Since: Jun 12

Location hidden

#228700 Apr 6, 2013
Bobbiez wrote:
<quoted text>
That sounds great! So if none of these girls/women have abortions, the number of abortions will automatically drop and there will be no need to outlaw it for the minority who feel the need to have one.
Agreed!

“I'm here with bells on.”

Since: Jul 12

Location hidden

#228701 Apr 6, 2013
Grunt56 wrote:
<quoted text>
So you only support abortion in cases where the mother's life is in danger?
I support women having the choice, regardless. The choice women other than myself make, is not my call.

I know that's a difficult concept for you to wrap your tiny mind around.

Since: Apr 12

Location hidden

#228702 Apr 6, 2013
Sister Kathryn Lust wrote:
<quoted text>I support women having the choice, regardless. The choice women other than myself make, is not my call.
I know that's a difficult concept for you to wrap your tiny mind around.
Yeah. For a second there I thought I saw a glimmer of rational thought.

I was mistaken. Carry on.

“I'm here with bells on.”

Since: Jul 12

Location hidden

#228703 Apr 6, 2013
Grunt56 wrote:
<quoted text>
Yeah. For a second there I thought I saw a glimmer of rational thought.
I was mistaken. Carry on.
Honey, you wouldn't know a rational thought if one bit you on the caboose.

And you haven't been anything but mistaken since you got here.

Since: Apr 12

Location hidden

#228704 Apr 6, 2013
Sister Kathryn Lust wrote:
<quoted text>Honey, you wouldn't know a rational thought if one bit you on the caboose.
And you haven't been anything but mistaken since you got here.
Coming from someone who thinks its ok o kill her hold, I'd say that's a compliment.

Since: Apr 12

Location hidden

#228705 Apr 6, 2013
Grunt56 wrote:
<quoted text>
Coming from someone who thinks its ok o kill her hold, I'd say that's a compliment.
Hold being my iPads translation of child.

“I'm here with bells on.”

Since: Jul 12

Location hidden

#228706 Apr 6, 2013
Grunt56 wrote:
<quoted text>
Coming from someone who thinks its ok o kill her hold, I'd say that's a compliment.
I couldn't possibly care less what you'd say. Maybe that concept is above your comprehension level as well - I wouldn't doubt it for a second.

“Cat got your tongue?”

