This was your second post to me, dishonest one:<quoted text>
You claim to have stayed on topic, but you didn't.
Here was the posts.
RR: My analogy is based on your comment that if I believe in one religion's miracles, I "have to" believe in all religion's miracles.
(to which you replied)
Hiding: Creation science isn't science.
How the flick is that staying on topic?!?
So, no, you aren't being honest above. Your analogy is a total failure, for it relies upon a misuse of the word science. Apparently that is so far beyond you, that you cannot understand it. I've explained it to you, but for you, since the words are spelled the same, that's all you see.<quoted text>
Why do I have to allow anything from all religions?
That's like me telling you that if you allow for your version of science, then you also have to allow for the Creationist version of science.
Is this seriously the best you can do? This is what passes for argument from you?