Why Should Jesus Love Me?
Dr Shrink

Baltimore, MD

#591527 Sep 15, 2013
BenAdam wrote:
<quoted text>
Don't blame me that you are a pathological liar.
for you all of them are lairs
but most pathological Liar and Bulshit is you,after 2 klicks of printer board you doesn't exist nor your fricking Bulcrap
klick and ben Adam gay aka god is gone without of any stinks,
I quess that farts are more valuable,because they live a stinks, but cretins like you just after klick left nothing and never exist?

klick with fart leaving fumes around

RiversideRedneck

“Ditat Deus”

Since: Jul 12

Location hidden

#591528 Sep 15, 2013
BenAdam wrote:
<quoted text>
Don't blame me that you are a pathological liar.
Let's just cut to the chase.

"You're lying and proving it."

There you go.

RiversideRedneck

“Ditat Deus”

Since: Jul 12

Location hidden

#591529 Sep 15, 2013
BenAdam wrote:
<quoted text>
"Two-thirds of him is god, one-third of him is human"
Where have we read that before ?
I don't know, where?

And who's "we"?

RiversideRedneck

“Ditat Deus”

Since: Jul 12

Location hidden

#591530 Sep 15, 2013
BenAdam wrote:
<quoted text>
Wrong.
Son of Man.
Son of Adam.
Son of David.
Son of God.
Son of Joseph.
By your insane and ignorant interpretation, Jesus had five of fathers.
You are still an uneducated moron pretending to be a historian.
Descendent, not offspring.

You're lying and proving it.

RiversideRedneck

“Ditat Deus”

Since: Jul 12

Location hidden

#591531 Sep 15, 2013
BenAdam wrote:
<quoted text>
Don't blame me that you are a pathological liar.
Ya, ya, ya...

Everybody who doesn't agree with you is a "pathological liar".

Imagine that.
dogs of war

Baltimore, MD

#591532 Sep 15, 2013
BenAdam wrote:
I am the offspring of Arthur.
Arthur is not my father or mother.
arthur was my brother who died from lungs cancer and suffering to watch insect like you,claim to be offspring of Arthur-his gold helmet cost 12000 english shillings on Christe auction in London??
made was from 24 jarat pure gold in the shape of night bucket for night urines, day time was wear on ARTHUR HEAD

sometime Arthur cook in this bucket potatoe sour with old chicken bones?

“ad victoriam”

Since: Dec 10

arte et marte

#591533 Sep 15, 2013
RiversideRedneck wrote:
<quoted text>
Cuts cigars.
Not when it's your finger stuck in it.
dogs of war

Baltimore, MD

#591534 Sep 15, 2013
BenAdam wrote:
<quoted text>
Wrong.
Son of Man.
Son of Adam.
Son of David.
Son of God.
Son of Joseph.
By your insane and ignorant interpretation, Jesus had five of fathers.
You are still an uneducated moron pretending to be a historian.
hebrew word BEN
have many different meanings but only one son of God leading only to jesus after repeating this word 7 times,

so you are too insane and ignorant of describe ben 7 times

trust me you are most uneducated troll about Bible and hebrew meanings

if you are BEN ADAM-are you son of Adam,Adamah or adamah im?

he he heeeeeeeeee old pal without of internet links is goof like goofy plush toy??

“ Ah see's lanlubbers Cap'n BT!”

Since: Oct 10

Location hidden

#591535 Sep 15, 2013
RiversideRedneck wrote:
<quoted text>
Why are you only responding to the last sentence of my post? Did you not read the rest? Do you agree, do you disagree, etc. Isn't that the way a debate or discussion is supposed to know?
Here is the post...
"Okay. You are correct, I am wrong. I misunderstood your meaning of "religiosity".

Calling it absurd is most definitely mocking me. If you change your wording to, "the WestBoro Baptist church conducts absurd religiosity", I would absolutely agree with you. They do.

And you never said, "to most people, your statements of belief are often seen absurd". You just called it absurd. There's a difference there.

If you think I have a complex and conversing with me is a waste of time, why do you even bother posting to me?"
----------
Firstly I stated -"Your absurd religiosity", and that is exactly what I meant. "religiosity" IS absurd by definition...and you certainly portray that in your posts.
Secondly-"And you never said, "to most people, your statements of belief are often seen absurd". You just called it absurd. There's a difference there"....refer to the above explanation.
There is your lack of understanding ---or your "complex" of persecution playing tricks on your ability to conceptualize and rationalize what is written.
Sometimes just trying to communicate with you at all is like playing Mozart to a dog.---that's no "mocking" you either...it is an example to help you understand how fruitless any communication attempts are with you.
I give up...
dogs of war

Baltimore, MD

#591536 Sep 15, 2013
Aura Mytha wrote:
<quoted text> Not when it's your finger stuck in it.
stick your finger into your a..turn few times around,pull out and test this dark chockolade giving you nutritious power to fly cheap helicopter

“A sentient umbrella speaks”

Since: Mar 11

Some stable somewhere

#591537 Sep 15, 2013
RiversideRedneck wrote:
<quoted text>
It was not intellectual dishonesty. I supply the first sentence, then I supplied the link. I'd rather let the reader choose if they want to continue reading rather than putting up a wall of text like you do.
Nope. You pretending that only those two sentences presented the entirely of the evidence by posting only them and telling IANS he was wrong only with them. The rest of that paragraph goes into greater detail and demonstrates that those two sentences are not explanatory.

