There is Everything Wrong with Abortion

Since: Apr 12

Location hidden

#228061 Apr 1, 2013
Sister Kathryn Lust wrote:
<quoted text>I sincerely hope an ectopic pregnancy, placental abruption, uterine rupture, and/or any of a host of other fatal complications of pregnancy, ends your game. It happens to pregnant women every day in this country, so why not to you? I cannot imagine a more appropriate end to your life.
The sooner the better.
Why? I haven't killed any of my unborn children. You, on the other hand.....

You have to be pretty mentally disturbed to live with that.

Judged:

12

12

11

Reply »
Report Abuse Judge it!

“I'm here with bells on.”

Since: Jul 12

Location hidden

#228062 Apr 1, 2013
Grunt56 wrote:
<quoted text>
Why? I haven't killed any of my unborn children. You, on the other hand.....
You have to be pretty mentally disturbed to live with that.
Because, as I've already mentioned, had I NOT killed that 2 week old embryo, IT WOULD HAVE KILLED ME.

My subsequent children are the result of not letting that one render them impossible...

What part of that do you not get?

“Jesus is coming soon”

Since: Nov 09

Location hidden

#228063 Apr 1, 2013
Mpnf1979 wrote:
<quoted text>
People can't choose when and where they become pregnant. They can take precautions and that's all. You should learn biology. You're obviously grossly ignorant of the process.
Biology has nothing to do with you taking responsibility for the life developing within you idiot, if you are not ready to take responsibility for that life then you should keep your legs closed.

“Ignorance is bliss.”

Since: May 11

Hightstown, NJ

#228064 Apr 1, 2013
Grunt56 wrote:
<quoted text>
Its been proven that you can't comprehend that a fetus and a baby are the same being, just in different stages of development.
It's been proven that you lie.
It's been proven that restrictions on abortions have been been steadily increasing.
It's been proven that a fetus' rights are increasing as we are able to slow overturn the agenda of those that want to kill them.
It hasn't been proven. Saying it's been proven and it actually having been proven are two different things. It's obvious you are ignorant of human biology. If a fetus were the same as a baby, it wouldn't require being called a fetus.

I've never lied. Don't have a reason to. The fact that you think so proves you cannot handle or understand the truth.

There is no "we." You are not a part of any legislative task force whose agenda is to overturn R v W. And it won't be overturned. And regardless, abortion will never cease to exist.

You still have nothing new to add.

“Ignorance is bliss.”

Since: May 11

Hightstown, NJ

#228065 Apr 1, 2013
Grunt56 wrote:
<quoted text>
Are you really so dense you don't know how to avoid getting pregnant? No wonder you support killing unborn babies.
I assume you're referring to not having sex. Not an option. Sorry.

“Ignorance is bliss.”

Since: May 11

Hightstown, NJ

#228066 Apr 1, 2013
Grunt56 wrote:
<quoted text>
And when when your argument has been dismantled at every turn, just declare yourself the winner.
What HAS been established is Rowe v Wade is eroded every year. An unborn child is granted more and more rights. Restrictions on abortion continue to increase.
We're moving towards the end game.
You haven't dismantled anything. You just have desperate claims to what you "think" will happen. You have failed to show how early-term abortions have been restricted. What I say stands and you can't argue it. You've got nothing.

“I'm here with bells on.”

Since: Jul 12

Location hidden

#228067 Apr 1, 2013
Grunt56 wrote:
<quoted text>
Three times.
You personally, or that 'wife' you claimed to have?(You know, the hypothetical one who might lose her hypothetical job, theoretically leaving you free to kill your hypothetical kids...)

You are not pregnant when your wife is pregnant, unless you are both pregnant women.

So are you just a garden-variety liar, or a lesbian and married in a state which allows it?

“I'm here with bells on.”

Since: Jul 12

Location hidden

#228068 Apr 1, 2013
LAWEST100 wrote:
<quoted text>Biology has nothing to do with you taking responsibility for the life developing within you idiot, if you are not ready to take responsibility for that life then you should keep your legs closed.
Go gestate something, Lawie.

Judged:

11

11

9

Reply »
Report Abuse Judge it!

“Ignorance is bliss.”

Since: May 11

Hightstown, NJ

#228069 Apr 1, 2013
Grunt56 wrote:
<quoted text>
It's NOT just her body, which is why the fetus has been granted an expanding array of rights.
Get over it.
I've yet to see one case where a fetus has brought a lawsuit against the pregnant woman. A fetus does not have rights. Especially a fetus younger than 24 weeks.

“Ignorance is bliss.”

Since: May 11

Hightstown, NJ

#228070 Apr 1, 2013
LAWEST100 wrote:
<quoted text>Biology has nothing to do with you taking responsibility for the life developing within you idiot, if you are not ready to take responsibility for that life then you should keep your legs closed.
No. It's my right to choose when and where I reproduce. Don't like it? Don't care. Not your business.

“Ignorance is bliss.”

Since: May 11

Hightstown, NJ

#228071 Apr 1, 2013
Interesting article and articulately spells out why abortion will never be outlawed.

http://www.thedailypage.com/isthmus/article.p...

