3,000 Died... Bush LIED!
First Prev
of 32
Next Last
BUSH IS RIGHT

Stockton, CA

#651 May 30, 2007
FREAKSHOW wrote:
I`D VOTE FOR HIM AGAIN,GOD HELP THIS COUNTRY IF WE HAVE A DEMOCRAT FOR OUR NEXT PRESIDENT ALONG WITH THE WHITE FLAG WAVERS IN THE HOUSE AND SENATE. PELOSI,KERRY,MURTHA,KENNEDY KUCCINICH,DURBIN AND THE WHOLE DEMOCRATIC PARTY,YOU THINK 3,OOO PEOPLE BEING SLAUGHTERED ON 9/11 WAS NOT ENOUGH WAIT TILL YOU SEE WHAT HAPPENS WHEN YOU ELECT A DEMOCRAT FOR PRESIDENT.
You are completely right!! I agree with everything you wrote. The democrats are the idiots not Bush. Unfortunately democrats are too stupid to understand the smart things me and you write about in our blogs. Keep it goin'. GREAT BLOG!!!!!!!!
BUSH IS RIGHT

Stockton, CA

#652 May 30, 2007
Why are there sooo many dumb democrats in the U.S.? We can't just give up and get out of this war or we will get bombed, attacked, and killed. President Bush is a great President and a perfect President for this time and thats a fact. God help us if Hilliary, or Obama, or any other liberals gets elected. The United States is full of so many idiots, followers, losers, hippies, and people that like to give up (ALL DEMOCRATS). In 2008 don't be an ass VOTE REPUBLICAN and save America from democrats and terroists.
Not Surprised

Sanford, FL

#653 May 30, 2007
My Shocked Face ---> :-\
BUSH IS ROTTEN

Zoe, KY

#654 Jun 10, 2007
First of all your statement about Democrats shows how one-sided and judgmental you are. You are very insecure and afraid and are willing to join the ones you can't beat. Hitler took advantage of your type years ago.

Fortunately, there were many who saw Hitler as more of a nuisance than a real threat. And, like a virus he ran his course until he vanished. Many of his followers were dumbfounded by the sudden truth and many continued to live in denial. But to hell with them, the ones who were relieved are the real winners.

Today is unlike that. There are those who were and are vulnerable enough to fall for just about anything, including Trudeau's book. Bush happens to be an arrogant, silver-spooned, illiterate, lying hillbilly who recklessly poses as a poster boy for a corrupt commercial money factory that spans across nations. All the honest hard working citizens have assimilated themselves to conforming to a media cultivated society ran by the media which is owned by those who all connected to all the major corporations such as the drug companies. Ever notice how a doctor would much rather prescribe a drug than tell you how to fix a problem yourself? I've been fixing my problems for years without drugs. I don't need Trudeau's book for it.

Only fools in Portland, OR and anywhere else that think we need to be in another country to save our own would be "dumb" enough to actually believe that's a good thing. It's a tragedy how American conformists get their information from mainstream media and call it the truth. That's sad but hilarious at the same time. There is no truth on television. The internet is the ONLY truth we have.

I won't take sides and say Democrats or Republicans because labeling is what's really DUMB here. There's people who really see the truth and there's people who see what they want to see. Where there's money, there's greed and those kinds of people don't know hard working people like myself. They can't speak or act in my best interest. The country needs someone who knows poor. Someone who remembers where they came from. Bush has never been poor and never earned his way in life.

We need a black or woman leader who has more than proven themselves. Not just with words but real dirt on their hands. As long as the rich drive this country, the poor will stay poor. And they are getting poorer since 2000.
EASY MONEY

Bangkok, Thailand

#655 Jun 11, 2007
bush is rottenin in KY was talkin. All I can say is get off the corn boy! it's turned you head into mash. Boy you is ate up, but I want to thank ya thank ya for showing the way not to act.

