Bush is a hero
Sure thing bub

Saint Paul, MN

#172792 Nov 25, 2013
bad bob wrote:
<quoted text>
Nah "add odds", jes' walkin' away.
Because of age or bad knees?
Sure thing bub

Saint Paul, MN

#172793 Nov 25, 2013
Roberta G wrote:
<quoted text>
LOL
You know NOTHING about Lis.
That's funny. So how do you know that?

Roberta G wrote:
And I seriously doubt whether you'll have the staying power to be around long enough to find out how completely wrong you are.
How do you know that? Maybe I've been here for years, YOU don't know.

USA_1

“For F***'s Sake”

Since: Aug 13

Tanner Flats

#172794 Nov 25, 2013
Sure thing boob wrote:
<quoted text>
That's a loaded question. GWB wasn't a hero and you aren't one either so get over it. Reality is a bitch.
I never said I was a hero, nor did I say W was either. I suppose you'll want to say your anointed leader is though. The only bitch here is you, little commie stooge. <¦-o
Sure thing bub

Saint Paul, MN

#172795 Nov 25, 2013
USA_1 wrote:
<quoted text>I never said I was a hero, nor did I say W was either. I suppose you'll want to say your anointed leader is though. The only bitch here is you, little commie stooge. <¦-o
Sure thing bub.

“Custer @ LBH - Ooops”

Since: Nov 07

Bakersfield, CA

#172796 Nov 25, 2013
Sure thing bub wrote:
<quoted text>
You and LisW are add odds, she believes in programs that receive state and federal subsidies. Let the debate between you two begin.
So tell the class Tex, how did'ja come to write "add odds" instead of
"at odds"? You went to school, right?

Or was the difficulty factor in building that paragraph a wee bit too much for you?

Here's the best part (IMO). If you can't even construct basic, coherent every day sentences, why should anyone in here bother with your
sorry adze!

“Custer @ LBH - Ooops”

Since: Nov 07

Bakersfield, CA

#172797 Nov 25, 2013
Sure thing bub wrote:
<quoted text>
Sure thing bub.
Snappy retort, tex!

That reminds me. Why in thunder are you so paranoid, ya can't settle
on ONE user name? Little green men chasin' ya thru the narrow streets again?

USA_1

“For F***'s Sake”

Since: Aug 13

Tanner Flats

#172798 Nov 25, 2013
bad bob wrote:
<quoted text>
So tell the class Tex, how did'ja come to write "add odds" instead of
"at odds"? You went to school, right?
Or was the difficulty factor in building that paragraph a wee bit too much for you?
Here's the best part (IMO). If you can't even construct basic, coherent every day sentences, why should anyone in here bother with your
sorry adze!
Because he makes a good punching bag like CHOCOLATE FACE does! LOL

Since: Sep 10

Redondo Beach, CA

#172799 Nov 25, 2013
bad bob wrote:
<quoted text>
So tell the class Tex, how did'ja come to write "add odds" instead of
"at odds"? You went to school, right?
Or was the difficulty factor in building that paragraph a wee bit too much for you?
Here's the best part (IMO). If you can't even construct basic, coherent every day sentences, why should anyone in here bother with your
sorry adze!
Chill, bad bob.

I'm the grammar checker here.

You concentrate on upholding Republican views, I'll handle the language use issues.

It's the separation of powers doctrine at work.

Since: Sep 10

Redondo Beach, CA

#172800 Nov 25, 2013
USA_1 wrote:
<quoted text>Because he makes a good punching bag like CHOCOLATE FACE does! LOL
Stop with the ad hominems already.

That's Lyndi's bailiwick.
UidiotRaceMAKEWO RLDPEACE

United States

#172801 Nov 25, 2013
USA_1 wrote:
<quoted text>Because he makes a good punching bag like CHOCOLATE FACE does! LOL
You our obnoxious US war mongers/war-for-profiteers/mer cenaries/war investors ... can use bully world/American Civilians who stand for human rights... but sooner of later just like Bush & co tried for war crimes against humanity at Int'l War crimes Tribunal. One for Humanity! Bhahahahaaaa

Since: Apr 07

Location hidden

#172802 Nov 25, 2013
bad bob wrote:
<quoted text>
Didn't think it was possible for this regime to sink to this level, but I believe the king snake and the Senate Dems will pay dearly for using the nuclear option.

The House will now delay ALL of the Senate business for at least the next year. And Obama's polital ploy of delaying the enrolments mandate until AFTER the midterm elections will NOT work.
As Lis alluded earlier, it will be up to the voters to change the seating in the Senate, and also in the House if they see fit.

But removing 200+ years of rules in the Senate just so king obama can have key federal judges appointed to make sure Obamacare can't be overturned, is the slimiest, most vile strategy ever foisted on the American people by an egotistical maniac "pole vaulting" for an historical legacy.

