Why Should Jesus Love Me?

“MEET KIKI -She Seeks Home”

Since: Oct 10

With Established Harem

#599869 Oct 9, 2013
Le_le wrote:
<quoted text>
RR's intent was to harm the man in the vehicle. What else could his intent of been?( that includes Skom).**PORTIONS SNIPPED**
.. when angry, sometimes I go outside and throw rocks against a fence. Displaced anger can be dangerous ..

Since: Mar 09

Location hidden

#599871 Oct 9, 2013
macumazahn wrote:
<quoted text>Of course I read it.
And, apparently unlike you, I understood it.
Lemme translate:
One can use deadly force to protect property if that's the only way one can stop it from being stolen, or if that's the only way to stop the thief from getting away with it.
Try to pay attention.
you are wrong

The court says you are wrong

And its why you made sure to put a disclaimer on your post saying "I would not recommend this"\

Why would you go out of your way to make sure you tell people you would not recommend using a legal remedy Mac?

That's weird from a guy who has bragged on Topix he would shoot trespassers

And what a surprise, you didn't link your source either

But try reading the case law and also link your source and we can go from there if you still don't get it
Do Do Cockodoo

Baltimore, MD

#599872 Oct 9, 2013
macumazahn wrote:
<quoted text>You do understand tht different states have different laws? Or did you skip that Civics class?
Iowa law does not apply in either Texas or Florida. Or, for that matter, Georgia.
go mother f....away from this thread about jesus

your atheistic BS is worth only pile of s...

Since: Mar 09

Location hidden

#599873 Oct 9, 2013
macumazahn wrote:
<quoted text>You do understand tht different states have different laws? Or did you skip that Civics class?
Iowa law does not apply in either Texas or Florida. Or, for that matter, Georgia.
Holy crap are you ignorant mac

Do you know what sister states means?

Do you know what legal precedent means?

Why do you think things go to a supreme court and not just the state supreme court?

Although I am not surprised coming from someone who said they would shoot trespassers
Dr shrink

Baltimore, MD

#599874 Oct 9, 2013
Happy Lesbo wrote:
<quoted text>
.. when angry, sometimes I go outside and throw rocks against a fence. Displaced anger can be dangerous ..
my 3 farts can make balance of your anger
also breat deep 3 farts prescribed by your dr Shrink

“Ditat Deus”

Since: Jul 12

Location hidden

#599875 Oct 9, 2013
RiversideRedneck wrote:
<quoted text>
I'm not participating in the name calling/slandering that you talked about,....
BenAdam wrote:
<quoted text>
Yes you do... and you lie about it as well. Thanks for proving why most of us think your an ahole.
Did you even read what Annie or I wrote?

The name calling & slandering is constant from you.

You seem to always have to end your posts with a derragtory name calling, like you JUST did here, calling me an ahole.

Since: Mar 09

Location hidden

#599876 Oct 9, 2013
BenAdam wrote:
<quoted text>
The reports on the DC incident.
Care to sit in a car while I smash the windshield with a piece of iron repeatedly ?
I wouldn't even do that to RR to test the theory. Can we get Coffey for a test subject ?
He said it struck it one time

Why are you saying repeatedly?

Besides, now the conversation is whether i would find it enjoyable, not whether i am allowed to kill the person in return?

No I am sure i wouldn't like it

Is that really what we are on now?

“Ditat Deus”

Since: Jul 12

Location hidden

#599877 Oct 9, 2013
BenAdam wrote:
No you didn't.
Another new story by you.
Yes, I've written that before.

Catcher has made several comments about it.

You do't believe me, ask him.

“Ditat Deus”

Since: Jul 12

Location hidden

#599878 Oct 9, 2013
BenAdam wrote:
Another new story!
My! My! You certainly are pathological.
How is that a new story?!

It's an addendum.

