“MEET ROSEMARY-She Seeks Home”

Since: Oct 10

With Established Harem

#600005 Oct 9, 2013
MisterCharrington wrote:
<quoted text>
...you're looking for a job as a proof reader?
.. are you offering? I'm pretty good at it ..

Since: Sep 10

San Francisco, CA

#600006 Oct 9, 2013
Skombolis wrote:
<quoted text>
Don't even pretend you know the law HL
You will have to find something else to circle the wagons on
And once again, this is you initiating the conflict
Be nice.

Remember, it's HL you're talking to.

“Ditat Deus”

Since: Jul 12

Location hidden

#600007 Oct 9, 2013
It aint necessarily so wrote:
<quoted text>
I was at the dog park park this morning. As I was walking up to them, my wife gave a woman there some coins for a reason that I don't know. The man next to her quipped, "What am I? Black? How come I don't get any change?"
Still? This is 2013.
What you may not know is that such comments can create a lot of bad feelings for you. You apparently either don't know or don't care. I want to be certain that it is not the former.
"Still"? What do you mean still?? Do you think humans are morally more advanced in 2013 than we were in 1013? Or in 0013? If so, why? What leads you to that assumption?

Since: Mar 09

Location hidden

#600008 Oct 9, 2013
Catcher1 wrote:
<quoted text>
Skom's dog ate my homework.
Poor Catcher

Even his little dorky claim how important correct sentences are to him backfires and leaves him scrambling

What do you have left pretend lawyer? Seems like just a lot of lotion and pickles to me

LOL

“Ditat Deus”

Since: Jul 12

Location hidden

#600009 Oct 9, 2013
Catcher1 wrote:

Your sidekick RR is a child abuser and wife beater.
Ugh.

How long are you gonna ride that lie?

Since: Mar 09

Location hidden

#600010 Oct 9, 2013
MisterCharrington wrote:
<quoted text>
Again...
What will be the differences in the ultimate effects of a law(either statute or precedent) and a "set of principles" which will be applied by the court.
Here's a clue...expressed numerically it's between -1 and 1
LOL

Yeah, I am the one that pointed that out to you dumbass troll!

The set of principles aren't legally binding on their own but in many states they have been incorporated into actual laws

Those laws are what is binding

“Ditat Deus”

Since: Jul 12

Location hidden

#600011 Oct 9, 2013
MisterCharrington wrote:
<quoted text>
*BOOOOM!*>Irony Bomb<*BOOOOM*
You got a problem with the truth?

Since: May 11

UK

#600012 Oct 9, 2013
Happy Lesbo wrote:
<quoted text>
.. hi ya waaasssuuup !!..
.. please don't proposition me ..
.. did you know Leslie Gore is a lesbian ??..
Just as an aside...

My new pupil Rhian is a lesbian, she thinks this means I automatically do not view her as a woman, to the point that she undressed in front of me and got ready for bed while we were staying in Middle Temple.

It's a little awkward, I told my wife who said she was simply having fun at my expense and flexing her "sexual muscles"....and attempting to torture a much older man.

I do have photographs....

Since: May 11

UK

#600013 Oct 9, 2013
Skombolis wrote:
<quoted text>
Dork bomb
Boooom!
Dumbass troll
LOL
*tumbleweed* and a single bell tolls dolefully

“MEET ROSEMARY-She Seeks Home”

Since: Oct 10

With Established Harem

#600014 Oct 9, 2013
Catcher1 wrote:
<quoted text>
You can bash Skom all you want, and he will no longer be nasty to you.
He must keep his pal RR satisfied.
Thing Two needs Thing One.
.. behave yourself or ..........

“MEET ROSEMARY-She Seeks Home”

Since: Oct 10

With Established Harem

#600015 Oct 9, 2013
Skombolis wrote:
<quoted text>
Don't even pretend you know the law HL
You will have to find something else to circle the wagons on
And once again, this is you initiating the conflict
Catcher1 wrote:
<quoted text>
Be nice.
Remember, it's HL you're talking to.
.. do you hate me or what? You're only inviting Thing #1 to abuse me more. Can I offer you a pickle? Sweet or sour ??..

Since: May 11

UK

#600016 Oct 9, 2013
Skombolis wrote:
<quoted text>
LOL
Yeah, I am the one that pointed that out to you dumbass troll!
The set of principles aren't legally binding on their own but in many states they have been incorporated into actual laws
Those laws are what is binding
...you can now show me the post where you pointed that out...of course.

Since: Mar 09

Location hidden

#600017 Oct 9, 2013
Catcher1 wrote:
<quoted text>
Be nice.
Remember, it's HL you're talking to.
Shoot.

