Bush is a hero

“Jesus is coming soon”

Since: Nov 09

Location hidden

#155816 Nov 27, 2012
okb2 wrote:
<quoted text>
Lets not only remember what President Obama was handed in January 2009, but the willingness (or lack of) of the Republican Party to come to the aid of this nation in its time of need. Instead, they looked at politics and said "Lets make this President a one term President." Politicas over nation it is the Republican way.
Exactly, the so called rights true underlying agenda was not to work with him for the good of the country but to try and block him on every issue that didn't jive with their own so the number one mission was to prevent his second term at all cost.
Lyndi

Sarasota, FL

#155818 Nov 27, 2012
LAWEST100 wrote:
<quoted text> ..... as I've said in a post earlier today that there are a slightly higher percentage of white people on welfare but because we are so much fewer in this country the number of blacks on walfare are still only less than a few hundred thousand.
"Less than a few hundred thousand?"
Who told you that?

It's my understanding that 450,000+- African Amercans are in prison which means the taxpayer is paying for their room and board so your figures are way off on that basis alone. Of the incarcerated, thousands have left behind wives and children who without a man to help support them, the ripple effect has taken hold and most of them are on welfare/government assistance too...they have wound up in the taxpayer supported foster care program, housing programs, food stamps etc.
You may want to double check your sources and forget percentages. Look specifically at per capita stats.

Since: Jul 12

Fort Huachuca, AZ

#155819 Nov 27, 2012
LAWEST100 wrote:
<quoted text> I ask the question to see the response that I would get from her, but I see that I've got you going.
Why would the House vote on the Obama budget knowing it was not going to pass and then have people defending the House on other things of political value saying "If it would not happen, why do it?"

For political points, the same reason they voted on the Obama budget. To make their position known.
Lyndi

Sarasota, FL

#155820 Nov 27, 2012
okb2 wrote:
<quoted text>
And yet, Saddam was close to being an enemy of Al Qaeda.
Ah, there's my sparring partner... hiya okb. Hope you had a nice Thanskgiving.
Did you pluck your own turkey?

Since: Jul 12

Fort Huachuca, AZ

#155821 Nov 27, 2012
bad bob wrote:
<quoted text>
He has NOT taken responsibility for F&F OR Benghazi. His best friend Eric Holder was mysteriously cleared of the F&F scandal, which also mysteriously cleared him.
And Obama is citing an ongoing Benghazi "investigation" on what exactly took place and when. Unless you have very recent info.
I think what you refer to is the C-I-C standard policy of "taking responsibility" for what happens down the chain. It's only a blanket statement in which NO punishment is administered.
But I believe there's a coverup to protect the election campaign, and now it's gone too far to turn back. In 4 years, the heat will be gone, and barry won't care what turns up. The congressional commitee in charge of the investigation has vowed to find out what happened and who was involved.
Yes Bob, how much involvement in F&F must the Republicans have to clear Holder and the President and not say another word. What are they trying to hide? Especially after all of the indignant presentations we have heard from Issa concerning the matter. They must have found something that was worth convicting bush of crimes....what else could it be?

On Benghazi the President clearly said the buck stops on his desk. Because you are too blind with Obama hate to remember or know it is your problem.

Since: Jul 12

Fort Huachuca, AZ

#155822 Nov 27, 2012
bad bob wrote:
<quoted text>
Obama's agenda is to rip this country apart, end capitolism and install socialism in its place.
I think you and the other Obama fans have made a TERRIBLE mistake.
Course I'm too old for it to matter, but our sons, daughters & grandkids are the ones that WILL be suffering.
Interesting you being on the same side as World.

Since: Jul 12

Fort Huachuca, AZ

#155823 Nov 27, 2012
Lyndi wrote:
<quoted text>
"Less than a few hundred thousand?"
Who told you that?
It's my understanding that 450,000+- African Amercans are in prison which means the taxpayer is paying for their room and board so your figures are way off on that basis alone. Of the incarcerated, thousands have left behind wives and children who without a man to help support them, the ripple effect has taken hold and most of them are on welfare/government assistance too...they have wound up in the taxpayer supported foster care program, housing programs, food stamps etc.
You may want to double check your sources and forget percentages. Look specifically at per capita stats.
So we now consider incarceration welfare? Well we can save a mint just letting those people go home and stop getting all that welfare.

Since: Jul 12

Fort Huachuca, AZ

#155824 Nov 27, 2012
Lyndi wrote:
<quoted text>
Ah, there's my sparring partner... hiya okb. Hope you had a nice Thanskgiving.
Did you pluck your own turkey?
Hope you and yours remained safe and happy over the Holiday. Hey, if you did there is no reason to stop now.

