IN ADDITION:<quoted text>
You got it. Obama sacrificed 4 men's lives so that he could be reelected (IMO). And I also believe he would not have hesitated, had there been 40 or more, instead of just 4.
Jay Carney has been answering questions during a press conference, and struggling to balance what he said in the past on Benghazi, and what is taking place now. The CIA talking points warning of a planned terrorist attack in Libya was edited 12 times since being published, to eliminate the reference to terrorists.
ABC broke the story earlier and now all of the MSM has been pounding Carney over the lies told by this administration to downplay the attack, mainly for purposes of Obama's return to the throne. Previously only FOX had been running stories of what happened in Benghazi.
Incredibly, just minutes ago, a sitting member of the House Oversight committee (D)IL, told Cavuto that "IF the info was true, the blame rests at the CIA doorstep". Cavuto quickly reminded him, that someone OTHER than the CIA edited the talking points, so wouldn't the blame be placed there? The Congressman had no answer, and said the investigation was ongoing.
Earlier this committee member declared that this was "just a witch hunt to defame H Clinton, who leads the Presidential race for 2016 by a wide margin over ANYone opting to run against her."
Jay Carney has now been caught blatantly lying about the CIA talking Points. He said there was only 1 "stylistic" change, in rewording "consulate" (in Benghazi) to "facility". Eric Bolling on The Five, held up the CIA paper showing 146 word changes.
Victoria Newland, directly under H Clinton, wanted the term "terrorist attack" scrubbed from the CIA Talking Points because it put the State Dept, and the Administration in a bad light, for the reelection of Obama.
However, whatever turns up will likely not be an issue of legality, but a matter if gross negligence and incompetence.
Stay tuned fffffffolks, I think this is gonna be a good spanking.