Bush is a hero
lisw

Lewis Center, OH

#159601 Feb 25, 2013
WildWeirdWillie wrote:
<quoted text>The help under Obamacare comes next year - the cuts come in the next several months.
Obamacare is intended to cut down on ER visits as a source of what most of us consider primary care. It should also reduce the amount of medical care county/city health departments have to deliver - but I don't know that it will eliminate all functions (and they have other functions).
Hm. Okay. Now as for the cuts that are supposed to occur in the next few months. At best they are a gross exaggeration. At worst a total fabrication. In reality there are no real cuts. Sequestration will prevent a huge growth in spending and cause some minor belt tightening. I'm for it.

“Help Cecil Help!”

Since: Dec 06

Lafayette IN

#159602 Feb 25, 2013
lisw wrote:
<quoted text>Hm. Okay. Now as for the cuts that are supposed to occur in the next few months. At best they are a gross exaggeration. At worst a total fabrication. In reality there are no real cuts. Sequestration will prevent a huge growth in spending and cause some minor belt tightening. I'm for it.
If you say so ...

“Pillars of Creation....”

Since: Jan 11

Into this world we're thrown

#159604 Feb 26, 2013
HipGnosis wrote:
<quoted text>Saw a report just like that....like, a year ago? Of course, there is, as Paul Harvey would say,..."the rest of the story." The survey was on employer-provided health insurance, and the >total< cost was projected to top $20K...in 2012. Total cost, meaning employee premiums (averaging something like 40%) PLUS employer pickup, which covered the rest. See what I mean? Just a little information fills out the story more clearly.
It's a pdf file so I won't link it, but "Milliman Medical Index" will getcha there.
And the rest of that story is how many companies have been granted waivers to Obamacare so they dont have to provide the insurance for their employees. And how many couples dont work for companies that employ over 50 people. And how many companies are reincorporating to avoid the 50 employee mark, and how many employers are dropping fulltime employees to 29 hour work weeks to avoid paying HC..........

I will add though that I hear the gov is going to pick up some that tab through subsidies and tax breaks..........I know there is more info to come out, but I also know of the skyrocketing costs of HI.........Again just a guess but I imagine the big increase is going to be in 2014..........

“Unemployed Bush 5.3 obama 8.7”

Since: Jul 10

Location hidden

#159605 Feb 26, 2013
WildWeirdWillie wrote:
<quoted text>If you say so ...
I know you moved, did you move to Washington, DC? That's the only place that I know of where they call it a "spending cut", when they are actually spending more than in the previous year.

"Baseline Budgeting", the religion of DC, and why we never see any "REAL" spending cuts.

“Help Cecil Help!”

Since: Dec 06

Lafayette IN

#159606 Feb 26, 2013
BobinTX wrote:
<quoted text>
I know you moved, did you move to Washington, DC? That's the only place that I know of where they call it a "spending cut", when they are actually spending more than in the previous year.
"Baseline Budgeting", the religion of DC, and why we never see any "REAL" spending cuts.
Huh?

If you're looking for someone to play semantic games, look elsewhere.

“Unemployed Bush 5.3 obama 8.7”

Since: Jul 10

Location hidden

#159607 Feb 26, 2013
WildWeirdWillie wrote:
<quoted text>Huh?
If you're looking for someone to play semantic games, look elsewhere.
The "Low information" voter... barry's "baseline".

“Help Cecil Help!”

Since: Dec 06

Lafayette IN

#159608 Feb 26, 2013
BobinTX wrote:
<quoted text>
The "Low information" voter... barry's "baseline".
So I'm a low information voter because I won't play your little games?

“Custer @ LBH - Ooops”

Since: Nov 07

Bakersfield, CA

#159609 Feb 27, 2013
WildWeirdWillie wrote:
<quoted text>So I'm a low information voter because I won't play your little games?
Pretty sure you know exactly who the low information voters are.

“Help Cecil Help!”

Since: Dec 06

Lafayette IN

#159610 Feb 27, 2013
bad bob wrote:
<quoted text>
Pretty sure you know exactly who the low information voters are.
Why do I think you and I have widely different views on who the 'low information voters' are?

The loud belly-aching I hear about 'low information voters' from some sources lately just sounds like sore losers searching desperately for somebody to blame.

“The future begins”

Since: Jul 07

every moment

#159611 Feb 27, 2013
bad bob wrote:
<quoted text>
Pretty sure you know exactly who the low information voters are.
I suppose you could go back to Sept/Oct and find all those pre-celebrating a landslide victory for the RNC across the board for a start....

“I'm here with bells on.”

Since: Jul 12

Location hidden

#159612 Feb 27, 2013
Sequestration is like not having the willpower to diet, so you rig the refrigerator to blow up when you open it...

-Bill Maher.

(Couldn't help it......that was too accurate and funny not to share.)
lisw

Lewis Center, OH

#159613 Feb 27, 2013
WildWeirdWillie wrote:
<quoted text>Why do I think you and I have widely different views on who the 'low information voters' are?
The loud belly-aching I hear about 'low information voters' from some sources lately just sounds like sore losers searching desperately for somebody to blame.
I suppose it's beyond your scope of understanding to think that people aren't sore losers for that long. It is beyond you to look at how strange the actions of this president are. Example would be charging people for meetings with him. Another is his swearing he'd have transparency and he is so opaque. I suppose it will take a history book ten years from now to see any truth about this president. In the present you are absolutely myopic. I can accept that, but you need to realize that people's criticism of Barack Obama is out of real concern. Romney (and it took a few seconds to remember his name) is not even a blip on "my" radar screen.

