Should we impeach Obama?

Should we impeach Obama?

Created by Armed Republic on Nov 8, 2012

171 votes

Click on an option to vote

Yes

No

“squuuze me”

Since: Feb 09

Florida, USA

#141 Nov 13, 2012
"The decision to allow a transgender 45-year-old college student who identifies as a woman but has male genitalia to use the womenÂ’s locker room has raised a fracas among parents and faith-based organizations, who say children as young as 6 years old use the locker room."

"The locker room at Evergreen College in Olympia, Wash., is shared with the Capital High School swim club and a childrenÂ’s swim academy, along with the students at Evergreen."

http://abcnews.go.com/blogs/headlines/2012/11...

A vote for Obama ...

As if dividing the country in half wasn't enough, now these tranny weirdo's are undressing in front of elementary students.

Way to go you all ...

“Ignore the trolls”

Since: Oct 08

London, UK

#142 Nov 13, 2012
BIBLE TRUE JEHOVA wrote:
<quoted text>
why 51 % dissagre with his reelection,
it is logical
obama didn't win popular votes
electorial college is fraud,and weapon of those guys against all american voters
Oh dear, another one who cannot understand statistics. If a MAJORITY of the population voted for him, 51% cannot be against him. To help you out, majority means over 50%. Try looking at the results before you post what must either be totally ill-informed information or lies. Only yuo know which of the two it is. To help you out, here's a link to the statistics, so if you continue to post this, it cannot be misinformation:

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-22290...

“Ignore the trolls”

Since: Oct 08

London, UK

#143 Nov 13, 2012
hick-up wrote:
<quoted text>
You're a liar Tony ...
I never said he didn't win it.
I said he hadn't won it at the time Andet made his post.
A forth grader could follow along better than you.
And they really let you vote huh?
Try looking back at the posts to see who lies, since you choose to throw that word around.

Btw, a fourth grader would note from my avatar that I am from the UK, they don't allow me to vote in US elections. Not that you want to appear dumb, you simply have a natural talent.

Since: Dec 07

Location hidden

#144 Nov 15, 2012
hick-up wrote:
<quoted text>
Big deal ...
You're a bully Rollin, a punk in platform shoes.
So typical for your generation ...another Facebook Rambo.
Big deal is right dipshyt, you sat there and berated a person for their spelling all the while you misspelled yourself. Glass houses my friend, deal with it.
Doctor REALITY

Hot Springs Village, AR

#145 Nov 15, 2012
Like him,or hate him,Obama will play a very important role in the unfolding of end-time Bible prophecy.

Since: Sep 10

Location hidden

#146 Nov 15, 2012
tony1003 wrote:
<quoted text>
Oh dear, another one who cannot understand statistics. If a MAJORITY of the population voted for him, 51% cannot be against him. To help you out, majority means over 50%. Try looking at the results before you post what must either be totally ill-informed information or lies. Only yuo know which of the two it is. To help you out, here's a link to the statistics, so if you continue to post this, it cannot be misinformation:
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-22290...
LOOK AT INTERNET FORST DAYS AFTER ELECTION,
I took 51% unhappy voters from internet,not biased web sites posted by you-they are fakes and lies

electorial votes always work in favor of those whom those rich top guys want to make president,without of popular majority voices or votes

electrial college is powerful mastermind aagainst single street folks whose majority voted or vote against.

stick your internet obama link web inside of your closet, and don't post this crap

Since: Sep 10

Location hidden

#147 Nov 15, 2012
Doctor REALITY wrote:
Like him,or hate him,Obama will play a very important role in the unfolding of end-time Bible prophecy.
not necesary mr dr
next 4 years will theoritical improve economy and this world-by faken peace and security

Notice dr about next secretary of state taken from UNO-mrs Rice

this qligue works in conspiracy to proclaim NWO after conspiracy and destruction by UNO whole christianity called Babilon Great in Rev 17.18

have good night mister
and alway count only on God Almighty who can save our souls and lifes

“Ignore the trolls”

Since: Oct 08

Blakesley, UK

#148 Nov 16, 2012
BIBLE TRUE JEHOVA wrote:
<quoted text>
LOOK AT INTERNET FORST DAYS AFTER ELECTION,
I took 51% unhappy voters from internet,not biased web sites posted by you-they are fakes and lies
electorial votes always work in favor of those whom those rich top guys want to make president,without of popular majority voices or votes
electrial college is powerful mastermind aagainst single street folks whose majority voted or vote against.
stick your internet obama link web inside of your closet, and don't post this crap
The site of a UK newspaper is "fake and lies"? Dear me, you really don't have much idea, do you? It has no connection whatsoever to Obama, aside from reporting on the election. Read your first sentence again and see how contradictory it it - you used websites!

