Comments
41 - 60 of 76 Comments Last updated Jan 8, 2013
Elohimsokie

Broken Bow, OK

#46 Jan 7, 2013
Say the Truth wrote:
<quoted text>
What are "exspolsions" ??
Where did you go to school for Geology?
If your not smart enough to figure out a mis-spelled word then your smart enough to be on this forum.
Keep watching your CNN, MSN, ect. Be a good lil' heard member,baabaa.
Force Majeure

Sweden

#47 Jan 7, 2013
Say the Truth wrote:
<quoted text>
You're kidding, right?
Of course. It's just that the ones who believe that a simple fire brought down WTC 7 and who ignore all of the facts, figures and statistics that indicate some sort of conspiracy are just as silly as my "just kidding" statment. Ridicule is my way of saying it.

“WELL PAID GOVIE SHILL ”

Since: Jun 07

Cold Spring Harbor, NY

#48 Jan 7, 2013
any explosion that could defeat a steel column would produce an explosion that in an urban eviroment could be heard for several miles ..... no such sound was heard at WTC 7 prior to collapse
you Brain Dead Twit
Elohimsokie wrote:
<quoted text>One on each collum, dope. I said hundreds.

“WELL PAID GOVIE SHILL ”

Since: Jun 07

Cold Spring Harbor, NY

#49 Jan 7, 2013
where did you study structural engineering Stupid !?!?!?!?
Force Majeure wrote:
<quoted text>
Of course. It's just that the ones who believe that a simple fire brought down WTC 7 and who ignore all of the facts, figures and statistics that indicate some sort of conspiracy are just as silly as my "just kidding" statment. Ridicule is my way of saying it.

Since: Jan 13

Bristol, UK

#50 Jan 7, 2013
No steel frame structure has ever collapsed due to fire prior or post 9/11.On 9/11 three of these structures had collapsed due to "structural failure from fires." Windsor tower in Madrid which used the same structure burned for 20 hours and did not collapse.

“WELL PAID GOVIE SHILL ”

Since: Jun 07

Cold Spring Harbor, NY

#51 Jan 7, 2013
is that staement in some sort of Twoofer Manuel on how to be a Clueless Dolt !?!?!?!?!?
Mohammedr51 wrote:
No steel frame structure has ever collapsed due to fire prior or post 9/11.On 9/11 three of these structures had collapsed due to "structural failure from fires." Windsor tower in Madrid which used the same structure burned for 20 hours and did not collapse.
Force Majeure

Sweden

#52 Jan 7, 2013
RAPEKIT wrote:
any explosion that could defeat a steel column would produce an explosion that in an urban eviroment could be heard for several miles .....
<quoted text>
What an idiot! Where did you go to school for Geology?

Since: Jan 13

Bristol, UK

#53 Jan 7, 2013
RADEKT wrote:
is that staement in some sort of Twoofer Manuel on how to be a Clueless Dolt !?!?!?!?!?
<quoted text>
No that statement was made of pure facts, what I am simply trying to say is that there must be more to this story than what meets the eye.

“WELL PAID GOVIE SHILL ”

Since: Jun 07

Cold Spring Harbor, NY

#54 Jan 7, 2013
Facts !?!?!?!? like the Madrid fire !?!?!?! HAHAHAHAHAAAAA
Mohammedr51 wrote:
<quoted text>
No that statement was made of pure facts, what I am simply trying to say is that there must be more to this story than what meets the eye.

“WELL PAID GOVIE SHILL ”

Since: Jun 07

Cold Spring Harbor, NY

#55 Jan 7, 2013
I dont have to study geology, I believe what the geologists at Lamont Doherty said
Force Majeure wrote:
<quoted text>
What an idiot! Where did you go to school for Geology?

Since: Jan 13

Bristol, UK

#56 Jan 7, 2013
RADEKT wrote:
Facts !?!?!?!? like the Madrid fire !?!?!?! HAHAHAHAHAAAAA
<quoted text>
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Windsor_Tower_ (Madrid) this is a link and please read it carefully after 24 hours of fire only the steel parts of the UPPER floor collapsed not the whole building the rest of the building stood still but the authoirties decided to deolish it completely.

