What Your Church Won't Tell You by Da...

Since: Aug 11

Location hidden

#34246 Nov 12, 2013
USA Born wrote:
<quoted text>
It's obvious you don't know what doctrine means. You have one. It may be forever changing, but you have one.
I don't have a doctrine grasshopper.
Saban fan

Decatur, AL

#34247 Nov 12, 2013
WasteWater wrote:
<quoted text>
You have no proof, only a belief.
The Dead Sea is an ocean remnant like the Great Salt Lake. An earth quake broke a natural barrier and the fertile land was flooded with salt water. The Biblical account is myth. You cannot prove otherwise with any tangible evidence because none exists.
As a matter of fact, you're statement has no proof - only a belief.

But, you asked the question where the cities went. I told you where they are just as the bible and the evidence of a DEAD Sea confirms. As I've already mentioned, we have no proof of writers B.C. or from the first century questioning these facts as confirmed in the Bible.

Since: Aug 11

Location hidden

#34248 Nov 12, 2013
Saban fan wrote:
<quoted text>
As a matter of fact, you're statement has no proof - only a belief.
But, you asked the question where the cities went. I told you where they are just as the bible and the evidence of a DEAD Sea confirms. As I've already mentioned, we have no proof of writers B.C. or from the first century questioning these facts as confirmed in the Bible.
False. I have no need to prove a negative. It is up to the person claiming that something exists to prove, using readily verifiable and tangible, non-ontological evidence that it does indeed exist or did exist. The Bible proves nothing.
USA Born

Claremont, CA

#34249 Nov 12, 2013
WasteWater wrote:
<quoted text>
Doctrine: n
1. a particular principle, position, or policy taught or advocated, as of a religion or government: Catholic doctrines; the Monroe Doctrine.
2. something that is taught; teachings collectively: religious doctrine.
3. a body or system of teachings relating to a particular subject: the doctrine of the Catholic Church.
Origin:
1350–1400; Middle English
Why should I blindly accept what others teach? Why should I believe that which has no verifiable proof or non-ontological evidence of it's existence?
doc·trine

1.A belief or set of beliefs held and taught by a church, political party, or other group.

2.A stated principle of government policy, mainly in foreign or military affairs.Eg: "the Monroe Doctrine".

Doctrine does not always pertain to religion.
USA Born

Claremont, CA

#34250 Nov 12, 2013
WasteWater wrote:
<quoted text>
I don't have a doctrine grasshopper.
Smart ass dolt. You hae a doctrine but you are too stupid to know.
USA Born

Claremont, CA

#34251 Nov 12, 2013
WasteWater wrote:
<quoted text>
You make claims but tell me this, how do you know either?
Faith

Romans 10:17 So then faith cometh by hearing, and hearing by the word of God.

Since: Aug 11

Location hidden

#34252 Nov 12, 2013
USA Born wrote:
<quoted text>
doc·trine
1.A belief or set of beliefs held and taught by a church, political party, or other group.
2.A stated principle of government policy, mainly in foreign or military affairs.Eg: "the Monroe Doctrine".
Doctrine does not always pertain to religion.
So what? The two operatives are belief or set of beliefs and being held or taught in some way by a group.

I don't have a belief system which I adhere too, therefore I have no doctrine. Besides, doctrine also implies something which is documented someplace. I have no such document so how can I have a doctrine? If so, what would you say my doctrine is?

Since: Aug 11

Location hidden

#34253 Nov 12, 2013
USA Born wrote:
<quoted text>
Faith
Romans 10:17 So then faith cometh by hearing, and hearing by the word of God.
Quoting the Bible is circular reasoning. Romans is the Word of Paul. Suppose I don't believe Paul. Then what? Suppose I don't think there is any such thing as the word of God?

Since: Aug 11

Location hidden

#34254 Nov 12, 2013
USA Born wrote:
<quoted text>
Smart ass dolt. You hae a doctrine but you are too stupid to know.
The Bible could be a source of doctrine. So is Canonical Law. I have no doctrine.

I don't follow any teachings or systematized belief. I go directly to God. LMAO

Since: Jul 10

Location hidden

#34255 Nov 12, 2013
WasteWater wrote:
Is Little Red Ridding Hood true?
http://www.worldoftales.com/fairy_tales/Broth... [LITTLE%20RED%20RIDING%20HOOD] .html
Is it true or false that often there are wolves in sheep's clothing?
Yes. Many of them can be seen on tv when they start holding somebody's head and saying in the name of Jesus I command you to be healed in the name of Jesus, these are wolves in sheep clothing. They are always asking for money and selling you holy water or some weird trinket for 100 bucks.