Therefore, what you did was intellectually dishonest.

Since: Mar 10

Location hidden

#591538 Sep 15, 2013
LuciFerr wrote:
<quoted text>
Projection and more lies.
A simple name change doesn't disguise much.
Seems to be the topic for today.
You're right though, jealousy is very ugly indeed.
Your post here isn't addressing anything we were talking about.

I have been informed you think you know me.
You are under the suspicion I am someone I am not.
I think maybe your line of fantasy and reality may be blurred.

How can I nicely say.. Shove off??

“A sentient umbrella speaks”

Since: Mar 11

Some stable somewhere

#591539 Sep 15, 2013
RiversideRedneck wrote:
<quoted text>
You have missed understood me, or I have misrepresented myself.
Tell me;
1. What is my opinion on the treatment of babies.
You believe that they need punishment. I disagree with your stance here, entirely.
2. What do I think of blacks.
You first claimed that criminality was inherent in black people while denying it was societal, then denied it was genetic, then denied that you made the claim that it was. So, basically just racism with a lot of confusion and back peddling.

“"None shall pass"”

Since: Jul 11

There

#591540 Sep 15, 2013
RiversideRedneck wrote:
<quoted text>
Ya, ya, ya...
Everybody who doesn't agree with you is a "pathological liar".
Imagine that.
Nope, just you and a couple of others here.

“A sentient umbrella speaks”

Since: Mar 11

Some stable somewhere

#591541 Sep 15, 2013
RiversideRedneck wrote:
<quoted text>
Oh, and
3. What is my opinion of women.
You know well enough. It's contemptible.

“ Ah see's lanlubbers Cap'n BT!”

Since: Oct 10

Location hidden

#591542 Sep 15, 2013
BenAdam wrote:
<quoted text>
"Two-thirds of him is god, one-third of him is human"
Where have we read that before ?
The homily of "universal" bishops.

“"None shall pass"”

Since: Jul 11

There

#591543 Sep 15, 2013
Hidingfromyou wrote:
<quoted text>
....
Therefore, what you did was intellectually dishonest.
Did you really expect anything else from him ?

“"None shall pass"”

Since: Jul 11

There

#591544 Sep 15, 2013
RiversideRedneck wrote:
<quoted text>
Descendent, not offspring.
Those were definitions of "offspring".

You are still a liar and a moron and prove it with every post.

Since: Oct 12

Location hidden

#591545 Sep 15, 2013
BenAdam wrote:
<quoted text>
They are blind and liars.
Ben we not talking about they,
We, you and me are talking about you and God.
There is no they in that picture just you and God.

“A sentient umbrella speaks”

Since: Mar 11

Some stable somewhere

#591547 Sep 15, 2013
RiversideRedneck wrote:
In what way does the "age of information" tell you that Adam was made from mud? There's more to it, you know.
I make the claim that Adam existed, you have made the claim "Adam did not exist". Why is the onus on me and not you? You make the claim, but I have to defend mine? I don't think so.
Adam could have been the very first Homo sapiens.
Adam could've wrote down the creation account which was later passed to Moses who put that account into a book.
Prove me wrong.
You argue in an infantile manner, constantly ignoring the information I post and returning to your initial claims.

The onus is on you for reason:

1. Adam is a mythological being who lived under impossible conditions. Made from mud, lived in the garden of eden, etc.

Moreover, there's no such thing as the "first homo sapiens." So...nope, that can't support your argument. You're just expressing a terrible understanding of science now.

Further, I don't have to prove your fantasies wrong. You can make up anything you like about Adam and ask "prove me wrong." Who cares? Adam is proved wrong by his fantastical description.

Argument fallacies don't help support your position.

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Top Stories Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
Prove there's a god. (Mar '08) 14 min Redeemed Jersey P... 996,561
Faculty of Dentistry, Dalhousie University Hal... 25 min Case File 1
There is Everything Wrong with Abortion (Nov '07) 44 min Grunt56 223,082
News Plurality of Americans think Trump is failing (Mar '17) 53 min science is god 88,515
News Roman Catholic church only true church, says Va... (Jul '07) 3 hr PadMark 703,824
Are women from USA scared of marriage? 6 hr stupdwmen 20
Are Ukraine women naturally prideful? 6 hr stupdwmen 4