Since: Sep 10

San Francisco, CA

#599471 Oct 8, 2013
RiversideRedneck wrote:
<quoted text>
If I were in your shoes and a man came to me about me defending him in court and he admitted to molesting a child, you damn right I hang his ass.
My hypothetical was not an accused child molester, it was an admitted child molester.
Some would want to hang an admitted baby spanker.

Since: Sep 10

San Francisco, CA

#599472 Oct 8, 2013
RiversideRedneck wrote:
<quoted text>
I asked you simply: "Would you take the job or not?"
Go work on your low self esteem.
Make sure people are watching.
You said the guy said something special to me.

It made no sense.

Try again.

“Ditat Deus”

Since: Jul 12

Location hidden

#599473 Oct 8, 2013
BenAdam wrote:
<quoted text>
Just like abortion. So why all the fuss over that ?
Thanks for admitting it, Christian!
Fuss over abortion? I've made no fuss over abortion. I'm pro-choice about it, Mr Tard.

“Ditat Deus”

Since: Jul 12

Location hidden

#599474 Oct 8, 2013
MisterCharrington wrote:
once AGAIN.....
"Whenever one person makes a willful attempt or threat to injure someone else, and also has an apparent, present ability to carry out the threat such as by flourishing or pointing a dangerous weapon or device at the other. An "assault" may be committed without actually striking or injuring another person.(same as forcible assault)
An assault is any unlawful attempt or offer with force or violence to do a corporal hurt to another, whether from malice or wantonness; for example, by striking at him or even holding up the fist at him in a threatening or insulting manner, or with other circumstances as denote at the time. an intention, coupled with a present ability, of actual violence against his person, as by pointing a weapon at him when he is within reach of it".
Thank you.

"Whenever one person makes a willful attempt or threat to injure someone else..."

I made no such attempt.

So no "deadly assault" charge would stick.

Cuz you can't be deadly against a car.

It was rightfully dropped to vandalism.

By the very court system you defend.

What's the problem?

“Ditat Deus”

Since: Jul 12

Location hidden

#599475 Oct 8, 2013
Catcher1 wrote:
<quoted text>
Some would want to hang an admitted baby spanker.
You're gonna try and compare disciplining a child to having sex with one?!?

Since: Sep 10

San Francisco, CA

#599476 Oct 8, 2013
RiversideRedneck wrote:
<quoted text>
"The implement was capable of causing death"
Absolutely.
If I hit him with it.
I didn't.
I hit his car.
How can one kill a car???
Don't be an idiot, you moron.

If a guy is sitting in a car, and you shoot at the front windshield with a firearm, you would be charged with attempted murder (unless you killed the guy).

No different if you smash the windshield with a club. You could have killed the guy.

“Love much, trust none”

Since: Jul 11

There

#599477 Oct 8, 2013
RiversideRedneck wrote:
<quoted text>
Fuss over abortion? I've made no fuss over abortion. I'm pro-choice about it, Mr Tard.
Based on your rules, anyone against abortion is an idiot.

Since: Sep 10

San Francisco, CA

#599478 Oct 8, 2013
RiversideRedneck wrote:
<quoted text>
Thank you.
"Whenever one person makes a willful attempt or threat to injure someone else..."
I made no such attempt.
So no "deadly assault" charge would stick.
Cuz you can't be deadly against a car.
It was rightfully dropped to vandalism.
By the very court system you defend.
What's the problem?
You.

Since: Sep 10

San Francisco, CA

#599479 Oct 8, 2013
RiversideRedneck wrote:
<quoted text>
You're gonna try and compare disciplining a child to having sex with one?!?
Don't even think about it.

“Love much, trust none”

Since: Jul 11

There

#599480 Oct 8, 2013
Red Apples wrote:
...
Maybe it's for the best when you consider your "purfesir" just might be someone who abused and abandoned his own daughter.
You need to be back your accusations Red.
If I knew your real name I would have you in court and end up owning your house.

You really enjoy the ability to lie constantly under the anononymity of Topix.

Based on your fellow Christian RR's law interpretation, you should be in prison.
Dr Shrink

Baltimore, MD

#599481 Oct 8, 2013
MisterCharrington wrote:
<quoted text>
...and torturing small animals is normal?
forsake own baby is normal?????
you are animal,worry more about animals then small kids?
you f...poor atheistic idiot,monkey around
Dr Shrink

Baltimore, MD

#599482 Oct 8, 2013
BenAdam wrote:
<quoted text>
You need to be back your accusations Red.
If I knew your real name I would have you in court and end up owning your house.
You really enjoy the ability to lie constantly under the anononymity of Topix.
Based on your fellow Christian RR's law interpretation, you should be in prison.
if his RA accusation is not the truth
You should explain this on this topic attendance by you and only from you posters knows your private affairs and problems,

tell everyone plain truth??

