Why Should Jesus Love Me?

Since: May 09

Location hidden

#547504 Jun 17, 2013
Skombolis wrote:
<quoted text>
LOL
The clowns all jump in to circle the wagons
A proxy on Topix?? That's crazy talk!
It was just a coincidence it was an anonymous proxy saying buffoon repeatedly then cameup Catcher huh?
You can go anonymous right on your phone
Welcome to the year 2013 dummy
:)
Careful, they're out to get you.


















BOO!

“Pillars of Creation....”

Since: Jan 11

Into this world we're thrown

#547505 Jun 17, 2013
AnnieJ wrote:
For anyone that is interested...
The trail of why and how the USSC labelled Atheism a religion. You might also note that they had to change the definition of religion in the constitution to get it to fit Atheism.
http://www.renewamerica.com/columns/gaynor/05...
Side note...I did not verify this article to be 100% accurate...just covering my butt!
Awe Bummer.........

I like it much better when you leave it exposed..........

;o)

Since: Mar 09

Location hidden

#547506 Jun 17, 2013
Le_le wrote:
<quoted text>

I find that sad..It breaks my heart she would believe, to her core,
such nonsense.
Yet, we all "dedicated" our children to a Protestant church, for her..
So you lied about your beliefs to get the approval of someone else

Nothing new about that for you

RiversideRedneck

“Ditat Deus”

Since: Jul 12

Location hidden

#547507 Jun 17, 2013
Rider on the Storm wrote:
<quoted text>
Awe Bummer.........
I like it much better when you leave it exposed..........
;o)
That took me a sec....

HA! I get it!

Since: Mar 09

Location hidden

#547508 Jun 17, 2013
scaritual wrote:
<quoted text>
Careful, they're out to get you.
BOO!
Who, you and your band of idiots that I have single-handedly embarrassed and exposed?

Oh No! LOL

Every time I log onto Topix on my Iphone it says "do you want to allow this site to use your location?"

All you have to do is press no. Although my location is hidden so it doesn't matter

But let's see

Anonymous proxy says buffoon
Anonymous proxy says buffoon again
Then it comes up Catcher's registered account saying "buffoon" to the next post

That's simply paying attention to the obvious. A proxy with "not-responsive" answers and dorky jokes defending Ians and HL says the same word repeatedly and then it comes up Catcher

Yeah, that's paranoia!

Let's hope for your sake stupidity isn't genetic

:)

“BE BRAVE ENOUGH ”

Since: Oct 09

TO STEP IN MUD PUDDLES

#547509 Jun 17, 2013
RiversideRedneck wrote:
<quoted text>
Oh. My bad, sorry.
I'll keep you updated on the policies & rules, ok?
:p
:-)

“BE BRAVE ENOUGH ”

Since: Oct 09

TO STEP IN MUD PUDDLES

#547510 Jun 17, 2013
Rider on the Storm wrote:
<quoted text>
Awe Bummer.........
I like it much better when you leave it exposed..........
;o)
LOL

Well...the last time I exposed my butt I got accused of porn. I just might have to bring "Eve in the Garden" back.

Since: Mar 09

Location hidden

#547511 Jun 17, 2013
It aint necessarily so wrote:
<quoted text>
There is nothing ethical about what you did either in your comment to Grace or in your mischaracterizing what I said.
<quoted text>
You're going to tell me what you think I meant and then call me a liar because you think I contradicted that? This is what I mean about your use of the words "lie" and "liar." There is nothing ethical at all about what you do. You misunderstand what you read and then attack others based on that misunderstanding.
<quoted text>
But you are just a run-of-the-mill Christian like Trifecta, Dr. Shrink, Counter_Strike, Blind Man, Red Apples, simplyput and LAWEST. Congratulations to all of you.
You did lie

You said even if I thought it was true someone was not being honest it was stupid to say something when that person could be a potential ally

Then realizing how poorly that reflected on your ethics you tried to distance yourself from it. I have asked you about it half a dozen times and you refused to answer.

Then when you finally did you claimed that isn't what happened at all and you were talking about "gratuitous alienation"

That was a lie

You lie quite regularly

Kind of like they want to keep you and your wife happy because they want your American money and then changing your story to they want to keep everyone in general happy because that's the kind of community they want it to be!

