Comments
171,001 - 171,020 of 173,275 Comments Last updated 2 hrs ago

“The future begins”

Since: Jul 07

every moment

#179263 Jun 29, 2014
lisw wrote:
<quoted text>The "quit making a big deal out of a stalker" is just the last straw.
After repeated requests, no one has yet offered one instance, much less a series of instances, that qualifies as "stalking". Not one.

Just as I showed previously, on any given day, you can easily find an exchange where she was belittling to his person, and he declined to engage on par. There was another on the same page where he wrote to Chris, and she denounced THAT post with slurs. Again, he declined to "play". Lyndi slams people in imaginative ways on a daily basis. It is her stock in trade. You people egg her on.

THAT's the way I've remembered their interaction throughout. You cannot throw out personal slurs, and then pull a stalker card the next day just cos you think that's the best way to shut him down. That's why this "stalker" crap is made up. Your defense of that behavior is equally discouraging.

“The future begins”

Since: Jul 07

every moment

#179264 Jun 29, 2014
common sense wrote:
(silently monitoring)
stalker.

Or is it worthless freekin' troll day?

I get my days mixed up.

bob, I I need a new calendar.

Since: Jun 08

Location hidden

#179265 Jun 29, 2014
WildWeirdWillie wrote:
<quoted text>You do realize I've said nothing of the sort, right?
We've disagreed about whether we should be talking troll or stalker. Along with that, I have said to quit giving the (troll/stalker) what he wants - attention or control. I've said that every time this subject has come up.
This round started because Catcher said something about Lyndi, Hip replied, you warned him off, and Hip replied to you.
What are we going to do at recess tomorrow, kids?
I'm going to let you have the last word. You gotta know when to fold 'em.

Since: Jun 08

Location hidden

#179266 Jun 29, 2014

“Custer @ LBH - Ooops”

Since: Nov 07

Bakersfield, CA

#179267 Jun 29, 2014
<edited for length>
HipGnosis wrote:
<quoted text>
I understand you don't care for him, but bob, you may not recall that you assign that status to each new poster here who doesn't hew to the "right opinions". I too have received the very vitriol from you that you now direct at him. I just ignored you and hung around. You seem to have a sentimental side after all, cos after awhile you quit calling the "new meat" a freekin' troll.
Close but NO cigar. Other than attempted humor, my vitriolic msgs have been mostly REactive. Early on it was the Bush-haters: Prof Veritas, ETC, and several drive-by haters.
I also went after snipers like ShovelFace, and her alter ego for attacking a couple of cyber-friends that didn't deserve the verbal abuse (IMO). A while back, it was quite enjoyable to take pot shots at the various trolls such as World Idiot. But I got a request to stop feeding the trolls, so I did. But you'd be hard-pressed to find any poster that I assigned "troll status" to, simply because we disagreed.
HipGnosis wrote:
<quoted text>
And I don't agree in the least that all he does is post after her. Oh he annoys her. She's an easy mark. Hell, I do the same.
Didn't say ALL he does is wait for Lyndi to post b4 chiming in with his critique of her. But at least 3-4 other posters noticed a pattern of him doing just that on several occasions. Perhaps pointing it out in here slowed him down a bit. Anyway, that was the intent.
HipGnosis wrote:
<quoted text>
All you have to do is hit the post count button, drop back a hundred or so pages, and take your pick. I picked one day at random in a previous post that showed Catcher declining to engage in her insult war THAT day. Other days he does.
Irrelevant Watson. One can only stand so much, before responding. Also, there was no need to show weakness by going mute, while the attacker shows NO signs of ebbing.
HipGnosis wrote:
<quoted text>
Sure he "trolls" her. And she trolls him. And you troll me. And I troll lisw. lisw trolls Willie. Everybody "trolls" everybody, It's a hippie wet-dream. IF your definition is, "after a brief absence, posts a response to a previous post". Shoot, she's one of my favorite "targets" too. She's so very intelligent, witty, opinionated, blissfully self-involved AND oblivious at the same time, and slabberingly belligerent, AND gets so hilariously manic when you rebut her with facts or have the audacity to ask her to support her statements. In short, she's a hoot.
As for trollin' YOU, you know very well why I get on yer case. You're the self-anointed misinformation specialist, and you go outta yer way to turn a casual café discussion into a
FORMAL debate. You admonished me quite a few times for not letting people just post their opinions without having me pick 'em apart. Yet apparently that doesn't apply to you. But you not only pick 'em apart, you go to great lengths (literally & figuratively) to whop people over the head, presumably to beat them into submission.

