Why Should Jesus Love Me?

Since: May 11

Birmingham, UK

#599663 Oct 8, 2013
RiversideRedneck wrote:
<quoted text>
Another red herring.
Forget it. I'm not asking you five times. Obviously you don't want to answer.
Your concesion is noted and accepted. You see discipline and assault as the same thing....
You saw a concession where there was none? You have a cognitive issue going on in your brain, seek help.

Using physical coercion(force) as 'discipline' is assault and abuse by every definition.

I would never do it.

Since: May 11

Birmingham, UK

#599664 Oct 8, 2013
Skombolis wrote:
<quoted text>
The habit of a lunchtime?
Yours must be eating crow
Tell your story again please dumbass troll
LOL
Well that's how you live isn't it? From one lunch to another?
Chess

Columbus, OH

#599665 Oct 8, 2013
Skombolis wrote:
<quoted text>
Hey look, the dumbass troll once again misses the point
And doesn't know that in some states battery is the physical assault and in others it is just called assault
LOL
Skombolis wrote:
<quoted text>
Dumbass troll posting to the guy making a chump out of him
LOL
You use the word "troll" much.

Why is that?

Since: May 11

Birmingham, UK

#599666 Oct 8, 2013
Catcher1 wrote:
<quoted text>
You lose.
Godwin's law.
yup, Godwin'ed, I concur.
Chess

Columbus, OH

#599667 Oct 8, 2013
Skombolis wrote:
<quoted text>
You lose
Murphy's dumbass troll law
LOL
But hey its bound to get better for ya right?
See?

“MEET KIKI -She Seeks Home”

Since: Oct 10

With Established Harem

#599668 Oct 8, 2013
RiversideRedneck wrote:
<quoted text>
Yes, I did.
But it was never violent.
Do you also see "discipline a child" equal to "violent assault"?
.. physically disciplining a child is assault ..

Since: May 11

Birmingham, UK

#599669 Oct 8, 2013
Catcher1 wrote:
<quoted text>
Another mistake by Thing Two's spellchecker.
you know I actually picked up my phone and typed 'consc' and it actually suggested 'conscious' and 'conscience'...skummybollocks must have just selected the wrong word...twice. LOL

Since: Mar 09

Location hidden

#599670 Oct 8, 2013
MisterCharrington wrote:
<quoted text>
Is that how you measure yourself? Wow, that's really tragic...my heart is bleeding purple piss just for you...wee 'man'.
Hey look, the dumbass troll jumped to dumbass conclusions

It has nothing to do with how I measure myself

I do think it shows how pathetic some adults are that they think putting colored pictures above a post means anything

Were those your icons dumbass troll? I had a hunch the person doing them would probably respond!

LOL

Since: May 11

Birmingham, UK

#599671 Oct 8, 2013
Chess wrote:
<quoted text>
<quoted text>
You use the word "troll" much.
Why is that?
The ultimate insult it can muster is to accuse others of what it is.

It's why I worry about all these good Christians who are so rabid when it comes to homosexuality and dare I say it paedophilia.

Since: Sep 10

Fremont, CA

#599672 Oct 8, 2013
RiversideRedneck wrote:
<quoted text>
Yes, I did.
But it was never violent.
Do you also see "discipline a child" equal to "violent assault"?
I'll answer.

But first, prove you have hands.

Since: Mar 09

Location hidden

#599673 Oct 8, 2013
Happy Lesbo wrote:
Skombolis wrote:
<quoted text>
So if i am inside my house and someone is , you see that as pretty much the same thing as swinging the bat at me personally?
You can't charge someone or defend yourself based on what you think someone may do afterwards
If you shoot a guy while he is still hitting your front door, you are going to jail for murder. Same with your windshield
If he breaks down your front door, enters the house, and tries to hit you; then you can shoot them
If someone breaks the windshield, manually pulls it away from the car and then tries to hit you with something, then you can shoot them. Not before
That's simply the law
<quoted text>
.. this legal debate has become comical. Perhaps you should attend the SKOM & RR Legal Seminar before appearing before another justice ??..
.. you need to go to SKOM & RR law school ..
So you think the point he made in response to a comment that was never said was a good one huh?

LOL

Since: Mar 09

Location hidden

#599674 Oct 8, 2013
MisterCharrington wrote:
<quoted text>
Well that's how you live isn't it? From one lunch to another?
LOL

Dumbass troll trying to pretend he meant habit of a lunchtime and not habit of a lifetime

Since: Sep 10

Fremont, CA

#599675 Oct 8, 2013
Skombolis wrote:
<quoted text>
You lose
Murphy's dumbass troll law
LOL
But hey its bound to get better for ya right?
I have a mansion forget the price
Ain't never been there they tell me it's nice
I live in hotels tear out the walls
I have accountants pay for it all

They say I'm crazy but I have a good time
I'm just looking for clues at the scene of the crime
Life's been good to me so far

My Maserati does 185
I lost my license now I don't drive
I have a limo ride in the back
I lock the doors in case I'm attacked

I go to parties sometimes until four
It's hard to leave when you can't find the door
It's tough to handle this fortune and fame
Everybody's so different I haven't changed

Credit: Joe Walsh

“A Universal Cause”

Since: Feb 09

The Cosmos

#599676 Oct 8, 2013
Skombolis wrote:
<quoted text>Honestly sometimes I don't know for sure if its all a game or if someone is truly bothered, regardless of whether its seems like they should be. IDK, I find myself feeling sympathy and maybe I'm getting laughed at for being so naive. Which in itself is ironic since I probably think there are more socks on Topix than anyone! Topix makes it hard to respond normally to situations.
And yeah I totally agree about the false prophets. And if one can't even show love during their specific witness that is pretty messed up. Makes me wonder sometimes which is the stronger emotion; hate or love? People will do just about anything in the name of both
Great to see ya sister
Your friend and brother always
Skom
Sorry I couldn't get back yesterday... some heavies on this end.
I commend you – for regardless of what you speak of in here, it is always carried thru in a post to as many as you can reply to, regardless.

