Bush is a hero

“Take It To The Limit”

Since: Mar 11

Location hidden

#163931 Jun 29, 2013
If you guys don't like it, that's fine. You are entitled to your opinion. I'm just speaking the truth as I see it.
In 1976, I was president of the Student Coaltion of Indian Natives at TCC. My mentor, Tom Goldtooth, talked me into bringing a fight to the Student Council. They were putting on the play, "The Fantasiks', and their character,'the perfect rapist' wore loincloth and a feather. I'd never heard of the play before, and Tom and a girl named Polly came to the meet at the Student Lounge. They goaded me into arguing with the guy, and I didn't know what the F*ck I was talking about.
Well, the guy had pity on me and they changed the costume on the character, making him a pirate. Later, tom and Polly had a good laugh at me for sputtering through the damn thing and I cursed them both.
See, I know what it feels like, swinging blindly about a subject. But on this, I know from where I speak because I see the one-sidedness of it every day.
In 2008, rep maxine waters wanted all treaties with Native America abrogated because the Navajo wanted all the blacks off their reservations. Why? Because the blacks were living off the Navajo resources. They didn't bother to integrate with the Navajo, just took everything they could, and were demanding more. Why was this going on? Because in 1866, the U.S. Government made the blacks 'wards' of the Navajo Nation. The black 'Freedmen' used to be slaves owned by the Navajo. The government promised to assist the tribe with money and resources, but later renegged on that promise. The Navajo kept their end for a hundred and fifty years, but got tired of the blacks demands. They finally said "Enough' but maxine and the government made them keep to their word. That was and is an injustice.
Who was wrong in this issue? maxine waters, definately. The government? Sure, but they've been F*cking Natives as long as there's been a US government. The Navajo? Yes and No. My question is, Why should the Navajo be held to a higher standard than the US government?

“Take It To The Limit”

Since: Mar 11

Location hidden

#163932 Jun 29, 2013
Sister Kathryn Lust wrote:
<quoted text>Anyone who thinks supporting the pillory of Paula Deen means they're not a racist, indicates that they're an idiot as well. The trashing of a woman's career, over the fact that she told the truth in a deposition, about a private conversation held thirty years ago, simply affords the trashers the ability to rationalize the fact that the real problems of racism in this country still persist, in spite of her public witch burning....
It's not like they've found the last racist in America, in Paula Deen....but they sure would like to think so.
Yes. It makes them feel good about themselves.
Racism is still rampant in this country. People (folks?) are just more careful about it. They see someone slip, and they say,'Well, he didn't Actually Say that, so it's OK.' But we all Know what he meant.
Look at zimmerman. He's going to get away with killing that black kid because of a bad law. And Aaron hernandez? He was making two million a year, and he couldn't get away from his 'gangster' mentality. You don't think some folks aren't looking at his laitno name and snickering at his situation? If you deny it, you're lying to yourself.(thats for everyone, Sis, not just you.)
remember the old saying, You can take the kid out of the country, but you can't take the country out of the kid.'
I'll bet that hernandez thinks his situation is someone else's fault. and zimmerman thinks he was right.
four people are dead, and neither of those two were 'right'.

“Unemployed Bush 5.3 obama 8.7”

Since: Jul 10

Location hidden

#163933 Jun 29, 2013
Rudyard Kiplingesque wrote:
<quoted text>Look at zimmerman. He's going to get away with killing that black kid because of a bad law.
George Zimmerman should get off because he was forced to defend himself in what he thought was a life threatening situation.

