I'd say life deals some of us a tough hand, all of us before it's all over. Off the top of my head, I can consider her extra years fighting a catastrophic illness, against my mother's experience in which she was denied coverage long before the ACA, and withered away with palliative care only, with intermittent chance participation in clinical trials for experimental drugs through the local university, 45 miles away. That experience alone soured me as to the "benevolent health insurance provider."<quoted text>
As a card carrying Obamacare supporter, why don't you respond to this womans plight for us. Show us what you know.
By Edie Littlefield Sundby
Nov. 3, 2013
"Everyone now is clamoring about Affordable Care Act winners and losers. I am one of the losers.
My grievance is not political; all my energies are directed to enjoying life and staying alive, and I have no time for politics. For almost seven years I have fought and survived stage-4 gallbladder cancer, with a five-year survival rate of less than 2% after diagnosis. I am a determined fighter and extremely lucky. But this luck may have just run out: My affordable, lifesaving medical insurance policy has been canceled effective Dec. 31.
My choice is to get coverage through the government health exchange and lose access to my cancer doctors, or pay much more for insurance outside the exchange (the quotes average 40% to 50% more) for the privilege of starting over with an unfamiliar insurance company and impaired benefits.
Countless hours searching for non-exchange plans have uncovered nothing that compares well with my existing coverage. But the greatest source of frustration is Covered California, the state's Affordable Care Act health-insurance exchange and, by some reports, one of the best such exchanges in the country. After four weeks of researching plans on the website, talking directly to government exchange counselors, insurance companies and medical providers, my insurance broker and I are as confused as ever. Time is running out and we still don't have a clue how to best proceed."
Full article: http://online.wsj.com/news/articles/SB1000142...
I'd say those that scour the nation's millions for singular hard-cases should at very least be a source that has not demonstrated an agenda ala Murdoch.