Why Should Jesus Love Me?

_-Alice-_

Since: Apr 13

Location hidden

#547065 Jun 15, 2013
Christians are cool.

http://www.topix.com/forum/topstories/TSHQAVD...
KittenKoder wrote:
<quoted text>
If you support the bibles, any of them, you support stoning children, your god commanded it according to your bibles.
very bright wrote:
<quoted text>
God did command that at times. You know why? You know what kind of people He had slaughtered in the Bible? They were evil crud like you. They were warned time and time again to obey God and His commands but they didn't because they were JUST LIKE YOU.
They were scumbags like you, those who were the enemy of God's people.
They were not innocent people, they were guilty sacks of shit just like you, you horrid bitch.
Thanks for bringing this up because it clearly justifies why God commanded the deaths of horrible people just like you. You should consider yourself fortunate that you have the right to be a scoffing bitch and get away with it...for now.
You atheists never bring that up, do you,??? you scummy lying atheist.

“"None shall pass"”

Since: Jul 11

There

#547067 Jun 15, 2013
_-Alice-_ wrote:
Christians are cool.
http://www.topix.com/forum/topstories/TSHQAVD...
<quoted text>
<quoted text>
The arguement you will receive is "He isn't a real Christian."
If only they were honest enough to admit all the hate and violence wrought by Christians.
They have more skeletons in their closet than in the catacombs of Rome.
Dr Shrink

Baltimore, MD

#547068 Jun 15, 2013
G_O_D wrote:
IN order for Shrinkie to have so much horse manure, he has to have a pony somewhere.
I grew weary of the shoveling a while back. <smile>
<quoted text>
you are not allowed to talk against your beloved friend dr Shrink
who daily pray for you and your healthy a.....

those atheists and poor churchoids only are waiting your suffer and death

but dr Shrink cry for you to HIS TRUE GOD,
cry for mercy on you,your poor alcoholic past dead liver, health,colon and all manures lay around your living room from this wild animals"borsuku" living with you my dear poor old sick deadly pal
take and accept sent friendly smile of humble dr Shrink for you and your poor animal 'borsuku"
Dr Shrink

Baltimore, MD

#547069 Jun 15, 2013
Mark wrote:
<quoted text>
Meet the new religion
One of harmony between
young and old,
black and white
homosexual and heterosexual
no more hate
I invite you to join, you poor thing
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v =euS2SlC68q8XX
dr Shrink urinate n your invitation of scumbag worshiping sun, and feces of animals

I am poor thing
but you are worse,you are mentaly sick, psychopath bambling wahn sin ohne Ende
and thinking that you are important figure

od course important figure standing outside and head is full of birds cheamical s.....

stick into your a.... all those internet links
I am to smart,to big,and to wise,to ready all those internet Lies written by idiots like you

go sleep you ruskij durak ponimajesch? or kapisho?

“Educating the uneducated”

Since: Aug 12

Montreal

#547070 Jun 15, 2013
Lacez wrote:
<quoted text>
So you don't eat or even touch pork, you don't wear mixed fabrics, and you don't eat shellfish?
If you respect all the rules of your precious Leviticus, then you can say without hypocrisy that being gay is an abomination. Doesn't mean you're right, it just means you could say it without being a hypocrite.
Though we all know you are a hypocrite.
BIBLE TRUE JEHOVA wrote:
<quoted text>
sorry
today true follower are not necessary christians, and not follow Mosaic ceremonial laws given only to phisical nation of Israel
none of phisical ceremonal laws have any worship practive in the lifes
of spiritual true Christ Believers.
YOU ALSO CAN BE ONE, ONLY YOU HAVE TO SURRENDER UNDER OBEDIENCE OF SPIRITUAL LAW, NOT YOUR OWN EARTHLY LAW,TRYING TO JUSTYFY YOUR OWN PRIVATE CHOICE
First of all, you didn't answer the question.
I take your silence is a "yes" to being a hypocrite.

You then babble about unrelated nothings.

I think you might be insane.

“Educating the uneducated”

Since: Aug 12

Montreal

#547071 Jun 15, 2013
BIBLE TRUE JEHOVA wrote:
<quoted text>
John jaws
you are uneducated idiot
grab hebrew language or visit Jews sinagouge and ask them what means EL SHADDAI.
because now you shoot incredible stinking bullet from your empty full of holes brain?
we know who are you John Jaws catolic departed togethere with german pope nazi old boy from RCC
you even look like face of square nazi box
if you got made mouth piece from cartoon box,it doesn't mean all posters are made in your image
POOR JOHN JAWS WITH YOUR FAMILY OF CRAZY BIRMINGHAM CATOLICS,
he he heeeeeeeeeeeee
Yup, you're insane.
Insane in the membrane.