“WELL PAID GOVIE SHILL ”

Since: Jun 07

Cold Spring Harbor, NY

#57 Jan 7, 2013
and WHY did the upper floors collapse and the lower floors not collapse !?!?!?!!?!
Mohammedr51 wrote:
<quoted text>
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Windsor_Tower_ (Madrid) this is a link and please read it carefully after 24 hours of fire only the steel parts of the UPPER floor collapsed not the whole building the rest of the building stood still but the authoirties decided to deolish it completely.
Force Majeure

Sweden

#58 Jan 7, 2013
Mohammedr51 wrote:
<quoted text>
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Windsor_Tower_ (Madrid) this is a link and please read it carefully after 24 hours of fire only the steel parts of the UPPER floor collapsed not the whole building the rest of the building stood still but the authoirties decided to deolish it completely.
I see that you have only 32 posts here. Telling the Twit Brothers to "read carefully" is like asking the cow to put out the rubbish. They'll be reading nothing that has the slightest whiff of "sense and logic". You'll soon learn not to pressure them into taxing their brains.

Since: Jan 13

Bath, UK

#59 Jan 7, 2013
RADEKT wrote:
and WHY did the upper floors collapse and the lower floors not collapse !?!?!?!!?!
<quoted text>
To be honest i'm not really sure because I am not engineer but i'll give it a go it is to I think it has something to do with the fact that the fire had also been started on the top floor. I mean correct me if I am wrong because i'm not too sure.

“WELL PAID GOVIE SHILL ”

Since: Jun 07

Cold Spring Harbor, NY

#60 Jan 7, 2013
says the MORON who thinks 9/11 was an inside job HAHAHAHAAHAAA !!!
Force Majeure wrote:
<quoted text>
I see that you have only 32 posts here. Telling the Twit Brothers to "read carefully" is like asking the cow to put out the rubbish. They'll be reading nothing that has the slightest whiff of "sense and logic". You'll soon learn not to pressure them into taxing their brains.

“WELL PAID GOVIE SHILL ”

Since: Jun 07

Cold Spring Harbor, NY

#61 Jan 7, 2013
NO .... here is why

the Madrid Windsor Tower fire which raged over 26 hours on 14-15 February 2005. This former landmark office block of 30 storeys featured a concrete core throughout, but with concrete columns up to the 21st floor and steel columns between the 22nd and 30th floors. Remarkably, despite the intensity and duration of the fire, the concrete floors and columns remained intact however, the steel supported floors above the 21st floor collapsed, leaving the concrete core in-situ and exposed. Preliminary findings suggest that a combination of the upper technical floor and the excellent passive fire resistance of the tower's concrete columns and core prevented total building collapse - Dr. Pal Chana of the British Cement Association

So what does the Madrid Windsor Tower fire show? That steel columns will collapse in a fire, that concrete is more fire-resistant, and, uh, thatís about it. Itís hard to see how any of this, especially in such a different building design, can have much meaning for the WTC case.
Mohammedr51 wrote:
<quoted text>
To be honest i'm not really sure because I am not engineer but i'll give it a go it is to I think it has something to do with the fact that the fire had also been started on the top floor. I mean correct me if I am wrong because i'm not too sure.

Since: Jan 13

Bristol, UK

#62 Jan 7, 2013
RADEKT wrote:
NO .... here is why
the Madrid Windsor Tower fire which raged over 26 hours on 14-15 February 2005. This former landmark office block of 30 storeys featured a concrete core throughout, but with concrete columns up to the 21st floor and steel columns between the 22nd and 30th floors. Remarkably, despite the intensity and duration of the fire, the concrete floors and columns remained intact however, the steel supported floors above the 21st floor collapsed, leaving the concrete core in-situ and exposed. Preliminary findings suggest that a combination of the upper technical floor and the excellent passive fire resistance of the tower's concrete columns and core prevented total building collapse - Dr. Pal Chana of the British Cement Association
So what does the Madrid Windsor Tower fire show? That steel columns will collapse in a fire, that concrete is more fire-resistant, and, uh, thatís about it. Itís hard to see how any of this, especially in such a different building design, can have much meaning for the WTC case.
<quoted text>
Oh sorry and thank you for correcting and clearing this misconception.

