Bush is a hero
UidiotRACEMAKEWO RLDPEACE

United States

#170011 Oct 14, 2013
Lyndi wrote:
<quoted text>
I refuse to engage in a pro choice/pro life debate on this forum, lis out of respect to the primary topic of the forum because I know how fast a forum can deteriorate but having said that, I can still insist that one cannot claim outrage against people who "know better" and be pro life.
The pro life movement is comprised ONLY of people who "know better" than the individual girl or woman who is pregnant and that is indisputable. WHY they think they know better... for example your belief that with responsibility comes freedom, is irrelevant to my point.
I absolutely defend anyones right to be pro life and would fight to protect that right but they don't get to be sick of people who know better and then claim to know better at the same time.
It doesn't work that way.
Another more sensitive issue then what you talking about and its an extremely highly controversial issue that most you will denied it ever exist , and is rarely come up in a discussion, why ? Those are the US Malthusian Castrophe , and the ugly US Planned Parenthood, and the US genocidal Wars worldwide ,... do tell? Why not talk about it, did Gestapo got you lowly tongues? Is our US not a Democracy in action? You hypocritical bunch of fanatical American right wingers war mongers are cause of the many big mess, we all are seeing today at home and worldwide, the many wars waged by your group of grunters... Shame on you for bringing misery to the US and to the world. Wake up time
I not a leftie nor a rightie! MWBbabbaabababaa
UidiotRACEMAKEWO RLDPEACE

United States

#170012 Oct 14, 2013
WildWeirdWillie wrote:
<quoted text>I wouldn't doubt that
Mr Doubtfire? BAHAhhahaa
lisw

Delaware, OH

#170013 Oct 14, 2013
WildWeirdWillie wrote:
<quoted text>Let me ask you a question.
Say you had a client in your practice who compulsively assigned either an untoward motive or a character defect to just about everyone they disagreed with. How would you treat that?
As you've so astutely observed, I am no clinician here and on a personal level I find Chris to be emotional but sincere. It's all in what you find tolerable in another person. As a person, not a clinician I feel I see deeper into people than some do. For example I always saw Fearless as "crusty", due to age and experience, not mean. How you view these people is totally up to you. I do not see Chris assigning defects to anyone, that is your territory.

Since: Dec 07

Location hidden

#170014 Oct 14, 2013
WildWeirdWillie wrote:
<quoted text>I'm theoretically supporting a division within my Party only if you take the concept of party and faction to the extreme and keep everything completely in the abstract.
The fact of the matter is that you are dividing it, reshaping it would also fit. Nothing abstract about that.
WildWeirdWillie wrote:
<quoted text> Practically speaking, you can't compare blue dogs with the tea party, not now - and probably not for decades.
For grins I googled the key words,“blue dogs and the tea party” Seems as though there is quite the number of those who don’t share your perspective. To be fair, there are some who do.

Who’s right?
WildWeirdWillie wrote:
<quoted text>You could argue that the intent of Jefferson's Democratic-Republicans and Adams' Federalists was to "divide the Nation and force through legislation to control the losers". To put how sustainable that is into perspective, 212 years elapsed between that election and the last.
Agreed, the process is the same however, at present, the Nation is mathematically divided, give or take a small percentage of polling error and no longer selfless.

We have reached an “American Standoff.”

Surely you don’t think The United States will stand as THE world power indefinitely do you?

Since: Dec 07

Location hidden

#170015 Oct 14, 2013
WildWeirdWillie wrote:
<quoted text>Well, actually, a great many of the things described in Lies have been incorporated into school curriculum, not without objections.

Can you be a little more specific about the "overwhelming disruptions of truths" you have in mind?
Did you want me to post the table of contents of each book?
HipGnozizzz

Dahinda, IL

#170016 Oct 14, 2013
lisw wrote:
It seems to me that it is the habit here to go after the more gentle of posters. In Chris many of you don't even know why you go after him except for the fact that you 1) think it will make you popular a la sister Kat 2) he happens to be a christian and that just makes you feel all icky like Catcher or you think he's mostly about pro life (which by the way he has not expressed at all in here) like Lyndi. Others just think he's not as smart as them.
(Sorry Chris to talk about you in the third person, but I hope you know they all have different rather childish reasons for what they do rather than a real reason to attack your ideology)
Yeah, that's it. Stroke the poor lil critter. We can dismiss any and all topical rebuttal by just saying "Aw, they just don't like....". Whoosh! And it's magically whisked away! It can't be because his positions on topics of public policy are incoherent, hypocritical, paranoid, sanctimonious, peevish, self-absorbed, or nuttin like dat dere.