Tsk tsk Iansy, pull it together and stick to one story at least

Since: Mar 09

Location hidden

#547512 Jun 17, 2013
It aint necessarily so wrote:
<quoted text>
How's work?
Great

How's Mexico?

LOL

Since: Mar 09

Location hidden

#547513 Jun 17, 2013
It aint necessarily so wrote:
<quoted text>
Not really.
Skombolis apparently has no concept of travel or vacation judging by his proxy comments, so perhaps Catcher was graciously allowing a menial laborer to vicariously enjoy his vacation with him.
I can't believe Catcher didn't come to that hot vacation spot you are in!

Aren't Mexican slums all the rage still these days for tourism?

LOL

“Credulity is not a virtue”

Since: Apr 09

San Francisco

#547514 Jun 17, 2013
Mark wrote:
<quoted text>
What you unconsciously do here is define homosexuality as innate preference,
No, I'm saying that homosexual sex and homosexuality are two different things, and not always related to each other. Two teenage kids of the same gender can have sex experimentally with each other, but that doesn't make either of them homosexual. People in prison who have sex with each other for lack of an alternative (or as a demonstration of dominance) aren't romantically attached to each other.
Scientifically more pure would be say: homosexuality is a behaviour in which people voluntarily engage in sex with the same gender.
But then heterosexuality would be likewise defined as merely sexual activity. That is only looking at a small part of human relationship.s
Machismo and Homosexuality are deeply related.
Mmmmmm. No. First, obviously, this doesn't describe lesbianism very well. Secondly, I think many gay people feel more free to play with or reject the predominantly heterosexual gender role stereotypes. Dominance can certainly be an aspect of that, but I think it's a mistake to overemphasize how much of an influence that has.

For instance in macho cultures a real macho man will also fuck a man if he challenges him to do so. Male dominance plays a big role here. That is why macho cultures like Islam they can accept their son is homosexual if he is the one on top, but not if he show a weak feminine side.
I know what you are saying, but I find this whole concept odd. Frankly, there is very little femininity when sex is between two men.
I think it is our lack of consciousness/feeling that animals should prove their intelligence to us. The same unfeeling state led us to believe that animals feel no pain, and have no emotions. Science is now starting to recognize those ideas are untrue, but any feeling person knows that.
I think we necessarily anthropomorphize animals, and that is necessarily going to make us misunderstand them. It's a pity we cannot communicate with them more directly.

Since: May 09

Location hidden

#547516 Jun 17, 2013
AnnieJ wrote:
For anyone that is interested...
The trail of why and how the USSC labelled Atheism a religion. You might also note that they had to change the definition of religion in the constitution to get it to fit Atheism.
http://www.renewamerica.com/columns/gaynor/05...
Side note...I did not verify this article to be 100% accurate...just covering my butt!
Well, in those decisions, the court didn't make the declaration that atheism is or was a religion, but that for purposes of the protection clause, it was to be afforded the full protections that religion enjoys.

In - Torcaso v. Watkins - Roy Torcaso, a man who had been appointed by a Maryland Governor to a Notary Public office was asked to swear in, and would not make "a declaration of belief in the existence of God"(part of the wording in the swearing in/oath process).

That violated the "no religious test" portion of our U.S. Constitution.

Roy Torcaso was atheist. You can read more about the case, here:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Torcaso_v._Watki...

That appears to be the rule or result in these "cited" court cases that theists often try to use in saying that atheism is a religion. The Courts didn't declare that atheism was a religion, or wasn't a religion, they declared that atheism was - afforded equal protection with religions - under the Establishment Clause.

These court cases were initiated and in response to, attempts or conditions that theists, or aspects of our theism saturated society in some way, trampled the rights of the atheist, which resulted when the atheist was discriminated against, or was denied a right or the liberties of the rights we all are supposed to enjoy, equally, and specifically because they(atheist) >- do not practice a religion -< at all.

“Credulity is not a virtue”

Since: Apr 09

San Francisco

#547517 Jun 17, 2013
trifecta1 wrote:
<quoted text>How about just say a prayer for wilderide writer Shrink, even if wilderide say he no want it, say a prayer for him anyways.
Pray away. Prayer is great because you can so easily feel better about yourself without having to actually do anything.

