Bush is a hero

“I'm here with bells on.”

Since: Jul 12

Location hidden

#167252 Aug 27, 2013
Sorry, that last one didn't work. Here's another.

http://wac.450f.edgecastcdn.net/80450F/thefw....

“Unemployed Bush 5.3 obama 8.7”

Since: Jul 10

Location hidden

#167253 Aug 27, 2013
WildWeirdWillie wrote:
<quoted text>Speaking of non-interventionists ...
Did I miss your answer on my questions concerning the possibility of obama unilaterally attacking Syria, or was attacking the messenger your only answer?

Here's a few more questions for you to duck...

Would the United States interests, as well as the Middle East, have been better served if obama had not been so quick to allow all our troops to be thrown out of Iraq? It was politically popular to maintain his political base, but it turned our hard won successes in Iraq into failure, and success for al-qaida and Iran.

Would the United States interests, as well as the Middle East, have been better served if obama had not been so quick to announce when our troops would be deserting Afghanistan... job complete, or not? A probable success, and a strong recruitment tool, for both al-qaida and the Taliban.

Would the United States interests, as well as the Middle East, have been better served if we had quietly supported Hosni Mubarak's pro USA regime?

Would there have been a Benghazi failure, and would United States interests have been better served if we had not intervened in defeating Muammar Gaddafi in Libya? What was the Libyan threat to the US?

After all the foreign policy "successes" of this regime, why would we want to see obama create one more anti-US regime in the Mid-East? Hasn't this administration already created enough of them?

“Unemployed Bush 5.3 obama 8.7”

Since: Jul 10

Location hidden

#167254 Aug 27, 2013
"Now let me be clear: I suffer no illusions about Saddam Hussein. He is a brutal man. A ruthless man. A man who butchers his own people to secure his own power.... The world, and the Iraqi people, would be better off without him.

But I also know that Saddam poses no imminent and direct threat to the United States, or to his neighbors...and that in concert with the international community he can be contained until, in the way of all petty dictators, he falls away into the dustbin of history." -barack hussein obama, 2002

http://usliberals.about.com/od/extraordinarys...

Congressional support for Iraq War:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Iraq_Resolution

UN support for Iraq War:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_Nations_S...

American popular support for Iraq War:
http://www.gallup.com/poll/7990/public-suppor...

obama hasn't approached Congress, or the UN, for support for an attack on Syria. Popular American support is below 30%, and opposition to such an attack is over 60%.

Go barry, go...

“Help Cecil Help!”

Since: Dec 06

Lafayette IN

#167255 Aug 27, 2013
BobinTX wrote:
<quoted text>
Did I miss your answer on my questions concerning the possibility of obama unilaterally attacking Syria, or was attacking the messenger your only answer?
Here's a few more questions for you to duck...
Would the United States interests, as well as the Middle East, have been better served if obama had not been so quick to allow all our troops to be thrown out of Iraq? It was politically popular to maintain his political base, but it turned our hard won successes in Iraq into failure, and success for al-qaida and Iran.
Would the United States interests, as well as the Middle East, have been better served if obama had not been so quick to announce when our troops would be deserting Afghanistan... job complete, or not? A probable success, and a strong recruitment tool, for both al-qaida and the Taliban.
Would the United States interests, as well as the Middle East, have been better served if we had quietly supported Hosni Mubarak's pro USA regime?
Would there have been a Benghazi failure, and would United States interests have been better served if we had not intervened in defeating Muammar Gaddafi in Libya? What was the Libyan threat to the US?
After all the foreign policy "successes" of this regime, why would we want to see obama create one more anti-US regime in the Mid-East? Hasn't this administration already created enough of them?
No, bobin, you didn't miss my answer to your 'questions'.

“Rainbow: God's covenant ”

Since: May 07

Clearwater, FL

#167256 Aug 27, 2013
BobinTX wrote:
"Now let me be clear: I suffer no illusions about Saddam Hussein. He is a brutal man. A ruthless man. A man who butchers his own people to secure his own power.... The world, and the Iraqi people, would be better off without him.
But I also know that Saddam poses no imminent and direct threat to the United States, or to his neighbors...and that in concert with the international community he can be contained until, in the way of all petty dictators, he falls away into the dustbin of history." -barack hussein obama, 2002
http://usliberals.about.com/od/extraordinarys...
Congressional support for Iraq War:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Iraq_Resolution
UN support for Iraq War:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_Nations_S...
American popular support for Iraq War:
http://www.gallup.com/poll/7990/public-suppor...
obama hasn't approached Congress, or the UN, for support for an attack on Syria. Popular American support is below 30%, and opposition to such an attack is over 60%.
Go barry, go...
President Barack Obama may take action on Syria without explicit congressional approval because seeking authorization from U.S. lawmakers may take too long and they may say “no,” NBC News Chief White House Correspondent Chuck Todd said Tuesday.

