Bush is a hero

Since: Jun 08

Location hidden

#177071 May 7, 2014
HipGnozizzz wrote:
See, what it's really about is a people so embarrassed by the manifold depredations of their hero's tenure, they are desperate for equivalency, manufactured or otherwise.
And dat's da name o'dat tune.
What's wrong with you? You don't even "sound" smart anymore. BTW, the prosecution doesn't prosecute unless they think they have enough evidence to win the case. Maybe that's why there is an uproar from republicans but not democrats. The cover-up Hip is what it's about. Try to focus.

“I'm here with bells on.”

Since: Jul 12

Location hidden

#177072 May 7, 2014
HipGnozizzz wrote:
See, what it's really about is a people so embarrassed by the manifold depredations of their hero's tenure, they are desperate for equivalency, manufactured or otherwise.
And dat's da name o'dat tune.
Reminds me of a certain South Park episode...

HipGnozizzz

Dahinda, IL

#177073 May 7, 2014
Nah. They won't exploit the dead for political gain.

http://www.nrcc.org/2014/05/06/can-become-ben...

But they will for $10.......
HipGnozizzz

Dahinda, IL

#177074 May 7, 2014
Rider on the Storm wrote:
<quoted text>
I dont know if you should be outraged but its not really over the video tape or whether or not it was planned, Its more about the coverup attempt. At least with me it is. But then again thats politics as usual..........Kinda gettin used to it.
Yes, I know. Romney, the Republicans, and righties in this forum, didn't say a word about it until AFTER "the cover-up".

Is that your story?
HipGnozizzz

Dahinda, IL

#177075 May 7, 2014
lisw wrote:
<quoted text>What's wrong with you? You don't even "sound" smart anymore. BTW, the prosecution doesn't prosecute unless they think they have enough evidence to win the case. Maybe that's why there is an uproar from republicans but not democrats. The cover-up Hip is what it's about. Try to focus.
Oooh, "Cover-up." It just sounds so sexy, politically speaking, don't it? Cover-up. Just gives you the mid-term shivers, huh?

See my post just above.

Remember this thing is archived.

As is every politician's utterance before the bodies were cold.

Go ahead, try again. Take a freebie just for sheer chutzpah.

Since: Jun 08

Location hidden

#177076 May 7, 2014
HipGnozizzz wrote:
<quoted text>Oooh, "Cover-up." It just sounds so sexy, politically speaking, don't it? Cover-up. Just gives you the mid-term shivers, huh?
See my post just above.
Remember this thing is archived.
As is every politician's utterance before the bodies were cold.
Go ahead, try again. Take a freebie just for sheer chutzpah.
Could you just speak English instead of trynig to be cool, I have no idea what you just said.

“Pillars of Creation....”

Since: Jan 11

Into this world we're thrown

#177077 May 7, 2014
HipGnozizzz wrote:
<quoted text>Yes, I know. Romney, the Republicans, and righties in this forum, didn't say a word about it until AFTER "the cover-up".
Is that your story?
IIRC I may have said something about the lack of security. Its still a valid argument. Eventually the word got out about the video being bad info and they knew it, but they went ahead with that story anyway.
UidiotRaceMAkeWO RLDPEACE

United States

#177078 May 7, 2014
Rider on the Storm wrote:
<quoted text>
Yer slobbering........
Let me guess Don't tell me, don't tel me. You mean yer Slobbering on MS littletit Sukahorn ! BAhhahahaaaa
USaWORLDBULLY WARMONGER

United States

#177079 May 7, 2014
lightbeamrider wrote:
<quoted text>
http://www.illinoispolicy.org/illinois-predic...
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2013/06/25/illi...
There are investors who won't buy Illinois or bonds with Illinois labels at any price. They just see it as toxic," said Brian Battle, director at Performance Trust Capital Partners, a Chicago-based investment firm. That means the state pays "the biggest penalty by a long, long shot."
Battle compared the Illinois situation to someone who has a good job and plenty of revenue. But "we just spend like crazy, don't pay our credit cards and haven't saved for retirement," he said.
----------
But oversea investors sure is buying assets, luckly to save our US from Bankruptcy and here we as American keep on pushing for kinectic/economic wars worldwide on other nations , I feel ashame of you BROKEN Lightbeamer the war mongering ignorant baboons! This is thanks we give for others not of our kind as overseas investors helping us Americans , purchasing those Chicago real Asset that you can see and live in it ! i feel ashame to be associate with you a war mongering ignorant ignorumus of Xtain fundie peon ! Bahahahahaaa
HipGnozizzz

Dahinda, IL

#177080 May 8, 2014
lisw wrote:
<quoted text>Could you just speak English instead of trynig to be cool, I have no idea what you just said.
The evolution of "what it's about" is what I'm talking about.