You may wish to put your fingers in your ears, crying "la, la, la, can't hear you, it isn't so", feel free. It will not change the statistics, nor the fact that Obama won by both a popular vote majority and the Electoral (spelt thus) College, one of only four US Presidents so to do.

Clearly, there is an element of Republican support that doesn't like the truth backed up by statistics. Guess in the case of those, there really is no cure for stupid.

“Unknown”

Since: Sep 12

Kingsport

#149 Nov 16, 2012
tony1003 wrote:
<quoted text>
The site of a UK newspaper is "fake and lies"? Dear me, you really don't have much idea, do you? It has no connection whatsoever to Obama, aside from reporting on the election. Read your first sentence again and see how contradictory it it - you used websites!
You may wish to put your fingers in your ears, crying "la, la, la, can't hear you, it isn't so", feel free. It will not change the statistics, nor the fact that Obama won by both a popular vote majority and the Electoral (spelt thus) College, one of only four US Presidents so to do.
Clearly, there is an element of Republican support that doesn't like the truth backed up by statistics. Guess in the case of those, there really is no cure for stupid.
Do you ever happen to see the people who actually fund EITHER candidates campaigns and what they contribute,donate, and demand when their "candidate" "makes" the white house? I would suggest looking into that..

I would say a Rep, is upset cause they are losing their freedoms under his supposed "reign". Which you cannot deny in any shape,form, or fashion. IF you can deny that, then you should not be allowed to speak on his behalf, especially since you fail to name any "good" he has done, which you cannot. P.S.- I know your mad about Obama, but Romney was absolutely the same package, with a different exterior, both men have the same investors,

If your a Dem, do not be that happy you guys beat Romney's crooked position either, he was just as dirty as your precious Obama. This major 2 party bullshit is absurd, Over 300 million people and 2 people to choose from.....That seems reasonable to most huh?

Your popular vote didnt do shit but waste,time,air,and real news. The popular vote does not mean nothing. I mean for shits sake a REAL vote, from an electronic machine and not even knowing where the machine was made from and WHO made it. Such deep thinking by both sides its amazing most are allowed to "vote" in the first place.

The President is ONLY a lightning rod - Since people will refuse to look into it, they will just talk shit and go back to tiny bullshit issues of what their "leaders" and "media" tell them to.

Take Care and enjoy following the majority weak Americans, who will trade security for freedom, any day of the week.

Since: Oct 12

Location hidden

#151 Nov 16, 2012
BIBLE TRUE JEHOVA wrote:
<quoted text>
not necesary mr dr
next 4 years will theoritical improve economy and this world-by faken peace and security
Notice dr about next secretary of state taken from UNO-mrs Rice
this qligue works in conspiracy to proclaim NWO after conspiracy and destruction by UNO whole christianity called Babilon Great in Rev 17.18
have good night mister
and alway count only on God Almighty who can save our souls and lifes
If you read as poorly as you write, it is truly amazing that you can read the word "Bible" to know which book to open. You likely read the King James Version and as a result of the dated English understand nothing that you read.

Many of us prayed that Obama would win. We felt that leaving people alone, defenseless, and helpless was not right. We felt that leaving children go hungry was not right. We felt that letting people die because they did not have enough money for the doctor was not right. Where, in YOUR Bible, does it say that it is okay to do those things?

Since: Oct 12

Location hidden

#152 Nov 16, 2012
tony1003 wrote:
<quoted text>
Oh dear, another one who cannot understand statistics. If a MAJORITY of the population voted for him, 51% cannot be against him. To help you out, majority means over 50%. Try looking at the results before you post what must either be totally ill-informed information or lies. Only yuo know which of the two it is. To help you out, here's a link to the statistics, so if you continue to post this, it cannot be misinformation:
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-22290...
He must be on something.

Lets see.....

More than half??????

Less than half??????

Since he is a half-wit, he does not understand.

“Ignore the trolls”