Did not pluck it, but in our household we have a tradition of the males cooking the meal on holidays because normally throughout the weeks the women cook more.

I prepared the Turkey, Ham and Collard Greens. The son-in-law did Mac-N-Cheese, made real Cranberry Sauce and Carrots. A family Friend did Cornbread stuffing and Gravy. As a special request my wife made Pumpkin Cheesecake the night prior. We also had Sweet Potatoes but can't remember who did them.

My shirts are a little tighter this week for some reason.
Lyndi

Sarasota, FL

#155826 Nov 27, 2012
okb2 wrote:
<quoted text>
So we now consider incarceration welfare?
WELFARE
.......aid to people in need: financial aid and other benefits for people who are unemployed, below a specific income level, or otherwise requiring assistance, especially when provided by a government agency, taxes or programs.
===
I'm sorry. Did you think those incarcerated paid their own way?

Since: Jul 12

Fort Huachuca, AZ

#155829 Nov 27, 2012
bad bob wrote:
<quoted text>
Obama's agenda is to rip this country apart, end capitolism and install socialism in its place.
I think you and the other Obama fans have made a TERRIBLE mistake.
Course I'm too old for it to matter, but our sons, daughters & grandkids are the ones that WILL be suffering.
Bottom Line: Why Gamble on the New Guy when the one you have works?

http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2012-11-27/cons...

Since: Jul 12

Fort Huachuca, AZ

#155830 Nov 27, 2012
Lyndi wrote:
<quoted text>
WELFARE
.......aid to people in need: financial aid and other benefits for people who are unemployed, below a specific income level, or otherwise requiring assistance, especially when provided by a government agency, taxes or programs.
===
I'm sorry. Did you think those incarcerated paid their own way?
Were they in need before you decided to forcibly put them on welfare?

Since: Aug 11

Location hidden

#155831 Nov 27, 2012
nebka wrote:
Wastewater you are nuts!!!! You belong in the Laughing Academy you will fit in well there.
There was no government conspiracy on 9/11
Answer this if you can if the government was behind 9/11 who flew the planes that day? Would the pilots commit suicide if the government was behind it.
What happened to the passengers that day?
Were they taken off the planes? Were they all in on this plot?
It was a bunch of extremest that flew the planes that day
You haven't looked at any of the footage which proves otherwise.

Good questions though.

1. PNAC documents at the time revealed a desire for a "Pearl Harbor" type event to justify American invasion of the Middle East and to establish western style democracies.

2. WTC7 was demolished professionally. This required a significant lead time. Larry Silverstein, leaseholder for WTC properties insured those properties three weeks prior to the event.

3. A cruise missle hit the Pentagon. According to people who were at the scene, there was no airplane debris or fuel. The hole in the building was the size a missile would make until the structure collapsed.

In answer to your questions.

Nobody knows for certain and those who do are not telling.

Possibilities? The plane's autopilot was rigged or the ones which hit the towers were indeed hijacked but enabled to carry out their mission. The towers were obviously structurally compromised just below the point of impact. It is clear in the footage that structural members in the corners were cut with termite type devices as we can see the plasma flows. The FEMA commentator must have known exactly how the buildings would collapse prior to 9/11. It was a brain-washing indoctrination Rove style technique. The footages were played over and over along with the inserted documentary. The so called eye-witness to the Pentagon bombing was another plant and professional commentator. His story was a lie and debunked by real witnesses. His line of sight and claims were impossible.

Who knows were the real plane went? At some point it went off the radar. Why trust the government? You really think it is in their interest to protect you? Who do they work for? Who buys them?

You are gullible and indoctrinated. Turn off your TV set.

“Custer @ LBH - Ooops”

Since: Nov 07

Bakersfield, CA

#155832 Nov 27, 2012
karl47 wrote:
The Tea Partiers like to constantly claim they are not racist.....
If they are not racists why then do they continually say things like this...
President Barack Obama is a "witch doctor"
Claim the President has "secret" plans for "white slavery"
Likens the American tax payers as N----ers
Etc...etc...
The Tea Partiers feel a loss … like their status has been diminished
Well guess what IT HAS there are not enough of you white racists to make ANY POLITICAL difference....anymore
Get use to being the minority and move along we GOOD Patriotic Americans have work to do....Fixing what you racist war mongers screwed up.
Dream away, biyatch!

You're celebrating that many minorities came here ILLEGALLY, not to mention being unable to keep their legs together and their pants zipped up.

Good patriots?? Nah. "Stupid" is closer. But take your msg out amongst the people anyway. I'm sure many of them would LOVE to hear you speak. Go ahead, you'll be safe.

