“The future begins”

Since: Jul 07

every moment

#154355 Nov 13, 2012
Lyndi wrote:
<quoted text>
lol-
So?
Contrary to popular belief, the masses can be wrong.
==
I've already told you many of the reasons he won. Add to those the Chicago style thug campaign he launched on a decent man unaccustomed to dirty fighting and voila, you win.
I view Obama's victory the way I view an *A* a student might get on a test which he cheated to get.
He's not an A student and he's not a nice kid.
>big grin here< So you can be funny when you try.

Since: Jul 12

Capitol Heights, MD

#154356 Nov 13, 2012
bad bob wrote:
<quoted text>
Consistently avoiding proof-reading, Chatty Cathy, especially on short msgs, leads me to believe that you are not only LAZY, but are lacking the basic skills in remedial communication.
BB, I do it on purpose to assist you in boosting your post count. So far so good, working like as advertised.

But I do find it amusing that you bust me while proliferating grammer errors yourself such as unnecessary punctuation, unnecessary words and run-on sentences among other things.

Since: Jul 12

Capitol Heights, MD

#154357 Nov 13, 2012
Chris Clearwater wrote:
<quoted text>
Why do I think of Charlie Sheen meltdown when Karl posts? I can't say how thankful I am not to get about anything the left has to offer. They bash the right for mean what you say and say what you mean and then praise it when O says it. Just empty words and no doubt in my mind no matter how many times they think they are "winning" they are the most vile hate filled people I hear.
Speaaking of meltdowns, what you told us was coming has happened. A woman in Arizona ran over her husband because she was upset Obama won (thought her family would now suffer) so she ran him down because he did not vote. Of course his vote was immaterial as Romney did carry Arizona (one of a few states).

But she was right, now her family will suffer as she is in jail and her husband is in the hospital.

How many more Republicans will go this route Chris?

“The future begins”

Since: Jul 07

every moment

#154358 Nov 13, 2012
bad bob wrote:
<quoted text>
Ah yes, more snappy catch phrases to go with Romneycare. "Etch-A-Sketch", "Romnesia", etc. I mean, if the left spent as much time working on actual issues instead of these gems, all of us might be better off.
Romney didn't "just wanna be the President", Rick. Who in their right mind would wanna take on the world's most demanding job both physically & mentally, just for the hee hoos.
Romney & Ryan both laid out their visions for the US. In case you may have missed it, it was the vision that was the complete OPPOSITE of Obamas. Ok so, Romney waffled. All politicians do that, don't they? But WHY did he waffle? Was it to stay abreast of the ever-changing dynamics in the field, or was it for the sole purpose of casting the net for the most voters?
Romney was certainly an UNKNOWN as you say. But so was Obama 4 years ago. He was not only an unknown, but an inexperienced unknown at best. He was also the anti-Bush vote, and probably the one and ONLY reason he made to the WH in the first place. But 4 years ago, we gave him a chance anyway. Huge mistake then, GINORMOUS blunder now.
I keep hearing about this "vision", but oddly enough no one seems to be able to elaborate on it's particulars. That is the point. It's not your fault in the least, seriously. Romney tried to skate through an election without putting his views on the line. Who knows why - maybe it worked for him at the state level. But as it happens, "Not-Obama" was just not quite a convincing enough reason for about 62,300,000 voters. We believe this President has done a competent job under historically tough conditions. I understand about 58 million disagree. Viva la democracy!

Since: Jun 08

Location hidden

#154359 Nov 13, 2012
Chris Clearwater wrote:
<quoted text>
More crap from the left. I wasn't so shocked. Sad yes, shocked not so much. I lived in a town that years back re-elected Marion Barry after going to the fed pen for doing crack. Don't spend much time in any big U.S. city do you Hip? And the biggest U.S. cities control it as we just saw in this election.
You have a point there Chris. Hip is not exactly metropolitan.

“Custer @ LBH - Ooops”

Since: Nov 07

Bakersfield, CA

#154360 Nov 13, 2012
okb2 wrote:
<quoted text>
Well it will certainly be fair if your chain gets yanked a time or two when the Republicans in Congress try screwing us again. And to remind you of when Obama does something right.......Like insisting on increasing taxes at the top.
Half the US population has CHARGED the Republicans in Congress not to
fold when the majority party overloads bills with trailers, stipulations, concessions and PORK! You call it screwing and obstructing. Tea Baggers and the right half of the US call it retaining their JOBS!

On the <rare> forseen occasion that Obama "does something right", it will hardly be necessary to "remind" anyone in here. I'm sure the king's loyal subjects will glady blare out his positive achievements, preceeded by the usual 30 minute baroque renaissance trumpet fanfare.

“The future begins”

Since: Jul 07

every moment

#154361 Nov 13, 2012
Lyndi wrote:
<quoted text>
lol-
So?
Contrary to popular belief, the masses can be wrong.
==
I've already told you many of the reasons he won. Add to those the Chicago style thug campaign he launched on a decent man unaccustomed to dirty fighting and voila, you win.
I view Obama's victory the way I view an *A* a student might get on a test which he cheated to get.
He's not an A student and he's not a nice kid.
You're welcome to any narrative that helps you cope. Oddly enough your "reasons" don't jibe so well with all the reasons you gloated about in your "win" pre-election. Imagine that.....

