Never once said that "the NSA, IRS, and Benghazi scandals are no big deal". We have disagreed on what the scandals mean, but not the same thing as the view you've assigned me for your convenience.<quoted text>This is from the same guy who thinks the NSA, IRS, and Benghazi scandals are no big deal. Do you often use anger to get your way. This blow up along with the name calling just seems inappropriate to me.
Puts you kind of in the same category with those you disparage.
Obama shaking his finger at the Ukraine is meaningless and you know it. he did the same with Syria, even drew red lines and then went and played golf when it mattered. The infiltration of news stations is no less real than the IRS and NSA. You just want to look the other way. I don't blame you, but remember that control of the media is a surefire way of controlling the country. It's been done so many times
I did insult the troll in the last post, but I did not mean to imply that I thought the same of you. My only point was that your convenient claim that I'm not posting out of embarrassment is as accurate as his detection of my communist agenda.
I asked you what you thought the US could do about Ukraine other than shake his finger. If you know of something he should be doing that he's not, please - say so. If not, what's your point?
As far as the survey goes ... yes, control of the media is a way to control a country, but I'm having a whole lot of trouble envisioning this survey as the first step down that road. To see it that way requires so many assumptions that I just don't think it's plausible.