Finally, if this sleaze bag in the WH is willing to disregard Thomas Jefferson's fail safe regulations for Congress, there's no telling WHAT the king will do in his last 3 years. Obama is sickening, dispicable, and I now have nothing but utter contempt for this DEMOCRAT president.
Thou and I thinketh much alike, O Bob, my friend. Splendideth posteth :)
lisw

Delaware, OH

#172803 Nov 25, 2013
Catcher1 wrote:
<quoted text>
Chill, bad bob.
I'm the grammar checker here.
You concentrate on upholding Republican views, I'll handle the language use issues.
It's the separation of powers doctrine at work.
Shouldn't you be busy representing people who are suing for losing their health care and for super high premiums because they smoke, even though that is a pre-existing condition?

“Custer @ LBH - Ooops”

Since: Nov 07

Bakersfield, CA

#172804 Nov 25, 2013
Catcher1 wrote:
<quoted text>
1) I'm the grammar checker here.

2) I'll handle the language use issues.
1) No, yer one of the 3 worthless trolls.

2) If so, I'd hafta fail you. You haven't even begun to "handle"
global idiot's language use issues, have you?

USA_1

“For F***'s Sake”

Since: Aug 13

Tanner Flats

#172805 Nov 25, 2013
I am a Catcher wrote:
<quoted text>
Stop with the ad hominems already.
That's Lyndi's bailiwick.
Why? Ad hominems are fun for the whole family! <¦-o

“Brevity is the soule of wit”

Since: May 09

USA

#172806 Nov 25, 2013
idiot wrote:
<quoted text>You our obnoxious ar crimes against humanity at Int'l War crimes Tribunal. One for Humanity! Bhahahahaaaa
Tell me all about this 'tribunal' and what power they have to uphold a verdict, illiterate Somali piglet.

BTW, use your own clumsy words. It's MUCH more funny when you do that, ignoramus.

'Bhahahahaaaa'

USA_1

“For F***'s Sake”

Since: Aug 13

Tanner Flats

#172807 Nov 25, 2013
UidiotSOMALIANbuttPIRATERaceMA KEWORLDPEACE wrote:
<quoted text>You our obnoxious US war mongers/war-for-profiteers/mer cenaries/war investors ... can use bully world/American Civilians who stand for human rights... but sooner of later just like Bush & co tried for war crimes against humanity at Int'l War crimes Tribunal. One for Humanity! Bhahahahaaaa
Hey CHOCOLATE FACE, how did your pirate outing go, did you rape pillage and plunder, dumb Somalian? <¦-o
UidiotRaceMAKEWO RLDPEACE

United States

#172808 Nov 25, 2013
Catcher1 wrote:
<quoted text>
Stop with the ad hominems already.
That's Lyndi's bailiwick.
Did you know you dealing with posters like USA_1 and his Authoritarians kind , these are the violent sociopaths and/or pyschopaths most time don't show empathy for human suffering... often working and choose immoral careers as mostly Gun-ho type and trigger happy morons , as most dumb Soldiers trained as killing machines , mercenaries, sycophants, plunderers, Soldiers-of-fortune ,weapons sellers... those who work for the corrupted leaders in power, the US war mongers/war investors/war-weapons manufacturers , war-for-profiteers... like Haliburton, Lockheed etc.,

Since: Sep 10

Redondo Beach, CA

#172809 Nov 25, 2013
lisw wrote:
<quoted text>Shouldn't you be busy representing people who are suing for losing their health care and for super high premiums because they smoke, even though that is a pre-existing condition?
I also have to relax in the evening, for balance.

In the morning, to the gym, and then ho ho, ho, off to work I go.

Since: Sep 10

Redondo Beach, CA

#172810 Nov 25, 2013
bad bob wrote:
<quoted text>
1) No, yer one of the 3 worthless trolls.
2) If so, I'd hafta fail you. You haven't even begun to "handle"
global idiot's language use issues, have you?
Hahaha, that would be impossible, and you know it.

Since: Sep 10

Redondo Beach, CA

#172811 Nov 25, 2013
USA_1 wrote:
<quoted text>Why? Ad hominems are fun for the whole family! <¦-o
Hey, you changed my name.

That's not nice.

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Top Stories Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
News Roman Catholic church only true church, says Va... (Jul '07) 2 min Anthony MN 641,868
The Christian Atheist debate (Jun '15) 4 min Nohweh 38,680
American Soldiers - Duty, Honor, Country (Jun '11) 6 min DENG 38,373
Everyone in my school thinks im a slut because ... (Apr '09) 12 min Suckmeoff77 32
Prove there's a god. (Mar '08) 14 min Brian_G 970,107
Jehovah's Witnesses are true disciple of Jesus ... (Mar '07) 1 hr RiccardoFire 44,454
Leslie Van Houten's parole hearing August 2009 (Jul '09) 1 hr Jimmy 1,582
Poll Is homosexuality a sin? (Oct '07) 1 hr RiccardoFire 104,762
More from around the web