Relatively, yes!<quoted text>Are you new to this whole following politics thing?
Except with past Presidents, did you EVER hear them say they wanted to fundamentally CHANGE America? And did they follow that up by doing just about everything possible to sink this FREAKIN'<quoted text>
I ask because you are trying to make a political point out of something that has affected every President in my memory.
I hate to break this to you, bob, but who's sitting in the White House isn't all that important to me. That's the reason that I've been saying for years that Obama, like Bush before him, ain't nothing but a President.
SHIP? Did they run up multi-TRILLION $$$ of debt during their 1st term alone, then refuse to make significant cuts to help reduce that debt? The "person sittin' in the WH" is the 3rd piece to a crucial puzzle. The EXECUTIVE branch can set the tone for the other 2 crucial pieces, and VETO anything he don't like.
Commendable as that is, I don't happen to share your benevolence related to this particular POTUS. If we're still in this shape or worse when 2016 rolls around,(and I believe we WILL be), I expect you to Google recipes for CROW. Otherwise, I'll concede to your seer political expertise in advance.<quoted text>
That doesn't mean I don't care; I do my bit to get the candidates I support elected. What it does mean is that my faith in this country doesn't ebb and flow because people pick a President or a Congress that I don't happen to agree with.
I'm pretty certain you read the start of that sentence! Specifically YOU were one of the folks I had in mind when I typed it. It's also the main reason I'm disappointed in your judgement<quoted text>
Then again ... I'm apparently by my nature at least disingenuous, right?
in 2008 AND for 2012. There's just no way (IMO) this man should've ever been enabled to the WH.