“Custer @ LBH - Ooops”

Since: Nov 07

Bakersfield, CA

#154362 Nov 13, 2012
HipGnosis wrote:
<quoted text>Uh, did ya happen to read the quasi-clinical analysis to which it replied?
Irrelevant (IMO).

Since: Jul 12

Capitol Heights, MD

#154363 Nov 13, 2012
bad bob wrote:
<quoted text>
With Wilson opting off the thread for now, it was only a matter of time b4 the predictable "sour grapes" made it's return appearance.
But "dim-witted" and "weak self image" seems to be a bit judgemental.
I agree. Further, it was much more likely your over-confidence and strong self-image that allowed you to put so much trust in your intelligence that you were tricked into believing you were correct. Even to the point of failing to give it proper analysis based on the available evidence.

Well, back to reality with you.

“The future begins”

Since: Jul 07

every moment

#154364 Nov 13, 2012
lisw wrote:
<quoted text>You have a point there Chris. Hip is not exactly metropolitan.
;) It's so cute when you circle up and stroke each other for comfort....
Chris Clearwater

Largo, FL

#154365 Nov 13, 2012
okb2 wrote:
<quoted text>
Speaaking of meltdowns, what you told us was coming has happened. A woman in Arizona ran over her husband because she was upset Obama won (thought her family would now suffer) so she ran him down because he did not vote. Of course his vote was immaterial as Romney did carry Arizona (one of a few states).
But she was right, now her family will suffer as she is in jail and her husband is in the hospital.
How many more Republicans will go this route Chris?
A few states? What does the sky look like in your world okb? You know, nevermind. As Hip just said whatever you need to think to make it. Lol. Keep posting your hate for your fellow Americans. I still pity you.
Chris Clearwater

Largo, FL

#154366 Nov 13, 2012
HipGnosis wrote:
<quoted text>;) It's so cute when you circle up and stroke each other for comfort....
Ahh, still have nothing but disdain we see. Carry on Hip. I pity you as well. It must suck for you to live in this nation with the little people.

“Custer @ LBH - Ooops”

Since: Nov 07

Bakersfield, CA

#154367 Nov 13, 2012
okb2 wrote:
<quoted text>
But I do find it amusing that you bust me while proliferating grammer errors yourself such as unnecessary punctuation, unnecessary words and run-on sentences among other things.
I told y'all a few months ago I was helplessly ANAL, not perfect.
But ANY opportunity I have to bust yer nuts, is a good day. It's just another price you forfeit for going over the 40K post limit.

With your proofreading & gramm[a]r skills professor Plumbtree, you'll excuse me if I breeze over your criticism regarding "unnecessary punctuation". And your opinion on the rest is purely subjective.

“The future begins”

Since: Jul 07

every moment

#154368 Nov 13, 2012
bad bob wrote:
<quoted text>
Half the US population has CHARGED the Republicans in Congress not to
fold when the majority party overloads bills with trailers, stipulations, concessions and PORK! You call it screwing and obstructing. Tea Baggers and the right half of the US call it retaining their JOBS!
Then why did so many Tea Party freshmen get their pink slips? You need to tweak your story to account for that.

I think you're interpreting the results wrong, is what I think. America is tired of extremism leading to gridlock, plain and simple. That's not my interpretation, that's the result of extensive polling across all party lines, as well as election results. What really happened? Pretty much the same makeup as before. Think of it - billions spent by outside groups to influence the election, and the breakdown ends up pretty much the same, with a major exception. Those perceived as extremist/ obstructionist were shown the door. This is pure numbers, bob. Show me where I'm wrong. No matter what spin the opposition threw, fueled by billions spent in the process, America just wasn't buying the "socialist" doom and gloom this time around.

Mitch McConnell set two top goals for the 2012 election: a Republican takeover of the Senate and the defeat of President Obama. He achieved neither, and in fact lost two seats. He himself isn't up for re-election until '14. It will be interesting to watch his manner over the next 2 years, to see what lesson he perceives from these election results.

Since: Jul 12

Capitol Heights, MD

#154369 Nov 13, 2012
Lyndi wrote:
<quoted text>
lol-
So?
Contrary to popular belief, the masses can be wrong.
==
I've already told you many of the reasons he won. Add to those the Chicago style thug campaign he launched on a decent man unaccustomed to dirty fighting and voila, you win.
I view Obama's victory the way I view an *A* a student might get on a test which he cheated to get.
He's not an A student and he's not a nice kid.
No, what you gave us was your OPINIONS concerning his win. You offer very little to nothing to substantiate your OPINIONS, but no doubt you believe them even if you lack the reasoning to convince others.

Obama need score no higher that a 50 on a 100 point test to best the Republican policies offered for the election.

