“I'm here with bells on.”

Since: Jul 12

Location hidden

#162186 May 13, 2013
UidiotRaceMakeWOrldPeace wrote:
<quoted text>You really slap Robertg down to hell! BAHAHAHAHAA
I disagree.

Since: Apr 07

Location hidden

#162187 May 13, 2013
Sister Kathryn Lust wrote:
<quoted text>That makes two of us.
As you know, I didn't vote for Obama, and to the best of my knowledge, Soros hasn't run - sorry, but I don't have the sort of resources it would take, to revoke his freedom of speech...either personal or corporate.

If I was to post all the similarly politically-oriented efforts in the other direction, which have affected our political scene at LEAST as much as those of Soros, on the part of the Koch brothers, I would be here typing non-stop for three days. You're definitely the more dedicated between us.
Good job.
Thanks, but I wasn't THAT dedicated. If I had been, I'd have finished and posted all that two weeks ago.

Who said anything about revoking Soros' freedom of speech? I'm gonna say this one more time--and if anyone else on the thread thinks it's meant for them, then it probably is.

That string of posts is NOT meant as a jumping-off point for debating policy(ies). As you said, Kat, for that I could have been typing non-stop for days, and I haven't the slightest inclination to do that. My purpose in all those posts was ONLY to demonstrate the ties between Obama and Soros. Make of the information what you will :)

“I'm here with bells on.”

Since: Jul 12

Location hidden

#162189 May 13, 2013
UidiotRaceMakeWOrldPeace wrote:
<quoted text>Why
?
Ok then down to earth!
Firstly, because I don't believe in hell...

and secondly, because Roberta is relatively un-slappable...she doen't have the emotional investment in this forum that you evidently do.

:)

Since: Apr 07

Location hidden

#162191 May 13, 2013
HipGnosis wrote:
<quoted text>The Southern Poverty Law Center?
The NAACP?
The Young Women's Christian Association?
Really?
These are among the "leftist" groups that threaten to take down America?

Obviously you didn't write this. But what you've done by pasting it is align yourself with those who oppose - oppose - the democratic ideals that formed this country. You, through them, oppose the free exchange of ideas. You, through them, tacitly abhor the democratic process. You, through them, despise the idea that it's the amalgamating differences that make up the American melting pot that launched us ahead of the globe in the last century and a half. You, through them, would silence - not counter, but silence - any and all views different from your own. You would sanitize our society of dissent from your views. You would homogenize American society for YOUR comfort. How? By marginalizing them, misrepresenting them, demonizing them, making them pariah, labeling them traitors. Why? So your world will feel all cozy and clean....

ONLY for those whose views align with your own.
There ain't nuthin' American about that.
Good gawd. The NAACP. >Still< on the white-hot seat. Like the Prophet said, ain't nuthin' new under the sun.
I see this post of yours has already garnered two Clueless, one Nuts and one Spam icons. I'm not surprised. Obviously, Hip, you didn't bother to actually READ what those organizations do and stand for.

Some of them actually do work I not only agree with, but even admire. I admire efforts to get people registered to vote who never would have voted before, for instance. And being the fair, honorable, trustworthy (and modest) person I am, where those organizations do work that I can support, I was honor-bound to include them. I am not the kind of person who would deliberately omit information simply because it did not support my case. Hip, you've seriously disappointed me. By now you should know me better than that.

By the way, that post you addressed to me a couple of weeks ago, similar to this one--I plan to address that in the next couple of days, hopefully tomorrow.

Since: Apr 07

Location hidden

#162192 May 13, 2013
Correction--2 Clueless, 1 Nuts and 1 Disagree icons.

“Custer @ LBH - Ooops”

Since: Nov 07

Bakersfield, CA

#162193 May 13, 2013
WildWeirdWillie wrote:
<quoted text>You're putting your DESIRE for something to have been done (or done wrong) so far beyond our actual capabilities that it's not funny, especially the ease with which you dismiss the threat of SAMs, but I'll play along.
Was there a fighter squadron at Sig (there usually isn't)? What was its ready status (time required to launch)? How were the planes configured and armed, and (if necessary) how long would it take them to be ready for the mission you're tasking them with? What provisions had been made for refueling, if necessary? What intel did we have on SAMs among the militias active in Libya? What intel did we have on the relative positions of the good guys and bad guys (assuming the most positive arrangement of all the questions before, the most critical question of all)?
You have answers to those questions, bob - or is all you've got "well, we're good and we got good stuff and we shoulda done something" going for you?
Without answers to those questions, bob, you might as well re-fight the Battle of Midway or better penetrate the airspace around Hanoi during Rolling Thunder.
These links may answer some of your questions. I read all 5 of them, considered the source and went from there.