If I told you it was in the middle of the afternoon, it that a "new story", too?
dogs of war

Baltimore, MD

#599879 Oct 9, 2013
BenAdam wrote:
<quoted text>
The reports on the DC incident.
Care to sit in a car while I smash the windshield with a piece of iron repeatedly ?
I wouldn't even do that to RR to test the theory. Can we get Coffey for a test subject ?
american cowards attack human,first handcuff then 10 of them beat and kick him to his death

I as foreign moral human ,use only my fist one by one?
I don't wish you to meet me alone one by one,
your nose would be broken eyes full of blue bruises,and kicked a.....for all those constant insults,and hates around.
dogs of war

Baltimore, MD

#599880 Oct 9, 2013
RiversideRedneck wrote:
RiversideRedneck wrote:
<quoted text>
I'm not participating in the name calling/slandering that you talked about,....
<quoted text>
Did you even read what Annie or I wrote?
The name calling & slandering is constant from you.
You seem to always have to end your posts with a derragtory name calling, like you JUST did here, calling me an ahole.
that is what I don't like
this f...scum call almost every christian with his insults,hates, and derogatory posts,

but if someone call him that he is POS
he get upset on you or RA

I even doesn't have desire to spew at his coward cyber face

he kiss only Skombolis a...because he is scare of Skombolis logical defeat of scums like him-that way it makes him safe in this room

Since: Mar 09

Location hidden

#599881 Oct 9, 2013
AnnieJ wrote:
<quoted text>
Just so there is not any misunderstanding...
My post might have been written to G/Duane/Ben but it included all that are fighting to have the biggest "D*ck"...including you RR.
If you find it ridiculous...why are you participating in it?
Basically you guys have fairly well cleaned out this thread...look around...how many do you see contributing to this thread on a regular basis? It has gotten old...the constant turf wars. It didn't just happen when "the other side" showed up...it has been going on for a long time in here. It has however gotten worse...maybe...if that is possible.
At this point...it has nothing to do with Christian vs nonChristian...it is about seeing who can piss the furthest.
Nonsense Annie

It is the same traveling trolls that came here in the beginning

Just because they don't always make it about religion doesn't change what they have come here to do

And why does RR participate when he is being slandered? is that a joke?

I noticed you have never said a word to any of the traveling trolls. You waited about two months into it and finally said something to G about it who you have said stuff to before

If you think the accusation against RR is untrue why wouldn't you address Catcher who has been the ringleader?

It has gotten WAY, WAY worse since the group from PTAG came here and everybody seems to know it except you and them

RR has a right to defend himself against claims he beats women and children

“"None shall pass"”

Since: Jul 11

There

#599882 Oct 9, 2013
Skombolis wrote:
<quoted text>
you are wrong
The court says you are wrong...
Several states authorize the use of deadly force to protect property.
Here is a list of the laws for all states from CNN's website:

http://www.cnn.com/interactive/2012/04/us/tab...

“"None shall pass"”

Since: Jul 11

There

#599883 Oct 9, 2013
RiversideRedneck wrote:
<quoted text>
...You do't believe me...
I don't believe much of anything you post. You are proven "fabricator".

You should read the story of the Boy Who Cried Wolf.
dr Shrink

Baltimore, MD

#599884 Oct 9, 2013
Skombolis wrote:
<quoted text>
He said it struck it one time
Why are you saying repeatedly?
Besides, now the conversation is whether i would find it enjoyable, not whether i am allowed to kill the person in return?
No I am sure i wouldn't like it
Is that really what we are on now?
this topic hater hates you too, not only old RA or RR,or me

only he kiss you a.... to makes you silence ,that way make him safe on this topic with all those wicked insults against every christian.
He knows that you by your logical defeats are able to smash him out of this room and stop this abominable hate spread by him(leader)or all those scums like;INAS,CATCHER ,HL and other sick moraly gays

Skom?I wonder you don't see this?

“H-o-o-o-o-o-o-ld on thar!”