“Custer @ LBH - Ooops”

Since: Nov 07

Bakersfield, CA

#179268 Jun 29, 2014
Lyndi wrote:
<quoted text>
Here Bob. I brought you a present.
http://www.1959bhsmustangs.com/VideoJukebox.h... #
Wow thank you Lyndi. I've never seen that online, and it appears to be quite unique.
Youtube is somewhat similar but they don't have nearly the one-stop selection mode that this does. Sent it to favorites.

“Custer @ LBH - Ooops”

Since: Nov 07

Bakersfield, CA

#179269 Jun 29, 2014
HipGnosis wrote:
<quoted text>stalker.
Or is it worthless freekin' troll day?
I get my days mixed up.
bob, I I need a new calendar.
So you don't think a poster might be BOTH?

Like I said, these type of replies by me are mostly REactive. My alz doesn't recall any preemptive attacks. But if anyone does remember, I'd like to be reminded of the event.

“Custer @ LBH - Ooops”

Since: Nov 07

Bakersfield, CA

#179270 Jun 29, 2014
HipGnosis wrote:
<quoted text>After repeated requests, no one has yet offered one instance, much less a series of instances, that qualifies as "stalking". Not one.
Just as I showed previously, on any given day, you can easily find an exchange where she was belittling to his person, and he declined to engage on par. There was another on the same page where he wrote to Chris, and she denounced THAT post with slurs. Again, he declined to "play". Lyndi slams people in imaginative ways on a daily basis. It is her stock in trade. You people egg her on.
THAT's the way I've remembered their interaction throughout. You cannot throw out personal slurs, and then pull a stalker card the next day just cos you think that's the best way to shut him down. That's why this "stalker" crap is made up. Your defense of that behavior is equally discouraging.
Selective memory? About 6 hours ago, I posted msg #179241, in which I stated that I do NOT believe chaser is "stalking" in the true legal sense. Your reply followed shortly thereafter.

Since: Jun 08

Location hidden

#179271 Jun 29, 2014
bad bob wrote:
<quoted text>
Selective memory? About 6 hours ago, I posted msg #179241, in which I stated that I do NOT believe chaser is "stalking" in the true legal sense. Your reply followed shortly thereafter.
Yes you did, BB and I have to disagree with you. He has made sexual references to Lyndi, he has suggested coming out her way and he has brought his posse here to harass her. All I ever wanted was to see a stand against that kind of behavior. Trolls are annoying, but harmless until they start to exhibit this kind of behavior. You know that driving someone off of a thread is the last thing I believe in, but there ought to be minimal standards.

“Custer @ LBH - Ooops”

Since: Nov 07

Bakersfield, CA

#179272 Jun 29, 2014
lisw wrote:
<quoted text>Yes you did, BB and I have to disagree with you. He has made sexual references to Lyndi, he has suggested coming out her way and he has brought his posse here to harass her. All I ever wanted was to see a stand against that kind of behavior. Trolls are annoying, but harmless until they start to exhibit this kind of behavior. You know that driving someone off of a thread is the last thing I believe in, but there ought to be minimal standards.
I believe you. Your memory is much better'n mine, and if that's the case, I'll stand (in the corner) corrected.

I recall bits & pieces of what you just said, but you would have the "professional skills" to connect the dots. Good on ya, mate.

Since: Jun 08

Location hidden

#179273 Jun 29, 2014
bad bob wrote:
<quoted text>
I believe you. Your memory is much better'n mine, and if that's the case, I'll stand (in the corner) corrected.
I recall bits & pieces of what you just said, but you would have the "professional skills" to connect the dots. Good on ya, mate.
It has nothing to do with professional skill, it's more of the female ability to detect ick.

