Police Apologize, Drop Charge Vs. She...

Police Apologize, Drop Charge Vs. Sheehan

There are 172 comments on the The Dispatch story from Feb 1, 2006, titled Police Apologize, Drop Charge Vs. Sheehan. In it, The Dispatch reports that:

Activist Cindy Sheehan of the Gold Star Families for Peace participates on a panel calling for the impeachment of President.

Join the discussion below, or Read more at The Dispatch.

First Prev
of 9
Next Last
BoneDoc

United States

#170 Nov 11, 2006
Highlander's comment: I have done =extensive= reading on the times leading up to WWII, and I can tell you that had the US Government stayed away from that incident, it =INDEED= would have turned out better – for everyone.

WWII was the globalist's war of determination, in that no matter who won, the globalists would have won anyway. Why is it, do you suppose, that the Bush family, the Kennedy family, the Rockefeller family – among many others, were involved with trading withe enemy DURING WWII?
That the US came out on top?
That was irrelevant.
----------end quote----------

That is one of the silliest remarks I've ever read, and makes one wonder what sort of oddball conspiracy theory websites he's been reading.

If we hadn't entered WW2, Hitler and the Japanese Empire would have owned the entire world except for North America by 1950, with the possible exception of Russia and China, who would have taken longer to squeeze unless the Nazi's nuclear program came in sooner. North America could have held out for an indefinite period until Hitler's nukes were usable. We had no program until well after our entry in the war, so we'd have been far behind.

A reasonable conclusion is that eventually the Nazis and Japanese would have controlled the world, period, though the timeline is always debatable. Blaming it on globalists and capitalists is about as reasonable as blaming the whole thing on the Jews. Or was that lurking below the horizon all along?
REAGAN RULES

United States

#171 Nov 11, 2006
LARRY wrote:
Why do you call this grieving mother a phony? Because FOX News, Rush, Hannity or others of their ilk said so!
And how about the Republican Reps wife.......Jones. I suppose it is OK for her to have "Freedom of Speech" with per "Support the Troops" t-shirt. And she wasn't even handcuffed. Both women spoke for the troops. At least Sheehan's T-shirt acknowledge how many of our soldiers have died, because of Bush's damn lies. You know........the sniveling coward, that hides the bodies arriving back in their body bags.
I sick and tired of people like you, that believe the only ones in this country that have a right to voice their opinions are the right-wing fanatics.
And I bet you call yourself a patriot! ROFLMAO
her own son couldnt stand that c%$nt
Lance Winslow

United States

#172 Nov 11, 2006
It is too bad Hugo Chavez does not want this traitor either. Maybe she will volunteer to start her own country on that new island in the Pacific that the volcano just made? Put a couple of tons of sand on top and make her a tent and she can build her country anyway she wants? She can defend it by making cookies and milk from cocanuts to bribe the local islanders to allow her to continue?
Highlander

Seattle, WA

#173 Nov 13, 2006
BoneDoc wrote:
That is one of the silliest remarks I've ever read, and makes one wonder what sort of oddball conspiracy theory websites he's been reading.
OIC. Your 'official' public school education view of history allows you engage in ad hominem, ad nausium, ad infinitum?
Moving right along:
BoneDoc wrote:
If we hadn't entered WW2, Hitler and the Japanese Empire would have owned the entire world except for North America by 1950, with the possible exception of Russia and China, who would have taken longer to squeeze unless the Nazi's nuclear program came in sooner.
You're forgetting the Italians, aren't you? Or are you giving them short shrift?
Now, granted, that the UK would have been overtaken right along with the rest of Europe, and a large part of Africa.
However, what you don't consider is that the USSR and their factories were largely out of strike range for the Nazis. I won't say 'Germans' here, because that nation had been hijacked from the people by the Nazis.

Now, with Europe largely under control, the Nazi army was stretched thin, so thin – so thin in fact – that fighting an effective war with the USSR would have been prohibitive, so prohibitive that the troop emplaced in defeated lands would have to be deployed, leaving large areas to become effectively war zones all over again.

The USSR in the meantime, having developed its =very effective= fighter, and a few bombers, along with a main battle tank that gave the Nazis nightmares: I would punch big holes in the Tiger tank, while remaining largely immune to the Tiger's own big gun.

