Why Should Jesus Love Me?

“Ditat Deus”

Since: Jul 12

Location hidden

#599546 Oct 8, 2013
BenAdam wrote:
<quoted text>
Physical "discipline" is what you claimed you did.
Don't blame others for your own words and actions.
There are other ways to discipline a person without corporal punishment.

My kids are disciplined to wake up at 5:15 every morning. Do you think that means the alarm clock spanks them awake?!

O_o

Since: Mar 09

Location hidden

#599547 Oct 8, 2013
RiversideRedneck wrote:
<quoted text>
If you're on a smart phone, I suggest you switch to the mobile version. You can't see the judgeits. It's great.
My crime was vandalism, nothing more. They want to label me a violent criminal to suit their egos and say "There's just another Christian criminal!"
Then you get guys like Ben & Catcher distorting the f_ck out of the details and a guy like ole chap thinking that discipline is equal to violent assault.
Ugh.
I'm on my computer right now

But I have ad=block on and can only see the numeric number of icons

Like for example it will read

2-2-1

But I don't have to unblock it to know where its coming from. Same useless pack of traveling trolls that do everything that's unbelievably stupid on Topix that nobody would expect out of adults

Since: Jan 11

United States

#599548 Oct 8, 2013
Catcher1 wrote:
I had a case where a guy was standing on the curb, and another guy pushed him onto the street from behind.
The charge: Attempted murder.
Here, the club is a powerful weapon; the windshield could have shattered, causing the occupant of the car serious bodily injury. Attempted murder would be overcharging (for plea bargaining), but assault on the occupant with a dangerous weapon could very well stick with a jury.
RR has his brain up his ass.
I had to bust out a windshield to replace it one time. The interior glass layer of the lamination turned into shrapnel. After I finished getting the windshield out, there were small pieces of glass everywhere in the vehicle. I would not want to be inside with someone beating on the windshield.

“Ditat Deus”

Since: Jul 12

Location hidden

#599549 Oct 8, 2013
BenAdam wrote:
<quoted text>
Only because of your own confession to doing it in several posts here.
Of course you still can't tell the difference between killing and disowning.
You should be in a mental institution.
You're lying, too.

You should also pay up $1000.

“"None shall pass"”

Since: Jul 11

There

#599550 Oct 8, 2013
Tide with Beach wrote:
<quoted text>
Perhaps.
You've only told us what the decision was. Judges often make decisions that they disagree with.
That reminds me of the Apple vs M.S. case. The court knew damn well that the intellectual property in question was stolen from Xerox but since the evidence never entered the courtroom (Xerox didn't care at the time) it could not be used to decide the case.

Fortunately since neither Apple nor M.S. could provide documentation of originality, they both lost their cases.

“Ditat Deus”

Since: Jul 12

Location hidden

#599551 Oct 8, 2013
BenAdam wrote:
<quoted text>
So what. Pull the crap you claim to have done and got away with in CA in Texas and you will be sitting in a nice tent village courtesy of the State of Texas..
Or the oh so scary state of Pennsylvania?!

HA HA!!!

“"None shall pass"”

Since: Jul 11

There

#599552 Oct 8, 2013
RiversideRedneck wrote:
<quoted text>
I have never been before the bench.
Ever.
I know the charges were lowered from assault to vandalism.
That info is available without speaking to a judge.
No, you don't if it never went to court.

Why do you constantly lie ? Are you insane or a troll ?

“Ditat Deus”

Since: Jul 12

Location hidden

#599553 Oct 8, 2013
MisterCharrington wrote:
<quoted text>
nooo don't you remember? It was some harsh words and loss of tv privilages...
Since my post was before Ben's, I know you saw it.

Why are you ignoring my question?

When you see "disciplining a child", do you only assume that means physical discipline?

Since: May 11

Birmingham, UK

#599554 Oct 8, 2013
RiversideRedneck wrote:
<quoted text>
A court and a judge disagree with you.
so when did they disagree and what did they disagree with while you were never there to hear it and were never arraigned and were unknown to the court?
Is that better?

Since: May 11

Birmingham, UK

#599555 Oct 8, 2013
BenAdam wrote:
<quoted text>
That reminds me of the Apple vs M.S. case. The court knew damn well that the intellectual property in question was stolen from Xerox but since the evidence never entered the courtroom (Xerox didn't care at the time) it could not be used to decide the case.
Fortunately since neither Apple nor M.S. could provide documentation of originality, they both lost their cases.
Xerox would simply have needed to prove 'prior art' and waited for a big payday after Apple and MS had made huge profits...

Missed the boat on that one.