Since: Jun 08

Location hidden

#179274 Jun 29, 2014
And no need to stand in a corner, I appreciate you acknowledging I might have a point. That's all I want.

Since: Mar 10

Location hidden

#179275 Jun 29, 2014
I honestly only read here to see what WWW and Hip have to say..
Catcher offered a bit to the conversation- also a laugh here and
there.. Not sure he was really stalking anyone?

This seems to be reaching a bit too far in the scheme of things.
lol.
Clearwater

Miami, FL

#179276 Jun 30, 2014
Le_le wrote:
I honestly only read here to see what WWW and Hip have to say..
Catcher offered a bit to the conversation- also a laugh here and
there.. Not sure he was really stalking anyone?
This seems to be reaching a bit too far in the scheme of things.
lol.
Like I said, you are crazy. Catch is a vile person and if he is lives at the level he claims to a total waste of a man. Laugh it up Le Le and tell us again how every heart counts and is important unless they aren't pc. In that case its cool for scum like catch to lie and smear.
HipGnozizzz

Altona, IL

#179277 Jun 30, 2014
bad bob wrote:
<quoted text>
I believe you. Your memory is much better'n mine, and if that's the case, I'll stand (in the corner) corrected.
I recall bits & pieces of what you just said, but you would have the "professional skills" to connect the dots. Good on ya, mate.
About face, hut two three four, dress up those ranks soldier, hut two three four.....

Don't believe your own lying eyes, right? I understand, seriously. Just keep this in mind the next time you feel the need to flame someone for showing agreement, puh-leeeze?
HipGnozizzz

Altona, IL

#179278 Jun 30, 2014
bad bob wrote:
<edited for length>
<quoted text>
Close but NO cigar. Other than attempted humor, my vitriolic msgs have been mostly REactive. Early on it was the Bush-haters: Prof Veritas, ETC, and several drive-by haters.
I also went after snipers like ShovelFace, and her alter ego for attacking a couple of cyber-friends that didn't deserve the verbal abuse (IMO). A while back, it was quite enjoyable to take pot shots at the various trolls such as World Idiot. But I got a request to stop feeding the trolls, so I did. But you'd be hard-pressed to find any poster that I assigned "troll status" to, simply because we disagreed.
<quoted text>
Didn't say ALL he does is wait for Lyndi to post b4 chiming in with his critique of her. But at least 3-4 other posters noticed a pattern of him doing just that on several occasions. Perhaps pointing it out in here slowed him down a bit. Anyway, that was the intent.
<quoted text>
Irrelevant Watson. One can only stand so much, before responding. Also, there was no need to show weakness by going mute, while the attacker shows NO signs of ebbing.
<quoted text>
As for trollin' YOU, you know very well why I get on yer case. You're the self-anointed misinformation specialist, and you go outta yer way to turn a casual café discussion into a
FORMAL debate. You admonished me quite a few times for not letting people just post their opinions without having me pick 'em apart. Yet apparently that doesn't apply to you. But you not only pick 'em apart, you go to great lengths (literally & figuratively) to whop people over the head, presumably to beat them into submission.
The reasons you treat new meat in any way are irrelevant to my point, bob. The point is, you need to have at least one poster at any given time to be the recipient of your REactive spleen. Been that way since time immemorial. I did my turn and just hung around long enough to see you pass on to the next newer meat (and the next, and the next). It was a sad day for me. One feels just used and discarded. Yes, at least you do send an ember now and again. It is a comfort and a mercy.
HipGnozizzz

Altona, IL

#179279 Jun 30, 2014
lisw wrote:
And no need to stand in a corner, I appreciate you acknowledging I might have a point. That's all I want.
I I showed a sincere willingness multiple times to "acknowledge your point" if anyone could show where it went over the line from the kind of MUTUAL give and take as shown by that re-post. All I got back, if anything at all, was "take my word for it." Well, I would, easily, if I hadn't witnessed their ongoing relationship myself over the course of months. Add to that the far too many other demonizing tactics used against opposing views, and the overwhelming evidence points to this as just another game-piece move on the board. A particularly scurrilous one, but a move nonetheless.