Given time, the USSR would have advanced upon the Nazis, thereby Hitler a no-win scenario.
The only thing the US did was buy the USSR a little more time to amass the necessary numbers to effectively engage the Nazi's just that much sooner.

Now, next we look at the far east with the Japanese Army.
Japan was already fairly involved in China, quite heavily so. They were also making =REAL= enemies of themselves by the attrocities they engaged in against the peoples of the lands they had invaded.

If the Nazis thought that they had problems keep the defeated under control, the Japanese were faced with an even larger problem of people of all ages – including children – who would attack troops without warning, sometimes with surprising results.

Additionally, both Mao Zedong, and Chiang Kai-shek were leading effective campaigns – although disparately – against the invader, and the other nations which Japan had occupied were providing real heartburn.
Japan as an island, has very few natural resources, and because of that, must import almost everything it needs.
The stupid fools destroyed the major industries when attacking, and in doing so effectively shot themselves in the foot.

END of PART 1
Highlander

Seattle, WA

#174 Nov 13, 2006
BEGIN PART II

A nation conducting a war either needs a large supply of strategic materials on hand before commencing hostilities, or it must have a good supply of those throughout those hostilities.
The most important thing it needed was petrol, and many of the facilites that were threatened were sabotaged prior the them falling into Japan's hands.

So the Japanese government had a real and increasing problem.
Compound that with the fact that the USSR was set to engage the Japanese Navy.
BoneDoc wrote:
North America could have held out for an indefinite period until Hitler's nukes were usable. We had no program until well after our entry in the war, so we'd have been far behind.
A reasonable conclusion is that eventually the Nazis and Japanese would have controlled the world, period, though the timeline is always debatable.
Once again, you are making conclusions based known a historical context gained from only one view – the one you've been given.
BoneDoc wrote:
Blaming it on globalists and capitalists is about as reasonable as blaming the whole thing on the Jews. Or was that lurking below the horizon all along?
Let's look at that, shall we?
The term 'capitalist' was coined by Karl Marx, as a play against anyone who would keep his own wealth. As an aside, your own wealth – being your body and mind – were (and still are) considered to belong to everyone, ergo the Marxist maxim: From each according to his ability, to each according to his need.

A 'globalist,' on the other hand, can be anyone who espouses global control of all assets owned by anyone. They pursue the same policies as the Marxist, but call it another name, just like the socialists.
So, in actuality, a globalist is actually a two-faced Marxist. Hypocrisy knows no bounds ...
Why =ELSE= would they have financed both sides of the war?

Oh, and by the way, the US was – and still is – a socialist nation during WWII, right along with the UK, France, Nazi Germany, the USSR, and to and extent, so was Japan. So, the whole war was among a pack lying socialists, funded by the globalists.

Now, regarding your comment on the Jews?
Not once – in anything I've said – have I ever even =hinted= as such a thing. So, once again, as before: you engage in ad hominem, ad nausium, ad infinitum.
Highlander

Seattle, WA

#175 Nov 13, 2006
BEGIN PART I
BoneDoc wrote:
That is one of the silliest remarks I've ever read, and makes one wonder what sort of oddball conspiracy theory websites he's been reading.
OIC. Your 'official' public school education view of history allows you engage in ad hominem, ad nausium, ad infinitum?
Moving right along:
BoneDoc wrote:
If we hadn't entered WW2, Hitler and the Japanese Empire would have owned the entire world except for North America by 1950, with the possible exception of Russia and China, who would have taken longer to squeeze unless the Nazi's nuclear program came in sooner.
You're forgetting the Italians, aren't you? Or are you giving them short shrift?
Now, granted, that the UK would have been overtaken right along with the rest of Europe, and a large part of Africa.
However, what you don't consider is that the USSR and their factories were largely out of strike range for the Nazis. I won't say 'Germans' here, because that nation had been hijacked from the people by the Nazis.

Now, with Europe largely under control, the Nazi army was stretched thin, so thin – so thin in fact – that fighting an effective war with the USSR would have been prohibitive, so prohibitive that the troop emplaced in defeated lands would have to be deployed, leaving large areas to become effectively war zones all over again.

The USSR in the meantime, having developed its =very effective= fighter, and a few bombers, along with a main battle tank that gave the Nazis nightmares: I would punch big holes in the Tiger tank, while remaining largely immune to the Tiger's own big gun.