Since: Apr 07

Evergreen, CO

#656 Jun 11, 2007
BUSH IS ROTTEN wrote:
First of all your statement about Democrats shows how one-sided and judgmental you are. You are very insecure and afraid and are willing to join the ones you can't beat. Hitler took advantage of your type years ago.
Fortunately, there were many who saw Hitler as more of a nuisance than a real threat. And, like a virus he ran his course until he vanished. Many of his followers were dumbfounded by the sudden truth and many continued to live in denial. But to hell with them, the ones who were relieved are the real winners.
Today is unlike that. There are those who were and are vulnerable enough to fall for just about anything, including Trudeau's book. Bush happens to be an arrogant, silver-spooned, illiterate, lying hillbilly who recklessly poses as a poster boy for a corrupt commercial money factory that spans across nations. All the honest hard working citizens have assimilated themselves to conforming to a media cultivated society ran by the media which is owned by those who all connected to all the major corporations such as the drug companies. Ever notice how a doctor would much rather prescribe a drug than tell you how to fix a problem yourself? I've been fixing my problems for years without drugs. I don't need Trudeau's book for it.
Only fools in Portland, OR and anywhere else that think we need to be in another country to save our own would be "dumb" enough to actually believe that's a good thing. It's a tragedy how American conformists get their information from mainstream media and call it the truth. That's sad but hilarious at the same time. There is no truth on television. The internet is the ONLY truth we have.
I won't take sides and say Democrats or Republicans because labeling is what's really DUMB here. There's people who really see the truth and there's people who see what they want to see. Where there's money, there's greed and those kinds of people don't know hard working people like myself. They can't speak or act in my best interest. The country needs someone who knows poor. Someone who remembers where they came from. Bush has never been poor and never earned his way in life.
We need a black or woman leader who has more than proven themselves. Not just with words but real dirt on their hands. As long as the rich drive this country, the poor will stay poor. And they are getting poorer since 2000.
BIR,

First rule of the internet: Take NOTHING at face value.

A favorite deceit of moronic conservatives is to claim to be a liberal & make idiotic, extremist liberal statements.

A favorite deceit of moronic liberals is to claim to be a conservative & make idiotic, extremist conservative statements.

Bush Is Right seems to be in the second category to me.

Now coming on as "Bush Is Rotten" leads me to think one of two things:

1. You are responding to "Bush is Right".
2. You ARE "Bush is Right".

Care to enlighten us before we waste time in debate with a troll (IF, as I do not suspect), option 2 is right.

tk

Since: Apr 07

Evergreen, CO

#657 Jun 11, 2007
Paul in SC,
Paul in SC wrote:
Go back and read what I posted and then explain to the readers of the forum why you are either a compulsive liar or an illiterate slob.
Pretty free flowing with the insults, eh Pablo?!

"Compulsive liar"?! Great. I used YOUR direct quote:
Paul in SC wrote:
When the Japs surrendered, we took control of the all the Japanese occupied territiorites [sic] in Asia. The US was calling all the shots in SE Asia for a while.
Then I listed the countries in which the Japanese still had troops in August '45. These places included China, Manchuria, Vietnam, etc. NO US troops "took control" of these, or the other countries, that I listed. It's rather difficult to "call the shots" in foreign countries in which you have ZERO troops.

Ergo, YOUR statement was false.

Yeah, right?!! The US controlled China?!!

The specific question was Vietnam. I searched for US troops who were moved into Vietnam in late '45. I found none. Since you claim otherwise, I invited you to post unit numbers, and then we'd all know.

You conveniently disappeared from the conversation.

One should be careful, even on the internet, of tossing around words like "liar" & "illiterate", Pablo. They have a way of coming back to haunt you.
Paul in SC wrote:
We actually had control of Vietnam as well, and we left the Japanese soldiers there for a while to enforce law and order, which is what we had to do in other countries too, until civil authority could be restored.
Interesting claim. Now back it up.

Provide one single reference to ANY US policy of "leaving the Japanese in charge of any territory".(Must be because they were such nice guys in Singapore, Nanking, Bataan, the Philippines, etc!)

As opposed to your LUDICROUS portrayal of the situation, the US forced the Japanese emperor himself to broadcast radio messages to ALL Japanese soldiers to lay down their weapons & surrender.(It's called an "Unconditional Surrender".) Hard to keep civil control of populations that you've just spent the last 5 years torturing, murdering, raping, etc. while, at the same time, "laying down your weapons."
Paul in SC wrote:
Ho Chi Minh actually sent a letter to Harry Truman begging for independence. Truman ignored the request.
Hey, some true statements. Refreshing.
Paul in SC wrote:
The French went in [to Vietnam], the Communist Chinese went in [to Vietnam], all hell started breaking loose.
As I said earlier, the French went in during the latter stages of the war, after FDR died. Not after the war. They DID set up a colonial gov't & attempt to "run" Vietnam. Didn't work out like they'd hoped.
Paul in SC wrote:
The US was the only super-power in the region...
The US is the only superpower in North America. Doesn't mean we RUN Canada & Mexico. We "ran" only ONE country in Asia - Japan.(Including Okinawa.)