Since: May 11

Birmingham, UK

#599556 Oct 8, 2013
Skombolis wrote:
<quoted text>
LOL
Such a dumbass troll
I knew there was no way you would reply on point
You try to pretend to be smart for about one post normally! Then when you realize how badly that always works out for you when you try, you go back to nonsensical trolling
I am glad i was able to remind you
:)
If you had a point you'd be somewhat dangerous...as it is, not so much, carry on.

Do you like hearing your own verbiage this much IRL? I bet you do, don't you? LMFAO

Since: Mar 09

Location hidden

#599557 Oct 8, 2013
Tide with Beach wrote:
<quoted text>
I had to bust out a windshield to replace it one time. The interior glass layer of the lamination turned into shrapnel. After I finished getting the windshield out, there were small pieces of glass everywhere in the vehicle. I would not want to be inside with someone beating on the windshield.
Cars have been using shatter-resistant glass for decades

What was your car?

A 1950 Nash Rambler?

“Romans 8:1.”

Since: Aug 09

Location hidden

#599558 Oct 8, 2013
BenAdam wrote:
<quoted text>
You need to be back your accusations Red.
If I knew your real name I would have you in court and end up owning your house.
You really enjoy the ability to lie constantly under the anononymity of Topix.
Based on your fellow Christian RR's law interpretation, you should be in prison.
Back my accusations you say. They're not accusations. They're things you've openly admitted to in this very thread deadbeat.

You've admitted that you ran out and abandoned your daughter.

And for you information "purfesir" that is abuse.
_______

Poor delusional fool isn't the sharpest tool in the shed.

Since: May 11

Birmingham, UK

#599559 Oct 8, 2013
RiversideRedneck wrote:
<quoted text>
Since my post was before Ben's, I know you saw it.
Why are you ignoring my question?
When you see "disciplining a child", do you only assume that means physical discipline?
the issue has always been your attitude towards physical discipline towards babies and toddlers.

You stated that your own children are afraid of you.

Do I need to pray to dog for post numbers again?

Since: Jan 11

United States

#599560 Oct 8, 2013
http://www.cnn.com/interactive/2012/04/us/tab...

Hey Catcher, is soliciting a prostitute legal in Texas?

“~ Prince of Peace~”

Since: Apr 08

~ And the greatest is LOVE~

#599561 Oct 8, 2013
BenAdam wrote:
<quoted text>
No, you don't if it never went to court.
Why do you constantly lie ? Are you insane or a troll ?
I thought you were through with RR.....

Since: Mar 09

Location hidden

#599562 Oct 8, 2013
Lamented Safety Glass For Windshields

"Since 1966, all passenger cars produced in the United States have been equipped with an improved laminated windshield with additional built-in safety. It is designed to withstand about three times the impact velocity of the windshield previously in use."

http://www.glasslinks.com/newsinfo/ag_history...

Lamented glass is the kind that spiderwebs and doesn't break into sharp pieces

“Ditat Deus”

Since: Jul 12

Location hidden

#599563 Oct 8, 2013
Tide with Beach wrote:
<quoted text>
I had to bust out a windshield to replace it one time. The interior glass layer of the lamination turned into shrapnel. After I finished getting the windshield out, there were small pieces of glass everywhere in the vehicle. I would not want to be inside with someone beating on the windshield.
What kind of car? Year, make, model?

“Ditat Deus”

Since: Jul 12

Location hidden

#599564 Oct 8, 2013
RiversideRedneck wrote:

I have never been before the bench.
Ever.
I know the charges were lowered from assault to vandalism.
That info is available without speaking to a judge.
BenAdam wrote:
No, you don't if it never went to court.
Why do you constantly lie ? Are you insane or a troll ?
I'm not lying.

Court records are avaiable without going to court or seeing a judge.

“Ditat Deus”

Since: Jul 12

Location hidden

#599565 Oct 8, 2013
MisterCharrington wrote:
so when did they disagree and what did they disagree with while you were never there to hear it and were never arraigned and were unknown to the court?
Is that better?
I don't know. A public defender called me and notified me of it. SHe then sent me a packet in the mail with all the info.

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Top Stories Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
News Roman Catholic church only true church, says Va... (Jul '07) 41 min Steve 637,924
Poll Was 9/11 a conspiracy?? (Oct '07) 1 hr Pegasus 280,531
Fischbach army depot-NATO site 67 (Mar '07) 1 hr RON WERNKE 444
Play "end of the word" part 2 1 hr Al Capone 1,462
Jehovah's Witnesses are true disciple of Jesus ... (Mar '07) 1 hr Steve 43,901
Gay sex in raigarh (Jun '15) 1 hr Anup 705
The Christian Atheist debate (Jun '15) 1 hr Thinking 29,803
Prove there's a god. (Mar '08) 4 hr Hukt on Fonix 968,870
Bush is a hero (Sep '07) 5 hr Freebird USA 181,944
More from around the web