The Declaration of Independence and B...

The Declaration of Independence and Bill of Rights

Posted in the Top Stories Forum


Miami Beach, FL

#1 May 14, 2014
In Congress - July 4, 1776

" .........Prudence, indeed, will dictate that Governments long established should not be changed for light and transient causes; and accordingly all experience hath shewn, that mankind are more disposed to suffer, while evils are sufferable, than to right themselves by abolishing the forms to which they are accustomed. But when a long train of abuses and usurpations, pursuing invariably the same Object evinces a design to reduce them under absolute Despotism, it is their right, it is their duty, to throw off such Government, and to provide new Guards for their future security...."

"Despite popular belief, every culture of every nation draws a line in the sand against government tyranny. The problem is, many draw this line so close to total defeat that it rarely matters. For the Jews of the Warsaw Ghetto, for instance, it wasn't until the Germans had already herded millions onto railroad cars destined for death camps and cornered the rest into dilapidated central housing that the ZOB resistance was formed, only to be wiped out a month later. Perhaps hindsight is 20/20, but clearly too many freedom movements throughout history waited too long to respond to the trespasses of oligarchs......"

Miami Beach, FL

#2 Jun 5, 2014
“President Obama Or King Obama?”

"PITTSBURGH (NewsRadio 1020 KDKA)– A Law Professor at George Mason University is afraid that we are on the horizon of a crowning government. Professor and author, Francis Buckley, is ready to state that President Obama will be,“the most consequential American president since George Washington.”

Buckley says George Washington was considered the “indispensable man” when he left the seat of President, but President Obama will be acknowledged as “the person who assumed king-like powers as President.”

Professor Buckley wrote a shorter, opinion article for Fox News that included information from his recently released book,“The Once and Future King: The Rise of Crown Government in America.” The book describes an America that is returning to a crown kind of government, like when King George III ruled in Britain.

In the article, Buckley references George Mason during the 1787 Convention when the Constitution was created. Mason remarked that the American President would become an “elective monarch” and worse than the real thing.

Buckley explains that while this government didn’t start with President Obama, he has certainly taken it to a higher level. The professor says that the way President Obama makes and unmakes laws without consent on Congress; the spending of government dollars; committing America to war; and rewarding his friends while punishing his enemies makes him “rex quondam, rex futurus – the once and future king.”

“Who cares which party controls the Senate, if all the action is at the other end of Pennsylvania Avenue,” said Buckley in his column. He believes that if Democrats want to continue to complain about the underfunding of Senate campaigns then they only have themselves to blame for the Obama administration.

He believes that the main idea that the founder’s had in mind when creating the Constitution was if political power became centralized in a single person, this would be a threat to liberty. America is and has been democratic, in Buckley’s opinion. He fears that if the media doesn’t start showing more interest in the quick rise of presidential power then the future will begin to resemble the past.........."

Miami Beach, FL

#3 Jun 6, 2014
When a president goes rogue

By George Will

" | What Winston Churchill said of Secretary of State John Foster Dulles — that he was a bull who carried his own china shop around with him — is true of Susan Rice, who is, to be polite, accident-prone . When in September 2012 she was deputed to sell to the public the fable that the Benghazi attack was just an unfortunately vigorous movie review — a response to an Internet video — it could have been that she, rather than Secretary of State Hillary Clinton, was given this degrading duty because Rice was merely U.N. ambassador, an ornamental position at an inconsequential institution. Today, however, Rice is Barack Obama’s national security adviser, so two conclusions must be drawn........"

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Top Stories Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
Bush is a hero (Sep '07) 1 min WildWeirdWillie 184,238
The Christian Atheist debate (Jun '15) 5 min Clearwater 99,535
No Walls! Don't fence Me In! 15 min bad bob 12
News Roman Catholic church only true church, says Va... (Jul '07) 21 min Rosesz 670,145
Prove there's a god. (Mar '08) 41 min nanoanomaly 980,036
God is REAL - Miracles Happen! (Jun '11) 1 hr Tony 6,134
____*Historic POPE - ISRAEL Meeting MARCH 2017____ 2 hr YTubeNews 1
Poll Was 9/11 a conspiracy?? (Oct '07) 13 hr AussieBobby 286,431
More from around the web