Bush is a hero

“Help Cecil Help!”

Since: Dec 06

Lafayette IN

#169862 Oct 11, 2013
BobinTX wrote:
<quoted text>
He didn't have the 'stones' not to sign it. Another one of barry's 'red lines' that he didn't have the backbone to stand behind.
Maybe we should call him pResident earthworm?
The only people who questioned whether he would sign it are complete and utter morons.

“Custer @ LBH - Ooops”

Since: Nov 07

Bakersfield, CA

#169863 Oct 11, 2013
Catcher1 wrote:
<quoted text>
Very good, Lyndi. Bring up Hitler.
All I can say to that is---Godwin's law.
And coincidentally, your pal bad bob wrote this about me:
"Worthless trolls like you should be exterminated....Yer peers will be the ultimate judge, jury and possible executioner."
Really? Exterminated?
If ye don't change yer ways, troll. Take my suggestions. Ye'll be a better person for it.

“Custer @ LBH - Ooops”

Since: Nov 07

Bakersfield, CA

#169864 Oct 11, 2013
Catcher1 wrote:
<quoted text>
How's the Republican Party polling?
See the Associated Press poll?
Let's see you (and the bobs, and any other "conservatives" here) spin it.
Are you winning?
This continued "bad attitude" toward the right is NOT conducive for you losing troll status. Loyal opposition is one thing. Smarm only sets
off Roman Candles.

Or are you really happier as a troll?

“I'm here with bells on.”

Since: Jul 12

Location hidden

#169865 Oct 11, 2013
BobinTX wrote:
<quoted text>
It's dumb enough, just not very accurate.
I never said the GOP's portrayal of it's position was accurate, Texas...just that it was dumb. And ineffective. And counterproductive, actually.

:)

“Unemployed Bush 5.3 obama 8.7”

Since: Jul 10

Location hidden

#169866 Oct 11, 2013
WildWeirdWillie wrote:
<quoted text>The only people who questioned whether he would sign it are complete and utter morons.
Agreed, Jay Carney is a moron. He's also the pResidents spokesperson.

http://washingtonexaminer.com/jay-carney-says...

“Custer @ LBH - Ooops”

Since: Nov 07

Bakersfield, CA

#169867 Oct 11, 2013
Catcher1 wrote:
<quoted text>
I'm fortunate that my financial affairs are in good order, as the result of hard work, planning for the future, and sound (or lucky?) investment decisions.
At the macro level, I remain optimistic about the country's economic prospects, while bemoaning the horrible influence of the anti-government Tea Partiers.
Troll, I have serious doubts as to yer repeated boasting claim to be a "lawyer". Attorneys worth their salt, especially defense lawyers are buried under a mountain of work. Time outta the courtroom is spent poring through law books and reference books, keeping abreast of the latest and greatest points to help the client, as well as legal precedent to impress a judge & jury (if a jury is present).

Paralegals are as busy or busier, some perhaps hoping to be an attorney
some day. I don't believe you are either a lawyer or even a paralegal.
I believe you're fake & a charlatan, bragging about being a lawyer in hopes of demonstrating a certain level of intelligence which does not exist in reality. Passing the bar exam would denote such intelligence.

There's no way a real lawyer has the amount of time you spend here and on the other thread(s), regardless of which section of law you supposedly practice. However, I DO believe you have a laptop computer, which aides you in your fantasy masquerade.

“Custer @ LBH - Ooops”

Since: Nov 07

Bakersfield, CA

#169868 Oct 11, 2013
Sister Kathryn Lust wrote:
<quoted text>Women in general voted D last year, because the R's kept telling us we aren't people...only corporations, men, and fetuses are people, according to R's... but according to D's, women are people too.
Dumbed down enough for ya, Texas?
No, that's the campaign that many people "bought" from the Dems, with the help of the MSM.

“Custer @ LBH - Ooops”

Since: Nov 07

Bakersfield, CA

#169869 Oct 11, 2013
Catcher1 wrote:
<quoted text>
Are you still beating your wife?
Worthless troll!

“Unemployed Bush 5.3 obama 8.7”

Since: Jul 10

Location hidden

#169870 Oct 11, 2013
Sister Kathryn Lust wrote:
<quoted text>Women in general voted D last year, because the R's kept telling us we aren't people...only corporations, men, and fetuses are people, according to R's... but according to D's, women are people too.
Dumbed down enough for ya, Texas?
Maybe a link would be helpful, as I can't seem to remember that as a Republican platform plank.

Please help me refresh my memory.

“I'm here with bells on.”

Since: Jul 12

Location hidden

#169871 Oct 11, 2013
bad bob wrote:
<quoted text>
No, that's the campaign that many people "bought" from the Dems, with the help of the MSM.
Then the GOP needs better ad men, because that's what most of the country thought it was selling.

“Unemployed Bush 5.3 obama 8.7”

Since: Jul 10

Location hidden

#169872 Oct 11, 2013
bad bob wrote:
<quoted text>
Troll, I have serious doubts as to yer repeated boasting claim to be a "lawyer". Attorneys worth their salt, especially defense lawyers are buried under a mountain of work.
Any lawyer worth his salt wouldn't be so easily slapped around by almost every poster in a TOPIX forum.

“Help Cecil Help!”

Since: Dec 06

Lafayette IN

#169873 Oct 11, 2013
BobinTX wrote:
<quoted text>
Agreed, Jay Carney is a moron. He's also the pResidents spokesperson.
http://washingtonexaminer.com/jay-carney-says...
There's no red line in the article you linked to, bobin.

That's a figment of your imagination.

