Just a Republican witch hunt???<quoted text>
Was planning to skip comment on this one, but it's so utterly childish & inane, I just couldn't let it go.
The gist is that the OPPOSITION (in here and elsewhere) is so ingrained in taking this beloved President down, that NO one cares
a whit about the 4 murdered victims, including Amb Cris Stevens in Benghazi, Libya.
One would think that you'd be just as interested in seeing full disclosure on EVERY single "scandal" as anyone else, regardless of
the picture it paints of your ELECTED President and his Administration. No. You'd rather speculate arrogantly that the opposition couldn't possibly care about the 4 murders in Benghazi. Or could it be that you'd also like to shift all the attention away from this beleaguered admin, if for nothing else, than for them to have time to regroup, or at least catch a breath of air?
Course, with help from some of the MSM, the main focus is how much the GOP stands to gain by endless Congressional hearings trying to get to the truth. Or as the Dems call it, "the latest witch hunt".
Problem is, this Administration is shooting ITSELF in the foot, with absolutely NO help from the GOP. And not just once (F & F), but one right after the other; Benghazi, IRS profiling, AP intrusion, Fox News' James Rosen's privacy invasion, and I believe there are more, out of different Obama departments.
So actually, your bored state doesn't seem to be so important anymore (IMO). Nah. I might be a bit more concerned about being one of the "enablers" that got this joker elected, TWICE!
That is, depending on the outcomes of the current "laundry list" of problems. The low-info supporters still LOVE Obama, no matter how hot the water gets.
Lois Lerner, a top IRS official in the non-profit division that paralyzed Tea Party groups with ongoing harassment, is expected to invoke the Fifth Amendment and refuse to answer questions during Congressional testimony schedule before the House Oversight Committee on Wednesday.
I know I'd never have to invoke the fifth for anything I did on my job. Why would she need to invoke the fifth if these activities were conducted by a couple of low level flunkies? Why would a public employee not want to answer questions from the peoples committee to oversee programs?
The minute that Lois Lerner refuses to answer questions from the peoples oversight committee as to what she was doing on her job, thereby refusing to tell us what she did for the money we pay her, we no longer need such an employee, and she should be immediately fired.
She may have a Constitutional right to invoke the Fifth Amendment, but she has no right to a public job where she will not disclose what she did/does for the $$$ we pay her.