“Twoof, a true act of ignorance”

Since: Jun 09

Edmonton, Canada

#63 Jan 8, 2013
Britmedica wrote:
There are always crackpots out there, picking apart obvious facts and trying to find inconsistencies and unspecified tidbits that they can exploit. I think the people who lost their loved ones that were passengers on those "fake" planes will attest to the fact that there were in fact planes that crashed and I can't imagine how insulted they would be reading about someone accusing those planes to be illusions when they are still hurting from their losses.
All work from their pre-determined conclusions backwards.

“Twoof, a true act of ignorance”

Since: Jun 09

Edmonton, Canada

#64 Jan 8, 2013
Timesten wrote:
<quoted text>And what if those planes were remotely controlled to crash into those buildings, overriding the pilots control?
That's one thought.
Another is that the planes were flown out to sea and disposed of, and military planes were used in their place.
When you find a pick up truck full of AA jets at all 4 crash sites and they show you one engine rotor, one pc of Jet skin and that's all, no luggage, no seats, no bodies, NO jet, then it tends to point to no plane as well.
Jets leave wreckage after crashing no matter the speed or impact material, they leave large pcs of wreckage...
https://sites.google.com/site/911whatyoumight...
.
On the other hand this aircraft has one Engine, no luggage, no bodies, no seats, but it can do the damage done on 911 and would explain why no 757 jets are visible
https://sites.google.com/site/911whatyoumight...
.
And there definitely was film fakery done on 911
There are 53 search pages on Google with findings of people
https://www.google.com/search...
.
https://www.google.com/search...
.
https://www.google.com/search...

More on Bing
http://www.bing.com/search...
.
And then there's the, phony OBL admission tapes to 911 and his supposed Death.... You have to search with much scrutiny, other than just believing what the MSM broadcasts to us.
http://4.bp.blogspot.com/-KA5fljdeduM/UGKcN-L... 's+called+conspiracy+theory.jp g
.
And what if a fossil fuel denying young earth creationist truck drivers musings were anything beyond proof of his ignorance and ideological bent?

Well one things for sure, that idiot wouldn't have to rely on search engine hits as an argument, because he'd have something tangible.

“Twoof, a true act of ignorance”

Since: Jun 09

Edmonton, Canada

#65 Jan 8, 2013
Elohimsokie wrote:
<quoted text>Real evil people planned and done 9/11. Israel mossad, cia, Bush ,Cheeny, Rumsfield,ect.
Real fretkillrs play guitar, you're the fake fretkillr and you play with yourself.

Tell me when this thread is updated: (Registration is not required)

Add to my Tracker Send me an email

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Top Stories Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
Prove there's a god. (Mar '08) 3 min timn17 732,726
Why Should Jesus Love Me? (Feb '08) 6 min Peace_Warrior 599,827
Atheism requires as much faith as religion? (Jul '09) 6 min PatrickisaCreatio... 226,246
Bush is a hero (Sep '07) 10 min Roberta G 173,275
Was 9/11 a conspiracy?? (Oct '07) 19 min onemale 257,850
Israel's end is near, Ahmadinejad says (Jun '07) 40 min bmz 36,738
Sleeping with mother (Oct '13) 1 hr Commander Bunny 8
Roman Catholic church only true church, says Va... (Jul '07) 1 hr Oxbow 538,793
Is homosexuality a sin? (Oct '07) 2 hr bacon hater 94,645
•••
Enter and win $5000

Top Stories People Search

Addresses and phone numbers for FREE

•••