Hey, the best, and the worst, thing about this thread, is the history of the players. Some of us have sharp chronological memories, and for those of us who don't, it's all archived and available at the click of a button.

Listen, ya'll, we've been doing this awhile, too long maybe. If this is the kind of board you want, well, hell, it's your world to create. Just don't be wondering what happened when the tumbleweeds gather in the corners. There is definitely a line been crossed in recent months, but you all are focused on one carrier among several, and ignoring the disease.
Lyndi

Sarasota, FL

#179280 Jun 30, 2014
HipGnozizzz wrote:
<quoted text>I I showed a sincere willingness multiple times to "acknowledge your point" if anyone could show where it went over the line from the kind of MUTUAL give and take as shown by that re-post. All I got back, if anything at all, was "take my word for it." Well, I would, easily, if I hadn't witnessed their ongoing relationship myself over the course of months. Add to that the far too many other demonizing tactics used against opposing views, and the overwhelming evidence points to this as just another game-piece move on the board. A particularly scurrilous one, but a move nonetheless.
Hey, the best, and the worst, thing about this thread, is the history of the players. Some of us have sharp chronological memories, and for those of us who don't, it's all archived and available at the click of a button.
Listen, ya'll, we've been doing this awhile, too long maybe. If this is the kind of board you want, well, hell, it's your world to create. Just don't be wondering what happened when the tumbleweeds gather in the corners. There is definitely a line been crossed in recent months, but you all are focused on one carrier among several, and ignoring the disease.
This same poster has called me a racist multiple times. I don't recall you jumping all over that one saying there is no proof. <gasp>
Here's what I think you should do. Pull a NY Times and bury his accusation in section B on page 19 and keep my stalker accusation on the front page.



HipGnozizzz

Altona, IL

#179281 Jun 30, 2014
Lyndi wrote:
<quoted text>
This same poster has called me a racist multiple times. I don't recall you jumping all over that one saying there is no proof. <gasp>
Here's what I think you should do. Pull a NY Times and bury his accusation in section B on page 19 and keep my stalker accusation on the front page.
You both have called each other lots of stuff, Lyndi. LOTS of stuff, both ways. The only difference I've seen is his are more pedestrian, while yours are more creative.

Wtf? Is this how we want the board to evolve? Are you willing to pledge to self-censor your admittedly witty and irascible offerings? Is your walk gonna match your talk? Shall we all take that pledge? Because you ain't gonna have it both ways. That ain't gonna happen, Lyndi.
common sense

United States

#179282 Jun 30, 2014
Lyndi wrote:
<quoted text>
This same poster has called me a racist multiple times. I don't recall you jumping all over that one saying there is no proof. <gasp>
Here's what I think you should do. Pull a NY Times and bury his accusation in section B on page 19 and keep my stalker accusation on the front page.
Still seeking special protection ="victim status" here to operate unabated? Nice try Ann(Coulture). I ain't buying it no matter how many crocodile tears you shedou can cry a river here for all I care. It's a bunch of nonsense. Move on people.....

Tell me when this thread is updated: (Registration is not required)

Add to my Tracker Send me an email

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Top Stories Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
Play "end of the word" (Jan '11) 16 min andet1987 4,329
Hot gays in Abu Dhabi (Nov '13) 32 min Falcon 732
Prove there's a god. (Mar '08) 38 min Liam 732,740
Was 9/11 a conspiracy?? (Oct '07) 42 min Absurd Insinuation 257,853
John Holmes(white man)had biggest penis in history (Dec '08) 58 min Dominick_Fontana 65
Israel's end is near, Ahmadinejad says (Jun '07) 1 hr MUQ1 36,740
Dance Music 1 hr andet1987 7
Why Should Jesus Love Me? (Feb '08) 1 hr Black Thunder 42 599,834
Roman Catholic church only true church, says Va... (Jul '07) 3 hr Oxbow 538,793
Is homosexuality a sin? (Oct '07) 4 hr bacon hater 94,645
•••
Enter and win $5000

Top Stories People Search

Addresses and phone numbers for FREE

•••