Lyndi

Sarasota, FL

#166583 Aug 17, 2013
Catcher1 wrote:
<quoted text>
Or perhaps you could let your hair down a bit, and....
.....go topless when the pool guy is here?
Lyndi

Sarasota, FL

#166584 Aug 17, 2013
WildWeirdWillie wrote:
Will somebody please explain to me the difference between whining that someone said Muslim and someone whining because someone didn't say Muslim?
Seems to me it all boils down to whining.
No, it doesn't. The correct answer is in the first sentence of the Krauthammer piece I posted.
".....the bending of language to fit a political need."

Since: Sep 10

Long Beach, CA

#166585 Aug 17, 2013
Lyndi wrote:
<quoted text>
.....go topless when the pool guy is here?
That could get things started.

But maybe we should put a lid on this sexy talk.

Chris Clearwater may be reading it.

“I'm here with bells on.”

Since: Jul 12

Location hidden

#166586 Aug 17, 2013
Lyndi wrote:
<quoted text>
If I spell your name wrong do you think you can make your head blow off again like you did before?
Remember that?
Whee, that was fun!
On the conniption fit scale of 1-10, yours was a 9.6!
Took me three weeks and half a pound of pot to find the damn thing....

“Custer @ LBH - Ooops”

Since: Nov 07

Bakersfield, CA

#166587 Aug 17, 2013
Sister Kathryn Lust wrote:
<quoted text>They're all over the 'net, bob.
Yet you didn't post ONE sane & rational link?
Sister Kathryn Lust wrote:
<quoted text>
In addition to individual personal accounts, there are at least 4 documentaries which point out the glaring inconsistencies in the 'official story. They give actual physical evidence of explosives found around all the 'crash' sites,(not to mention video of the concurrent implosion of auxiliary buildings which were nowhere near the Twin Towers) They document the immediate export of all the steel from said towers to China for 'recycling', rather than it having been processed, as any and every other retrievable piece of structural material is after such an event, as EVIDENCE in a possible crime scene. These items alone are enough to at least make a sane and rational person QUESTION the validity of that 'official story'.
I've seen a couple of "conspiracy documentaries". And in them, NOTHING was concusive. It was merely the docu maker's "take" on what happened. Liken their takes to the illusions of an accomplished magician, who can easily make a 747 disappear right in front of your eyes. Or Chris Angel, who can walk up or down the outside of any Las Vegas Casino, or "fly" thru the air with the greatest of ease.

Now think about "all the steel going to China for recycling". You think for one minute China would hesitate to produce physical evidence of a conspiracy for the purpose of bringing down a sitting US President, especially a GW Bush, who they rail against at every opportunity? We also know <some> portions of the Towers were saved to be used at the new Memorial site.
Sister Kathryn Lust wrote:
<quoted text>
Lots of people sang after the fact. At least 11 people who did question that official story, and a few who came forward to PUBLICLY refute it, in the immediate aftermath of 9/11, have since disappeared or inexplicably died -
Where's the proof of this bold statement? Because the disappearance or death of 11 people or more is more than enough to warrant an investigation. You think the Dems in Congress wouldn't like to hang Bush after such an investigation? Your arguments
are weak and far fetched.
Sister Kathryn Lust wrote:
<quoted text>
and there are thousands of experts in demolition, professors of physics, architects, and first-hand witnesses to the collapse of the WTC, who are STILL trying to illuminate the truth - but those of us who refuse to believe our government (since it's composed of knights in shining armor and those with the highest moral principles available to humanity) could POSSIBLY have engaged in such a conspiracy, are quite content to agree that it was 'them damn Muslims' working alone. Safer that way. As for swinging from the rafters, obviously that just doesn't happen to Presidents, or their accomplices. Obama is still in the White House too, and not mounted on a wall plaque in the Oval Office, next to a taxidermied Hillary. That should tell you something.
More weak & far fetched arguments. It's been nearly 12 years, and these "experts" have had plenty of time to make their case. At the very least Bush could've been impeached. Nixon was, for far less.

<Continued>

“Custer @ LBH - Ooops”

Since: Nov 07

Bakersfield, CA

#166588 Aug 17, 2013
Part II
Sister Kathryn Lust wrote:
<quoted text>
I have no problem believing that "Bush and Co" had no problem with eliminating thousands of American citizens - they certainly had no problem eliminating thousands of military personnel, or tens of thousands of foreign civilians, over the course of their 8 years. They LOVED collateral damage - it's very profitable to create, and makes it appear that the perpetrators are keeping America safe and free...to useful idiots who would rather believe that, than the alternative.
Now you're grasping at straws trying to equate lives lost in battle to innocent civilians murdered by BushCO. You state "they loved collateral damage", when the finest techs on earth have a priority to develop weapons which have the capacity to cause the least collateral damage. AND you conveniently failed to mention that most of the innocent civilians lost in the ME battles, were murdered by the ruthless coward terrorists we were fighting against.

“Custer @ LBH - Ooops”

Since: Nov 07

Bakersfield, CA

#166589 Aug 17, 2013
Catcher1 wrote:
<quoted text>
Chris Clearwater may be reading it.
Worthless troll is YOU!