“I.Spirit.Son.God”

Since: Jan 12

Location hidden

#547518 Jun 17, 2013
AnnieJ wrote:
<quoted text>
So you believe that once someone does something that you consider "wrong" they are never to be forgiven??? The slate wiped clean as they say???
That up to Bunny to forgive him. She and her child were the ones violated and abused.

“I.Spirit.Son.God”

Since: Jan 12

Location hidden

#547519 Jun 17, 2013
Skombolis wrote:
<quoted text>
Who, you and your band of idiots that I have single-handedly embarrassed and exposed?
Oh No! LOL
Every time I log onto Topix on my Iphone it says "do you want to allow this site to use your location?"
All you have to do is press no. Although my location is hidden so it doesn't matter
But let's see
Anonymous proxy says buffoon
Anonymous proxy says buffoon again
Then it comes up Catcher's registered account saying "buffoon" to the next post
That's simply paying attention to the obvious. A proxy with "not-responsive" answers and dorky jokes defending Ians and HL says the same word repeatedly and then it comes up Catcher
Yeah, that's paranoia!
Let's hope for your sake stupidity isn't genetic
:)
They are "atheists", Stupidity is Inherent.

“"None shall pass"”

Since: Jul 11

There

#547521 Jun 17, 2013
Snowbunnie shared everything about herself.

I didn't expose anything.

She gave the link where SHE was accused of child abuse:

http://www.ripoffreport.com/r/Jodi-In-Johnsto...

She gave us her full name and address with this link of hers:

https://license.ohio.gov/Lookup/SearchDetail....

http://www.topix.com/forum/topstories/T0N0LOR...

And told us her myspace page.

Then this cupid stunt had the unmitigated gal to accuse ME of posting it!

She is lying POS and so is Trifecta.

“I.Spirit.Son.God”

Since: Jan 12

Location hidden

#547522 Jun 17, 2013
scaritual wrote:
<quoted text>
Well, in those decisions, the court didn't make the declaration that atheism is or was a religion, but that for purposes of the protection clause, it was to be afforded the full protections that religion enjoys.
In - Torcaso v. Watkins - Roy Torcaso, a man who had been appointed by a Maryland Governor to a Notary Public office was asked to swear in, and would not make "a declaration of belief in the existence of God"(part of the wording in the swearing in/oath process).
That violated the "no religious test" portion of our U.S. Constitution.
Roy Torcaso was atheist. You can read more about the case, here:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Torcaso_v._Watki...
That appears to be the rule or result in these "cited" court cases that theists often try to use in saying that atheism is a religion. The Courts didn't declare that atheism was a religion, or wasn't a religion, they declared that atheism was - afforded equal protection with religions - under the Establishment Clause.
These court cases were initiated and in response to, attempts or conditions that theists, or aspects of our theism saturated society in some way, trampled the rights of the atheist, which resulted when the atheist was discriminated against, or was denied a right or the liberties of the rights we all are supposed to enjoy, equally, and specifically because they(atheist) >- do not practice a religion -< at all.

who="scaritual-wrote:
You were deceptive when you added, "atheism" as such - Secular Humanism(atheism)- when you supplied the footnoted opinion of Justice Hugo Black.
But that isn't what the Judge wrote that footnoted opinion, is it?
You - fabricated - that additional portion that you added, which you then presented(or, attempted to) as what was said.
That's not all...
I'll also point out that what Justice Black supplied as his personal >opinion< carried no legal weight.
That footnoted comment made by Justice Black did not set a legal or binding precedent.
It didn't establish Secular Humanism, Buddhism, Taoism or any of those philosophies mentioned by Justice Black as - "religions".
Not even the added in, and fabricated portion -(atheism)- you attributed to Justice Black's personal opinion.
You can pontificate, defecate, twist, flounder, jump through hoops or write until you fingers turn purple---you still part of a religion:

"...Among the religions in this country which do not teach what would generally be considered a belief in the existence of God are Buddhism, Taoism, Ethical Culture, Secular Humanism(Atheism), and others..."
Torcaso v. Watkins (1961)

That statement is part of the case, period. Secular Humanism which includes (Atheism) is part of the writings by a Supreme Court Judge involved in the case. It is part of the case.

As such, you're part of the most asinine and azz clown religions ever invented by mankind. Congratulations. Now go find Dawkins and tell him to freethink you a clue.