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-22307...

http://www.forbes.com/sites/larrybell/2012/10...

http://rt.com/usa/special-forces-benghazi-pur...

http://www.nypost.com/p/news/international/pr...

http://thinkprogress.org/security/2013/05/08/... #

This one I just found very interesting:
http://www.blackfive.net/main/2012/10/bigger-...

“I'm here with bells on.”

Since: Jul 12

Location hidden

#162194 May 13, 2013
Roberta G wrote:
<quoted text>
Thanks, but I wasn't THAT dedicated. If I had been, I'd have finished and posted all that two weeks ago.
Who said anything about revoking Soros' freedom of speech? I'm gonna say this one more time--and if anyone else on the thread thinks it's meant for them, then it probably is.
That string of posts is NOT meant as a jumping-off point for debating policy(ies). As you said, Kat, for that I could have been typing non-stop for days, and I haven't the slightest inclination to do that. My purpose in all those posts was ONLY to demonstrate the ties between Obama and Soros. Make of the information what you will :)
Given my unwillingness to spend three non-stop days typing, not to mention the countless hours of necessary research, I don't know this for a stone fact - but I'm relatively certain that a detailed synopsis of the Koch Brothers' political agenda, and efforts in the political spectrum, would be a stark indication of their hand in glove associations with Bush, Cheney, and Rumsfeld, not to mention with the American Legislative Exchange Council...and I am exceptionally opposed to the efforts of THAT worthy body... which seems to be setting policy for Republican candidates across the nation.

“Custer @ LBH - Ooops”

Since: Nov 07

Bakersfield, CA

#162196 May 13, 2013
HipGnosis wrote:
<quoted text>'Cos SecDef is just another joe's opinion....
No. Gate's is a politician not a fighter jet pilot.

“Custer @ LBH - Ooops”

Since: Nov 07

Bakersfield, CA

#162197 May 13, 2013
Sister Kathryn Lust wrote:
<quoted text>Given my unwillingness to spend three non-stop days typing, not to mention the countless hours of necessary research, I don't know this for a stone fact - but I'm relatively certain that a detailed synopsis of the Koch Brothers' political agenda, and efforts in the political spectrum, would be a stark indication of their hand in glove associations with Bush, Cheney, and Rumsfeld, not to mention with the American Legislative Exchange Council...and I am exceptionally opposed to the efforts of THAT worthy body... which seems to be setting policy for Republican candidates across the nation.
Are the Koch Bros. spending billions of $$ to change America to their vision of a secular-progressive socialist country? SOROS is!

Since: Sep 10

Long Beach, CA

#162198 May 13, 2013
Sister Kathryn Lust wrote:
<quoted text>Firstly, because I don't believe in hell...
and secondly, because Roberta is relatively un-slappable...she doen't have the emotional investment in this forum that you evidently do.
:)
Come on, you are a very nice person.

Give the guy a break--he means well.

Since: Sep 10

Long Beach, CA

#162199 May 13, 2013
Roberta G wrote:
<quoted text>
I see this post of yours has already garnered two Clueless, one Nuts and one Spam icons. I'm not surprised. Obviously, Hip, you didn't bother to actually READ what those organizations do and stand for.
Some of them actually do work I not only agree with, but even admire. I admire efforts to get people registered to vote who never would have voted before, for instance. And being the fair, honorable, trustworthy (and modest) person I am, where those organizations do work that I can support, I was honor-bound to include them. I am not the kind of person who would deliberately omit information simply because it did not support my case. Hip, you've seriously disappointed me. By now you should know me better than that.
By the way, that post you addressed to me a couple of weeks ago, similar to this one--I plan to address that in the next couple of days, hopefully tomorrow.
Those judgits must have come from your cohort.

Since: Sep 10

Long Beach, CA

#162200 May 13, 2013
Roberta G wrote:
Correction--2 Clueless, 1 Nuts and 1 Disagree icons.
Noted, Roberta.

I have placed it in the official book of Bush Is a Hero records.

Since: Sep 10

Long Beach, CA

#162201 May 13, 2013
Sister Kathryn Lust wrote:
<quoted text>Given my unwillingness to spend three non-stop days typing, not to mention the countless hours of necessary research, I don't know this for a stone fact - but I'm relatively certain that a detailed synopsis of the Koch Brothers' political agenda, and efforts in the political spectrum, would be a stark indication of their hand in glove associations with Bush, Cheney, and Rumsfeld, not to mention with the American Legislative Exchange Council...and I am exceptionally opposed to the efforts of THAT worthy body... which seems to be setting policy for Republican candidates across the nation.
I second that emotion.