Given time, the USSR would have advanced upon the Nazis, thereby Hitler a no-win scenario.
The only thing the US did was buy the USSR a little more time to amass the necessary numbers to effectively engage the Nazi's just that much sooner.

Now, next we look at the far east with the Japanese Army.
Japan was already fairly involved in China, quite heavily so. They were also making =REAL= enemies of themselves by the attrocities they engaged in against the peoples of the lands they had invaded.

If the Nazis thought that they had problems keep the defeated under control, the Japanese were faced with an even larger problem of people of all ages – including children – who would attack troops without warning, sometimes with surprising results.

Additionally, both Mao Zedong, and Chiang Kai-shek were leading effective campaigns – although disparately – against the invader, and the other nations which Japan had occupied were providing real heartburn.
Japan as an island, has very few natural resources, and because of that, must import almost everything it needs.
The stupid fools destroyed the major industries when attacking, and in doing so effectively shot themselves in the foot.
Highlander

Seattle, WA

#176 Nov 13, 2006
BoneDoc wrote:
That is one of the silliest remarks I've ever read, and makes one wonder what sort of oddball conspiracy theory websites he's been reading.
If we hadn't entered WW2, Hitler and the Japanese Empire would have owned the entire world except for North America by 1950, with the possible exception of Russia and China, who would have taken longer to squeeze unless the Nazi's nuclear program came in sooner. North America could have held out for an indefinite period until Hitler's nukes were usable. We had no program until well after our entry in the war, so we'd have been far behind.
A reasonable conclusion is that eventually the Nazis and Japanese would have controlled the world, period, though the timeline is always debatable. Blaming it on globalists and capitalists is about as reasonable as blaming the whole thing on the Jews. Or was that lurking below the horizon all along?
Begin Part II
A nation conducting a war either needs a large supply of strategic materials on hand before commencing hostilities, or it must have a good supply of those throughout those hostilities.
The most important thing it needed was petrol, and many of the facilites that were threatened were sabotaged prior the them falling into Japan's hands.

So the Japanese government had a real and increasing problem.
Compound that with the fact that the USSR was set to engage the Japanese Navy.
BoneDoc wrote:
North America could have held out for an indefinite period until Hitler's nukes were usable. We had no program until well after our entry in the war, so we'd have been far behind.
A reasonable conclusion is that eventually the Nazis and Japanese would have controlled the world, period, though the timeline is always debatable.
Once again, you are making conclusions based known a historical context gained from only one view – the one you've been given.
BoneDoc wrote:
Blaming it on globalists and capitalists is about as reasonable as blaming the whole thing on the Jews. Or was that lurking below the horizon all along?
Let's look at that, shall we?
The term 'capitalist' was coined by Karl Marx, as a play against anyone who would keep his own wealth. As an aside, your own wealth – being your body and mind – were (and still are) considered to belong to everyone, ergo the Marxist maxim: From each according to his ability, to each according to his need.

A 'globalist,' on the other hand, can be anyone who espouses global control of all assets owned by anyone. They pursue the same policies as the Marxist, but call it another name, just like the socialists.
So, in actuality, a globalist is actually a two-faced Marxist. Hypocrisy knows no bounds ...
Why =ELSE= would they have financed both sides of the war?

Oh, and by the way, the US was – and still is – a socialist nation during WWII, right along with the UK, France, Nazi Germany, the USSR, and to and extent, so was Japan. So, the whole war was among a pack lying socialists, funded by the globalists.

Now, regarding your comment on the Jews?
Not once – in anything I've said – have I ever even =hinted= as such a thing. So, once again, as before: you engage in ad hominem, ad nausium, ad infinitum.
Highlander

Seattle, WA

#177 Nov 13, 2006
BoneDoc wrote:
That is one of the silliest remarks I've ever read, and makes one wonder what sort of oddball conspiracy theory websites he's been reading.
OIC. Your 'official' public school education view of history allows you engage in ad hominem, ad nausium, ad infinitum?
Moving right along:
BoneDoc wrote:
If we hadn't entered WW2, Hitler and the Japanese Empire would have owned the entire world except for North America by 1950, with the possible exception of Russia and China, who would have taken longer to squeeze unless the Nazi's nuclear program came in sooner.
You're forgetting the Italians, aren't you? Or are you giving them short shrift?
Now, granted, that the UK would have been overtaken right along with the rest of Europe, and a large part of Africa.
However, what you don't consider is that the USSR and their factories were largely out of strike range for the Nazis. I won't say 'Germans' here, because that nation had been hijacked from the people by the Nazis.

