Syria is no threat to the USA.<quoted text>
A surgical strike on Syrian military sites.
Rather than launching a strike on a country that holds no threat to us, why not strike Iran instead. A country that is providing support to the Assad regime, a country that is developing nuclear weapons, a country that will destabilize the region and the world's oil supply, AND a country that is definitely a threat to us?It's imperative.
I know. The war powers act was supposed to give the president the ability to use the military against countries or groups that are an imminent danger to the USA... not to attack a country that doesn't like us, and we don't care for. We'd be improperly using our military to aid in replacing a regime that isn't a threat with one that very well might be.<There are limits.
The obama administration attacked Libya, which was no threat to the USA, and left a void that al-qaida was quick to fill. It cost us an ambassador, as well as other Americans... and lost us our presence, and our consulate in Eastern Libya.
And now obama wants to duplicate the same error in Syria. It makes no sense, unless barry's actually trying to assist the Muslim Brotherhood and al-qaida in coming to power in Middle East countries.