recent dna research their dna matched with aborigines and africans. While telugus had the record of migrations from North india after the invasions of central asians with largegroups this was mentioned in vedas Aitreya brahmana and puranas. Tamilnadu was in telugu territory tamil barbarians r ruled by telugu empires. Telugus ruled them and patronised tamil and developed them. Tamil is tribal version of Telugu and few sinhala words.
shyam

Ashburn, VA

#739 Aug 17, 2014
haven't u still realised that no one is supporting u or hearing to u...

haven't u yet find a corpse bride.. pls stop barking senseless in ur graveyard

Since: May 14

Singapore, Singapore

#740 Aug 17, 2014
Naveen kumar wrote:
This is the paper work made recently by Neelakaran and a man who know 5 to 7 languages and he mentioned many times in sanskrit vs tamil topix that he knew Tamil,malayalam,hindi,german,f rench,spanish,and a little bit chineese. and he have told in below link open and see his paper work he told that they dont have signs for kha,ga,gha,cha,jha,tha,da,dha, pha,ba,bha,sha,,ha,ksha etc... he said they have T and Ith signs. U can check this paper link recently posted b4 few days in sanskrit vs tamil topix. http://i57.tinypic.com/8xn1ip.jpg
Ha ha.. Yes, There are ith and many more signs in Tamil which I didn't mention in that page, because there I am comparing the Tamil and the Sanskrit alphabets.

If I write purely for Tamil then the ith or whatever sings will come... I will write one for pure Tamil alphabets and consonants...

Since: May 14

Singapore, Singapore

#741 Aug 17, 2014
Naveen kumar wrote:
See indians, Tamil script was designed for their sounds and pronounciations. They dont have signs for kha,ga,gha,cha,jha,tha,da,dha, pha,ba,bha,sha,ha,ksha. If there are no vowels diacritics then consonants should must absent for those vowels diacritics. They dont have kha,kkha,khi,khee to kam kaha, like that they dont hav for all those absent letters. Sameway they dont have conjuctive consonants for lakhs of pronounciations. At recent years and now a days they know about absent letters in tamil so they using a single tamil letter to pronounce for other absent letters. They using Ith sound as Tha. Hope indians know about fake Tamil
LOL!! Its hard to control my laugh here :D

Tamils will laugh at your comment here..

You should really learn Tamil basics at least before you comment or claim anything about Tamil.

Better you learn the basics or I will teach them tonight, wait for my posts..
Naveen kumar

Ashburn, VA

#742 Aug 17, 2014
Neelakaran wrote:
<quoted text>
LOL!! Its hard to control my laugh here :D
Tamils will laugh at your comment here..
You should really learn Tamil basics at least before you comment or claim anything about Tamil.
Better you learn the basics or I will teach them tonight, wait for my posts..
stop ur acting ra idiot, stop ur multiple crossing talk with any single name. Fake idiot half language fool.
Naveen kumar

Ashburn, VA

#743 Aug 17, 2014
People dont believe this multiple crosser writing with different names as Neelakaran,shyam etc.. Bcoz i have experience talking with them since many months. He is talking with patience in the name of neelakaran. And scolding and behaving like a adog in the name of shyam. Now this multiple crosser will come and say me that they both are different people. I know their coment sense,coment timings,coment gaps. I know that bcoz i have experienced these two names. People dont believe them.
Naveen kumar

Ashburn, VA

#744 Aug 17, 2014
Arey multiple crosser, u have posted this link in ur previous coments at sanskrit vs tamil topix, can u say what are the meanings of those words u have mentioned in that paper link.
http://i58.tinypic.com/sq40t3.jpg
Naveen kumar

Ashburn, VA

#745 Aug 17, 2014
See people, A script or sound/letter cann't be constructed when we dont have a sound or pronounciation in our tongue or brain. The reason why they dont have many letters bcoz they r tribal people who imported from African after A.D.s with half sounds in their tongue. Their script and language everything born in India. Even in recent dna research their dna matched with aborigines and africans. While telugus had the record of migrations from North india after the invasions of central asians with largegroups this was mentioned in vedas Aitreya brahmana and puranas. Tamilnadu was in telugu territory tamil barbarians r ruled by telugu empires. Telugus ruled them and patronised tamil and developed them. Tamil is tribal version of Telugu and few sinhala words..
shyam

Chennai, India

#749 Aug 17, 2014
Mr.Naveen ugly minded mentally retarded cursed creature...

now take a look at my location because this was posted through PC..

so far i used smartphone is y my location is wrong
shyam

Chennai, India

#750 Aug 17, 2014
Kennai koodhi Naveen....

