There is Everything Wrong with Abortion

“Ignorance is bliss.”

Since: May 11

Columbus, OH

#227969 Mar 31, 2013
Grunt56 wrote:
<quoted text>
Nothing? Wish I could say that was unusual. Even your unintelligent cohort realizes you stated no argument to respond to.
If you say so. Really it's just not worth talking to you because you don't offer civilized discourse. You just become juvenile and repeat the same crap over and over such as your "saying it's ___ isn't the same as it being ____." That's not an argument.

“Ignorance is bliss.”

Since: May 11

Columbus, OH

#227970 Mar 31, 2013
Grunt56 wrote:
<quoted text>
We will, eventually.
You will eventually stop griping? Good.

“Ignorance is bliss.”

Since: May 11

Columbus, OH

#227971 Mar 31, 2013
Grunt56 wrote:
<quoted text>
You stand by a misleading an ignorant statement? That's one solid argument.
You specifically stated a fetus has no rights. I provided specific examples that showed you're wrong.
Repeating a falsehood doesn't make it fact.
And you can't disprove what I've said. You know full well that if I were pregnant and smoking, I would not be arrested for endangering the fetus within. That is a fact. If I gave a minor a cigarette, I would be arrested. How many times do I have to repeat this? A woman has autonomy over her body.

“Ignorance is bliss.”

Since: May 11

Columbus, OH

#227972 Mar 31, 2013
LAWEST100 wrote:
<quoted text>That was established with ol'Mpnf1979 long ago, you are just one of the few intelligent enough to see it
And yet he nor you are able to deny the truth of my statement. Funny. Neither one of you are very smart. Both of you are just angry people who hate the women are allowed to make their own decisions regardless of what you think.

“Ignorance is bliss.”

Since: May 11

Columbus, OH

#227973 Mar 31, 2013
Grunt56 wrote:
<quoted text>
Sure. It's currently legal for you to kill that unborn child. The restrictions on that grow stronger every year, and it won't be long before it will no longer to be legal.
Legal or not, abortions won't stop. And they won't be prosecuted. The right seems to think gun control won't stop violent crimes committed with guns but they think abortion restrictions will stop abortions. Shows how smart they aren't.

“I'm here with bells on.”

Since: Jul 12

Location hidden

#227974 Mar 31, 2013
Grunt56 wrote:
<quoted text>
Sure. It's currently legal for you to kill that unborn child. The restrictions on that grow stronger every year, and it won't be long before it will no longer to be legal.
Abortion in America will not be outlawed. Too many women recognize that laws against it are not in our best interests, and will fight for our bodily autonomy, regardless of the opinions of folks who would happily send us back to the days of back-alleys and filthy kitchen tables. Criminalizing abortion is not a pro-life idea - it is merely punitive, stupid, and pointless.

Politicians who vote the restrictions in, are being summarily ignored at the polls, too.

What have you heard from Todd Akin lately?

Since: Apr 12

Location hidden

#227975 Mar 31, 2013
mamma-san wrote:
<quoted text>
The only thing you "proved" was that you have an opinion. There was nothing legal in what you stated.
As for morals, they are subjective and have no bearing on this decision except for the person involved.
The UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, you know, the country you live in? says it is LEGAL for a woman to retain her privacy after having sex and to have autonomy over her body. That includes having an abortion if she doesn't wish to remain pregnant.
Game, set, match.
False. This shows you don't even have a basic understanding of law. It also shows you can't read, since I've posted specific examples to support my statement.

Since: Apr 12

Location hidden

#227976 Mar 31, 2013
Mpnf1979 wrote:
<quoted text>
And you can't disprove what I've said. You know full well that if I were pregnant and smoking, I would not be arrested for endangering the fetus within. That is a fact. If I gave a minor a cigarette, I would be arrested. How many times do I have to repeat this? A woman has autonomy over her body.
Sure. That's just half of what you said, and I don't dispute it. That will soon change, though. That statement was made by you to support your other statement, which you now conveniently ignore, that a fetus doesn't have rights.

That's a false statement, like just about everything else you've posted.

Since: Apr 12

Location hidden

#227977 Mar 31, 2013
Mpnf1979 wrote:
<quoted text>
And yet he nor you are able to deny the truth of my statement. Funny. Neither one of you are very smart. Both of you are just angry people who hate the women are allowed to make their own decisions regardless of what you think.
Saying I didn't establish that you were incorrect is another falsehood.

You specifically said a fetus leant have rights. I provided specific examples that showed you were wrong.

Since: Apr 12

Location hidden

#227978 Mar 31, 2013
Mpnf1979 wrote:
<quoted text>
Legal or not, abortions won't stop. And they won't be prosecuted. The right seems to think gun control won't stop violent crimes committed with guns but they think abortion restrictions will stop abortions. Shows how smart they aren't.
They won't stop, but once uncovered they will be prosecuted.

Since: Apr 12

Location hidden

#227979 Mar 31, 2013
Sister Kathryn Lust wrote:
<quoted text>Abortion in America will not be outlawed. Too many women recognize that laws against it are not in our best interests, and will fight for our bodily autonomy, regardless of the opinions of folks who would happily send us back to the days of back-alleys and filthy kitchen tables. Criminalizing abortion is not a pro-life idea - it is merely punitive, stupid, and pointless.
Politicians who vote the restrictions in, are being summarily ignored at the polls, too.
What have you heard from Todd Akin lately?
Yes it will

“Ignorance is bliss.”

