Bush is a hero

“I'm here with bells on.”

Since: Jul 12

Location hidden

#155396 Nov 23, 2012
Chris Clearwater wrote:
<quoted text>
Tolerance on display. Not. Carry on.
"...Many evangelicals will be shocked to learn there are Palestinian Christians living under Israeli occupation. But that shouldn’t be the reason to care. Regardless of the religion or ethnicity of the people caught up in this conflict, there are two peoples with two stories, and if you want to figure out how to be a peacemaker, to take what Jesus said seriously, then it behooves you to be able to listen to the other and ask,“What do I really need to do to be a reconciler in this very broken place?”

Christians would be wise to ponder that important question."
- Kristen Powers

“Unemployed Bush 5.3 obama 8.7”

Since: Jul 10

Location hidden

#155397 Nov 23, 2012
WasteWater wrote:
<quoted text>
What a jackass. I proved Bush lied and you bring up a red herring.
What a moron!!!
The government can't be trusted and you are still play good guys and bad guys. What an indoctrinated dufus.
You brought up ancient history and insignificant tripe... I gave you a current, and very significant, example of a pResident intentionally misleading the public, and you immediately jam your head up your hiney and cry foul.

Have a nice day in your "truther facts" world.

“Unemployed Bush 5.3 obama 8.7”

Since: Jul 10

Location hidden

#155398 Nov 23, 2012
WasteWater wrote:
Care to talk about FEMA? How about FEMA camps, Homeland Security and the Patriot Act? Our freedom disappeared under the War Criminal Bush and the gutless teabag Republicans have no courage to set things right again. What a bunch of gutless wonders.
It's hard to beat a Santa Claus with no fiscal responsibility.

“Unemployed Bush 5.3 obama 8.7”

Since: Jul 10

Location hidden

#155399 Nov 23, 2012
Force Manure wrote:
<quoted text>
I think that we can all agree with that.
<quoted text>
It's seems as though it's you who believes in fairy tales. Your credibility is rock bottom ... and I've only just met you. I can hardly wait to see what you'll say next and I'm sure it'll be a real beauty.
Wow, the forum is getting infested with "truthers". The asylums must have let their patients out for the holidays?

“Unemployed Bush 5.3 obama 8.7”

Since: Jul 10

Location hidden

#155400 Nov 23, 2012
WasteWater wrote:
<quoted text>
What a jackass. I proved Bush lied and you bring up a red herring.
You proved nothing, "truther"... you simply made an unsubstantiated and unproven claim. Besides, it' much ado about nothing, but I'm sure to the "truther" crowd, it's very important.

“Unemployed Bush 5.3 obama 8.7”

Since: Jul 10

Location hidden

#155401 Nov 23, 2012
jake12 wrote:
<quoted text>
Worse, I don't know about. And is Obama an improvement over Bush? I'd still say he is. However, there's no denying that the NDAA... the Patriot Act... the drone wars... these things are black marks against his record, without a doubt. I support Obama generally, but not on these points. They're wrong decisions and you're right to call them out.
obama... Nobel PEACE Prize winner!

“Unemployed Bush 5.3 obama 8.7”

Since: Jul 10

Location hidden

#155402 Nov 23, 2012
Force Majeure wrote:
<quoted text>
Well, the only act of 'force majeure' excuse that could apply to Saddam having WMD's in Irak would have been if a hurricane had blown them in from the U.S. or from Israel, but as Saddam had no WMD's then he was completely innocent of the charge, hurricanes not-withstanding.
WMD's, which President Clinton, most world leaders, and a huge majority of Congress believed Saddam had.

http://www.snopes.com/politics/war/wmdquotes....

President Bush43 made sure that if there were any, Saddam wouldn't be using them.
Force Majeure wrote:
Considering the UN forbade the U.S. from invading, that makes Bush and his whole government guilty of breaking international law because (as you so correctly pointed out) "breaking the law, for whatever the reason, is still against the law." That fact would have made the U.S. guilty even IF Saddam DID have WMD's.
What does unanimous mean to you?

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_Nations_S...

Besides, we don't look to the UN to provide for our defense against our enemies. We have our Constitution, our Congress, and our President to provide for our security.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Iraq_Resolution

Since: Aug 11

Location hidden

#155403 Nov 23, 2012
Sister Kathryn Lust wrote:
<quoted text>Obama had the power to refuse to sign the NDAA.
He signed it, instead.
One of his 2008 campaign promises, was to at least make an effort to get rid of the Patriot Act. He did not.
He bolstered it, instead.
These are not the acts of a gutless wonder - they are the acts of a determinedly Unconstitutional subversive, who just happens to be the President of the United States of America.
Doesn't make Bush right - but Obama's no better, and arguably worse.
What a spineless whip huh? Our government cannot protect us. We will never be safe if we sacrifice freedom for safety. We now live in a police state.

Since: Aug 11

Location hidden

#155404 Nov 23, 2012
BobinTX wrote:
<quoted text>
WMD's, which President Clinton, most world leaders, and a huge majority of Congress believed Saddam had.
http://www.snopes.com/politics/war/wmdquotes....
President Bush43 made sure that if there were any, Saddam wouldn't be using them.
<quoted text>
What does unanimous mean to you?
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_Nations_S...
Besides, we don't look to the UN to provide for our defense against our enemies. We have our Constitution, our Congress, and our President to provide for our security.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Iraq_Resolution
Bush was just a pathetic liar and mouthpiece for the New World Order, whoever they are.

Since: Aug 11

Location hidden

#155405 Nov 23, 2012
Bush was less than B-movie material.

Since: Aug 11

Location hidden

#155406 Nov 23, 2012
BobinTX wrote:
<quoted text>
Your credibility is really taking a big hit. Do you believe in the tooth fairy too?
I believe what I can plainly see.