If so why have congress? Or the supreme court? Its quite clear Obama sees his position as more important, he has zero interest in the branches of power being equal. Just host his mug up all over the nation and call it what it is.

http://www.theblaze.com/stories/2013/08/27/nb...

http://www.examiner.com/article/obama-flag-ma...

Since: Sep 10

Long Beach, CA

#167257 Aug 27, 2013
BobinTX wrote:
<quoted text>
Did I miss your answer on my questions concerning the possibility of obama unilaterally attacking Syria, or was attacking the messenger your only answer?
Here's a few more questions for you to duck...
Would the United States interests, as well as the Middle East, have been better served if obama had not been so quick to allow all our troops to be thrown out of Iraq? It was politically popular to maintain his political base, but it turned our hard won successes in Iraq into failure, and success for al-qaida and Iran.
Would the United States interests, as well as the Middle East, have been better served if obama had not been so quick to announce when our troops would be deserting Afghanistan... job complete, or not? A probable success, and a strong recruitment tool, for both al-qaida and the Taliban.
Would the United States interests, as well as the Middle East, have been better served if we had quietly supported Hosni Mubarak's pro USA regime?
Would there have been a Benghazi failure, and would United States interests have been better served if we had not intervened in defeating Muammar Gaddafi in Libya? What was the Libyan threat to the US?
After all the foreign policy "successes" of this regime, why would we want to see obama create one more anti-US regime in the Mid-East? Hasn't this administration already created enough of them?
You're very quick to make predictions about the past.

But that's easy.

Let's see you have a go at the future for a change.

“Rainbow: God's covenant ”

Since: May 07

Clearwater, FL

#167258 Aug 27, 2013
Sister Kathryn Lust wrote:
Sorry, that last one didn't work. Here's another.
http://wac.450f.edgecastcdn.net/80450F/thefw....
Perhaps the people that have been warning of Disney were right all along? One thing it proves is money doesn't equal class.

“Rainbow: God's covenant ”

Since: May 07

Clearwater, FL

#167259 Aug 27, 2013
Catcher1 wrote:
<quoted text>
You're very quick to make predictions about the past.
But that's easy.
Let's see you have a go at the future for a change.
I predict whatever action or non action of the dear leader you will kiss his rear. Of note that (if) we do this w/o going to Congress Biden was once saying this. Of course Bush went to Congress.

Video: Biden Threatening to Impeach President If He Launches an Attack Without Congressional Authority

http://www.breitbart.com/InstaBlog/2013/08/27...

“I'm here with bells on.”

Since: Jul 12

Location hidden

#167260 Aug 27, 2013
Chris Clearwater wrote:
<quoted text>
Perhaps the people that have been warning of Disney were right all along? One thing it proves is money doesn't equal class.
Who ever said it does?

Since: Sep 10

Long Beach, CA

#167261 Aug 27, 2013
Chris Clearwater wrote:
<quoted text>
I predict whatever action or non action of the dear leader you will kiss his rear. Of note that (if) we do this w/o going to Congress Biden was once saying this. Of course Bush went to Congress.
Video: Biden Threatening to Impeach President If He Launches an Attack Without Congressional Authority
http://www.breitbart.com/InstaBlog/2013/08/27...
That's the best you can do?

Focus on me?

Come on, you're a great critic, tell us what we SHOULD do, not just what we shouldn't have done.

“Unemployed Bush 5.3 obama 8.7”

Since: Jul 10

Location hidden

#167262 Aug 27, 2013
Catcher1 wrote:
<quoted text>
You're very quick to make predictions about the past.
But that's easy.
Let's see you have a go at the future for a change.
If you could understand what you read, you might have noticed that I already had made my prediction... based on barry's past foreign policy failures.

BobinTX: "After all the foreign policy "successes" of this regime, why would we want to see obama create one more anti-US regime in the Mid-East? Hasn't this administration already created enough of them?"

“Unemployed Bush 5.3 obama 8.7”

Since: Jul 10

Location hidden

#167263 Aug 27, 2013
WildWeirdWillie wrote:
<quoted text>No, bobin, you didn't miss my answer to your 'questions'.
It does get tougher and tougher to try to defend the obama administration's foreign policies, doesn't it? Better to just stay mum, and hope the media lets them pass.

Thinking back, I can name numerous obama foreign policy failures, but I can't think of one of barry's foreign policy successes.