“I.Spirit.Son.God”

Since: Jan 12

Location hidden

#547523 Jun 17, 2013
G_O_D wrote:
Snowbunnie shared everything about herself.
I didn't expose anything.
She gave the link where SHE was accused of child abuse:
http://www.ripoffreport.com/r/Jodi-In-Johnsto...
She gave us her full name and address with this link of hers:
https://license.ohio.gov/Lookup/SearchDetail....
http://www.topix.com/forum/topstories/T0N0LOR...
And told us her myspace page.
Then this cupid stunt had the unmitigated gal to accuse ME of posting it!
She is lying POS and so is Trifecta.
Beating up a woman and child not here to defend themselves...Nice, keep digging.

“"None shall pass"”

Since: Jul 11

There

#547524 Jun 17, 2013
SnowBunny's own post revealing everything about her:

"YEP..it worked!

Name Jodi Justice
Birth Date:&nbsp12/1977 &nbspBirth Place:&nbspColumbus, OH
Birth Country:
Practice No address information on file.
Residence Johnstown, OH 43031
County:&nbspLicking
Professional
Education School: 991250-Everest Institute
Graduated: 08/29/08

Here's just ONE page...i think you can find the rest:)

Oh...and LOOK..it says GRADUATED!!"

http://www.topix.com/forum/topstories/T0N0LOR...

Only a sick POS would post their personal info then accuse someone of breaching their privacy.

Only a big pile of crap would keep bringing up over a year later and accuse an innocent of child abuse.

Since: May 09

Location hidden

#547525 Jun 17, 2013
Skombolis wrote:
Who, you and your band of idiots that I have single-handedly embarrassed and exposed?
Oh No! LOL
Every time I log onto Topix on my Iphone it says "do you want to allow this site to use your location?"
All you have to do is press no. Although my location is hidden so it doesn't matter
But let's see
Anonymous proxy says buffoon
Anonymous proxy says buffoon again
I've got to point out, that poster has been pointing out a few here are "buffoons", for a while now.

It isn't just you, Skombolis.

Relax...
Skombolis wrote:
Then it comes up Catcher's registered account saying "buffoon" to the next post
That's simply paying attention to the obvious. A proxy with "not-responsive" answers and dorky jokes defending Ians and HL says the same word repeatedly and then it comes up Catcher
No, that's your opinion of what it must be due to your skewed understanding of the written words and thought of others.

Nothing more.

It's already been established how you completely misunderstand and misconstrue what is written by others.

You could fnck up an anvil with a rubber mallet - as they say in these parts.

You've decided that since Catcher used that comment from the other poster, since it does aptly describe you, it must be Catcher that is that poster.

You're making huge and wildly unsupported claims when you do that(sound familiar?).

Here's the thing, hahaaa...

Catcher has no problem pointing out your flaws, inconsistencies, and shortcomings using his registered name.

None of the (registered) atheists and theists here have a problem pointing those things out, and all along, there are anonymous posters who do drive by posts that say much the same things,in short sentences, succinct and apt, or at times will offer quite lengthy and valid observations. Whether short and succinct, or at length, those anonymous posters, post anonymously and they are valid posts. The regular(registered) posters do the same.

But, no....

Suddenly, you're gonna claim he used a proxy to call you a buffoon.

You know what that sounds like?
Skombolis wrote:
Yeah, that's paranoia!
It is. Pure and simple. You've let your paranoid mind convince you that "they're plotting against me".

Each time you cast the "your group" et al accusation, that's what it represents.

You think it's a conspiracy. A conspiracy against you. hahaaa...

You truly are a buffoon.

Funny.
Skombolis wrote:
Let's hope for your sake stupidity isn't genetic
:)
Why, are you in a position of responsibility for the safety of others?

No worries, I don't live where you do.

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Top Stories Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
News Plurality of Americans think Trump is failing (Mar '17) 2 hr Drumpf Disaster 46,224
Why are Europeans a race of savages, thieves, a... (Jun '15) 3 hr Johnny 388
News Roman Catholic church only true church, says Va... (Jul '07) 3 hr kent 691,985
Prove there's a god. (Mar '08) 4 hr Aura Mytha 990,681
God is REAL - Miracles Happen! (Jun '11) 4 hr exposingm0r0ns 6,704
Jeffreys: Evangelicals will vote for Moore 5 hr whatever 6
Why I’m no longer a Christian (Jul '08) 6 hr Dec 2017 News 445,848
More from around the web