We occupied (i.e., "ran") Japan for several years, gradually turning it back over to a demilitarized civilian government.

We ran several tiny islands (e.g., Saipan, Tinian, Ulithi) across the Pacific by virtue of having bases there.

Your assessments of foreign policy & diplomacy are constantly long on platitudes and very short on academics.

And you're rude.

Charming combination.

tk

Since: Feb 07

Tarawa Terrace, NC

#658 Jun 11, 2007
tomk52 wrote:
Paul in SC,
<quoted text>
Pretty free flowing with the insults, eh Pablo?!
"Compulsive liar"?! Great. I used YOUR direct quote:
<quoted text>
Then I listed the countries in which the Japanese still had troops in August '45. These places included China, Manchuria, Vietnam, etc. NO US troops "took control" of these, or the other countries, that I listed. It's rather difficult to "call the shots" in foreign countries in which you have ZERO troops.
Ergo, YOUR statement was false.
Yeah, right?!! The US controlled China?!!
The specific question was Vietnam. I searched for US troops who were moved into Vietnam in late '45. I found none. Since you claim otherwise, I invited you to post unit numbers, and then we'd all know.
You conveniently disappeared from the conversation.
One should be careful, even on the internet, of tossing around words like "liar" & "illiterate", Pablo. They have a way of coming back to haunt you.
<quoted text>
Interesting claim. Now back it up.
Provide one single reference to ANY US policy of "leaving the Japanese in charge of any territory".(Must be because they were such nice guys in Singapore, Nanking, Bataan, the Philippines, etc!)
As opposed to your LUDICROUS portrayal of the situation, the US forced the Japanese emperor himself to broadcast radio messages to ALL Japanese soldiers to lay down their weapons & surrender.(It's called an "Unconditional Surrender".) Hard to keep civil control of populations that you've just spent the last 5 years torturing, murdering, raping, etc. while, at the same time, "laying down your weapons."
<quoted text>
Hey, some true statements. Refreshing.
<quoted text>
As I said earlier, the French went in during the latter stages of the war, after FDR died. Not after the war. They DID set up a colonial gov't & attempt to "run" Vietnam. Didn't work out like they'd hoped.
<quoted text>
The US is the only superpower in North America. Doesn't mean we RUN Canada & Mexico. We "ran" only ONE country in Asia - Japan.(Including Okinawa.)
We occupied (i.e., "ran") Japan for several years, gradually turning it back over to a demilitarized civilian government.
We ran several tiny islands (e.g., Saipan, Tinian, Ulithi) across the Pacific by virtue of having bases there.
Your assessments of foreign policy & diplomacy are constantly long on platitudes and very short on academics.
And you're rude.
Charming combination.
tk
Sorry loser. The US had control of Vietnam after the Japs surrendered. We left their forces in Vietnam to maintain law and order, but they were essentially under our command at that point.

So you can invent history with the best of them, but you'll always be WRONG!
AWOL COWARD President

Pensacola, FL

#659 Jun 11, 2007
FREAKSHOW wrote:
I`D VOTE FOR HIM AGAIN,GOD HELP THIS COUNTRY IF WE HAVE A DEMOCRAT FOR OUR NEXT PRESIDENT ALONG WITH THE WHITE FLAG WAVERS IN THE HOUSE AND SENATE. PELOSI,KERRY,MURTHA,KENNEDY KUCCINICH,DURBIN AND THE WHOLE DEMOCRATIC PARTY,YOU THINK 3,OOO PEOPLE BEING SLAUGHTERED ON 9/11 WAS NOT ENOUGH WAIT TILL YOU SEE WHAT HAPPENS WHEN YOU ELECT A DEMOCRAT FOR PRESIDENT.
9/11 happened during George W Bush, A REPUBLICAN you moron!(P.S bin Laden is not in Iraq)

Since: Apr 07

Evergreen, CO

#660 Jun 11, 2007
Paul in SC wrote:
<quoted text>
Sorry loser. The US had control of Vietnam after the Japs surrendered. We left their forces in Vietnam to maintain law and order, but they were essentially under our command at that point.
So you can invent history with the best of them, but you'll always be WRONG!
You've said this now several times.