He is consistent tho.....
lisw

Delaware, OH

#170017 Oct 14, 2013
HipGnozizzz wrote:
<quoted text>Yeah, that's it. Stroke the poor lil critter. We can dismiss any and all topical rebuttal by just saying "Aw, they just don't like....". Whoosh! And it's magically whisked away! It can't be because his positions on topics of public policy are incoherent, hypocritical, paranoid, sanctimonious, peevish, self-absorbed, or nuttin like dat dere.
He is consistent tho.....
why must you be such a bully?
HipGnozizzz

Dahinda, IL

#170018 Oct 14, 2013
Sister Kathryn Lust wrote:
Jesus Christ filed a lawsuit today in the New York Supreme Court against the Republican National Committee for what he is calling “egregious misrepresentation of his statements and image.”
One of the attorneys representing Christ had this to say:
“For years Republicans have proclaimed their love for and loyalty to Jesus, yet their actions are highly contradictory to what Mr. Christ preached. Instead of helping the poor and the sick GOP instead punishes the poor and the sickly.
Our client simply wants the Republican Party to stop using his name, when their actions contradict everything he stood for.
If the GOP would like to continue using his name, Mr. Christ is fine with that, as long as they adhere to the rules: they will have to start making a significant effort to help the poor and the sick, instead of the rich, and start promoting a more peaceful agenda.”
When asked about the lawsuit, House Speaker John Boehner made the following remarks:
“Mr. Christ is entitled to his opinion, however the GOP believes that the underlying message in the Bible is that giving tax cuts to the wealthy is the true path to happiness.
I don’t know where Mr. Christ thinks the Bible says to help the poor and the sick, but that sounds awfully socialistic to me, and we are not a socialist country.”
I had an otherwise very intelligent poster respond once that "those Biblical social paradigms just wouldn't work in modern society."

I said it sounds to me like if it weren't for the salvation aspect (ie, "what's in it for me?") fundamentalist evangelicals would kick ol' Yeshua to the curb as just another dusty ol' philosopher.

Poster agreed without prejudice.

That was probably one of the most eye-opening dialogues I've ever had in topix.

Since: Sep 10

Redondo Beach, CA

#170019 Oct 14, 2013
lisw wrote:
<quoted text>As you've so astutely observed, I am no clinician here and on a personal level I find Chris to be emotional but sincere. It's all in what you find tolerable in another person. As a person, not a clinician I feel I see deeper into people than some do. For example I always saw Fearless as "crusty", due to age and experience, not mean. How you view these people is totally up to you. I do not see Chris assigning defects to anyone, that is your territory.
I see some dysfunction in the (thread) family.
UidiotRACEMAKEWO RLDPEACE

United States

#170020 Oct 14, 2013
NEWS-FLASH wrote:
<quoted text>
Did you want me to post the table of contents of each book?
If WWW don't want to! I do, post away... a few or as much as you like? ;)
HipGnozizzz

Dahinda, IL

#170021 Oct 14, 2013
lisw wrote:
<quoted text>why must you be such a bully?
why can't you keep from personalizing each and every discussion when it turns south for you? I'll bet you don't even realize it.....
HipGnozizzz

Dahinda, IL

#170022 Oct 14, 2013
lisw wrote:
<quoted text>As you've so astutely observed, I am no clinician here and on a personal level I find Chris to be emotional but sincere. It's all in what you find tolerable in another person. As a person, not a clinician I feel I see deeper into people than some do. For example I always saw Fearless as "crusty", due to age and experience, not mean. How you view these people is totally up to you. I do not see Chris assigning defects to anyone, that is your territory.
So, in your eyes, Chris bailing out of a political discussion with a haughty, "You serve your father Satan," is not "assigning a defect"?

I think it's been amply demonstrated over the years that you certainly express "tolerance" for misanthropes, but it's generally reserved for those in ideological alignment.
UidiotRACEMAKEWO RLDPEACE

United States

#170023 Oct 14, 2013
lisw wrote:
<quoted text>why must you be such a bully?
what wrong with Hip dong a reverse Bullying for all the many bullying of the handicap of society... You know Sis LISW you do not want to admit that you stand up for the real bullies... do tell? iGNORANCE IS bLISS FoR YOU KIND! Caught you in heat of the moment! BAHHAHahahahahaha
UidiotRACEMAKEWO RLDPEACE