Now, with Europe largely under control, the Nazi army was stretched thin, so thin – so thin in fact – that fighting an effective war with the USSR would have been prohibitive, so prohibitive that the troop emplaced in defeated lands would have to be deployed, leaving large areas to become effectively war zones all over again.

The USSR in the meantime, having developed its =very effective= fighter, and a few bombers, along with a main battle tank that gave the Nazis nightmares: I would punch big holes in the Tiger tank, while remaining largely immune to the Tiger's own big gun.

Given time, the USSR would have advanced upon the Nazis, thereby Hitler a no-win scenario.
The only thing the US did was buy the USSR a little more time to amass the necessary numbers to effectively engage the Nazi's just that much sooner.

Now, next we look at the far east with the Japanese Army.
Japan was already fairly involved in China, quite heavily so. They were also making =REAL= enemies of themselves by the attrocities they engaged in against the peoples of the lands they had invaded.

If the Nazis thought that they had problems keep the defeated under control, the Japanese were faced with an even larger problem of people of all ages – including children – who would attack troops without warning, sometimes with surprising results.

Additionally, both Mao Zedong, and Chiang Kai-shek were leading effective campaigns – although disparately – against the invader, and the other nations which Japan had occupied were providing real heartburn.
Japan as an island, has very few natural resources, and because of that, must import almost everything it needs.
The stupid fools destroyed the major industries when attacking, and in doing so effectively shot themselves in the foot.
Debra J M Smith

Portland, OR

#178 Nov 13, 2006
Would you like to see who Cindy hangs with? This is shocking, even for her. Go to this page on my site: http://www.debrajmsmith.com/citgo.html

Debra...
of
www.InformingChristians.com
Highlander

Seattle, WA

#179 Nov 13, 2006
To all:

My most humble apologies for the multiple postings!
I can say for certain that it wasn't my fault.
When I tried to post the whole thing, the error message of "4000 characters max" appeared.

So, I split the doc into roughly two parts.
What happend was that I posted part 1, and it took.
I then posted part 2, and went back to view it.
Part 2 had replaced part 1.
So, I went back, and reposted part 1, which then replaced part 2.

There's a bug in the system.
But anyway, once again: My sincerest and most humble apologies!
Highlander

Seattle, WA

#180 Nov 13, 2006
Debra J M Smith wrote:
Would you like to see who Cindy hangs with? This is shocking, even for her. Go to this page on my site: http://www.debrajmsmith.com/citgo.html
Debra...
of
www.InformingChristians.com
Went to the URL above.

Desperate people do desperate things.

Since: Jul 11

Location hidden

#183 Jul 10, 2014
Art wrote:
This is not directed at Bill.
Some important facts are:
1. Close to 2400 servicemen have died in the war. More than that number would have died of natural causes and traffic accidents not related to the war.
2. All of our military personnel are volunteers and knew a war was possible.
3. Bush may have not lied about WMD's but he is responsible to verify the information is accurate before taking action.
4. Bush is now developing plans to attack Iran if UN doesn't impose sanctions.
Although I don't support Sheenan's position, I support her right to protest.
President Bush has voiced his opinion to involve the US in military action around the world, invited or not, while at the same time cutting funds to the Veteran's Hospitals across the country.
Try to put these facts together and come to your own conclusion.
Ditto

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker
First Prev
of 9
Next Last

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Top Stories Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
Prove there's a god. (Mar '08) 1 hr Tellthetruth 988,615
News Plurality of Americans think Trump is failing (Mar '17) 1 hr Tellthetruth 37,310
The American Dream is DEAD DEAD DEAD. 1 hr Johnny 18
God is REAL - Miracles Happen! (Jun '11) 1 hr Tony 6,554
Bring the jobs back to the USA! 2 hr Johnny 24
Why doesn't God STOP the world's MADNESS and in... 3 hr Doctor REALITY 10
News Roman Catholic church only true church, says Va... (Jul '07) 3 hr oneear69 688,931
More from around the web