It appears to be a unfortunate misunderstanding by both Zimmerman and Trevon Martin that led to the confrontation that led to the situation. Zimmerman, a conscientious and over-zealous neighborhood watchman, thought Trevon looked, and acted suspiciously in a community that was plagued by crime. Trevon thought he had a "creepy ass cracker" following him, confronted George, threw the first punch, and then continued the assault.
Rudyard Kiplingesque wrote:
I'll bet that hernandez thinks his situation is someone else's fault. and zimmerman thinks he was right.
If Zimmerman was forced to defend his life in self-defense, he was right. Looking at the prosecution's evidence so far, Zimmerman's account of the situation has not been disproved, and may have been strengthened. Of course, we still need to hear from the field investigator,(who wanted to charge Zimmerman that night), the folks that treated Zimmerman's injuries, and the Medical Examiner.

If Zimmerman is found guilty, I think it will be for all the wrong reasons. I don't see any way the prosecution can develop a murder case against Zimmerman that meets the required "beyond a shadow of a doubt" criteria.

“Unemployed Bush 5.3 obama 8.7”

Since: Jul 10

Location hidden

#163934 Jun 29, 2013
Let me amend my first sentence in the preceeding message.

I believe that George Zimmerman should get off because he was forced to defend himself in what he thought was a life threatening situation, based on what I've seen, and heard, so far.

Since: Aug 11

Location hidden

#163935 Jun 29, 2013
Rudyard Kiplingesque wrote:
<quoted text>
Yes. It makes them feel good about themselves.
Racism is still rampant in this country. People (folks?) are just more careful about it. They see someone slip, and they say,'Well, he didn't Actually Say that, so it's OK.' But we all Know what he meant.
Look at zimmerman. He's going to get away with killing that black kid because of a bad law. And Aaron hernandez? He was making two million a year, and he couldn't get away from his 'gangster' mentality. You don't think some folks aren't looking at his laitno name and snickering at his situation? If you deny it, you're lying to yourself.(thats for everyone, Sis, not just you.)
remember the old saying, You can take the kid out of the country, but you can't take the country out of the kid.'
I'll bet that hernandez thinks his situation is someone else's fault. and zimmerman thinks he was right.
four people are dead, and neither of those two were 'right'.
It would appear as if Hernandez chose to embrace the thug life that led to people being killed. George Zimmerman should be found not guilty because of the abundance of reasonable doubt . The stand your ground law is not even a part of the case . Self defense however is.

“Rainbow: God's covenant ”

Since: May 07

Clearwater and Honolulu

#163936 Jun 29, 2013
Freebird USA wrote:
<quoted text>
I live in the south but was born and raised in NYC. I frequently read op-ed pieces from northern transplants talking about their apprehensions about moving south.Usually when some racial issue is in the news. They take the opportunity to pounce and praise the progressive utopia the left and take cheap shots at native southerners.Makes me wonder what made them leave in the first place.Bottom line is they are FOS. I lived there for 50 years and I say without reservation racism was rampant in NY, in both directions. At least in the south common courtesy is the norm unlike the abundance of rude self absorbed idiots inhabiting NY.BTW Emperor Bloomberg now wants to ban sparklers from July 4 celebrations.What a utopia.
Yes. I lived close enough to see it in Washington D.C. for 3 years. Also my pop was in Philly for a time when working for an airline and I didn't witness much brotherly love during a visit. Its the old saying if its so great why did you leave and move here? I hope I never have to step foot in some of these places again but if I did make I would make the best of it. Nobody wants to hear how you did it elsewhere. New York city is on another level. Looks like Weiner may win. Ha.

“Take It To The Limit”

Since: Mar 11

Location hidden

#163937 Jun 29, 2013
The regulations governing citizen groups like 'neighborhood watch' say that No officer, guard, or patrolperson, whichever is used in this instance, will carry or use a gun.
zimmerman was 'outside the law' when he pulled the gun, and committed an act of murder when he used it.
I say he had it because he wanted to know what it was like to kill someone.

