*** Did WTC 7 Collapse due to fire ***

*** Did WTC 7 Collapse due to fire ***

Created by Timesten on Nov 19, 2010

4,842 votes

Click on an option to vote

Yes

No

“Google Operation Northwoods”

Since: Aug 10

** 9-11 was an inside job **

#2222 Feb 28, 2013
Charlie Sheen wrote:
<quoted text>
Wrong, it was from the North Tower falling on WTC7 severing the sprinkler lines.
The people agree, it was DUE TO FIRE MOOBS!
And how many times did you vote sheen?
And the pic shows someone hosing down the building from WTC 7 after the first collapse.
.
Contradictory pictures of WTC 7's corner damage
There are conflicting pictures of WTC 7's south-west corner on September 11, 2001.
http://wtc7corner.blogspot.com/
.
And how did the damage to one corner bring down all 4 corners?
http://www.debunking911.com/wtc7swd.jpg
.
https://sites.google.com/site/911whatyoumight...
.
You shills are so gullible and naive.
Charlie Sheen

Lincoln, NE

#2223 Feb 28, 2013
Timesten wrote:
And you're a liar. I never stated any such thing.that psychic super solders do to fight the paranormal by turning invisible, telaporting, waking through walls and killing goats with their minds.
Sure you did, don't lie!
Charlie Sheen

Lincoln, NE

#2224 Feb 28, 2013
Timesten wrote:
Name them and I will shred them Moobs, I don't debate websites.
Charlie Sheen

Lincoln, NE

#2225 Feb 28, 2013
Timesten wrote:
<quoted text>
And how many times did you vote sheen?
And the pic shows someone hosing down the building from WTC 7 after the first collapse.
Even if true so, one person, for how long before they lost water pressure plus we were talking about the sprinklers.
Charlie Sheen

Lincoln, NE

#2226 Feb 28, 2013
Timesten wrote:
<quoted text>
And how did the damage to one corner bring down all 4 corners?
http://www.debunking911.com/wtc7swd.jpg
21. Did debris from the collapse of WTC 1 cause damage to WTC 7's structure in a way that contributed to the building's collapse?

The debris from WTC 1 caused structural damage to the southwest region of WTC 7—severing seven exterior columns—but this structural damage did not initiate the collapse. The fires initiated by the debris, rather than the structural damage that resulted from the impacts, initiated the building's collapse after the fires grew and spread to the northeast region after several hours. The debris impact caused no damage to the spray-applied fire-resistive material that was applied to the steel columns, girders, and beams except in the immediate vicinity of the severed columns. The debris impact damage did play a secondary role in the last stages of the collapse sequence, where the exterior façade buckled at the lower floors where the impact damage was located. A separate analysis showed that even without the structural damage due to debris impact, WTC 7 would have collapsed in fires similar to those that occurred on Sept. 11, 2001. None of the large pieces of debris from WTC 2 hit WTC 7 because of the large distance between the two buildings.

10. Some people have said that a failure at one column should not have produced a symmetrical fall like this one. What is NIST’s answer to those assertions?

WTC 7's collapse, viewed from the exterior (most videos were taken from the north), did appear to fall almost uniformly as a single unit. This occurred because the interior failures that took place did not cause the exterior framing to fail until the final stages of the building collapse. The interior floor framing and columns collapsed downward and pulled away from the exterior frame. There were clues that internal damage was taking place prior to the downward movement of the exterior frame, such as when the east penthouse fell downward into the building and windows broke out on the north face at the ends of the building core. The symmetric appearance of the downward fall of WTC 7 was primarily due to the greater stiffness and strength of its exterior frame relative to the interior framing.
Charlie Sheen

Lincoln, NE

#2227 Feb 28, 2013
Timesten wrote:
<quoted text>
And how many times did you vote sheen?
Once, Do you know something I don't Moobs, like those psychic super soldiers battling the paranormal?

“Google Operation Northwoods”

Since: Aug 10

** 9-11 was an inside job **

#2228 Feb 28, 2013

“Google Operation Northwoods”

Since: Aug 10

** 9-11 was an inside job **

#2229 Feb 28, 2013
I don't debate websites.
I don't debate websites.
I don't debate websites.

Your pathetic sheen

You're on a website now idiot.
It's called Topix jtlyk

Go play with your tonka trucks in your sandbox you are useless here.
Charlie Sheen

Lincoln, NE

#2230 Feb 28, 2013
Timesten wrote:
What did they lie about MOOBS!

“Google Operation Northwoods”

Since: Aug 10

** 9-11 was an inside job **

#2231 Feb 28, 2013
Click the link shill.
I'm thru trying to discuss matters with you idiots.
I say the sun is hot and you jump up, arms flaring and say, "No it's not and I already proved that to you a dozen times."
.
All you and your buds are is a lot of...
http://3.bp.blogspot.com/-BvyQ0ZDQDqU/TtBZGX7...

"I don't debate websites"
"I don't debate websites"
.
Go back to the....
http://www.babyvest.lv/files/Piegadataju%20br...
Charlie Sheen

Lincoln, NE

#2232 Feb 28, 2013
Timesten wrote:
I don't debate websites.
I don't debate websites.
I don't debate websites.
Your pathetic sheen
You're on a website now idiot.
It's called Topix jtlyk
Go play with your tonka trucks in your sandbox you are useless here.
Are you crying MOOBS?

“Google Operation Northwoods”

Since: Aug 10

** 9-11 was an inside job **

#2233 Feb 28, 2013
Silverstein said they decided to "pull it"

Date: January 9, 1996
City staff have contacted the property owner by phone to request that he obtain a demolition permit and pull down and demolish the building, however, the owner has demonstrated no desire to cooperate.

