The Islamization Of The ACLU

The Islamization Of The ACLU

Posted in the Top Stories Forum

“O'er the land of the free ? ”

Since: Jan 09

Don't Tread On Me

#1 Oct 4, 2012
Islamofascism: Americans might as well be living under Islamic blasphemy laws, yet the nation's champion of free speech — the ACLU — is AWOL. That's because it's now largely run by Muslims.

The ACLU usually stands up strong for First Amendment rights. Not in the case of the Muhammad movie.

The ACLU's executive director failed to release an official statement condemning the outrageous efforts of the White House to deep-six the film, including pressuring YouTube to remove its trailer from the Web.

Amnesty International, in contrast, asserted that any Muslim hurt over the film "should not be used as a justification to curtail core freedoms or justify potential government repression."

Not until The Daily Caller contacted the ACLU did it speak out, and only meekly so. It said it was "concerned" about the White House request to censor the "repellant film." The ACLU's strangely muted response contrasts sharply with its militant reaction to post-9/11 measures to crack down on Islamic terrorists.

"The government has gone to extraordinary lengths to squelch dissent (in the Muslim community)— from censorship and surveillance to detention," it says on its website, complaining it was "encroaching" on the "free speech rights" of Muslims.

In a 200-page report on jihad fundraising, "Blocking Faith, Freezing Charity," the ACLU argued that "federal law enforcement is engaging in practices that intimidate Muslim donors and create a climate of fear that chills American Muslims' free and full exercise of their religion."

In other words, the First Amendment rights of Muslims are more precious than those of the average citizen.


Subscribe to the IBD Editorials Podcast

Where is this bias coming from? Muslims.

The ACLU now counts at least eight on its national executive staff alone. In fact, a Muslim runs the ACLU's Center for Democracy, while another heads its National Security Project.

The irony is not lost on Steve Emerson, director of the Investigative Project on Terrorism.

"The ACLU was founded on the basis that there shouldn't be any blasphemy laws," said Emerson, who's airing a new documentary, "Jihad in America: The Grand Deception." "Yet in the last 10 years, they've appointed (to their boards) members of the Muslim Brotherhood who believe in blasphemy laws."

The top Muslim lawyer in ACLU's stable is Jameel Jaffer, who successfully sued the U.S. to reveal CIA secrets for interrogating terror suspects.

This national-security wrecking machine is not even American. He's Canadian. He also happens to be a Muslim activist closely tied to major Muslim Brotherhood figures and front groups.


Read More At IBD: http://news.investors.com/ibd-editorials/0926...
Strel

Tallahassee, FL

#2 Oct 5, 2012
Well that would explain their famous Establishment clause lawsuitagainst TiZa, the Muslim school receving public funds.

Oh wait. I should have LOL'd instead.
part time betty Phil Gray

France

#3 Oct 5, 2012
I fart ups your nose aho!

e
homeboy

Saint Louis, MO

#5 Oct 5, 2012
Where Is My America wrote:
Islamofascism: Americans might as well be living under Islamic blasphemy laws, yet the nation's champion of free speech — the ACLU — is AWOL. That's because it's now largely run by Muslims.
The ACLU usually stands up strong for First Amendment rights. Not in the case of the Muhammad movie.
The ACLU's executive director failed to release an official statement condemning the outrageous efforts of the White House to deep-six the film, including pressuring YouTube to remove its trailer from the Web.
Amnesty International, in contrast, asserted that any Muslim hurt over the film "should not be used as a justification to curtail core freedoms or justify potential government repression."
Not until The Daily Caller contacted the ACLU did it speak out, and only meekly so. It said it was "concerned" about the White House request to censor the "repellant film." The ACLU's strangely muted response contrasts sharply with its militant reaction to post-9/11 measures to crack down on Islamic terrorists.
"The government has gone to extraordinary lengths to squelch dissent (in the Muslim community)— from censorship and surveillance to detention," it says on its website, complaining it was "encroaching" on the "free speech rights" of Muslims.
In a 200-page report on jihad fundraising, "Blocking Faith, Freezing Charity," the ACLU argued that "federal law enforcement is engaging in practices that intimidate Muslim donors and create a climate of fear that chills American Muslims' free and full exercise of their religion."
In other words, the First Amendment rights of Muslims are more precious than those of the average citizen.
Subscribe to the IBD Editorials Podcast
Where is this bias coming from? Muslims.
The ACLU now counts at least eight on its national executive staff alone. In fact, a Muslim runs the ACLU's Center for Democracy, while another heads its National Security Project.
The irony is not lost on Steve Emerson, director of the Investigative Project on Terrorism.
"The ACLU was founded on the basis that there shouldn't be any blasphemy laws," said Emerson, who's airing a new documentary, "Jihad in America: The Grand Deception." "Yet in the last 10 years, they've appointed (to their boards) members of the Muslim Brotherhood who believe in blasphemy laws."
The top Muslim lawyer in ACLU's stable is Jameel Jaffer, who successfully sued the U.S. to reveal CIA secrets for interrogating terror suspects.
This national-security wrecking machine is not even American. He's Canadian. He also happens to be a Muslim activist closely tied to major Muslim Brotherhood figures and front groups.
Read More At IBD: http://news.investors.com/ibd-editorials/0926...
I do believe that. The ACLU, hates anything to do with GOD,Jesus Christ,or the King James Bible,or what America,was built on. Yet, they'll stand back and support anything that's opposing.

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Top Stories Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
News The 'Fake News' Con: A Case Study 2 min TRUMP WINNERS 23
Christians cannot debate with ATHEISTS 9 min Buck Crick 583
Secular Humanism VS Christianity 18 min Elerby 162
The Future of Politics in America 18 min Buck Crick 251
News Roman Catholic church only true church, says Va... (Jul '07) 30 min Gods r Delusions ... 665,376
The Christian Atheist debate (Jun '15) 34 min RiversideRedneck 88,225
Prove there's a god. (Mar '08) 36 min RiversideRedneck 977,371
More from around the web