Go back to Sept 12, 2012 in this forum. See "what it's about" then. Watch how it changes over time.

Now if you really want to see something amazing, check out the changing headlines from Fox News throughout the same period as to "what it's about".

See how lockstep they are, like a trainer and a lovely dog at heel.

Upon doing so, please forgive me if I'm skeptical as to claims of "what it's about" today. Tomorrow may be different. I'll tune in to Fox to stay ahead of the curve.

Four people have graced me with a reply on the subject so far. Not one has addressed the lack of "outrage" over ANYthing in the 01-08 period. Nothing. Not one.

Recap: I said openly that "Impeach Bush" mobs were a witch-hunt. The DNC agreed, obviously, as they chose not to put the nation thru such prolonged and contentious, ultimately NON-productive, "investigations".

The Right has no such compunction. One could have their pick of any one of multiple highly questionable actions in the previous admin, and the Right not only ignored them, they defended them, each one.

Yet, in this one instance alone, we've seen something like eleven "investigations". We've seen multiple just-in-time-for-prime-time "smoking guns" that turn out to be more smoke then gun. And the Right cheers it on, in harmony sung about one-quarter beat behind the Fox News lead of the day.

Hypocrisy without a hint of shame.

Since: Jun 08

Location hidden

#177082 May 8, 2014
HipGnozizzz wrote:
<quoted text>The evolution of "what it's about" is what I'm talking about.
Go back to Sept 12, 2012 in this forum. See "what it's about" then. Watch how it changes over time.
Now if you really want to see something amazing, check out the changing headlines from Fox News throughout the same period as to "what it's about".
See how lockstep they are, like a trainer and a lovely dog at heel.
Upon doing so, please forgive me if I'm skeptical as to claims of "what it's about" today. Tomorrow may be different. I'll tune in to Fox to stay ahead of the curve.
Four people have graced me with a reply on the subject so far. Not one has addressed the lack of "outrage" over ANYthing in the 01-08 period. Nothing. Not one.
Recap: I said openly that "Impeach Bush" mobs were a witch-hunt. The DNC agreed, obviously, as they chose not to put the nation thru such prolonged and contentious, ultimately NON-productive, "investigations".
The Right has no such compunction. One could have their pick of any one of multiple highly questionable actions in the previous admin, and the Right not only ignored them, they defended them, each one.
Yet, in this one instance alone, we've seen something like eleven "investigations". We've seen multiple just-in-time-for-prime-time "smoking guns" that turn out to be more smoke then gun. And the Right cheers it on, in harmony sung about one-quarter beat behind the Fox News lead of the day.
Hypocrisy without a hint of shame.
There were not eleven investigations of Benghazi, its all one investigation. It's taking so long because of the refusal of the administration to release all the information.
I'm sorry Hip but the "we don't want to put the American people through that" is legal talk for "we do not have a case" As I said a prosecutor is very reluctant to prosecute if they do not have a case.
I believe that the investigation on the IRS and Benghazi are meaningful and productive. An administration cannot lie to the American people because they want to win an election, and they cannot target parts of American society because they want to win an election. It isn't even able to fall under the category of what's best for the country.
I'd like some indication that under Obama that there is any department that doesn't have problems. I thought for a minute that it might be the department of agriculture under Vilsack
But then my husband reminded me that food stamps have increased exponentially.
Republicans aren't going after every little thing. They are going after real issues that hurt not only particular groups but the whole nation. If it makes you feel any better, Obama will be found not to blame for these issues,but for being totally unaware of what his staff is doing. His problems appear to be problems of omission and negligence;
HipGnozizzz

Dahinda, IL

#177083 May 8, 2014
lisw wrote:
<quoted text>There were not eleven investigations of Benghazi, its all one investigation. It's taking so long because of the refusal of the administration to release all the information.
I'm sorry Hip but the "we don't want to put the American people through that" is legal talk for "we do not have a case" As I said a prosecutor is very reluctant to prosecute if they do not have a case.
I believe that the investigation on the IRS and Benghazi are meaningful and productive. An administration cannot lie to the American people because they want to win an election, and they cannot target parts of American society because they want to win an election. It isn't even able to fall under the category of what's best for the country.
I'd like some indication that under Obama that there is any department that doesn't have problems. I thought for a minute that it might be the department of agriculture under Vilsack
But then my husband reminded me that food stamps have increased exponentially.
Republicans aren't going after every little thing. They are going after real issues that hurt not only particular groups but the whole nation. If it makes you feel any better, Obama will be found not to blame for these issues,but for being totally unaware of what his staff is doing. His problems appear to be problems of omission and negligence;
Like I said, amazing. Call it self-delusion if we're being charitable, or simple denial if we're not, the capacity is just amazing.