2.THAT the owners are hereby ordered to pull down the building and remove the resulting debris and discarded materials from the site within 14 days of the date
http://former.vancouver.ca/ctyclerk/cclerk//9...
.
From a demolition office to a caller
http://www.thewebfairy.com/killtown/audio/cdi...
.
more.
https://sites.google.com/site/911whatyoumight...

Still say "Pull it" doesn't mean take down the building, mr shills.
Charlie Sheen

Lincoln, NE

#2234 Feb 28, 2013
Timesten wrote:
"I don't debate websites"
"I don't debate websites"
OK, Moobs, since you don't think it's pointless to debate a website, debunk everything in this one and lead by example!

http://www.911myths.com/indexold.html
Charlie Sheen

Lincoln, NE

#2235 Feb 28, 2013
Timesten wrote:
Silverstein said they decided to "pull it"
Still say "Pull it" doesn't mean take down the building, mr shills.
On the pull it statement

On September 9, 2005, Mr. Dara McQuillan, a spokesman for Silverstein Properties, issued the following statement on this issue:

Seven World Trade Center collapsed at 5:20 p.m. on September 11, 2001, after burning for seven hours. There were no casualties, thanks to the heroism of the Fire Department and the work of Silverstein Properties employees who evacuated tenants from the building.

The Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) conducted a thorough investigation of the collapse of all the World Trade Center buildings. The FEMA report concluded that the collapse of Seven World Trade Center was a direct result of fires triggered by debris from the collapse of WTC Tower

In the afternoon of September 11, Mr. Silverstein spoke to the Fire Department Commander on site at Seven World Trade Center. The Commander told Mr. Silverstein that there were several firefighters in the building working to contain the fires. Mr. Silverstein expressed his view that the most important thing was to protect the safety of those firefighters, including, if necessary, to have them withdraw from the building.

Later in the day, the Fire Commander ordered his firefighters out of the building and at 5:20 p.m. the building collapsed. No lives were lost at Seven World Trade Center on September 11, 2001.

As noted above, when Mr. Silverstein was recounting these events for a television documentary he stated,“I said, you know, we've had such terrible loss of life. Maybe the smartest thing to do is to pull it.” Mr. McQuillan has stated that by “it,” Mr. Silverstein meant the contingent of firefighters remaining in the building.
http://usinfo.state.gov/media/Archive/2005/Se...

doesn’t accept that Silverstein’s quote is in itself evidence of that. He reports:

I mailed Jowenko BV and asked if 'pull' was an industry term for 'demolish'. They said it wasn't. Implosionworld said the same thing. I run into the same problem when looking into different dictionaries. There is always a distinction made between 'pull down','pull away' and 'pull back'. And I have not been able to find one person on the internet who uses this word as a substitute for 'demolish'. So I think it's safe to assume that Larry needs to clarify what he meant, but unfortunately he refuses to do that.
http://web.archive.org/web/20050327052408/htt...

Those sceptical of the “pull=demolish” idea suggest that “pull it” could mean “pull a firefighting operation”, instead. And even sites collecting examples to show that it is a demolition term (see http://thewebfairy.com/killtown/wtc7/pullit.h... , for instance), offer some support for this idea. Note how that page also contains the following quotes referring to the firefighters (our emphasis on the words in bold):

“Google Operation Northwoods”

Since: Aug 10

** 9-11 was an inside job **

#2236 Feb 28, 2013
Charlie Sheen wrote:
<quoted text>
l
http://www.topix.com/forum/topstories/T80OHV1...
Charlie Sheen

Lincoln, NE

#2238 Feb 28, 2013
Charlie Sheen wrote:
<quoted text>
OK, Moobs, since you don't think it's pointless to debate a website, debunk everything in this one and lead by example!
http://www.911myths.com/indexold.html
Still waiting MOOBS!

“Google Operation Northwoods”

Since: Aug 10

** 9-11 was an inside job **

#2239 Feb 28, 2013
What part of "don't bother me" don't you understand shill.
And you can take your govie website and put it where the sun doesn't shine.

“Google Operation Northwoods”

Since: Aug 10

** 9-11 was an inside job **

#2240 Feb 28, 2013
This is where you can put it also....
https://www.google.com/search...

“Google Operation Northwoods”

Since: Aug 10

** 9-11 was an inside job **

#2241 Feb 28, 2013
For the readers here, besides the shills that don't debate websites.
https://sites.google.com/site/911whatyoumight...
.
https://sites.google.com/site/911whatyoumight...
Charlie Sheen

Lincoln, NE

#2242 Feb 28, 2013
Charlie Sheen wrote:
<quoted text>
OK, Moobs, since you don't think it's pointless to debate a website, debunk everything in this one and lead by example!
http://www.911myths.com/indexold.html
Still waiting unemployed truck driver!

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Top Stories Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
The Christian Atheist debate 6 min Poov 1,982
Prove there's a god. (Mar '08) 10 min PELE78 864,406
News Quiet Fight to Free American in China Jail (Nov '09) 54 min Big Jim 55
Which is the Oldest Indian Language? Sanskrit V... (Jul '08) 1 hr sangili karuppan 7,494
Jehovah's Witnesses are true disciple of Jesus ... (Mar '07) 2 hr Student 40,866
"Children of DISOBIENCE": U R of your FATHER...... 2 hr Child of Set 3
Poll If you're Christain what kind are you? (Oct '07) 2 hr dollarsbill 6,454
Why Should Jesus Love Me? (Feb '08) 5 hr Peace_Warrior 612,900
News Roman Catholic church only true church, says Va... (Jul '07) 5 hr Liam 599,552
More from around the web