1. Silverstein, the owner of WTC7 said plainly that the building was pulled meaning demoed.

2. Shortly before demolition, an official came and told people to clear out because the building was full of explosives.

3. Cars, buses and trucks in that area were incinerated by a pyroclastic flow.

4. The 46 story building can be seen deflecting downward in the middle first and falling into a very neat pile of rubble within the footprint.

5. BBC released a story an hour before demolition of WTC7 that it had fallen. They later called it a "cock up."

Believe what nonsense you wish. The facts say the FEMA report is false.

Since: Aug 11

Location hidden

#155407 Nov 23, 2012
It's all in the previous link Jackass.

Since: Aug 11

Location hidden

#155408 Nov 23, 2012
BobinTX wrote:
<quoted text>
WMD's, which President Clinton, most world leaders, and a huge majority of Congress believed Saddam had.
http://www.snopes.com/politics/war/wmdquotes....
President Bush43 made sure that if there were any, Saddam wouldn't be using them.
<quoted text>
What does unanimous mean to you?
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_Nations_S...
Besides, we don't look to the UN to provide for our defense against our enemies. We have our Constitution, our Congress, and our President to provide for our security.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Iraq_Resolution
There never were any WMDs Jackass.
BlackHeart

Redding, CA

#155409 Nov 23, 2012
WasteWater wrote:
<quoted text>
There never were any WMDs Jackass.
Yep. The CIA, British MI-6, and the Israeli Mossad confirmed that before Clinton left office.
but georgie wanted to avenge his daddy.

Since: Aug 11

Location hidden

#155410 Nov 23, 2012
BlackHeart wrote:
<quoted text>
Yep. The CIA, British MI-6, and the Israeli Mossad confirmed that before Clinton left office.
but georgie wanted to avenge his daddy.
Indeed. Hey I don't care what political flavor the poster ascribes. I am concerned about people looking into real evidence and facts rather than the pablum which is fed to them by main stream television. I have no idea who the new world order is, but I know they have made a power grab and I know how dangerous they are that they would cancel the Constitution by instituting the Patriot Act and feeding us so many obvious lies.

Since: Aug 11

Location hidden

#155411 Nov 23, 2012
BlackHeart wrote:
<quoted text>
Yep. The CIA, British MI-6, and the Israeli Mossad confirmed that before Clinton left office.
but georgie wanted to avenge his daddy.
We can only guess his motivations. What we do know is they wound him up and sent him out to indoctrinate the American People.

“Custer @ LBH - Ooops”

Since: Nov 07

Bakersfield, CA

#155412 Nov 23, 2012
BobinTX wrote:
<quoted text>
You proved nothing, "truther"... you simply made an unsubstantiated and unproven claim. Besides, it' much ado about nothing, but I'm sure to the "truther" crowd, it's very important.
Just ignore Pee Water. This crap has already been hashed over a 1000 times, and you notice he curls up in the fetal position when he has no argument. SOP "Jackass" & "FUN". Just another troll, not worth your time (IMO).

Since: Aug 11

Location hidden

#155413 Nov 23, 2012
bad bob wrote:
<quoted text>
Just ignore Pee Water. This crap has already been hashed over a 1000 times, and you notice he curls up in the fetal position when he has no argument. SOP "Jackass" & "FUN". Just another troll, not worth your time (IMO).
You are not worth anyone's time either. Have you got anything of substance to say?

I have already proven Bush to be a liar. Refute what I posted or STFU Jackass.
UIdiotRacesMakeW orldPeace

United States

#155414 Nov 23, 2012
Force Majeure wrote:
<quoted text>
Well, the only act of 'force majeure' excuse that could apply to Saddam having WMD's in Irak would have been if a hurricane had blown them in from the U.S. or from Israel, but as Saddam had no WMD's then he was completely innocent of the charge, hurricanes not-withstanding.
Considering the UN forbade the U.S. from invading, that makes Bush and his whole government guilty of breaking international law because (as you so correctly pointed out) "breaking the law, for whatever the reason, is still against the law." That fact would have made the U.S. guilty even IF Saddam DID have WMD's.
Most have not clue militarist US empire put Dicktator Saddam in power and when his service is no longer needed he got the can.
UIdiotRacesMakeW orldPeace

United States

#155415 Nov 23, 2012
bad bob wrote:
<quoted text>
Just ignore Pee Water. This crap has already been hashed over a 1000 times, and you notice he curls up in the fetal position when he has no argument. SOP "Jackass" & "FUN". Just another troll, not worth your time (IMO).
I hear YOU the DEMENTED War Hawk SQuaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaWking aGAIN .Did your DICKtator Cheney shoot the little war hawk Biddy-eyed bad bob In the foot! hi this is Burt! BWHWHWWHWHWHWHHWHWaaaaaaaaaaa

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Top Stories Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
Desi aunty enjoyment with young boys in Delhi 3 min asadaman 3
"Hey!!!! Do you think I have an ODD-SHAPED HEAD... 5 min Knock off purse s... 12
Prove there's a god. (Mar '08) 6 min Stilgar Fifrawi 853,740
Will the world end in the middle of 2016? 10 min Knock off purse s... 19
The Next O.J. & Nicole 13 min Knock off purse s... 3
Obama Confederate Flag 14 min F16Jock 1
the REAL REASON the state of California lost to... 17 min Knock off purse s... 3
Poll Is homosexuality a sin? (Oct '07) 20 min Jac 100,708
News Roman Catholic church only true church, says Va... (Jul '07) 30 min Robert F 595,887
Why I’m no longer a Christian (Jul '08) 38 min Toxic Shocker 444,118
The Christian Atheist debate 44 min Lbj 753
More from around the web