“Jesus is coming soon”

Since: Nov 09

Location hidden

#228072 Apr 1, 2013
Mpnf1979 wrote:
<quoted text>
No. It's my right to choose when and where I reproduce. Don't like it? Don't care. Not your business.
That's a tired and worn out cliche, you are just another heartless pro death advocate who wants to engage in your lust and use this misguided legal system as an excuse to kill your unborn baby instead of taking the mature adult route of responsibility.

Judged:

11

10

9

Reply »
Report Abuse Judge it!

“Ignorance is bliss.”

Since: May 11

Hightstown, NJ

#228073 Apr 1, 2013
LAWEST100 wrote:
<quoted text>That's a tired and worn out cliche, you are just another heartless pro death advocate who wants to engage in your lust and use this misguided legal system as an excuse to kill your unborn baby instead of taking the mature adult route of responsibility.
Sure. Whatever you say.

Since: Apr 12

Location hidden

#228074 Apr 1, 2013
Sister Kathryn Lust wrote:
<quoted text>Because, as I've already mentioned, had I NOT killed that 2 week old embryo, IT WOULD HAVE KILLED ME.
My subsequent children are the result of not letting that one render them impossible...
What part of that do you not get?
Like I said, it takes a special kind of sick and twisted to be ok with killing your unborn child.

Since: Apr 12

Location hidden

#228075 Apr 1, 2013
Mpnf1979 wrote:
<quoted text>
It hasn't been proven. Saying it's been proven and it actually having been proven are two different things. It's obvious you are ignorant of human biology. If a fetus were the same as a baby, it wouldn't require being called a fetus.
I've never lied. Don't have a reason to. The fact that you think so proves you cannot handle or understand the truth.
There is no "we." You are not a part of any legislative task force whose agenda is to overturn R v W. And it won't be overturned. And regardless, abortion will never cease to exist.
You still have nothing new to add.
Ignoring the proof isn't quite the same as it having never been presented.

That's your game, though. You lie. You get caught. You ignore the fact that you got caught. Then you one b&k pages later with "what? You didn't prove anything".

I guess that's all you have when you're a liar.

Since: Apr 12

Location hidden

#228076 Apr 1, 2013
Mpnf1979 wrote:
<quoted text>
I assume you're referring to not having sex. Not an option. Sorry.
Personal responsibility.

You lack it

Judged:

13

13

12

Reply »
Report Abuse Judge it!

Since: Apr 12

Location hidden

#228077 Apr 1, 2013
Mpnf1979 wrote:
<quoted text>
You haven't dismantled anything. You just have desperate claims to what you "think" will happen. You have failed to show how early-term abortions have been restricted. What I say stands and you can't argue it. You've got nothing.
You try to narrow the conversation by stating "early term". The fact is, hats about all you have left. The rest of the gestation period has been restricted, and "early term" gets earlier all the time.

Thankfully, you're losing this fight.

Judged:

13

13

13

Reply »
Report Abuse Judge it!

Since: Apr 12

Location hidden

#228078 Apr 1, 2013
Mpnf1979 wrote:
<quoted text>
I've yet to see one case where a fetus has brought a lawsuit against the pregnant woman. A fetus does not have rights. Especially a fetus younger than 24 weeks.
You contradict yourself. "A fetus does not have rights", then "especially a fetus lunges than 24 weeks"

A fetus does have rights. As I pointed out earlier, the high court says so.

It's sad to see someone so uneducated discuss such an important topic.

Judged:

12

12

12

Reply »
Report Abuse Judge it!

“Ignorance is bliss.”

Since: May 11

Hightstown, NJ

#228079 Apr 1, 2013
Grunt56 wrote:
<quoted text>
Personal responsibility.
You lack it
You saying I lack personal responsibility isn't the same as me lacking personal responsibility.

“Ignorance is bliss.”

Since: May 11

Hightstown, NJ

#228080 Apr 1, 2013
Grunt56 wrote:
<quoted text>
You try to narrow the conversation by stating "early term". The fact is, hats about all you have left. The rest of the gestation period has been restricted, and "early term" gets earlier all the time.
Thankfully, you're losing this fight.
Nobody is fighting for late-term abortions. It's not even part of the argument except when you try to introduce it as a claim that there are "restrictions." No one is advocating late-term abortions be allowed unless it is in dire circumstances. Your entire argument is based on a lie. Haven't lost. Ain't gonna lose. And there isn't a fight.

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Top Stories Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
Prove there's a god. (Mar '08) 3 min Buck Crick 856,126
Can a White Pride Group not be labeled a racist... (Apr '07) 3 min Johnny 6,113
The Christian Atheist debate 3 min Kaitlin the Wolf ... 1,090
Why I’m no longer a Christian (Jul '08) 9 min waaasssuuup 444,389
Why do we live life when we have to die anyway? (Jul '13) 10 min No username 200
Bush is a hero (Sep '07) 12 min WildWeirdWillie 177,231
News Roman Catholic church only true church, says Va... (Jul '07) 30 min THE VOICE OF GOD 596,773
More from around the web