“Rainbow: God's covenant ”

Since: May 07

Clearwater, FL

#159614 Feb 27, 2013
HipGnosis wrote:
<quoted text>I suppose you could go back to Sept/Oct and find all those pre-celebrating a landslide victory for the RNC across the board for a start....
Or we could look here...

“Rainbow: God's covenant ”

Since: May 07

Clearwater, FL

#159615 Feb 27, 2013
lisw wrote:
<quoted text>I suppose it's beyond your scope of understanding to think that people aren't sore losers for that long. It is beyond you to look at how strange the actions of this president are. Example would be charging people for meetings with him. Another is his swearing he'd have transparency and he is so opaque. I suppose it will take a history book ten years from now to see any truth about this president. In the present you are absolutely myopic. I can accept that, but you need to realize that people's criticism of Barack Obama is out of real concern. Romney (and it took a few seconds to remember his name) is not even a blip on "my" radar screen.
Yes and here in the present is where we live. Gas is now almost 80 cents more than it was in Nov here and the main reason I'm starting a new job next week. I will bring home just a bit less but take what has been a 104 mile round trip to work and now be doing less than 40 so its a win. I also see no reason to better myself right now as so called leadership has a war on success.

“Custer @ LBH - Ooops”

Since: Nov 07

Bakersfield, CA

#159616 Feb 27, 2013
WildWeirdWillie wrote:
<quoted text>Why do I think you and I have widely different views on who the 'low information voters' are?
The loud belly-aching I hear about 'low information voters' from some sources lately just sounds like sore losers searching desperately for somebody to blame.
There is NO desperation about it. Without the young people who don't follow politics and couldn't name pictures of the vice president, house speaker, and many more, and without the minority vote, also low info voters, Obama goes back to Chicago.

And I know for certain both you and HipGnosis are well aware of this block of voters who got Barry reelected.

“Custer @ LBH - Ooops”

Since: Nov 07

Bakersfield, CA

#159617 Feb 27, 2013
HipGnosis wrote:
<quoted text>I suppose you could go back to Sept/Oct and find all those pre-celebrating a landslide victory for the RNC across the board for a start....
Deflective humor. Kudos.
lisw

Lewis Center, OH

#159618 Feb 27, 2013
bad bob wrote:
<quoted text>
There is NO desperation about it. Without the young people who don't follow politics and couldn't name pictures of the vice president, house speaker, and many more, and without the minority vote, also low info voters, Obama goes back to Chicago.
And I know for certain both you and HipGnosis are well aware of this block of voters who got Barry reelected.
BB, without his ideology, Willie would not be able to support this president. Have you noticed that he does not attempt to defend Obama? He merely attacks is detractors. Seems to me there was a similar occurence about 1861. Remember Willie?

“The future begins”

Since: Jul 07

every moment

#159619 Feb 27, 2013
bad bob wrote:
<quoted text>
Deflective humor. Kudos.
Just tryin' to help out a pal.

“The future begins”

Since: Jul 07

every moment

#159620 Feb 27, 2013
lisw wrote:
<quoted text>I suppose it's beyond your scope of understanding to think that people aren't sore losers for that long. It is beyond you to look at how strange the actions of this president are. Example would be charging people for meetings with him. Another is his swearing he'd have transparency and he is so opaque. I suppose it will take a history book ten years from now to see any truth about this president. In the present you are absolutely myopic. I can accept that, but you need to realize that people's criticism of Barack Obama is out of real concern. Romney (and it took a few seconds to remember his name) is not even a blip on "my" radar screen.
Well, you can expand it as you please but let's please stay focused for a moment. How much mileage you think there is on that "low-information voter" clinker?

“The future begins”

Since: Jul 07

every moment

#159621 Feb 27, 2013
lisw wrote:
<quoted text>BB, without his ideology, Willie would not be able to support this president. Have you noticed that he does not attempt to defend Obama? He merely attacks is detractors. Seems to me there was a similar occurence about 1861. Remember Willie?
I'd say there's where you're wrong. There are some serious deficiencies in this admin, the worst of which (IMO) conservatives can't bring themselves to admit is even a problem. Conservatives would rather spend their time talking about subjective vagaries like "transparency", birtherism, creeping socialism, death panels, paling around with terrorists, and such blather. So there's little room for anything to talk about in criticism.

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Top Stories Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
The Christian Atheist debate (Jun '15) 1 min Bongo 37,853
Why do white men hate white women who want blac... (May '11) 3 min Amandapanda19 4,075
News Roman Catholic church only true church, says Va... (Jul '07) 21 min truth 641,244
my name is lorna and morrcan cock is biggest 29 min lorna 1
Prove there's a god. (Mar '08) 45 min Broken Record 969,916
Jehovah's Witnesses are true disciple of Jesus ... (Mar '07) 46 min MUQ2 44,304
ye olde village pub (Jun '07) 48 min Ruby88 53,750
Why Should Jesus Love Me? (Feb '08) 1 hr Peace_Warrior 618,359
Poll Is homosexuality a sin? (Oct '07) 2 hr Anna 104,617
More from around the web