Now prove it. Provide a reference.

tk

Since: Apr 07

Evergreen, CO

#661 Jun 11, 2007
AWOL COWARD President wrote:
<quoted text>
9/11 happened during George W Bush, A REPUBLICAN you moron!(P.S bin Laden is not in Iraq)
And we did NOT go into Iraq to get bin Laden.

9/11 could have happened during a Republican's administration OR a Democrat's administration. The primary reason that it worked was that it was so anomolous and unprecedented.

Someone will one day figure out some new, unexpected way to attack the US. The cuplability of the administration will not be determined by the event, but by whether or not the preventive steps were reasonable.

tk

Since: Jul 08

Pittsburgh, PA

#662 Nov 27, 2008
tomk52 wrote:
<quoted text>
And we did NOT go into Iraq to get bin Laden.
9/11 could have happened during a Republican's administration OR a Democrat's administration. The primary reason that it worked was that it was so anomolous and unprecedented.
Someone will one day figure out some new, unexpected way to attack the US. The cuplability of the administration will not be determined by the event, but by whether or not the preventive steps were reasonable.
tk
tomk52 the preventive steps?Cheney let the flight 77 hit the Pentagon for gosh sake,The cuplability of the administration will be determined by the 9/11 event.What on earth are you saying theres a indictment against Dick Cheney evil monster war crimes.Cheney is responsible for all the dead at the Pentagon,would you work with a man that would let you get hit and injured?Cheney was startgazing at the JET Approaching like a looney bin.

Since: Jul 08

Pittsburgh, PA

#663 Nov 27, 2008
tomk52 wrote:
<quoted text>
BIR,
First rule of the internet: Take NOTHING at face value.
A favorite deceit of moronic conservatives is to claim to be a liberal & make idiotic, extremist liberal statements.
A favorite deceit of moronic liberals is to claim to be a conservative & make idiotic, extremist conservative statements.
Bush Is Right seems to be in the second category to me.
Now coming on as "Bush Is Rotten" leads me to think one of two things:
1. You are responding to "Bush is Right".
2. You ARE "Bush is Right".
Care to enlighten us before we waste time in debate with a troll (IF, as I do not suspect), option 2 is right.
tk
tomk52 you are chasing the hand in time forward in reverse Bush is rotten

Since: Jul 08

Pittsburgh, PA

#664 Nov 27, 2008
AWOL COWARD President wrote:
<quoted text>
9/11 happened during George W Bush, A REPUBLICAN you moron!(P.S bin Laden is not in Iraq)
9/11 coincident
Florida/NSA/JEB BUSH/HI-JACKERS this could be the
three stooges?

“Google Operation Northwoods”

Since: Aug 10

** 9-11 was an inside job **

#666 Jan 14, 2013

“Google Operation Northwoods”

Since: Aug 10

** 9-11 was an inside job **

#667 Jan 15, 2013
A great video.....911 in 5 minutes...
The Corbett Report.
http://www.corbettreport.com/911-a-conspiracy...

“Google Operation Northwoods”

Since: Aug 10

** 9-11 was an inside job **

#668 Jan 15, 2013

“Google Operation Northwoods”

Since: Aug 10

** 9-11 was an inside job **

#669 Mar 9, 2013

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker
First Prev
of 32
Next Last

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Top Stories Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
Why Should Jesus Love Me? (Feb '08) 2 min New Ideas 618,576
The Christian Atheist debate (Jun '15) 5 min Bongo 56,031
News Roman Catholic church only true church, says Va... (Jul '07) 5 min Michael 650,275
Prove there's a god. (Mar '08) 12 min New Age Spiritual... 971,772
You can't get electricuted sticking a key in an... (Nov '09) 15 min AnonymousX 3
Looking for Female Yorkie to mate with my male ... (Mar '13) 22 min Jeannette 163
Why I’m no longer a Christian (Jul '08) 31 min ChristineM 445,913
Moms having sex with their sons (Aug '12) 14 hr akon mason 70
More from around the web