I take it back

Please don't sissy slap me

Since: Mar 09

Location hidden

#600018 Oct 9, 2013
MisterCharrington wrote:
<quoted text>
*tumbleweed* and a single bell tolls dolefully
It was mocking you for being a dork

I really don't think there is a "dork bomb"

I was pointing out how dorky it is to say there is an "irony bomb"

You missed the point again dumbass!

“MEET ROSEMARY-She Seeks Home”

Since: Oct 10

With Established Harem

#600019 Oct 9, 2013
MisterCharrington wrote:
<quoted text>
Just as an aside...
My new pupil Rhian is a lesbian, she thinks this means I automatically do not view her as a woman, to the point that she undressed in front of me and got ready for bed while we were staying in Middle Temple.
It's a little awkward, I told my wife who said she was simply having fun at my expense and flexing her "sexual muscles"....and attempting to torture a much older man.
I do have photographs....
.. is she hot? Can you e-mail me the photos ??..

.. was it torture for you? Did Catcher tell you about our Skype sessions ??..

Since: Sep 10

San Francisco, CA

#600020 Oct 9, 2013
RiversideRedneck wrote:
<quoted text>
Ugh.
How long are you gonna ride that lie?
It's not a lie.

In my view, from what you have posted here and how you have posted, you are a child abuser and a wife beater. And a racist, and a mysogynist, and a very violent, controlling, angry guy.

And so long as you're here, you'll hear about it.

You'll just have to deal with it.

Skom will support you, if that's any consolation.

But don't expect support from any civilized people.

Since: Sep 10

San Francisco, CA

#600021 Oct 9, 2013
Happy Lesbo wrote:
Skombolis wrote:
<quoted text>
Don't even pretend you know the law HL
You will have to find something else to circle the wagons on
And once again, this is you initiating the conflict
<quoted text>
.. do you hate me or what? You're only inviting Thing #1 to abuse me more. Can I offer you a pickle? Sweet or sour ??..
Find any pickle in a post of mine, and I have $1,000 for your favorite charity.

Since: Mar 09

Location hidden

#600022 Oct 9, 2013
MisterCharrington wrote:
<quoted text>
...you can now show me the post where you pointed that out...of course.
Unbelievable!

"Try reading dumbass troll

"[1] The doctrine is not a defined law that can be invoked, but a set of principles which is incorporated in some form in the law of most states."

http://www.topix.com/forum/topstories/T0N0LOR...

What do you think that is saying?

It specifically says the doctrine is not a defined law that can be invoked but the principles have been incorporated into the law in most states

I have to repeat what it says because that is how obvious it is what it is saying

You really are a dumbass. It doesn't get stupider than this

Since: May 11

UK

#600023 Oct 9, 2013
Skombolis wrote:
<quoted text>
It was mocking you for being a dork
I really don't think there is a "dork bomb"
I was pointing out how dorky it is to say there is an "irony bomb"
You missed the point again dumbass!
...you know that sometimes an explanation is not required and that it often shows the best command of language to say very little or absolutely nothing?

That was one of those times.

Since: Mar 09

Location hidden

#600024 Oct 9, 2013
Catcher1 wrote:
<quoted text>
It's not a lie.
In my view, from what you have posted here and how you have posted, you are a child abuser and a wife beater. And a racist, and a mysogynist, and a very violent, controlling, angry guy.
And so long as you're here, you'll hear about it.
You'll just have to deal with it.
Skom will support you, if that's any consolation.
But don't expect support from any civilized people.
You are a blatant liar pickle boy

No "civilized" person would conclude tapping a baby on the butt justifies calling someone a child abuser

No "civilized" person would conclude smacking someone on the top of the head to get them to stop biting you justifies calling someone a wife-beater

You are a sad little man

Now go find some other "civilized men" and take a bath

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Top Stories Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
Prove there's a god. (Mar '08) 3 min ChristineM 810,072
Was 9/11 a conspiracy?? (Oct '07) 4 min Aura Mytha 268,963
ye olde village pub (Jun '07) 16 min Ricky F 53,315
Roman Catholic church only true church, says Va... (Jul '07) 18 min hojo 574,215
sex (May '13) 22 min xxx 96
sex 52 min romance gay 1
Gay sex in Doha - need hot men (Sep '13) 2 hr Kumar 13
Straight guys: Would you ever have intercourse ... (Jul '12) 3 hr viky235 164
Dubai massage Body To Body full service 0559... (Mar '14) 13 hr Coolsa 205
More from around the web