Bush is a hero

“Custer @ LBH - Ooops”

Since: Nov 07

Bakersfield, CA

#161892 May 11, 2013
Catcher1 wrote:
<quoted text>
It was a funny mistake, look it up.
http://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php...

“I'm here with bells on.”

Since: Jul 12

Location hidden

#161893 May 11, 2013
bad bob wrote:
http://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php...

If you scroll down to #3, you'll see why the Urban Dictionary is not the preferred source for definitive definitions....

:)

Since: Sep 10

United States

#161894 May 11, 2013
bad bob wrote:
Excellent!

Now look at the meaning of the word YOU wrote.
Lyndi

Sarasota, FL

#161895 May 11, 2013
"From boycotts to delays, Republicans using tough tactics to disrupt Obama agenda."
====

A political tip to the libs. Next time you pick a candidate you may want to think it through twice IF: 1) he's the furthest left liberal in the senate. 2} he starts talking about fundamentally changing America and 3) if he's a rookie.
Maybe, just maybe republicans won't fight him/her every step of the way.
Lyndi

Sarasota, FL

#161896 May 11, 2013
Catcher1 wrote:
<quoted text>
Excellent!
Now look at the meaning of the word YOU wrote.
Did you email Obama after the speech when he misprounounced Marine Corps and called it the Marine CORPSE?
Yep.
He said "Marine CORPSE" three times.

Our Commander in Chief and didn't know the 'P' is silent in one of our most respected branches of the military.

Let him know, will ya?
It's embarrassing.

“Take It To The Limit”

Since: Mar 11

Location hidden

#161897 May 11, 2013
Lyndi wrote:
"From boycotts to delays, Republicans using tough tactics to disrupt Obama agenda."
====
A political tip to the libs. Next time you pick a candidate you may want to think it through twice IF: 1) he's the furthest left liberal in the senate. 2} he starts talking about fundamentally changing America and 3) if he's a rookie.
Maybe, just maybe republicans won't fight him/her every step of the way.
You forgot stupid. barry's dumber than a box of democrats.
Yeah, yeah. So he went to harvard community college. Big deal. that school has no honor, morality, or integrity. also, barry lied to get in, illegally took financial aid by claiming to be a foreign student, and since he never revealed his grades, he was probably a token minority.

“Take It To The Limit”

Since: Mar 11

Location hidden

#161898 May 11, 2013
Lyndi wrote:
<quoted text>
Did you email Obama after the speech when he misprounounced Marine Corps and called it the Marine CORPSE?
Yep.
He said "Marine CORPSE" three times.
Our Commander in Chief and didn't know the 'P' is silent in one of our most respected branches of the military.
Let him know, will ya?
It's embarrassing.
Willie is gonna shoot you in the face with a bazooka for that one. He's going to call you an elitist, and say that you think you're hot shit because you know how to pronounce a word that king barry doesn't.
never mind. willie is just getting crabby in his old age. We all are, I think.
Oh, yeah. There is no jealousy in barry-the-dip getting into harvard community college. I got accepted to USC in 1977 on merit alone. My 3.72 GPA was enough. Didn't need any 'affirmative action' points.
Frankgurs

Pittsburgh, PA

#161899 May 11, 2013
youtube.com/watch... ……… Gave Peace a Last
YTube

AOL

#161900 May 11, 2013
.

Bible PROOF 1.5 MUSLIMS to die ---

http://youtu.be/n7ok0g8iwJI

.

“Custer @ LBH - Ooops”

Since: Nov 07

Bakersfield, CA

#161901 May 11, 2013
Catcher1 wrote:
<quoted text>
Excellent!
Now look at the meaning of the word YOU wrote.
No need, jackwad. Yes I put an "a" where an "o" should'a been.

But the entire world (minus you), knew EXACTLY what I meant on the original msg. Uh uh. You wanna be anal on a msg board with no edit feature. Here, GO "EFF" YERSELF!(look THAT up).

“2016 No Clinton No Bush!”

Since: Dec 06

Lafayette IN

#161902 May 11, 2013
Rudyard Kiplingesque wrote:
<quoted text>
Willie is gonna shoot you in the face with a bazooka for that one. He's going to call you an elitist, and say that you think you're hot shit because you know how to pronounce a word that king barry doesn't.
never mind. willie is just getting crabby in his old age. We all are, I think.
Oh, yeah. There is no jealousy in barry-the-dip getting into harvard community college. I got accepted to USC in 1977 on merit alone. My 3.72 GPA was enough. Didn't need any 'affirmative action' points.
There's nothing elitist about chickens**t, and making a big deal of a mispronounced word (Corps once or a couple of times, nuclear as part of a more general speech pattern) ain't nothing if it ain't chickens**t.