Since: Sep 10

Long Beach, CA

#162203 May 13, 2013
bad bob wrote:
<quoted text>
Are the Koch Bros. spending billions of $$ to change America to their vision of a secular-progressive socialist country? SOROS is!
Don't be silly, bad bob.

OK, hope everybody is happy. We're stuck with one another here for our allotted time on earth, so we might as well try to make the most of it. We should all try to be friendly.:)

Catcher out.

“2016 No Clinton No Bush!”

Since: Dec 06

Lafayette IN

#162205 May 13, 2013
Roberta G wrote:
<quoted text>
I see this post of yours has already garnered two Clueless, one Nuts and one Spam icons. I'm not surprised. Obviously, Hip, you didn't bother to actually READ what those organizations do and stand for.
Some of them actually do work I not only agree with, but even admire. I admire efforts to get people registered to vote who never would have voted before, for instance. And being the fair, honorable, trustworthy (and modest) person I am, where those organizations do work that I can support, I was honor-bound to include them. I am not the kind of person who would deliberately omit information simply because it did not support my case. Hip, you've seriously disappointed me. By now you should know me better than that.
By the way, that post you addressed to me a couple of weeks ago, similar to this one--I plan to address that in the next couple of days, hopefully tomorrow.
I read what you posted about a few of the organizations I was familiar with, including the NAACP and SPLC.

The descriptions of them you posted are about as accurate as a description of the Family Research Council written by the most militant atheist gay organization that you can think of - and you've probably been told about one or two of those that are particularly dangerous.

With that in mind, I think it's perfectly appropriate that you claim the judicons as an indication of the value of your list.

“I'm here with bells on.”

Since: Jul 12

Location hidden

#162206 May 13, 2013
bad bob wrote:
<quoted text>
Are the Koch Bros. spending billions of $$ to change America to their vision of a secular-progressive socialist country? SOROS is!
No bob, they do not HAVE a vision of a secular-progressive socialist country...their vision is comprised of oligarcical and exclusionary aspirations...and, yes, they are spending BILLIONS of dollars, to influence elections... and plenty of political clout too, in the formation and furtherance of ALEC.

“I'm here with bells on.”

Since: Jul 12

Location hidden

#162207 May 13, 2013
Catcher1 wrote:
<quoted text>
Come on, you are a very nice person.
Give the guy a break--he means well.
Thanks for the compliment, but no.

I know he means well, but his approach generally only serves to make my teeth itch.

“Unemployed Bush 5.3 obama 8.7”

Since: Jul 10

Location hidden

#162208 May 13, 2013
Roberta G wrote:
<quoted text>
Good point :D
With all the rehearsing and filming, do you suppose the actors playing Tony, McGee, Ziva and Abby ever have concussions?
I love the whole bunch of 'em :) I can't believe I only started watching this show over the last couple of years! I should have started on it from the series premiere.
They have hours of reruns of NCIS on the USA and SLEUTH networks, and I watch the show a lot. Like you, I only started watching it a couple of years ago. Even with several cast changes, a real killer for some shows, the quality of the show has stayed the same.

Since: Sep 10

Long Beach, CA

#162209 May 13, 2013
Sister Kathryn Lust wrote:
<quoted text>Thanks for the compliment, but no.
I know he means well, but his approach generally only serves to make my teeth itch.
:)

Since: Apr 07

Location hidden

#162210 May 13, 2013
Rudyard Kiplingesque wrote:
<quoted text>
How did WIR steal BobbiG's avatar?
This scares the bejesus out of me. I keep thinking someone's gonna steal mine and have me saying nice things about obama.
Oh, yeah. The only reason michelle sold her aluminum foil dress is, she said it got wet, shrunk up and didn't fit her anymore.
Where on earth did I say anything nice about Obama?? Blackheart, when was the last time you had your eyesight checked?

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Top Stories Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
Prove there's a god. (Mar '08) 3 min Ooogah Boogah 777,965
Roman Catholic church only true church, says Va... (Jul '07) 5 min confrinting with ... 560,388
Which is the Oldest Indian Language? Sanskrit V... (Jul '08) 13 min putti 5,527
Why Should Jesus Love Me? (Feb '08) 19 min lil whispers 605,320
Jehovah's Witnesses are true disciple of Jesus ... (Mar '07) 33 min lovewithin 39,378
White Men, Would You Have A BABY by a Black Woman (Apr '10) 37 min that guy you know 464
Was 9/11 a conspiracy?? (Oct '07) 40 min Aura Mytha 265,422
Wake up, Black America!! (Sep '13) 4 hr yon 4,875
More from around the web