Since: May 11

Columbus, OH

#227980 Mar 31, 2013
Grunt56 wrote:
<quoted text>
Sure. That's just half of what you said, and I don't dispute it. That will soon change, though. That statement was made by you to support your other statement, which you now conveniently ignore, that a fetus doesn't have rights.
That's a false statement, like just about everything else you've posted.
You keep saying things will soon change. You've been saying this for a while, yet nothing has changed. It won't change. It hasn't changed. The fetus does not have rights. I stand by that statement. If a fetus dies within a woman's womb through no fault of her own, there is sometimes a charge of fetal homicide. This is largely a state-by-state decision. That charge is more for the woman's benefit than the fetus'. The fetus does not have any rights. It is not issued any power whatsoever by the law.

“Ignorance is bliss.”

Since: May 11

Columbus, OH

#227981 Mar 31, 2013
Grunt56 wrote:
<quoted text>
Saying I didn't establish that you were incorrect is another falsehood.
You specifically said a fetus leant have rights. I provided specific examples that showed you were wrong.
You didn't show anything. The fetus still doesn't have rights.

“Ignorance is bliss.”

Since: May 11

Columbus, OH

#227982 Mar 31, 2013
Grunt56 wrote:
<quoted text>
They won't stop, but once uncovered they will be prosecuted.
We've already gone over this and I have proven that there is no way of distinguishing between a miscarriage and an abortion. You seem to hold a lot of hope in what you "think" might happen. Your estrangement from reality is alarming.

“Jesus is coming soon”

Since: Nov 09

Location hidden

#227983 Mar 31, 2013
Mpnf1979 wrote:
<quoted text>
And yet he nor you are able to deny the truth of my statement. Funny. Neither one of you are very smart. Both of you are just angry people who hate the women are allowed to make their own decisions regardless of what you think.
Your post is too ironic and full of deflection at others, you've just really described yourself, you profess to stand on women's rights but you hate them yourself, not I, because you lack the character and concern as well as the wisdom to stir them toward the right direction of chosing life for their unborn, how pitiful you truly are.

Judged:

10

10

9

Reply »
Report Abuse Judge it!

“I'm here with bells on.”

Since: Jul 12

Location hidden

#227984 Mar 31, 2013
Grunt56 wrote:
<quoted text>
Yes it will
Saying "it will" does not mean that it will.

It hasn't. That's the important thing.

“I'm here with bells on.”

Since: Jul 12

Location hidden

#227985 Mar 31, 2013
Grunt56 wrote:
<quoted text>
They won't stop, but once uncovered they will be prosecuted.
Have you applied for the position of 'womb inspector' under the new regime yet, dear?

Shall I start mailing you my menstrual pads every month, so that you can ascertain whether or not they contain a fertilized ovum or two?

I have a box, and I'll line it with plastic wrap - what's your address??

“Ignorance is bliss.”

Since: May 11

Columbus, OH

#227986 Mar 31, 2013
LAWEST100 wrote:
<quoted text>Your post is too ironic and full of deflection at others, you've just really described yourself, you profess to stand on women's rights but you hate them yourself, not I, because you lack the character and concern as well as the wisdom to stir them toward the right direction of chosing life for their unborn, how pitiful you truly are.
lol...okay then. I don't think any woman should be forced to have a child she does not want or cannot care for. I'm not interested in subjugating women the way you are.

Since: Apr 12

Location hidden

#227987 Mar 31, 2013
Mpnf1979 wrote:
<quoted text>
You keep saying things will soon change. You've been saying this for a while, yet nothing has changed. It won't change. It hasn't changed. The fetus does not have rights. I stand by that statement. If a fetus dies within a woman's womb through no fault of her own, there is sometimes a charge of fetal homicide. This is largely a state-by-state decision. That charge is more for the woman's benefit than the fetus'. The fetus does not have any rights. It is not issued any power whatsoever by the law.
Things HAVE changed, and they continue to.

Since: Apr 12

Location hidden

#227988 Mar 31, 2013
Mpnf1979 wrote:
<quoted text>
You didn't show anything. The fetus still doesn't have rights.
Yeah. Except for the fact that I provided specific examples that show they do.

Jennifer Johnson
Cornelia Whitner
Melissa Ann Rowland

Just three examples of women prosecuted for violating the rights of the fetus.

Ooops. Looks like you're wrong.

Again.

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Top Stories Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
The Christian Atheist debate (Jun '15) 16 min Buck Crick 104,795
News Roman Catholic church only true church, says Va... (Jul '07) 27 min waaasssuuup 673,367
News Michael Jackson broke down racial barriers (Jun '09) 1 hr yidfellas v USA 1,561
Prove there's a god. (Mar '08) 1 hr Nohweh 981,360
Bush is a hero (Sep '07) 1 hr bad bob 184,628
God is REAL - Miracles Happen! (Jun '11) 4 hr ChromiuMan 6,190
Well.......now I KNOW I won't buy with Amazon.com 6 hr Doctor REALITY 1
More from around the web