Can you say nuclear?

Willie doesn't have a lot to say about this thread. Been sick for a week and haven't check it out at all.

Didn't miss a damned thing.

There's no interest in any form of discussion left among most of the regulars here. There's no interest in discussing, say, what went wrong in Benghazi, or why available assets weren't set in, except in the context of how Obama screwed it up.

If you stray outside the context you are dismissed as blindly defending Obama, whether that's true or not. The concern does NOT seem to be with the four dead Americans; the concern seems to be with beating Obama with their bodies.

This has become a circle jerk.

Since: Sep 10

United States

#161903 May 11, 2013
Lyndi wrote:
<quoted text>
Did you email Obama after the speech when he misprounounced Marine Corps and called it the Marine CORPSE?
Yep.
He said "Marine CORPSE" three times.
Our Commander in Chief and didn't know the 'P' is silent in one of our most respected branches of the military.
Let him know, will ya?
It's embarrassing.
Yeah,he's working on it.

Have a nukelar day!

Since: Sep 10

United States

#161904 May 11, 2013
Lyndi wrote:
"From boycotts to delays, Republicans using tough tactics to disrupt Obama agenda."
====
A political tip to the libs. Next time you pick a candidate you may want to think it through twice IF: 1) he's the furthest left liberal in the senate. 2} he starts talking about fundamentally changing America and 3) if he's a rookie.
Maybe, just maybe republicans won't fight him/her every step of the way.
We don't really need tips from the party of no.

But thanks anyway.

Since: Sep 10

United States

#161905 May 11, 2013
bad bob wrote:
<quoted text>
No need, jackwad. Yes I put an "a" where an "o" should'a been.
But the entire world (minus you), knew EXACTLY what I meant on the original msg. Uh uh. You wanna be anal on a msg board with no edit feature. Here, GO "EFF" YERSELF!(look THAT up).
So, did you learn what cajones means?

Yes or no?

“Pillars of Creation....”

Since: Jan 11

Into this world we're thrown

#161906 May 11, 2013
WildWeirdWillie wrote:
<quoted text>There's nothing elitist about chickens**t, and making a big deal of a mispronounced word (Corps once or a couple of times, nuclear as part of a more general speech pattern) ain't nothing if it ain't chickens**t.
Can you say nuclear?
Willie doesn't have a lot to say about this thread. Been sick for a week and haven't check it out at all.
Didn't miss a damned thing.
There's no interest in any form of discussion left among most of the regulars here. There's no interest in discussing, say, what went wrong in Benghazi, or why available assets weren't set in, except in the context of how Obama screwed it up.
If you stray outside the context you are dismissed as blindly defending Obama, whether that's true or not. The concern does NOT seem to be with the four dead Americans; the concern seems to be with beating Obama with their bodies.
This has become a circle jerk.
Can Obama be defended in this Willie?

“Custer @ LBH - Ooops”

Since: Nov 07

Bakersfield, CA

#161907 May 11, 2013
WildWeirdWillie wrote:
<quoted text>There's no interest in any form of discussion left among most of the regulars here. There's no interest in discussing, say, what went wrong in Benghazi, or why available assets weren't set in, except in the context of how Obama screwed it up.
If you stray outside the context you are dismissed as blindly defending Obama, whether that's true or not. The concern does NOT seem to be with the four dead Americans; the concern seems to be with beating Obama with their bodies.
This has become a circle jerk.
RUBBISH W. Put yer big-boy pants back on and quit bleating.

You may be miffed because the heat's been turned up on the State Dept (Clinton), and by extension, Obama, But many of us are sick to death of this freakin' ROOKIE skating away from accountability, because of his color, popularity, and help from the MSM.

You voted for Obama instead of McCain, and instead of Romney, OK I get that. But I call other voters ENABLERS, because many were clueless, many low info, many scared hispanics, and scared women, too afraid to try Romney. And yes, Romney also didn't help himself when he should have, so much of the blame goes to him too.

There was a joint agreement to cover up the TERRORIST ATTACK, by
members of the State Dep't and probably Ben Rhodes, so that Obama's reelection campaign would not be sullied. Your claim that it's more about Obama's takedown, than it is about the 4 murdered
men is pure hogwash. How about the embarrassment of an inexperienced C-I-C to "sacrifice" those men for the purpose of his almighty campaign. How about the FAMILIES of the slain men wanting the GD TRUTH!