“Rainbow: God's covenant ”

Since: May 07

Clearwater and Honolulu

#163938 Jun 29, 2013
Sister Kathryn Lust wrote:
<quoted text>Anyone who thinks supporting the pillory of Paula Deen means they're not a racist, indicates that they're an idiot as well. The trashing of a woman's career, over the fact that she told the truth in a deposition, about a private conversation held thirty years ago, simply affords the trashers the ability to rationalize the fact that the real problems of racism in this country still persist, in spite of her public witch burning....
It's not like they've found the last racist in America, in Paula Deen....but they sure would like to think so.
From the little I've learned of Deen this week she isn't a racist.

“Rainbow: God's covenant ”

Since: May 07

Clearwater and Honolulu

#163939 Jun 29, 2013
Rudyard Kiplingesque wrote:
The regulations governing citizen groups like 'neighborhood watch' say that No officer, guard, or patrolperson, whichever is used in this instance, will carry or use a gun.
zimmerman was 'outside the law' when he pulled the gun, and committed an act of murder when he used it.
I say he had it because he wanted to know what it was like to kill someone.
Really? I carry a cdl and as any driver knows you can't have a gun in the truck. That being said I've known drivers that go into high crime areas and do so anyway. The law is not always right. And if it does come to riots some people are going to have quite a wake up call.

Since: Aug 11

Location hidden

#163940 Jun 29, 2013
Chris Clearwater wrote:
<quoted text>
Yes. I lived close enough to see it in Washington D.C. for 3 years. Also my pop was in Philly for a time when working for an airline and I didn't witness much brotherly love during a visit. Its the old saying if its so great why did you leave and move here? I hope I never have to step foot in some of these places again but if I did make I would make the best of it. Nobody wants to hear how you did it elsewhere. New York city is on another level. Looks like Weiner may win. Ha.
Yes NY Post reports "Weiner Surges in Poll".

Since: Aug 11

Location hidden

#163941 Jun 29, 2013
Rudyard Kiplingesque wrote:
The regulations governing citizen groups like 'neighborhood watch' say that No officer, guard, or patrolperson, whichever is used in this instance, will carry or use a gun.
zimmerman was 'outside the law' when he pulled the gun, and committed an act of murder when he used it.
I say he had it because he wanted to know what it was like to kill someone.
Pure speculation.
1. Why call the police BEFORE shooting Martin?
2. Zimmerman's weapon was being legally carried.
3. Killing in self defense is a homicide but its not murder.

Since: Aug 11

Location hidden

#163942 Jun 29, 2013
Chris Clearwater wrote:
<quoted text>
Really? I carry a cdl and as any driver knows you can't have a gun in the truck. That being said I've known drivers that go into high crime areas and do so anyway. The law is not always right. And if it does come to riots some people are going to have quite a wake up call.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v =Ffb_IZ-iWK8XX
Better to be judged by 12 than carried by 6.

“Unemployed Bush 5.3 obama 8.7”

Since: Jul 10

Location hidden

#163943 Jun 29, 2013
Rudyard Kiplingesque wrote:
The regulations governing citizen groups like 'neighborhood watch' say that No officer, guard, or patrolperson, whichever is used in this instance, will carry or use a gun.
zimmerman was 'outside the law' when he pulled the gun, and committed an act of murder when he used it.
I say he had it because he wanted to know what it was like to kill someone.
I'd say that George Zimmerman had a weapon because he didn't want to find out what it was like to be killed... and he had a permit that legally entitled him to carry a concealed weapon. I suppose that's why George Zimmerman wasn't charged with illegally carrying a weapon.

It turned out that he needed that weapon to save his life.

“Unemployed Bush 5.3 obama 8.7”

Since: Jul 10

Location hidden

#163944 Jun 29, 2013
Freebird USA wrote:
<quoted text>
Better to be judged by 12 than carried by 6.
In Florida, it's a jury of six... all women.

Since: Aug 11

Location hidden

#163945 Jun 29, 2013
BobinTX wrote:
<quoted text>
In Florida, it's a jury of six... all women.
I know but it doesn't sound as good with 6and 6.

“I'm here with bells on.”