“Unemployed Bush 5.3 obama 8.7”

Since: Jul 10

Location hidden

#169874 Oct 11, 2013
WildWeirdWillie wrote:
<quoted text>There's no red line in the article you linked to, bobin.
That's a figment of your imagination.
Try reading it again, this time without the blinders.

“Help Cecil Help!”

Since: Dec 06

Lafayette IN

#169875 Oct 11, 2013
BobinTX wrote:
<quoted text>
Try reading it again, this time without the blinders.
I read the article.

I saw nothing in the article that comes even close to what a reasonable person would call a red line. Frankly, I don't think an ideologue speaking to an intelligent audience would try to spin it that way.

There was a belief attributed to the President that the legislation wasn't necessary, but you have to be a fool to think there was a threat to refuse to sign it.

Bray on, little fellow.
NEWS - FLASH

San Antonio, TX

#169876 Oct 11, 2013
Catcher1 wrote:
<quoted text>
I'm fortunate that my financial affairs are in good order, as the result of hard work, planning for the future, and sound (or lucky?) investment decisions.
At the macro level, I remain optimistic about the country's economic prospects, while bemoaning the horrible influence of the anti-government Tea Partiers.
Kudos on making the grade!

Looks like some of us will have seats on the 50 yard line to watch this unfold. The other rest of us will just have to view it at slightly different angles which will undoubtedly give rise to bad calls and poor decisions.

Spoiler alert:
There are no winners, just a dizzy array of frustration and change.

“Unemployed Bush 5.3 obama 8.7”

Since: Jul 10

Location hidden

#169877 Oct 11, 2013
WildWeirdWillie wrote:
<quoted text>There's no red line in the article you linked to, bobin.
That's a figment of your imagination.
Maybe this will help jog your memory of your hero's promise...

President Barack Obama would veto piecemeal bills that would restore funding only to certain parts of the government like federal parks, veterans programs and the District of Columbia rather than a broad government spending bill, White House spokeswoman Amy Brundage said on Tuesday.

"These piecemeal efforts are not serious, and they are no way to run a government," Brundage said in a statement, noting the White House wants the House to pass a bill that would continue funding government without any unrelated policy measures attached.

"The President and the Senate have been clear that they won't accept this kind of game-playing, and if these bills were to come to the President's desk, he would veto them," she said.

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2013/10/01/obam...

“Unemployed Bush 5.3 obama 8.7”

Since: Jul 10

Location hidden

#169878 Oct 11, 2013
WildWeirdWillie wrote:
<quoted text>I read the article.
I saw nothing in the article that comes even close to what a reasonable person would call a red line. Frankly, I don't think an ideologue speaking to an intelligent audience would try to spin it that way.
There was a belief attributed to the President that the legislation wasn't necessary, but you have to be a fool to think there was a threat to refuse to sign it.
Bray on, little fellow.
The article was about him breaking his 'red line' promise to veto any piecemeal funding. But, to jog your obama memory, I linked to barry's 'red line' promise that he was breaking in the previous message.

“Unemployed Bush 5.3 obama 8.7”

Since: Jul 10

Location hidden

#169879 Oct 11, 2013
Willie, I can't even guess how many times I've watched the Cards play at home, and I never realized, until tonight, that there's an image of the Gateway Arch in the outfield grass.

Please tell me it hasn't always been there.

“Unemployed Bush 5.3 obama 8.7”

Since: Jul 10

Location hidden

#169880 Oct 11, 2013
NEWS - FLASH wrote:
<quoted text> Kudos on making the grade!
Looks like some of us will have seats on the 50 yard line to watch this unfold. The other rest of us will just have to view it at slightly different angles which will undoubtedly give rise to bad calls and poor decisions.
Spoiler alert:
There are no winners, just a dizzy array of frustration and change.
Amen to that. After this manufactured financial fiasco, I hope the voters get rid of every one of the 'old guard, big government' Republicans and their Democrat twins that are up for re-election in 2014.

“Help Cecil Help!”

Since: Dec 06

Lafayette IN

#169881 Oct 11, 2013
BobinTX wrote:
<quoted text>
Maybe this will help jog your memory of your hero's promise...
President Barack Obama would veto piecemeal bills that would restore funding only to certain parts of the government like federal parks, veterans programs and the District of Columbia rather than a broad government spending bill, White House spokeswoman Amy Brundage said on Tuesday.
"These piecemeal efforts are not serious, and they are no way to run a government," Brundage said in a statement, noting the White House wants the House to pass a bill that would continue funding government without any unrelated policy measures attached.
"The President and the Senate have been clear that they won't accept this kind of game-playing, and if these bills were to come to the President's desk, he would veto them," she said.
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2013/10/01/obam...
I can see why you need to spin Obama's signature on this specific bill as him crossing his own red line, but I don't think this is what he was talking about on the 1st. If you'll remember, partial funding bills was an R strategy being discussed at the time.

About Obama being my hero ... tell you what, pal. You find one post of mine that describes Obama (or ANY politician, for that matter) in terms even close to the gushing stuff you post about Cruz, and we can talk about heroes.

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Top Stories Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
News Plurality of Americans think Trump is failing (Mar '17) 14 min NotSoDivineMsM 45,815
God is REAL - Miracles Happen! (Jun '11) 19 min Eagle 12 - 6,689
Prove there's a god. (Mar '08) 24 min Eagle 12 - 990,659
News Roman Catholic church only true church, says Va... (Jul '07) 26 min Michael 691,916
*** All Time Favorite Songs *** (Dec '10) 1 hr Classic 4,396
__POPE & ISRAEL to SIGN Historic Agreement__ 1 hr Dec 2017 News 1
Why are Europeans a race of savages, thieves, a... (Jun '15) 3 hr Exposing Devil Lies 368
More from around the web