Since: Oct 08

Barnet, UK

#153 Nov 16, 2012
sir unknown wrote:
<quoted text>
Do you ever happen to see the people who actually fund EITHER candidates campaigns and what they contribute,donate, and demand when their "candidate" "makes" the white house? I would suggest looking into that..
I would say a Rep, is upset cause they are losing their freedoms under his supposed "reign". Which you cannot deny in any shape,form, or fashion. IF you can deny that, then you should not be allowed to speak on his behalf, especially since you fail to name any "good" he has done, which you cannot. P.S.- I know your mad about Obama, but Romney was absolutely the same package, with a different exterior, both men have the same investors,
If your a Dem, do not be that happy you guys beat Romney's crooked position either, he was just as dirty as your precious Obama. This major 2 party bullshit is absurd, Over 300 million people and 2 people to choose from.....That seems reasonable to most huh?
Your popular vote didnt do shit but waste,time,air,and real news. The popular vote does not mean nothing. I mean for shits sake a REAL vote, from an electronic machine and not even knowing where the machine was made from and WHO made it. Such deep thinking by both sides its amazing most are allowed to "vote" in the first place.
The President is ONLY a lightning rod - Since people will refuse to look into it, they will just talk shit and go back to tiny bullshit issues of what their "leaders" and "media" tell them to.
Take Care and enjoy following the majority weak Americans, who will trade security for freedom, any day of the week.
Can you read avatars? I am from the UK - I support neither party in the USA as I do not have a vote there. So why should I "follow the majority weak Americans" (sic)? As to politics being big money in the USA - much of Europe was not impressed by the huge sums spent. In passing, since you ask, I reckon Obama sanctioning a successful hit on Osama Bin Laden was pretty good, or had you forgotten that one?

Btw, a monarch reigns, a President rules - a clue for you, one is in post for life, the other (in the USA) for a maximum of 8 years.
So True

Yorba Linda, CA

#154 Nov 16, 2012
tony1003 wrote:
<quoted text>
Can you read avatars? I am from the UK - I support neither party in the USA as I do not have a vote there. So why should I "follow the majority weak Americans" (sic)? As to politics being big money in the USA - much of Europe was not impressed by the huge sums spent. In passing, since you ask, I reckon Obama sanctioning a successful hit on Osama Bin Laden was pretty good, or had you forgotten that one?
Btw, a monarch reigns, a President rules - a clue for you, one is in post for life, the other (in the USA) for a maximum of 8 years.
I'm afraid you see biased reports and base your judgement on that. That would be us watching only the BBC and forming opinions.

“Ignore the trolls”

Since: Oct 08

Barnet, UK

#155 Nov 16, 2012
So True wrote:
<quoted text>
I'm afraid you see biased reports and base your judgement on that. That would be us watching only the BBC and forming opinions.
But then any report is going to be biased, particularly in the USA where different stations line up behind different candidates. More chance of getting a less biased version outside the USA. In passing, I do not just use the BBC, we have a variety of news sources here and with the internet, it is possible to view several of them, as I do. Interestingly, much as I dislike Murdoch and his empire, the best coverage of Sandy in the UK was Sky News, not the BBC.

“Unknown”

Since: Sep 12

Kingsport

#156 Nov 16, 2012
tony1003 wrote:
<quoted text>
Can you read avatars? I am from the UK - I support neither party in the USA as I do not have a vote there. So why should I "follow the majority weak Americans" (sic)? As to politics being big money in the USA - much of Europe was not impressed by the huge sums spent. In passing, since you ask, I reckon Obama sanctioning a successful hit on Osama Bin Laden was pretty good, or had you forgotten that one?
Btw, a monarch reigns, a President rules - a clue for you, one is in post for life, the other (in the USA) for a maximum of 8 years.
What exactly was it, that Bin Laden did that made him guilty?

You do know who funded Bin Laden in the first place right?

When do we ever serve the right as a country, to go into another country and execute/assassinate another human?

A President DOES NOT run our country, regardless of what you think of it. You being outside the US, you should at least get the real news, unless you follow the BBC?

If you actually just investigate the bullshit Bin Laden STORIES, which there are way more than 1 now, you will see the obvious lies and slander, created by our lovely media and government.

Take Care and bollocks to ya.

“Turn left at pub Number 42”

Since: Dec 08

Homehill,QLD

#157 Nov 17, 2012
You were supposed to impeach Bush.
What happened?

I know..blame to next guy

“Ignore the trolls”

Since: Oct 08

Barnet, UK

#158 Nov 17, 2012
sir unknown wrote:
<quoted text>
What exactly was it, that Bin Laden did that made him guilty?
You do know who funded Bin Laden in the first place right?
When do we ever serve the right as a country, to go into another country and execute/assassinate another human?
A President DOES NOT run our country, regardless of what you think of it. You being outside the US, you should at least get the real news, unless you follow the BBC?
If you actually just investigate the bullshit Bin Laden STORIES, which there are way more than 1 now, you will see the obvious lies and slander, created by our lovely media and government.
Take Care and bollocks to ya.
Arrogance is not becoming in one so ignorant. If you do not know of the actions of Al Qua'eda and Bin Laden's leadership - fine, stay ignorant - it is hardly my task to educate you.
I am well aware (probably more so than you) on the way the USA is governed. Try reading my post and show me where I wrote that the President runs the country. Reading not high on your list of skills? Whether you like it or not, he is the head of state and thus rules the country. Too much for you to hoist on board?
No doubt you find Fox News (nothing like a contradiction of terms) adequate for your prejudices, I would take the BBC any day over that. However, I'll reiterate as your reading skills are inadequare, I use a variety of sources of media for information. Unlike you, I am not paranoid and do not subscribe to conspiracy fantasies.
Tissue

Versailles, KY

#159 Nov 17, 2012
tony1003 wrote:
<quoted text>
I would take the BBC any day over that.
It's a sad truth,I too watch BBC for a less partisan opinion of US news.