You're saying that of every single thing I listed, not one "had a case".

But in this one item, you're just right dead certain "they got a case".

Go down my list and tell me there was no "case" for soldiers having to up-armor their vehicles out of scrap piles. "No case" for troops buying their own body armor because none was provided. "No case" for saying not only were there WMD, but they knew right where they were. "No case" for saying the WMD were nuclear. "No case" for planting and then exploiting the aluminum tube story. "No case" for timing terror alerts for political purposes. "No case" for illegal wire-tapping. "No case" for asserting an Al Qaeda connection based on one crook's story. Hell, I'm just getting started.

And you all in concert have twisted every which way to avoid them. Almost like you were parroting a party line dictated by a central organ.

Just freeking amazing........

“I'm here with bells on.”

Since: Jul 12

Location hidden

#177084 May 8, 2014
HipGnozizzz wrote:
<quoted text>Like I said, amazing. Call it self-delusion if we're being charitable, or simple denial if we're not, the capacity is just amazing.
You're saying that of every single thing I listed, not one "had a case".
But in this one item, you're just right dead certain "they got a case".
Go down my list and tell me there was no "case" for soldiers having to up-armor their vehicles out of scrap piles. "No case" for troops buying their own body armor because none was provided. "No case" for saying not only were there WMD, but they knew right where they were. "No case" for saying the WMD were nuclear. "No case" for planting and then exploiting the aluminum tube story. "No case" for timing terror alerts for political purposes. "No case" for illegal wire-tapping. "No case" for asserting an Al Qaeda connection based on one crook's story. Hell, I'm just getting started.
And you all in concert have twisted every which way to avoid them. Almost like you were parroting a party line dictated by a central organ.
Just freeking amazing........
(I'm waiting for her to tell you to quit getting personal...)

Since: Jun 08

Location hidden

#177085 May 8, 2014
Sister Kathryn Lust wrote:
<quoted text>(I'm waiting for her to tell you to quit getting personal...)
I don't think he's getting personal, do you? Or is it just wishful thinking?

Since: Jun 08

Location hidden

#177086 May 8, 2014
HipGnozizzz wrote:
<quoted text>Like I said, amazing. Call it self-delusion if we're being charitable, or simple denial if we're not, the capacity is just amazing.
You're saying that of every single thing I listed, not one "had a case".
But in this one item, you're just right dead certain "they got a case".
Go down my list and tell me there was no "case" for soldiers having to up-armor their vehicles out of scrap piles. "No case" for troops buying their own body armor because none was provided. "No case" for saying not only were there WMD, but they knew right where they were. "No case" for saying the WMD were nuclear. "No case" for planting and then exploiting the aluminum tube story. "No case" for timing terror alerts for political purposes. "No case" for illegal wire-tapping. "No case" for asserting an Al Qaeda connection based on one crook's story. Hell, I'm just getting started.
And you all in concert have twisted every which way to avoid them. Almost like you were parroting a party line dictated by a central organ.
Just freeking amazing........
Calm down. It seems to me that Rummy had to leave after the lack of appropriate supplies to our troops. And it wasn't with praise and adulation like Sebelius left or Clinton. But I am glad their gone and I thought Rumsfield needed replacing. But to my knowledge neither Rumsfield nor Sebelius were really hiding anything or lying. Hillary was and still is.
As for WMD's, I believe that Bush himself said they were WRONG. I'd settle for a "I was wrong" from Obama from Clinton, even from Susan Rice. I'm not looking for public floggings unless we discover that they sold arms to the very people who killed the 4 Americans and told them to do it. What has happened to people admitting they make mistakes. This guy and his group that stole the young girls and is doing God knows what to them, has been operating for awhile. Hillary refused to call them a terrorist group for whatever reason. There is nothing more terrifying than children being stolen. But do we hear "I was wrong"? We won't hear it and this crap will continue to be permissable.

“I'm here with bells on.”