“"Tanners Flat" U dummy”

Since: Jan 10

Location hidden

#166590 Aug 17, 2013
A tough talking guy named bush got us into something he couldn't get us out of.

Can you say overcompensation?

“2016 No Clinton No Bush!”

Since: Dec 06

Lafayette IN

#166591 Aug 17, 2013
Lyndi wrote:
<quoted text>
No, it doesn't. The correct answer is in the first sentence of the Krauthammer piece I posted.
".....the bending of language to fit a political need."
I think the "bending of language to fit a political need" door swings both ways.

Behind one side are the people who get offended when Islam is mentioned, behind the other are people upset when it isn't mentioned enough. There are a variety of reasons for people being behind those doors, but imo the primary reason is pure partisanship.

I mean, seriously - who on God's green earth is remotely unclear about who/what "violent extremism" refers to? Do you need a constant reminder?

“2016 No Clinton No Bush!”

Since: Dec 06

Lafayette IN

#166592 Aug 17, 2013
Yellow Star Seed is Back wrote:
A tough talking guy named bush got us into something he couldn't get us out of.
Can you say overcompensation?
What, exactly, did Bush get us into that we can't get out of?

We're out of Iraq. We're going to be out of Afghanistan next year.

Not exactly a member of the GWB fan club, but you're talking crap here, bub.

“Pillars of Creation....”

Since: Jan 11

Into this world we're thrown

#166593 Aug 17, 2013
Yellow Star Seed is Back wrote:
A tough talking guy named bush got us into something he couldn't get us out of.
Can you say overcompensation?
You got it wrong.........Its Obama whose having a tough time getting us out of it..........Read a paper every now and then........

Since: Sep 10

Long Beach, CA

#166594 Aug 17, 2013
bad bob wrote:
<quoted text>
Worthless troll is YOU!
Present your evidence, please.

“The future begins”

Since: Jul 07

every moment

#166595 Aug 17, 2013
Lyndi wrote:
<quoted text>
Obama's foreign policy --> fail
Obama's domestic policy --> fail
Obama job plan--> fail
Deficit reduction--> fail
Obamacare --> fail
NSA, IRS, Benghazi, Fast & Furious--> fail, fail, fail, fail
Snowden--> fail
Race relations--> fail
Trust in government--> Fail
Transparency-->fail
Lyndi wrote:
<quoted text>
It was pressure from the "we're in a perpetual state of being offended" democrats who got him fired.
---> lie
Lyndi wrote:
<quoted text>It was pressure from the NAACP (National Association of Colored Progressives) that got him fired.
--->lie

Some of us were taught as children that if someone feels their spiel has to include blatant lies, there must be something queer in their pitch.
Lyndi wrote:
<quoted text>Maybe the Christians have it right. The devil hates being mocked.
lol-
Vaguely but deniably racist? nah...
Lyndi wrote:
<quoted text>This whole rodeo clown thing is reminiscent of Muslim extremists declaring holy war or putting out a death warrant against that Dutch cartoonist for mocking Mohammed in a CARTOON. They have no sense of humor either.
Uh huh. Tell it to the Dixie Chicks.
Lyndi wrote:
<quoted text>Way back before Obama was inaugurated for the first time one of his daughters said, "he'd better do a good job because he's going to be the 1st African American president" or something to that effect.
That little girl unknowingly spoke words of great warning and wisdom which unfortunately weren't heeded and haven't panned out. He hasn't done a good job. He has failed on all fronts and he has become something of a joke. Worldwide and at the local rodeo.
You guys should have been more patient about putting a black dude in there just for the sake of getting a black dude in there and found one with qualifications and a track record of leadership skills. Stupid move, imo. But it's all water under the bridge now.
We's gots what we's gots.
And newsflash to Obama and Co. It's not his skin color.
It's the thinness of his skin and his complete and utter failure to do the job.
Shew! are these grapes sour......

Hey, here's a REAL test. Republicans write to their Congressman and tell them to actually work together to, wait for it....govern! Then we can really see if this President a failure and not just fated to hold office with the most ineffectual and obstructionist Congress in US history.

“Custer @ LBH - Ooops”

Since: Nov 07

Bakersfield, CA

#166596 Aug 17, 2013
Catcher1 wrote:
<quoted text>
Present your evidence, please.
Hah, no need! Yer doin' a fine job of that on yer own.

“Custer @ LBH - Ooops”

Since: Nov 07

Bakersfield, CA

#166597 Aug 17, 2013
WildWeirdWillie wrote:
<quoted text>I think the "bending of language to fit a political need" door swings both ways.
Behind one side are the people who get offended when Islam is mentioned, behind the other are people upset when it isn't mentioned enough. There are a variety of reasons for people being behind those doors, but imo the primary reason is pure partisanship.
I mean, seriously - who on God's green earth is remotely unclear about who/what "violent extremism" refers to? Do you need a constant reminder?
Yer partially right I guess, Wilmer. But there's a big difference between a "constant reminder", and a US President who refuses to call something by it's real name, for political (or religious) reasons.