Since: Sep 08

The Borderland of Sol

#599885 Oct 9, 2013
Skombolis wrote:
<quoted text>
you are wrong
The court says you are wrong
And its why you made sure to put a disclaimer on your post saying "I would not recommend this"\
Why would you go out of your way to make sure you tell people you would not recommend using a legal remedy Mac?
That's weird from a guy who has bragged on Topix he would shoot trespassers
And what a surprise, you didn't link your source either
But try reading the case law and also link your source and we can go from there if you still don't get it
*sigh*

What court said otherwise? And does their writ run in Florida and Texas?

And I put the disclaimer in because I was a professional firearms instructor and Range Safety Officer - as well as a competitive shooter.

I ALWAYS recommend unassing the area rather than shooting.

Since: May 11

Ashford, UK

#599886 Oct 9, 2013
Skombolis wrote:
<quoted text>
LOL
The dumbass troll actually gets something close to right
But its not would a reasonable man feel his life is in imminent danger but rather would it be reasonable for a person to feel their life was in imminent danger
The reaction is being judged as reasonable not the man
But you are right it needs to be reasonable and the danger needs to be IMMINENT
And someone pounding on the outside of a locked door would not make the danger imminent
Your group is pretty prideful for being so freaking stupid
But you came close at least. Much closer than Scaritual. Then again, you had my posts telling you all this already
You can regurgitate, that I know
:)
The 'reasonable person' test is first semester criminal law, something about which you know nothing. It is called a 'legal fiction', an hypothetical tool constructing an analogue of the 'ideal human agent', this is employed by the court to benchmark what was 'reasonable'. There are countless jornal articles on the subject.

The reactions would be measured against the reaction of the 'reasonable man'. Not you, me or anyone else.

Google Quetelet, Menlove and perhaps APP v Wednesbury for case law regarding 'reasonableness' then commence your word vomit.

“"None shall pass"”

Since: Jul 11

There

#599887 Oct 9, 2013
Skombolis wrote:
<quoted text>
He said it struck it one time
Why are you saying repeatedly?
Besides, now the conversation is whether i would find it enjoyable, not whether i am allowed to kill the person in return?
No I am sure i wouldn't like it
Is that really what we are on now?
Which rendition of RR's story are you buying ?

He changed it a few dozen times already.

First he was "killing a car" then it changed to "slightly broke a windshield with a single blow from a steering wheel lock."

He sounds just like a teenager caught in a lie.

In honesty, I think the who event only happened in RR's imagination. There was no car, person, club, cop, court, jail etc. at all.

Since: May 11

Ashford, UK

#599888 Oct 9, 2013
Skombolis wrote:
<quoted text>
LOL
Shut up dumbass troll
I am sure the child didn't remember being tapped on the butt at 6 months old
You can't have it both ways. That the baby won't even make the connection but being tapped on the butt at 6 months will make them turn on their father violently when they are older
You seem worked up. Find Catcher and take a bubble bath
shhhh...listen....they're playing your song!

Since: Mar 09

Location hidden

#599889 Oct 9, 2013
BenAdam wrote:
<quoted text>
Several states authorize the use of deadly force to protect property.
Here is a list of the laws for all states from CNN's website:
http://www.cnn.com/interactive/2012/04/us/tab...
No they don't Ben

Please list the states from your own source that supposedly say that and I will copy what it actually says from the same source

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Top Stories Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
The Christian Atheist debate (Jun '15) 21 min RiversideRedneck 104,523
Prove there's a god. (Mar '08) 23 min RiversideRedneck 981,211
News Roman Catholic church only true church, says Va... (Jul '07) 52 min RiversideRedneck 672,928
Speedway- Have You Purchased a Money order and... (Sep '09) 2 hr Neil1210 28
Bush is a hero (Sep '07) 4 hr bad bob 184,571
News Michael Jackson's doctor: 'I told the truth' (Aug '09) 4 hr Pres Mr Donald J ... 392
the BIGGEST "LIE" LAPD's Tom Lange EVER told! 5 hr Pres Mr Donald J ... 2
Poll Was 9/11 a conspiracy?? (Oct '07) 14 hr Rob Ford Sr 286,299
More from around the web