Since: Mar 07

Location hidden

#228707 Apr 6, 2013
With this ruling, abortion has become a moot point
~~~~~~~~~~

Judge orders FDA to make Plan B morning after pill available to females of all ages*
A Brooklyn judge on Friday reversed the FDA's 2011 decision to limit the Plan B pill's availability to women 17 and older.
(*without a prescription)

Read more: http://www.nydailynews.com/life-style/health/...

This ruling will end almost all abortions.

Judged:

12

12

11

Reply »
Report Abuse Judge it!

Since: Apr 12

Location hidden

#228708 Apr 6, 2013
Sister Kathryn Lust wrote:
<quoted text>I couldn't possibly care less what you'd say. Maybe that concept is above your comprehension level as well - I wouldn't doubt it for a second.
I expect as much. If you don't care about the kids you create to keep them alive, ou can't care about much except yourself.

“I'm here with bells on.”

Since: Jul 12

Location hidden

#228709 Apr 6, 2013
Grunt56 wrote:
<quoted text>
I expect as much. If you don't care about the kids you create to keep them alive, ou can't care about much except yourself.
Well, I can agree that I certainly don't care about you.

Judged:

11

10

10

Reply »
Report Abuse Judge it!
The Advocate

Mexico, Mexico

#228710 Apr 6, 2013
Grunt56 wrote:
<quoted text>
I expect as much. If you don't care about the kids you create to keep them alive, ou can't care about much except yourself.
Back again for more? How about you actually answer M's prompt? Or present some FACTS against the data from the Guttmacher Institute?
The Advocate

Mexico, Mexico

#228711 Apr 6, 2013
Grunt56 wrote:
<quoted text>
Hold being my iPads translation of child.
So you're saying an iPad's smarter than you? Figured as much.
konnon

Pittsburgh, PA

#228712 Apr 6, 2013
youtube.com/watch... …… Rude & Crude is the way to go

Since: Feb 08

Location hidden

#228715 Apr 6, 2013
zakinah wrote:
lets just say someone rape you have to be in a situation people always saying what they wouldn't do until they are in that situation. If I was raped, and became pregnant , you think I'm going to carry that baby for 9 months? no?
I would have, if my rape would have resulted in a pregnancy. That too would have been MY CHOICE. Nobody's business but my own.

Since: Feb 08

Location hidden

#228716 Apr 6, 2013
LightForce wrote:
<quoted text>
You are now referring to a case in which the mother's life is in danger if the child is not killed. I'm not arguing that point. What I was saying is that morality is actually when you act in the interest of others, as opposed to your own self-interest. Therefore your comment does contradict itself because you stated that the self-interest of the mother is the moral thing to do, and is also in the best interest of the child. Hypothetically speaking, there might be a cause for concern if we knew for certain that the child were doomed to spend their entire life posting meaningless comments on Topix, but then we still can't say that the self-interest of the mother ever has anything to do with the morality of killing the preborn child.
Wads of goo are not children. You really are a foolish boy.

Since: Feb 08

Location hidden

#228717 Apr 6, 2013
LightForce wrote:
<quoted text>
If a child dies at Planned Parenthood and nobody is there to see it, does that mean it never really happened? What I'm saying is that just because you don't know something, doesn't mean it's not true.
Where is your proof that there is a pro-abortion movement?
Not pro-choice, but pro-abortion?
Proof? Have you any?
I'll bet not.

Since: Feb 08

Location hidden

#228718 Apr 6, 2013
Grunt56 wrote:
<quoted text>
I've proven everything I've stated. I've pointed out that your rebuttals don't make sense, or even address my point. I've pointed out that you ignore my evidence, and instead try to shift focus to a side point.
Like I said. You're dishonest. You've lost your argument, now you just hang around to troll and cry loudly. You're like the schoolyard bully who just got his butt handed to him, so now he stands outside the fence and calls names.
You have no evidence, and you still haven't answered questions put to you.
If your wife had an ectopic pregnancy, would you just let her die before allowing a therapeutic abortion performed?
(That is just supposing that the law would LET you deny her treatment she wanted, it would not)

Since: Feb 08

Location hidden

#228719 Apr 6, 2013
LightForce wrote:
<quoted text>
I'll assume that what you are saying is that human beings who do not possess certain physical criteria that we see in most adults should not have the basic right to live like you and others might enjoy. You could use this same argument to kill granny too.
Another anomaly is that first you said that it's nobody's business, and then you said it's alright as long as she acts in a “reasonable” time. Which is it?
I've found in my own experience that it usually works for the best if you try to develop a moral basis for your actions before they actually occur, rather than acting first, and then trying to justify your actions later.
Note: At the most about 1% of abortions are done because the woman's life is in danger, so that is essentially a non-argument.
Wrong, I'm saying a wad of goo is not a child. You're the one trying to assign attributes to wads of goo that do not exist, and assume an outcome to every conception that just isn't there.
Wads of goo are not people. BORN human beings have rights, even when they're old or incapable of caring for themselves because they are BORN HUMAN BEINGS.
Sorry you're too dense to understand that.

Since: Feb 08

Location hidden

#228720 Apr 6, 2013
LightForce wrote:
<quoted text>
(deleted hogwash)
Note: At the most about 1% of abortions are done because the woman's life is in danger, so that is essentially a non-argument.
Really? When MY life was nearly ended because of an ectopic pregnancy it was certainly not a non-argument. It was the only reason I had the abortion, because it was that or die.
Oh, and in case it escapes your limited scope of comprehension, if *I* had died, the foetus would have died along with me. So what good would it have done to have refused the surgery?
Fool.

Since: Feb 08

Location hidden

#228721 Apr 6, 2013
LightForce wrote:
<quoted text>
As long as the rights of another person are being violated, it is the responsibility of everybody to make it their business.
Wads of goo are not persons. They are insensate wads of goo.

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Top Stories Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
Prove there's a god. (Mar '08) 42 min Double Fine 828,619
News Roman Catholic church only true church, says Va... (Jul '07) 45 min Robert F 584,339
9/11&bin 1 hr REV CAROL 1
Elliott and Associates: Counseling voor alle ge... 1 hr jervsc0ut 5
chat with demi lovato 112 (the real official de... (Jan '09) 1 hr Demi lovato 1,916
News Who is an atheist? (May '10) 1 hr thetruth 9,331
Poll Was 9/11 a conspiracy?? (Oct '07) 2 hr AussieBobby 270,672
Poll If you're Christain what kind are you? (Oct '07) 2 hr par five 3,540
Why Should Jesus Love Me? (Feb '08) 3 hr Ugly Truth from d... 611,869
Why I’m no longer a Christian (Jul '08) 7 hr HipGnosis 442,875
More from around the web