I believe anyone in 'their own know' of knowledge will always laugh at another more naive... that is their egotistical empowerment, and again a false sense of their own insecurities. They are incapable of demonstrating compassion. Self only feels self pity. Only strength can show that emotion.

Love and hate are as truly as close as their polar existence, but as humans are the balance between such emotional triggers, guess that's why we feel them so strongly. Interesting the way Christians say God hates the sin but loves the sinner. Wonder were these taken from Proverbs 6:16-19
“There are six things the Lord hates— no, seven things he detests:
haughty eyes,
a lying tongue,
hands that kill the innocent,
a heart that plots evil,
feet that race to do wrong,
a false witness who pours out lies,
a person who sows discord in a family.”

It would be easy for any to put their tag on any of these these things against anyone they personally hate. The 'person' then becomes the target rather than the thing that is hated. No doubt that's the easiest, because it isn't easy to love an enemy in essence, so we avoid them instead! lol

Take Care always to you too my brother and friend. Hamba Khale – be at Peace – am still not sure how long I can stay today. Love you. <3

“Romans 8:1.”

Since: Aug 09

Location hidden

#599677 Oct 8, 2013
BenAdam wrote:
<quoted text>
So anyone who puts a child up for adoption is abusive according to you.
You going to confront all the women here on that one ?
Nah, your a coward as much as you are a liar.
Your lies aren't going to work in here anymore deadbeat. Putting a child up for adoption isn't abandoning them or abusing them. They are usually given to a loving family. Unlike your daughter who you abandoned and abused by doing so. Your daughter wasn't put up for adoption now was she dead beat? Nope, she was raised by her "Christian mother" as you called her. And you indeed did abandon her which is abuse by the way nut job.

All that has been recorded in here. So don't even try to lie your way out of it "purfesir".

Since: Mar 09

Location hidden

#599678 Oct 8, 2013
RiversideRedneck wrote:
<quoted text>
What he means by "physical discipline" is "corporal punishment". IE; spanking.
He's right, I did use corporal punishment on my kids, starting at around 6 months old with a tap to the butt.
It was never violent.
Oh I know what he meant

I also see what he is trying to do

He is trying to make it appear as if tapping a baby's butt is the same as striking a baby because technically he can claim both are forms of "physical discipline"

It's intellectually dishonest

But I expect it from him

Since: Sep 10

Fremont, CA

#599679 Oct 8, 2013
Happy Lesbo wrote:
Skombolis wrote:
<quoted text>
So if i am inside my house and someone is , you see that as pretty much the same thing as swinging the bat at me personally?
You can't charge someone or defend yourself based on what you think someone may do afterwards
If you shoot a guy while he is still hitting your front door, you are going to jail for murder. Same with your windshield
If he breaks down your front door, enters the house, and tries to hit you; then you can shoot them
If someone breaks the windshield, manually pulls it away from the car and then tries to hit you with something, then you can shoot them. Not before
That's simply the law
<quoted text>
.. this legal debate has become comical. Perhaps you should attend the SKOM & RR Legal Seminar before appearing before another justice ??..
.. you need to go to SKOM & RR law school ..
In the trade, we call these types "jailhouse lawyers."

Since: May 11

Birmingham, UK

#599680 Oct 8, 2013
Skombolis wrote:
<quoted text>
Hey look, the dumbass troll jumped to dumbass conclusions
It has nothing to do with how I measure myself
I do think it shows how pathetic some adults are that they think putting colored pictures above a post means anything
Were those your icons dumbass troll? I had a hunch the person doing them would probably respond!
LOL
Awww...and you were wrong again.

Since: May 11

Birmingham, UK

#599681 Oct 8, 2013
Skombolis wrote:
<quoted text>
LOL
Dumbass troll trying to pretend he meant habit of a lunchtime and not habit of a lifetime
Seriously?

Your suggestion is ....unconsciousable.

Since: Jan 11

Location hidden

#599682 Oct 8, 2013
Catcher1 wrote:
Hey, it's Texas.
He claims she took $150 without fulfilling her end of the deal. If that amount had only been $10, I doubt he would have been acquitted. I find myself more than a little bit curious as to where the line would be drawn, for the value of human life.$50,$100,$119.39?

How many prostitutes will we have to "process" before we have an accurate market value?

I'm also curious to know if the value of a prostitute is more or less than the value of a drug dealer.

It's possible that these minimum values could change with the economy. Texas should send out update tweets to gun owners.

"Pushers +$2.14, Hookers -$8.10"

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Top Stories Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
News Sean Hannity offers to fly Obama to Kenya - and... 4 min Joie 5
Prove there's a god. (Mar '08) 18 min Gabriel 977,193
News Roman Catholic church only true church, says Va... (Jul '07) 53 min kent 665,121
Poll Was 9/11 a conspiracy?? (Oct '07) 56 min RADEKT 284,468
Christians cannot debate with ATHEISTS 1 hr Liamm 445
The Christian Atheist debate (Jun '15) 1 hr Bongo 87,868
The Future of Politics in America 1 hr Nohweh 174
More from around the web