Since: Jul 12

Location hidden

#177087 May 8, 2014
lisw wrote:
<quoted text>I don't think he's getting personal,
Well, there's a first time for everything...
Clearwater

Fort Lauderdale, FL

#177089 May 8, 2014
Rider on the Storm wrote:
<quoted text>
I dont know if you should be outraged but its not really over the video tape or whether or not it was planned, Its more about the coverup attempt. At least with me it is. But then again thats politics as usual..........Kinda gettin used to it.
I am outraged that becuase of the right my state will soon be under water. Talk about an echo chamber, lol.
Clearwater

Fort Lauderdale, FL

#177090 May 8, 2014
lisw wrote:
<quoted text>Calm down. It seems to me that Rummy had to leave after the lack of appropriate supplies to our troops. And it wasn't with praise and adulation like Sebelius left or Clinton. But I am glad their gone and I thought Rumsfield needed replacing. But to my knowledge neither Rumsfield nor Sebelius were really hiding anything or lying. Hillary was and still is.
As for WMD's, I believe that Bush himself said they were WRONG. I'd settle for a "I was wrong" from Obama from Clinton, even from Susan Rice. I'm not looking for public floggings unless we discover that they sold arms to the very people who killed the 4 Americans and told them to do it. What has happened to people admitting they make mistakes. This guy and his group that stole the young girls and is doing God knows what to them, has been operating for awhile. Hillary refused to call them a terrorist group for whatever reason. There is nothing more terrifying than children being stolen. But do we hear "I was wrong"? We won't hear it and this crap will continue to be permissable.
Speaking of children being stolen good on the dad that stood against the soft porn his 14 y/o girl was given at school and then arrested for going over the 2 min rule. What is the name of the person on Msnbc that said kids don't belong to you but the collective? Welcome to why more are homeschooling. This is not the USA I was born in.
Clearwater

Safety Harbor, FL

#177091 May 8, 2014
At first I thought this was an snl skit.

Stupid white liberals apologize for being white in video:‘We suck and we’re sorry’

http://www.conservativefiringline.com/stupid-...

“Custer @ LBH - Ooops”

Since: Nov 07

Bakersfield, CA

#177093 May 8, 2014
HipGnozizzz wrote:
<quoted text>Like I said, amazing. Call it self-delusion if we're being charitable, or simple denial if we're not, the capacity is just amazing.
You're saying that of every single thing I listed, not one "had a case".
But in this one item, you're just right dead certain "they got a case".
Go down my list and tell me there was no "case" for soldiers having to up-armor their vehicles out of scrap piles. "No case" for troops buying their own body armor because none was provided. "No case" for saying not only were there WMD, but they knew right where they were. "No case" for saying the WMD were nuclear. "No case" for planting and then exploiting the aluminum tube story. "No case" for timing terror alerts for political purposes. "No case" for illegal wire-tapping. "No case" for asserting an Al Qaeda connection based on one crook's story. Hell, I'm just getting started.
And you all in concert have twisted every which way to avoid them. Almost like you were parroting a party line dictated by a central organ.
Just freeking amazing........
Tonight on Fox News, Laura Ingraham in for Bill O.

She points out where about a year(?) ago in Nigeria some 50 boys are murdered when the Islamic terrorist group Boko Haram burns them alive. Hmmm, that's the first I've heard of that. Apparently Boko Haram has murdered entire villages, men women & children.

About 3-4 weeks ago some 300 teen girls are kidnapped at night outta their school, by this same terrorist group. The left explodes. Numerous celebs, Queen Obama, Congressional
Reps including Sheila Jackson are OUTRAGED. They want action, and they want these girls rescued immediately.

Nigeria has asked for the US (along with other nations) to help find the girls and return them
safely to their anguished parents. Of course the US has agreed and is probably already in North Africa on the hunt.

Now flashback 2 years ago, Benghazi Libya. The US ambassador and 3 others are murdered by Islamic terrorists. They also asked for help, but no help would be forthcoming.
Any talk of hypocricy owned by one political party over the other, just goes to prove the "speaker" is nothing more than a partisan HACK!

NBD really, quite understandable. I mean, what voter-enabler wants to be associated with a
stumblebum admin that can't seem to get ANYthing right, has staffers lying and covering up
the truth, and accrues one scandal after another, but according to supporters during the investigations, is merely a "witch hunt" staged by Republicans for political purposes. Sound familiar? Oh wait, ahhhh that's right, you can just blame it on Faux Noise. Pffffffffffft

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Top Stories Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
News Plurality of Americans think Trump is failing (Mar '17) 4 min June VanDerMark 42,074
Prove there's a god. (Mar '08) 33 min Big Al 989,750
Are you like the silver jewelry? 45 min ssjtv46 1
Why are Europeans a race of savages, thieves, a... (Jun '15) 47 min Paul McCartney is... 135
Charles Mansion Died Last Night 1 hr Paul McCartney is... 8
Do white girls really love filipino men? In wha... (Apr '14) 1 hr Paul is dead 3
American Soldiers - Duty, Honor, Country (Jun '11) 1 hr Ricky F 39,277
News Roman Catholic church only true church, says Va... (Jul '07) 2 hr Just Think 690,472
Bring the jobs back to the USA! 3 hr Paul is dead 632
More from around the web