Seems they are more interested in reporting then inciting emotions in their viewers.

Besides,I like British accents and cadence.=P

“Ignore the trolls”

Since: Oct 08

Barnet, UK

#160 Nov 17, 2012
Tissue wrote:
<quoted text>
It's a sad truth,I too watch BBC for a less partisan opinion of US news.
Seems they are more interested in reporting then inciting emotions in their viewers.
Besides,I like British accents and cadence.=P
Glad you enjoy it, although they're going through a rough time at the moment with the mistakes made over firstly not broadcasting on Savile (he was outed as a paedo by ITV) and then broadcasting to out a guy as a paedo when he wasn't! Not great researching, one has to say and rightly, the Director General has fallen on his sword over it.

“Unknown”

Since: Sep 12

Kingsport

#163 Nov 17, 2012
tony1003 wrote:
<quoted text>
Arrogance is not becoming in one so ignorant. If you do not know of the actions of Al Qua'eda and Bin Laden's leadership - fine, stay ignorant - it is hardly my task to educate you.
I am well aware (probably more so than you) on the way the USA is governed. Try reading my post and show me where I wrote that the President runs the country. Reading not high on your list of skills? Whether you like it or not, he is the head of state and thus rules the country. Too much for you to hoist on board?
No doubt you find Fox News (nothing like a contradiction of terms) adequate for your prejudices, I would take the BBC any day over that. However, I'll reiterate as your reading skills are inadequare, I use a variety of sources of media for information. Unlike you, I am not paranoid and do not subscribe to conspiracy fantasies.
I guess I under estimate my translations through text then. I despise the corporate media in america. All they do is slander true stories and make up bullshit for the rest of the news.

What "conspiracy fantasies" am I referring to? It seems when you question "official" stories your automatically labeled a conspiracy nut and when you provide legit questions or evidence to the contrary, its instant silence.

I am not assuming your entire depth of resources as you should not mine, I was generally stating that if you believe Al-Qaeda is not helped and created by our very own CIA, then your sources are obviously hiding things, just like the others do. I always wonder why when you ask questions back to people who "believe" in government lies, they never answer and start going for personal agendas, instead of staying on topic....

He is the head of state on paper, just a hint here, just cause the ever "trusting" government endorses a story or positions, does not make it true by any means. Our entire country is ran by the global rich,world banks,stock market,equity firms,federal reserve, and other not so obvious "sources". He may make all the decisions it seems by what you hear from "american" sources, but this is not the case. To believe ANY one man can run entire country without an agenda or have "all" the answers for whats best of the country is absurd. Especially down to the bullshit candidates that we have and the corporations who "fund" their campaigns.

Too insist upon one certain "person" fucking up our country, sorry to say that is just not true by any means at all. It would be very dumb to assume this, in my opinion.

You did bring up the "Stats" provided as if they are truly going to relay the "truth" especially through our media sources. It does not matter as I have stated multiple of times. Our popular vote means NOTHING whatsoever, as far as who gets elected.

Im not angry nor want to vindicate my "intelligence" on you, for as you could easily tell I do not have much. But for the little bit I do have, I have enough to know that our voting system is corrupt and empty. The politicians that are shown in the public are pretty much always corrupt or bought out, and the ones who are not and have legit "solutions" are never brought out through our media. Our entire basis for "news" in this country, is based on heavily weighed bullshit political agendas and backed,sourced,and bankrolled by a corrupt government.

So take care and I never called you a fool, but all of what I have stated in this post and the previous are ALL true legit facts. Not assumptions or half ass reading.

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Top Stories Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
Poll If you're Christain what kind are you? (Oct '07) 2 min WasteWater 8,218
gay bottom in gurgaon (May '14) 3 min lucky 575
The Christian Atheist debate 5 min too lazy to log in 3,887
Prove there's a god. (Mar '08) 6 min Critical Eye 879,647
China to hold military parade to mark victory o... 6 min Livs 1
Bush is a hero (Sep '07) 10 min USaGlobalWarMongerer 177,881
China to set anti-Japanese war victory day 11 min Livs 1
News Roman Catholic church only true church, says Va... (Jul '07) 2 hr June VanDerMark 603,309
More from around the web