Carter was a "nice" kid, you want him back?
Lyndi

Sarasota, FL

#154370 Nov 13, 2012
HipGnosis wrote:
<quoted text>;) It's so cute when you circle up and stroke each other for comfort....
No cuter than watching you, Larry and Curly gloat over a president who got relected on one of the all time worst records in the history of the United States.

Nice job, Moe.

“Custer @ LBH - Ooops”

Since: Nov 07

Bakersfield, CA

#154371 Nov 13, 2012
HipGnosis wrote:
<quoted text>I keep hearing about this "vision", but oddly enough no one seems to be able to elaborate on it's particulars. That is the point. It's not your fault in the least, seriously. Romney tried to skate through an election without putting his views on the line. Who knows why - maybe it worked for him at the state level. But as it happens, "Not-Obama" was just not quite a convincing enough reason for about 62,300,000 voters. We believe this President has done a competent job under historically tough conditions. I understand about 58 million disagree. Viva la democracy!
Competent??

Well just off the top of me skull we have in Obama I, a grossly expensive UHC law that few wanted, but forced on us anyway. We have a nuclear Iran threat pending. We have an unresolved Fast & Furious scandal, and the Benghazi tragedy unexplained. We have the top CIA chief caught with his pants down, PRIOR to the election, but undisclosed until AFTER the election.

Laurel & Hardy were more competent.

“Custer @ LBH - Ooops”

Since: Nov 07

Bakersfield, CA

#154372 Nov 13, 2012
HipGnosis wrote:
<quoted text>Then why did so many Tea Party freshmen get their pink slips? You need to tweak your story to account for that.
I think you're interpreting the results wrong, is what I think. America is tired of extremism leading to gridlock, plain and simple. That's not my interpretation, that's the result of extensive polling across all party lines, as well as election results. What really happened? Pretty much the same makeup as before. Think of it - billions spent by outside groups to influence the election, and the breakdown ends up pretty much the same, with a major exception. Those perceived as extremist/ obstructionist were shown the door. This is pure numbers, bob. Show me where I'm wrong. No matter what spin the opposition threw, fueled by billions spent in the process, America just wasn't buying the "socialist" doom and gloom this time around.
Mitch McConnell set two top goals for the 2012 election: a Republican takeover of the Senate and the defeat of President Obama. He achieved neither, and in fact lost two seats. He himself isn't up for re-election until '14. It will be interesting to watch his manner over the next 2 years, to see what lesson he perceives from these election results.
You know very well that I'm not deeply immersed in Capitol Hill seat numbers. But I was referring to the movement, not the
congressional reps. But I do think possibly McConnell is aging to the point that I doubt if he much cares whether he's reelected or not, over principles.

In less than 2 years, I believe this Prez will either screw up on an enormous scale, or have a series of screw ups of a lesser degree.
Whichever happens, I think it'll be enough for at least a repeat of the 2010 midterms, but much more of a Republican edge this time. And that'll obviously be to reduce Barry to a lame duck, until he can finally be sent packing.

Since: Jul 12

Capitol Heights, MD

#154373 Nov 13, 2012
Chris Clearwater wrote:
<quoted text>
High five on this. A local station played a bit of obama on one of his many Tampa trips and thats all it was. Romnesia indeed. You can bet in the near future we will be treated to more bashing the rich and anyone else on the right while o still has no clue what leadership is. This was of note today as business may not wait to find out.
Marc Faber: Prepare for a Massive Market Meltdown
http://www.cnbc.com/id/49802535
Bashing of the rich?

http://patrioticmillionaires.org/

How about millionaires "bashing" themselves?

Since: Jul 12

Capitol Heights, MD

#154374 Nov 13, 2012
Chris Clearwater wrote:
<quoted text>
High five on this. A local station played a bit of obama on one of his many Tampa trips and thats all it was. Romnesia indeed. You can bet in the near future we will be treated to more bashing the rich and anyone else on the right while o still has no clue what leadership is. This was of note today as business may not wait to find out.
Marc Faber: Prepare for a Massive Market Meltdown
http://www.cnbc.com/id/49802535
I will say predictions are all over the place. Has to dom ore with the Repubicans and if they are willing to accept a tax increase for those at the top.

Really makes things interesting since about half the top supported and voted for Obama and now we have those Patriotic Millionaires begging Congress to raise their taxes.

What is more important to the Republicans? The people's will and the fiscal health of the nation? Or a promise made to Grover?

I am betting the promise is, at least for a while. Long enough to be remembered in 2014.

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Top Stories Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
Prove there's a god. (Mar '08) 6 min ChromiuMan 795,327
Roman Catholic church only true church, says Va... (Jul '07) 7 min New Age Spiritual... 568,028
Blaming Israel for carnage (Jul '06) 12 min Mummy NFL 120,711
Why Should Jesus Love Me? (Feb '08) 16 min lil whispers 607,189
Scientific proof for God's existence 19 min lightbeamrider 555
Why Iím no longer a Christian (Jul '08) 20 min waaasssuuup 442,015
Thousands march in Holocaust memorial (Apr '06) 27 min Yumpin Yimminy 492
Was 9/11 a conspiracy?? (Oct '07) 1 hr Heisenberg 267,407
More from around the web