Since: Jul 12

Location hidden

#163946 Jun 30, 2013
BobinTX wrote:
<quoted text>
Here's an even better example of the "knowledge" of the obama voter.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v =Skw-0jv9ktsXX
There are literally hundreds of similar examples of "obama voters" on YouTube.
As there are hundreds of examples of 'low information' Congresscritters.....in Congress.

Oh, look - here's one now:

http://www.torontosun.com/2013/06/26/texas-re...

"A Republican state senator in Texas who sponsored a recently blocked abortion-restriction bill has some odd, and incorrect, ideas about how rape kits work.

In arguing against an amendment to her bill that would make exceptions for rape and incest victims, UPI reports Jodie Laubenberg said: "We have funded what's called rape kits that will help the woman, basically clean her out."

Rape kits collect potential DNA evidence from rape victims, but don't prevent or terminate pregnancy.

Laubenberg pushed a bill this week that would have banned abortions after 20 weeks in the state, and required all abortions to take place in surgical facilities, effectively shutting down most of the state's abortion centres.

But because of a lengthy filibuster by Sen. Wendy Davis, the vote was ruled too late for its midnight deadline Wednesday and didn't pass.

Davis stood for more than 10 hours straight without taking any food or bathroom breaks to block the vote."

Good thing ya'll have at least ONE 'high-information', not to mention highly motivated, one, in your abysmally misogynist State.

“Unemployed Bush 5.3 obama 8.7”

Since: Jul 10

Location hidden

#163947 Jun 30, 2013
Sister Kathryn Lust wrote:
<quoted text>As there are hundreds of examples of 'low information' Congresscritters.....in Congress.
Oh, look - here's one now:
http://www.torontosun.com/2013/06/26/texas-re...
"A Republican state senator in Texas who sponsored a recently blocked abortion-restriction bill has some odd, and incorrect, ideas about how rape kits work.
In arguing against an amendment to her bill that would make exceptions for rape and incest victims, UPI reports Jodie Laubenberg said: "We have funded what's called rape kits that will help the woman, basically clean her out."
Rape kits collect potential DNA evidence from rape victims, but don't prevent or terminate pregnancy.
Laubenberg pushed a bill this week that would have banned abortions after 20 weeks in the state, and required all abortions to take place in surgical facilities, effectively shutting down most of the state's abortion centres.
But because of a lengthy filibuster by Sen. Wendy Davis, the vote was ruled too late for its midnight deadline Wednesday and didn't pass.
Davis stood for more than 10 hours straight without taking any food or bathroom breaks to block the vote."
Good thing ya'll have at least ONE 'high-information', not to mention highly motivated, one, in your abysmally misogynist State.
We do have some "high quality representatives" in this state.

Eddie Bernice Johnson
http://www.dallasnews.com/news/politics/headl...

And the "winner"

Sheila Jackson Lee

"I am a queen, and I demand to be treated like a queen."

"Today, we have two Vietnams, side by side, North and South, exchanging and working. We may not agree with all that North Vietnam is doing, but they are living in peace. I would look for a better human rights record for North Vietnam, but they are living side by side."

"I happen to represent Enron here in Houston. We have many good corporate citizens here in Houston. Enron happened to have been one."



http://www.youtube.com/watch...

http://www.youtube.com/watch...

“Rainbow: God's covenant ”

Since: May 07

Clearwater and Honolulu

#163948 Jun 30, 2013
Lyndi wrote:
Alec Baldwin- democrat and liberal let loose with a horrific homophobic tweet 2 days after SCOTUS made their historic rulings with regards to gay marriage and prop 8 in CA.
(Oh yes and he's now sorry.)
http://www.foxnews.com/entertainment/2013/06/...
===
Considering Paula Deens entire life is coming apart at the seams and she's been beaten unmercifully for comments she made 30 years ago, I think it's only fair the Alec Baldwin lose his job as spokesperson for Capital One so I just sent off an email urging them to fire him.
If anyone is in the mood, here's the address.
[email protected]
Do as libs say, not as they do.