Lyndi

Sarasota, FL

#155833 Nov 27, 2012
LAWEST100 wrote:
<quoted text> I have sacrificed nothing, Abortion is a non factor in my reasons for voting for who I did.
Remember me? I was {I think} the only pro choicer on the abortion thread who didn't jump all over you for your God inspired pro life position. I'm surprised to see God took a backseat with you on election day when you have preached repeatedly that God is most important above ALL else.
LAWEST100 wrote:
<quoted text> I'm sorry but you do err through not having an understanding of the scriptures, abortion is covered under the commandment of thou shall not kill.
Pray for an understanding of God's Word.
LAWEST100 wrote:
<quoted text> But your unbelief is not going to allow you to get away, read Hebrews 2:3.
LAWEST100 wrote:
<quoted text>
First pray and then read the 1st chapter of 1si corinthians to understand what I'm trying to tell you, that which you believe to be "commonsense" really doesn't apply here, abortion IS murder.
=======
I have to tell you that most of them on that thread would be pleased you voted for Obama but I'm afraid they'd laugh their heads off if they knew YOU did. The self righteous preaching/teaching you do doesn't coincide with casting a vote for a very, VERY pro choice, pro gay marriage presidential candidate.
Your religious grandiosity would go kaput and your credibility >>> whooooooooooosh, right out the window!
It doesn't matter to me who you voted for but it might behoove you to know that anyone who preaches life is a gift from God and votes for a proponent of in your words, "murdering the most innocent among us" is a wee bit mixed up.
I'll borrow a play from your playbook and leave you with this one.

Exodus 20:3 "You shall have no other gods before me.

That it would seem to me, includes Barack Obama.
Lyndi

Sarasota, FL

#155834 Nov 27, 2012
okb2 wrote:
<quoted text>
Were they in need before you decided to forcibly put them on welfare?
Pass me some of that pumpkin cheesecake.
Lyndi

Sarasota, FL

#155836 Nov 27, 2012
karl47 wrote:
<quoted text>
Tom Ricks Pulitzer Prize winning reporter said Benghazi (gunfight) was generally hyped for political gain.
He is not alone in his recognition of what FoxNOISE has lowered it's standard of pseudo-journalism to.
You need a new "News" source.
It has nothing to do with a news source. FOX just kept the story alive when the President, those on his coattails, the media, et al wanted to bury it.

There is a senate investigation ongoing which is no small deal, Susan Rice may well receive blocking if Obama nominates her for Secretary of State because of her Sunday morning youtube tour, H. Clinton will testify last I knew, Petraeus already has, the families of the dead want answers......

The Ben Ghazi incident has reached a level way beyond FOX news, Karl.

Since: Aug 11

Location hidden

#155837 Nov 27, 2012
Lyndi wrote:
<quoted text>
It has nothing to do with a news source. FOX just kept the story alive when the President, those on his coattails, the media, et al wanted to bury it.
There is a senate investigation ongoing which is no small deal, Susan Rice may well receive blocking if Obama nominates her for Secretary of State because of her Sunday morning youtube tour, H. Clinton will testify last I knew, Petraeus already has, the families of the dead want answers......
The Ben Ghazi incident has reached a level way beyond FOX news, Karl.
i want answers to 9/11

You think I'll get them?

ROTFLMAO

Since: Aug 11

Location hidden

#155838 Nov 27, 2012
Our government is concerned with our safety?

Patriot Act.

Homeland Security protects us?

You must be kidding me.

Since: Aug 11

Location hidden

#155839 Nov 27, 2012
TSA searching old ladies?

This makes us safe?

“Custer @ LBH - Ooops”

Since: Nov 07

Bakersfield, CA

#155840 Nov 27, 2012
WasteWater wrote:
TSA searching old ladies?
This makes us safe?
Old ladies and children, pw. Because ruthless terrorists will use ANYone to accomplish their horrific goals.

Goals that include destroying YOU & your family. Wake up.

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Top Stories Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
The Christian Atheist debate (Jun '15) 8 min nanoanomaly 87,969
Poll Was 9/11 a conspiracy?? (Oct '07) 23 min crucifiedguy 284,507
FATIH SIEMENS Servisi (2I2) 2O2 62 35 SIEMENS F... 42 min buzser 1
Siemens Cerrahpasa Siemens Servisi (2I2) 2O2 62... 45 min buzser 1
Prove there's a god. (Mar '08) 49 min Devil number 666 977,214
Christians cannot debate with ATHEISTS 52 min Truthiness 480
Secular Humanism VS Christianity 1 hr Truthiness 28
News Roman Catholic church only true church, says Va... (Jul '07) 1 hr -KENTUCKY- 665,191
More from around the web