“Unemployed Bush 5.3 obama 8.7”

Since: Jul 10

Location hidden

#167264 Aug 27, 2013
Catcher1 wrote:
<quoted text>
That's the best you can do?
Focus on me?
Come on, you're a great critic, tell us what we SHOULD do, not just what we shouldn't have done.
We should do NOTHING. It's none of our business, we aren't sure what the final outcome will be, and, most important, Syria is not an imminent threat to the USA.

We don't need to commence unprovoked acts of war against sovereign nations simply because they don't like us.

Since: Sep 10

Long Beach, CA

#167265 Aug 27, 2013
BobinTX wrote:
<quoted text>
If you could understand what you read, you might have noticed that I already had made my prediction... based on barry's past foreign policy failures.
BobinTX: "After all the foreign policy "successes" of this regime, why would we want to see obama create one more anti-US regime in the Mid-East? Hasn't this administration already created enough of them?"
Stop dodging and make a policy recommendation.

“Custer @ LBH - Ooops”

Since: Nov 07

Bakersfield, CA

#167266 Aug 27, 2013
Chris Clearwater wrote:
<quoted text>
President Barack Obama may take action on Syria without explicit congressional approval because seeking authorization from U.S. lawmakers may take too long and they may say “no,” NBC News Chief White House Correspondent Chuck Todd said Tuesday.
If so why have congress? Or the supreme court? Its quite clear Obama sees his position as more important, he has zero interest in the branches of power being equal. Just host his mug up all over the nation and call it what it is.
http://www.theblaze.com/stories/2013/08/27/nb...
http://www.examiner.com/article/obama-flag-ma...
Venezuela's Maduras warns against attack on Syria:

http://www.washingtonpost.com/world/the_ameri...

But Obama won't put boots on the ground. He'll just isolate the Syrian airbases and remove Assad's ability to deliver any more chemical canisters. Neither side of the 2 year civil war within Syria will be aided. So far I believe the Brits, France, and Canada are with us, though Canada has said it will be a very limited role.

The UNSC can't move without China & Russia, and IINM, the only agency left after that is NATO. Looks like any ground war inside Syria would hafta be left up to them.

“Custer @ LBH - Ooops”

Since: Nov 07

Bakersfield, CA

#167267 Aug 27, 2013
BobinTX wrote:
<quoted text>
We should do NOTHING. It's none of our business, we aren't sure what the final outcome will be, and, most important, Syria is not an imminent threat to the USA.
We don't need to commence unprovoked acts of war against sovereign nations simply because they don't like us.
I'd agree if Assad hadn't chose to gas innocent men women, and children. That can't be allowed in a civilized society.

Since: Apr 07

Location hidden

#167268 Aug 27, 2013
!!!Please Help Save Roberta's Sanity!!!

Does anyone else here use Yahoo! and if you do have you been having trouble with it lately?

“Custer @ LBH - Ooops”

Since: Nov 07

Bakersfield, CA

#167269 Aug 27, 2013
BobinTX wrote:
<quoted text>
It does get tougher and tougher to try to defend the obama administration's foreign policies, doesn't it? Better to just stay mum, and hope the media lets them pass.
Thinking back, I can name numerous obama foreign policy failures, but I can't think of one of barry's foreign policy successes.
I'm hoping Obama attacks Syria, and kills Assad. That can only help the Republicans during the next 2 election cycles,(next year and 2016). And Obama's base will be lookin' to mount his head on a pole.

“Unemployed Bush 5.3 obama 8.7”

Since: Jul 10

Location hidden

#167270 Aug 27, 2013
Catcher1 wrote:
<quoted text>
Stop dodging and make a policy recommendation.
I did.
http://www.topix.com/forum/topstories/T2LK4SO...

“Help Cecil Help!”

Since: Dec 06

Lafayette IN

#167271 Aug 27, 2013
BobinTX wrote:
<quoted text>
It does get tougher and tougher to try to defend the obama administration's foreign policies, doesn't it? Better to just stay mum, and hope the media lets them pass.
Thinking back, I can name numerous obama foreign policy failures, but I can't think of one of barry's foreign policy successets.
If there's anything this exchange proves, it's that you have no patience, and that you don't need an actual response from me to read from your script.

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Top Stories Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
Poll Was 9/11 a conspiracy?? (Oct '07) 7 min onemale 284,481
Ladies, do u wear minis to get touched up or pu... (Nov '12) 15 min 53Brian 96
Secular Humanism VS Christianity 19 min Truthiness 19
The Christian Atheist debate (Jun '15) 30 min Bongo 87,903
Christians cannot debate with ATHEISTS 31 min Truthiness 448
Dirty k,.k 2 hr Spank594 7
Why extreme weather is the new normal 2 hr Booty6322 2
Queen Cleopatra was clearly Black. White people... (Aug '10) 5 hr gundee123 1,226
More from around the web