ABC News Defends Alec Baldwin, Calls Homophobic Attack ‘Alleged Slur’

Read more: http://newsbusters.org/blogs/noel-sheppard/20...

“On a sailing ship to nowhere”

Since: Jun 07

Colorado

#163949 Jun 30, 2013
HipGnozizzzzz wrote:
<quoted text>Roger that. In context, I thought it clear I was talking about the fact that no conservative apps were denied, since they were the alleged "victims", but it never hurts to be scrupulously accurate with the known facts. Leave the self-serving vagary and speculation to the wolf-spotter dweebs, right? Thx.
Gooda "see" ya, MaryCO of the High Country Far!
Good to see you too, buddy o' mine.
You were in context but there is always the little jots and tittles that add so much to the context. Conservative groups in the main were the target. It was far easier to consign them to bureaucratic Purgatory than to give reasons for denial that might just show their hand. The one lone Democrat affiliated group that got denied was so blatantly political that it couldn't be allowed the requested status. If the Conservative groups that ended up in a 3 year long limbo could have been so easily denied they would have been. That should say something about the nature of those groups. If they had been blatantly political they would have received quick denials. Instead they got the colonoscopy without the definitive results. A brilliant strategy for keeping leering eyes off the Obama Administrations strategery for thwarting Conservative leaning groups in the 2012 elections.

“On a sailing ship to nowhere”

Since: Jun 07

Colorado

#163950 Jun 30, 2013
Sister Kathryn Lust wrote:
<quoted text>As there are hundreds of examples of 'low information' Congresscritters.....in Congress.
Oh, look - here's one now:
http://www.torontosun.com/2013/06/26/texas-re...
...
Let's talk low information Congressman.
at about 1:20
He is worried that the Island of Guam will tip over due to an increase of Marines on the island.

Then there is Colorado's own beloved (snark) Dianna Degette who said this "I will tell you these are ammunition, they’re bullets, so the people who have those now they’re going to shoot them, so if you ban them in the future, the number of these high capacity magazines is going to decrease dramatically over time because the bullets will have been shot and there won’t be any more available." (April 2, 2013, Denver Post forum)
http://www.realclearpolitics.com/video/2013/0...

And meet Joe Salazar, another great Colorado Democrat who thinks campus safe zones are the way to curb violence on campus:“That’s why we have call boxes, that’s why we have safe zones, that’s why we have whistles, because you just don’t know who you’re going to be shooting at,” Mr. Salazar said.
He said he worried that armed women on campus could wind up shooting innocent bystanders.
“And you don’t know, if you feel like you’re going to be raped, or if you feel like someone’s been following you around, or if you feel like you’re in trouble, and when you may actually not be, that you pop out that gun and you pop around that somebody,” he said.

Read more: http://www.washingtontimes.com/blog/inside-po...
Follow us:@washtimes on Twitter

I'd rather someone be ignorant of what is in a rape kit. A rape kit is a rather banal object.

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Top Stories Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
Prove there's a god. (Mar '08) 5 min nanoanomaly 866,152
Jehovah's Witnesses are true disciple of Jesus ... (Mar '07) 9 min MUQ2 40,926
Poll Are Mexicans Taking Over America (May '13) 13 min Pine Nut 3
Poll Will US Govt close Mexican border? (Apr '09) 19 min Pine Nut 23
Poll should white men marry mexican women? (May '10) 22 min Pine Nut 6
News Roman Catholic church only true church, says Va... (Jul '07) 23 min USA Born 600,244
Gay sex in raigarh 49 min tiger 18
The Christian Atheist debate 1 hr Pipo Picolo Buu 2,135
Poll Was 9/11 a conspiracy?? (Oct '07) 2 hr onemale 272,469
Sleeping with mother (Oct '13) 2 hr imr 48
More from around the web