It's no surprise that you wanna see Obama, Clinton, and the rest of ObamaCo, emerge from these hearings smelling rosy. Often I felt the same way about BushCo. But when is enough gonna be enough? From Obamacare, to F & F to Benghazi, this admin can do NO wrong.

Sit on yer hands if you don't like the way this thread has been trending. I damn sure won't, whether it looks like a witch hunt or not.

“Unemployed Bush 5.3 obama 8.7”

Since: Jul 10

Location hidden

#161908 May 11, 2013
Lyndi wrote:
<quoted text>
By not sendng military assistance because they "couldn't get there in time" begs the question: how did the decision maker(s) know how long the attack would last?
Obviously, the answer is they didn't know. They didn't have a flipping clue if it was going to be over in 55 minutes or 15 hours. They HOPED the event would be mild and go by relatively unnoticed by the genius voters in this country and wind up being nothing more than a mild hiccup. The decision to not act was nothing more than placing a hopeful bet. Unfortnately, they used American lives as poker chips and lost.
After killing bin Laden, the President and his merry men didn't want the public to know about al-Qaeda in Libya and for all the low information Americans out there glued to news about the Kim Kardahian pregnancy, al-Qaeda is far from dead, is not on the run and in fact is spreading nicely throughout the middle east and Africa.....thank you very much.
You're addressing something I've wondered about. We sent nothing, except a couple of drones with cameras, to aid our people. AS it was, the attack lasted seven hours and came in two separate attacks. Who knew if there would be a third or forth attack, or if al-qaeda would have made a day of it... in which case we had more than enough time to send help. The truth is, our commander-in-chief had no clue how many attack waves were planned, or how long al-qaeda was going to keep attacking.

Without a declaration of war, obama had sole responsibility for committing American troops to fight on foreign soil. He chose to do nothing, and leave those Americans defenseless and on their own, against numerically superior forces and weapons.

When do we start getting the names of the people that made the decisions that caused this huge blunder, and the deaths of those four Americans? When do we see people getting fired... and we can start with Jay Carney.(I never though I'd say it, but Jay makes Robert Fibbs seem almost competent.

“2016 No Clinton No Bush!”

Since: Dec 06

Lafayette IN

#161909 May 11, 2013
Rider on the Storm wrote:
<quoted text>
Can Obama be defended in this Willie?
If you mean the role Obama actually played in using the "anger over the video" excuse for a significant amount of time - the answer is no.

Anyone who thinks that a) got more Americans killed, or b) was an election game changer, is stating nothing more than a completely subjective opinion with very little to back it up except party/ideological loyalty or blind hatred of Barack Obama.

After that ... before any need to defend Obama arises you first have to establish that Obama is responsible beyond the general "buck stops here"/chain of command ultimate responsibility.

“I'm here with bells on.”

Since: Jul 12

Location hidden

#161910 May 11, 2013
WildWeirdWillie wrote:
<quoted text>If you mean the role Obama actually played in using the "anger over the video" excuse for a significant amount of time - the answer is no.
Anyone who thinks that a) got more Americans killed, or b) was an election game changer, is stating nothing more than a completely subjective opinion with very little to back it up except party/ideological loyalty or blind hatred of Barack Obama.
After that ... before any need to defend Obama arises you first have to establish that Obama is responsible beyond the general "buck stops here"/chain of command ultimate responsibility.
You mean proof that Obama said "Screw the diplomats, I plan to get re-elected...and I don't care what it costs in American lives..."?

“Pillars of Creation....”

Since: Jan 11

Into this world we're thrown

#161911 May 11, 2013
Catcher1 wrote:
<quoted text>
So, did you learn what cajones means?
Yes or no?
You should go through your cajones and throw all your dirty magazines away..........And then grow some cojones and apologize to all the people you've played 'official topix spell checker' with..........

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Top Stories Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
Poll If you're Christain what kind are you? (Oct '07) 8 min -Stray Dog 6,406
No one should blaspheme Prophet Mohammad, peace... 12 min Just Think 836
Should I marry this ugly blonde German girl or ... 17 min Felix loves Alison 16
Prove there's a god. (Mar '08) 20 min ChristineM 863,982
The Christian Atheist debate 1 hr Justise_League 1,940
Tamil vs Kannada. Which one is the oldest langu... (Oct '12) 1 hr sangili karuppan 1,838
Which is the Oldest Indian Language? Sanskrit V... (Jul '08) 2 hr sangili karuppan 7,475
News Roman Catholic church only true church, says Va... (Jul '07) 3 hr pusherman_ 599,406
Poll Was 9/11 a conspiracy?? (Oct '07) 5 hr WasteWater 272,403
More from around the web