Since: Aug 11

Location hidden

#34256 Nov 12, 2013
Working for the Lord wrote:
<quoted text> Yes. Many of them can be seen on tv when they start holding somebody's head and saying in the name of Jesus I command you to be healed in the name of Jesus, these are wolves in sheep clothing. They are always asking for money and selling you holy water or some weird trinket for 100 bucks.
Thank you for pointing out the truth within Grimm's Fairy Tales. Our friend USA says fiction cannot be true. He is sadly mistaken.

Since: Aug 11

Location hidden

#34257 Nov 12, 2013
Working for the Lord wrote:
<quoted text> Yes. Many of them can be seen on tv when they start holding somebody's head and saying in the name of Jesus I command you to be healed in the name of Jesus, these are wolves in sheep clothing. They are always asking for money and selling you holy water or some weird trinket for 100 bucks.
I thought the Holy Water was free and collections discretionary. Am I mistaken?
USA Born

Rancho Cucamonga, CA

#34258 Nov 12, 2013
WasteWater wrote:
<quoted text>
So what? The two operatives are belief or set of beliefs and being held or taught in some way by a group.
I don't have a belief system which I adhere too, therefore I have no doctrine. Besides, doctrine also implies something which is documented someplace. I have no such document so how can I have a doctrine? If so, what would you say my doctrine is?
You said you were a mystic. Even claimed Jesus was the supreme mystic. Mysticim has been around long before you believed in it.

Since: Aug 11

Location hidden

#34262 Nov 12, 2013
USA Born wrote:
<quoted text>
You said you were a mystic. Even claimed Jesus was the supreme mystic. Mysticim has been around long before you believed in it.
Then where is the doctrine you claim exists?

Since: Aug 11

Location hidden

#34263 Nov 12, 2013
USA Born wrote:
<quoted text>
You said you were a mystic. Even claimed Jesus was the supreme mystic. Mysticim has been around long before you believed in it.
I neither believe nor disbelieve. Belief is futile.

Since: Aug 11

Location hidden

#34264 Nov 12, 2013
Dr shrink wrote:
<quoted text>
Bible doesn't have to prove anything
Bible is Moral codex of Gods Laws written only to Gods Royal Family of 144000,
not to unsaved and full of doubts earthly humans predestined to life 80 or more years and die-as finish their earthly journey and lusts,
there is nothing to prove from Bible for people like you,
You make many unsubstantiated claims. The Bible cannot be used to prove the Bible. That is circular reasoning.

Since: Aug 11

Location hidden

#34265 Nov 12, 2013
Dr shrink wrote:
<quoted text>
whorever what you say?
you are great "cyber visionary idiot"
I am your boss on this topic,and be humble and accept Bible,
than you can bale anything,now not?9YOU ARE TO POOR AND TO DUMB ON YOUR POOR TOP)
R U Mad bro?

“What are you looking at?”

Since: Jan 08

Albuquerque, NM

#34266 Nov 13, 2013
USA Born wrote:
<quoted text>
You said you were a mystic. Even claimed Jesus was the supreme mystic. Mysticim has been around long before you believed in it.
This archeological find gives support to "Jesus, the Magician".

http://www.nbcnews.com/id/26972493/ns/technol...

Even the word "magi" has multiple meanings.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Magi

Since: Aug 11

Location hidden

#34269 Nov 13, 2013
Dr shrink wrote:
<quoted text>
don't be sick
DR Shrink thread supervoisery i daily interupted by lazy bums like you,
bimbo YO YO.OGA BOOGHaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa
Take your meds bro.

Since: Aug 11

Location hidden

#34270 Nov 13, 2013
USA Born wrote:
<quoted text>
You said you were a mystic. Even claimed Jesus was the supreme mystic. Mysticim has been around long before you believed in it.
You previously claimed all beliefs were subject to doctrine. Where is the mystic doctrine written?

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Top Stories Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
News Roman Catholic church only true church, says Va... (Jul '07) 2 min kentthetard 675,425
The Christian Atheist debate (Jun '15) 4 min Bongo 110,022
Prove there's a god. (Mar '08) 1 hr hallucinatingGab 982,187
68 year old man missing from Deens Landing?! 1 hr bugg_85 1
Play "End of the Word" ..... Part 2 1 hr andet1987 69
My NEW SPECULATION about the mystery vehicle an... 1 hr andet1987 10
I love to show off my hot wife (Jan '12) 4 hr Deewhy 23
More from around the web