United States

#170024 Oct 14, 2013
HipGnozizzz wrote:
<quoted text>So, in your eyes, Chris bailing out of a political discussion with a haughty, "You serve your father Satan," is not "assigning a defect"?
I think it's been amply demonstrated over the years that you certainly express "tolerance" for misanthropes, but it's generally reserved for those in ideological alignment.
Our Ex-POTUS Peanut Farmer Did talked about US satanism in power at core of our governing institution(s), you know about this? Confirming , those who support Father Satan is doing a disservice ... Paradocical Ironic , they can not see through the Evil at core that ruining our US and world with it war machines...
UidiotRACEMAKEWO RLDPEACE

United States

#170025 Oct 14, 2013
UidiotRACEMAKEWORLDPEACE wrote:
<quoted text>what wrong with Hip dong a reverse Bullying for all the many bullying of the handicap of society... You know Sis LISW you do not want to admit that you stand up for the real bullies... do tell? iGNORANCE IS bLISS FoR YOU KIND! Caught you in heat of the moment! BAHHAHahahahahaha
Not the word "Of" replace with word 'ON' the handicap of society...
UidiotRACEMAKEWO RLDPEACE

United States

#170026 Oct 14, 2013
Catcher1 wrote:
<quoted text>
I see some dysfunction in the (thread) family.
Can we all blame lISW and few others , she know not ? I say that real Family (in power) is more Criminal...and insane. She and others need a slap ... a Wake up call! Let hope they wake up soon, else heads will roll, our Sexy Founding Fathers will most likely be rolling in their graves seeing what out progeny had done. Sad bunch is it not?

BWHHAHAHAhaa
lisw

Delaware, OH

#170027 Oct 14, 2013
UidiotRACEMAKEWORLDPEACE wrote:
<quoted text>what wrong with Hip dong a reverse Bullying for all the many bullying of the handicap of society... You know Sis LISW you do not want to admit that you stand up for the real bullies... do tell? iGNORANCE IS bLISS FoR YOU KIND! Caught you in heat of the moment! BAHHAHahahahahaha
I have no issue with you, world idiot, you are who you are with no pretense.
lisw

Delaware, OH

#170028 Oct 14, 2013
HipGnozizzz wrote:
<quoted text>why can't you keep from personalizing each and every discussion when it turns south for you? I'll bet you don't even realize it.....
I am telling the truth, Hippy, why does that mean I personalize. You are such a joke because you do the projection thing so perfectly. You get personal more than anyone on this thread and yet you accuse others of getting personal. bottom line. You ARE a Bully. Fact.
lisw

Delaware, OH

#170029 Oct 14, 2013
HipGnozizzz wrote:
<quoted text>why can't you keep from personalizing each and every discussion when it turns south for you? I'll bet you don't even realize it.....
And the funny thing is that I wasn't even in the conversation. I just jumped in uninvited, so what went south on me? Now if you'll kindly answer the question rather than just make a speech I'd appreciate it.
UidiotRACEMAKEWO RLDPEACE

United States

#170030 Oct 14, 2013
HipGnozizzz wrote:
<quoted text>why can't you keep from personalizing each and every discussion when it turns south for you? I'll bet you don't even realize it.....
Why they run, because they know they are guilty bunch who even support greed, criminality, corruption... risk aviodance is one of their many tools as to aviod deep Socratic inquisition, FOR BEING found out as Hypocrites , the corrupted, those with criminal intentions , war mongers ... like the bad kids without/lack of moral conscience and ethics , nor have sympathy and empathy for humanity, mere bullies and warring Pychopaths/war mopngbers that bully the weak of society , and steal from other , rape , plunder, kill,...and these your support for bad bullies would often try to avoid those who are more educated and in the know ...! Sorry sIS Lisw, not aimed at u! bUT YOU SUPPORT EVIL AND NEED TO WAKE UP SOON, FOR YOUR PROGENY fUTURE! i do not know if you believe in Karma?

Sorry for sounding philosophical but it realistic assessment where our US is going into the hell hole, that is you standing up for evil mens in US power that are morally and financially bankrupted US and ruining the world with your US war machines . And have we all not learn from history of fall of Great Empires that fall from grace because of Greed and Corruption...? So, what you US right wingers /war supporters ... afraid that we all see through you guise standing up for evil mens? U know no shame!

Caught you again ! MWBBABAbababaaa

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Top Stories Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
News The 'Fake News' Con: A Case Study 2 min TRUMP WINNERS 23
Christians cannot debate with ATHEISTS 9 min Buck Crick 583
Secular Humanism VS Christianity 18 min Elerby 162
The Future of Politics in America 18 min Buck Crick 251
News Roman Catholic church only true church, says Va... (Jul '07) 30 min Gods r Delusions ... 665,376
The Christian Atheist debate (Jun '15) 34 min RiversideRedneck 88,225
Prove there's a god. (Mar '08) 36 min RiversideRedneck 977,371
More from around the web