“Love much, trust none”

Since: Jul 11

There

#599483 Oct 8, 2013
RiversideRedneck wrote:
<quoted text>
Thank you.
"Whenever one person makes a willful attempt or threat to injure someone else..."
I made no such attempt...
Sure you did. You were trying to smash the windshield so you could get to him and beat him to death. Your own actions make you a criminal and you should be in prison by your own rules.

No trial, no lawyers, just lock you up!

“Ditat Deus”

Since: Jul 12

Location hidden

#599484 Oct 8, 2013
Catcher1 wrote:
<quoted text>
You said the guy said something special to me.
It made no sense.
Try again.
No. Not again.

Mr Char has the ability to offer up an honest answer.

you don't.

It's the Catcher Word Jumble.

Since: May 11

Banbury, UK

#599485 Oct 8, 2013
RiversideRedneck wrote:
<quoted text>
You're gonna try and compare disciplining a child to having sex with one?!?
Ahhh well now we're into the realm of jurisprudence.

A crime is a crime is a crime.

What is it about the sexual element of an offence which makes it different to a violent offence?

Is the rape of a child higher up the scale than an aggravated battery on a child?

A crime is something which is so heinous that we(the people) delegate the responsibility for its prosecution to the state. A battery on a child is a crime, a sexual battery on a child is simply a battery with a sexual element.

Civilians tend to make that distinction which is in the final analysis, highly artificial and most likely to be used by politicians, and 'the media'.
Dr Shrink

Baltimore, MD

#599486 Oct 8, 2013
LuciFerr wrote:
<quoted text>
You're getting predictable shrinky dink.
I know
you need badly male rabbit(man)
he can change your unhappy senseless life as lesbian
have true handsome man in the bed is most pleasuable time for any wome,
touch your hairs,smell your body, and..........
and silent voice"I love you babe,I love youuuuuuuuuu zia"????

“Ditat Deus”

Since: Jul 12

Location hidden

#599487 Oct 8, 2013
Catcher1 wrote:
<quoted text>
Don't be an idiot, you moron.
If a guy is sitting in a car, and you shoot at the front windshield with a firearm, you would be charged with attempted murder (unless you killed the guy).
No different if you smash the windshield with a club. You could have killed the guy.
Well der...

If you were sitting in your living room in Long Beach and some thugs did a f-ed up driveby and you got shot, they'd get the same penalty.

But we're not talking about shooting at a car, are we?

“Ditat Deus”

Since: Jul 12

Location hidden

#599488 Oct 8, 2013
BenAdam wrote:
<quoted text>
Based on your rules, anyone against abortion is an idiot.
Why would you say that?

Abortion is a very touchy subject for a lot of people.

I try to stay out of it.

I think it should be the choice of the woman and no one else.

Period.

“Ditat Deus”

Since: Jul 12

Location hidden

#599489 Oct 8, 2013
BenAdam wrote:
Sure you did. You were trying to smash the windshield so you could get to him and beat him to death.
No I wasn't. Maybe you missed the post where I said his driver's side window was down and he even warned me as I approached; "You better not!".

I could've very easily hit him.

I didn't.

You say I tried to kill his car.

Whatever the f_ck that means.

“What's left to defend?”

Since: Jan 11

Freedom

#599490 Oct 8, 2013
RiversideRedneck wrote:
Thank you.
"Whenever one person makes a willful attempt or threat to injure someone else..."
I made no such attempt.
So no "deadly assault" charge would stick.
Cuz you can't be deadly against a car.
It was rightfully dropped to vandalism.
By the very court system you defend.
What's the problem?
You violently rampaged on a dude's car while he was still in it. That goes beyond vandalism.

In some states, people can protect their property using lethal force.

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Top Stories Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
Prove there's a god. (Mar '08) 7 min Good-Evil 796,693
__POPE to Lead U.N. 1-World GOVT "Launching" 52 min UMakeWORLDPEACEID... 2
Roman Catholic church only true church, says Va... (Jul '07) 1 hr marge 568,578
Blaming Israel for carnage (Jul '06) 1 hr AN NFL FAN 120,765
White girls who live in Texas that wanna sexy a... 1 hr bigblack 1
Do white girls like Hispanic guys? (Girls who a... (Jan '14) 1 hr menglihua 16
Jehovah's Witnesses are true disciple of Jesus ... (Mar '07) 1 hr Student 39,681
Was 9/11 a conspiracy?? (Oct '07) 2 hr Dr_Zorderz 267,563
Scientific proof for God's existence 3 hr eyeful 642
More from around the web