“2016 No Clinton No Bush!”

Since: Dec 06

Lafayette IN

#166598 Aug 17, 2013
bad bob wrote:
<quoted text>
Yer partially right I guess, Wilmer. But there's a big difference between a "constant reminder", and a US President who refuses to call something by it's real name, for political (or hahahahahahaha) reasons.
I might agree with you IF I hadn't had a very similar conversation with D.S. Higgins (and maybe others) who did not think Bush was sufficiently precise about using 'real names'.
UdiotRaceMAKEWOR LDPEACE

United States

#166599 Aug 17, 2013
WildWeirdWillie wrote:
<quoted text>What, exactly, did Bush get us into that we can't get out of?
We're out of Iraq. We're going to be out of Afghanistan next year.
Not exactly a member of the GWB fan club, but you're talking crap here, bub.
interjecting where yellow left off. Our US Militaristic Neo_imperialist interventionist will never leave Mid East until we get last vestige of the Black golden... and Will install a dictatorial US puppet govt and leave some US troops to safeguard our greatest heist !:} Come on Willy you gotta use your cranial left faculty, what they taught u law school - critical reasoning skills ... BWHHAHAHAHA
UIDOTRACEMAKEWOR LDPEACE

United States

#166600 Aug 17, 2013
Sister Kathryn Lust wrote:
<quoted text>They're all over the 'net, bob. In addition to individual personal accounts, there are at least 4 documentaries which point out the glaring inconsistencies in the 'official story. They give actual physical evidence of explosives found around all the 'crash' sites,(not to mention video of the concurrent implosion of auxiliary buildings which were nowhere near the Twin Towers) They document the immediate export of all the steel from said towers to China for 'recycling', rather than it having been processed, as any and every other retrievable piece of structural material is after such an event, as EVIDENCE in a possible crime scene. These items alone are enough to at least make a sane and rational person QUESTION the validity of that 'official story'.
Lots of people sang after the fact. At least 11 people who did question that official story, and a few who came forward to PUBLICLY refute it, in the immediate aftermath of 9/11, have since disappeared or inexplicably died - and there are thousands of experts in demolition, professors of physics, architects, and first-hand witnesses to the collapse of the WTC, who are STILL trying to illuminate the truth - but those of us who refuse to believe our government (since it's composed of knights in shining armor and those with the highest moral principles available to humanity) could POSSIBLY have engaged in such a conspiracy, are quite content to agree that it was 'them damn Muslims' working alone. Safer that way. As for swinging from the rafters, obviously that just doesn't happen to Presidents, or their accomplices. Obama is still in the White House too, and not mounted on a wall plaque in the Oval Office, next to a taxidermied Hillary. That should tell you something.
I have no problem believing that "Bush and Co" had no problem with eliminating thousands of American citizens - they certainly had no problem eliminating thousands of military personnel, or tens of thousands of foreign civilians, over the course of their 8 years. They LOVED collateral damage - it's very profitable to create, and makes it appear that the perpetrators are keeping America safe and free...to useful idiots who would rather believe that, than the alternative.
And, Silverstein got his dirty blood money from Insurance co. for the Asbestos laden-Skyscrapers -that he wanted it to be demolished as local govt Asbestos inspectors will fine him for every day it stands not abated! And I wonder if this co-inside coincidently to 9/11 , and he got his dirty insurance payouts . It seems those radical gestapos in govt took care of this with one stone on multiple targets . More like million of Civilians! Evil it is.
UIDOTRACEMAKEWOR LDPEACE

United States

#166601 Aug 17, 2013
HipGnosis wrote:
<quoted text>Sounds like modern representative government to me......government does as it pleases and the people only bitch when it's "those other guys" doin' it. Sweet deal......
Addressing of this post of your above to Chris! I don't think many of us AMericans know it really a Unitary Presidental Constitutional Republic. Yep they fool most of the populace.
UIDOTRACEMAKEWOR LDPEACE

United States

#166602 Aug 17, 2013
bad bob wrote:
<quoted text>
Hah, no need! Yer doin' a fine job of that on yer own.
U lost to a Catcher! NO! You doing a bad job, you lose to a lawyer, if you keep it up and your be shirtless sooner or latter! BWHAHHAHAA

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Top Stories Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
Roman Catholic church only true church, says Va... (Jul '07) 7 min Anthony MN 560,697
Jehovah's Witnesses are true disciple of Jesus ... (Mar '07) 14 min lovewithin 39,393
Prove there's a god. (Mar '08) 19 min Dave Nelson 779,071
Was 9/11 a conspiracy?? (Oct '07) 23 min YellowPissreality 265,581
The Anti-Christ...Part 4 24 min End Of Days 21
Wake up, Black America!! (Sep '13) 24 min MAKEWORLDPEACEUID... 4,938
Are You A Friend Or An Enemy To Humans? Read Th... 25 min End Of Days 31
Why Should Jesus Love Me? (Feb '08) 2 hr Innocent Holy dr ... 605,384
How do I ask my dad for sex? (Oct '13) 5 hr daveo69 72
More from around the web