I don't refuse to.<quoted text>
Yet you discredited many of the 10 scholars as being shills and gave no reason and still refuse to
Next to your standards mine are more than reasonable
At least mine calls into question the biases when someone has money or a doctorate to gain or all 5 follow a pattern of naming a book off of something that most their book isn't even about
Is the reason you had for dismissing so many scholars anything more than you disagreed? Because calling them shills would seem to be the nonsense part
And I'll be happy to limit my self primarily to the source you linked to, Shawn Eyer.