Neelakaran is now in singapore and i am in chennai da u fool....

goddamn wat the hell are u!!!!!!!!!!

first tell me wat is ur profession, where u live come on now, its not Ashburn VA, i know how this place is getting in,

like when i use my smartphone it shows my location as Ashburn VA...

come on tell me where u live and wat work u do if u r not a coward
shyam

United States

#751 Aug 17, 2014
wat Mr.Naveen seems u started some topics and barking alone there huh :D
Naveen kumar

San Mateo, CA

#753 Aug 17, 2014
Everyone should know the cunningness of barbarian Tamil looters here, In the Wiki of Telugu language According to the Russian linguist Andronov Telugu was split from Proto dravidian languages between 1500-1000 B.C.E.[11][12].This was the statement i was read b4 some months. Recently i have seen a new line added behind that statement by tamil looters to steal the telugu history. What they added is; It originates from Tamil. The proto dravidian info &Tamil wiki not said like that then who added that? Tamil looters, to mislead the people. The Telugu wiki saying it split from central dravidians and independent.The Tamil wiki saying Tamil was derived from south dravidians(south version was tribal version of central telugu)(Tamil-Kannada)-(Tamil- kodagu)-(Tamil-malayalam)-Tami l. Is there telugu in that group? click on[12] in telugu wiki history statement Also read tamil language wiki. Or read below links....
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Telugu_language
https://lists.hcs.harvard.edu/mailman/listinf...

Since: May 14

Singapore, Singapore

#754 Aug 17, 2014
Naveen kumar wrote:
Everyone should know the cunningness of barbarian Tamil looters here, In the Wiki of Telugu language According to the Russian linguist Andronov Telugu was split from Proto dravidian languages between 1500-1000 B.C.E.[11][12].This was the statement i was read b4 some months. Recently i have seen a new line added behind that statement by tamil looters to steal the telugu history. What they added is; It originates from Tamil. The proto dravidian info &Tamil wiki not said like that then who added that? Tamil looters, to mislead the people. The Telugu wiki saying it split from central dravidians and independent.The Tamil wiki saying Tamil was derived from south dravidians(south version was tribal version of central telugu)(Tamil-Kannada)-(Tamil- kodagu)-(Tamil-malayalam)-Tami l. Is there telugu in that group? click on[12] in telugu wiki history statement Also read tamil language wiki. Or read below links....
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Telugu_language
https://lists.hcs.harvard.edu/mailman/listinf...
What is your problem??

Go edit it back to its original form or write a mail to the editor saying that it was changed with wrong information.. Why do you say it here?? Oh, to make people believe that Tamils were looters??

Look mister, if you think its wrong then its your own personal opinion based on your finding and you should deal it with the site which is hosting such information. Not here...

Since: May 14

Singapore, Singapore

#755 Aug 17, 2014
shyam wrote:
wat Mr.Naveen seems u started some topics and barking alone there huh :D
yes, saw that. That is not even a question for debate bro.. He is just dumping his ideas over there..
Naveen kumar

Ashburn, VA

#756 Aug 17, 2014
Every Indian know u tamil barbarins are looters and cheaters. Whats special in that statement.
shyam

San Mateo, CA

#758 Aug 17, 2014
Naveen kumar wrote:
Every Indian know u tamil barbarins are looters and cheaters. Whats special in that statement.
u r only special... Indian's now realised and feeling frustrated to see fool like u, U r a big shame for India!!

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Top Stories Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
Poll Is homosexuality a sin? (Oct '07) 3 min karl44 104,584
Why Should Jesus Love Me? (Feb '08) 6 min Steve III 618,288
Prove there's a god. (Mar '08) 6 min Oath Keeper 969,838
Should Black People Forgive White People for Sl... (Jun '07) 7 min Joe Fortuna 4,843
News Roman Catholic church only true church, says Va... (Jul '07) 9 min hojo 641,075
The Christian Atheist debate (Jun '15) 16 min scientia potentia... 37,361
Bush is a hero (Sep '07) 26 min X Pendable 182,267
Poll Was 9/11 a conspiracy?? (Oct '07) 4 hr who 280,849
More from around the web