“The eye has it...”

Since: May 09

Russell's teapot

#547072 Jun 15, 2013
G_O_D wrote:
<quoted text>
The arguement you will receive is "He isn't a real Christian."
If only they were honest enough to admit all the hate and violence wrought by Christians.
They have more skeletons in their closet than in the catacombs of Rome.
That's the "beauty" of the "No True Christian™" fallacy.

Only people who do nothing wrong at all are called Christian — by Christians — and those who do wrong are not Christian, no matter if the person who does something illegal, wrong or less than exemplary says they are a Christian.

It's a disingenuous claim by "Christians" who utilize the fallacy(obviously), and very convenient. When a Christian does something that casts a bad light on Christianity, they just say those people who presented a negative view of Christianity aren't real Christians and the problem is solved, no?

It's good people are standing up and pointing out these flaws in Christianity and exposing that type of "No True Christian™" thinking as disingenuous and fallacious.

The - "No True Christian™" - fallacy points to there being far less Christians in the nation than statistics say there are, meaning the US isn't a "Christian Country", if we allow Christians to make the "No true Christian", assertion, nor has it ever been. <(chuckle)>

We know that is protested, however, by all Christians, true Christians or not, and suddenly every Christian a Christian could get to say they are a Christian would indeed be a Christian...~/.

This is the rule: The only "Real Christian™" is the one you happen to be talking to at the moment, and they'll tell you who isn't, a "Real Christian™".

I'm proud to say, I'm not.

"Atheism, Secularity, and Well-Being: How the Findings of Social Science Counter Negative Stereotypes and Assumptions"
https://www.google.com/url...

The above link is a good article/.pdf on the subject that illustrates a religion/deity belief definitely does not make for a better human, and the lack of a religion/deity belief certainly does not make for a worse human.

It's quite the opposite.

_-Alice-_

Since: Apr 13

Location hidden

#547074 Jun 15, 2013
Doctor Jordan wrote:
<quoted text>No, I think that the US Supreme Court said that the Irish weren't human and were to be fed with the pigs. But, didn't the founding fathers say that a man without religion is lower that a rat and not worthy to breathe. People say the darnedest things. Women were seen as less valued than pigs and dogs, thus not right to vote or own property. You forget that at one time, blacks in America owned white slaves, while women could not even own the bed they slept in.
Who wants a big meaty bone? My wittle boi does, yes hims duuuhhhsss.

Sit?

“Life may be sweeter for this”

Since: Nov 08

Fennario

#547075 Jun 15, 2013
RiversideRedneck wrote:
<quoted text>
Off topic but funny as hell, here:
A Marine was deployed to Afghanistan. While he was there he received a letter from his girlfriend. In the letter she explained that she had slept with two guys while he had been gone and she wanted to break up with him. AND, she wanted pictures of herself back.
So the Marine did what any squared-away Marine would do. He went around to his buddies and collected all the unwanted photos of women he could find. He then mailed about 25 pictures of women (with clothes and without) to his girlfriend with the following note:
“I don’t remember which one you are. Please remove your picture and send the rest back.”
LIKE A BOSS
Funny. I like it.

“Life may be sweeter for this”

Since: Nov 08

Fennario

#547076 Jun 16, 2013
Mark wrote:
No only Christians are.
They admit to that
And I believe them
Their history proves them right
They are indeed evildoers.
I was not born a sinner
I think humanity should ask itself whether it wants to be ruled by people that confess to they are innate evildoers. I say no. I have no problem with homosexuality, but evildoing is unethical. We should not let the evil rule us.
RiversideRedneck wrote:
To what "innate evildoers" are you referring?
He appears to mean people that say that they were born sinners.
RiversideRedneck wrote:
You say; "I have no problem with homosexuality, but evildoing is unethical.". I agree. Now who's gonna decide what's evil and what's not?
He appears to be saying that the individual decides this about himself. If he declares himself born evil, we take him at his word.

I'm anxious to see how he answers the question himself. It seems to be a tongue-in-cheek way of saying that you can call yourself a born sinner if that's what you think you are, but not anybody else, and that if you do, you should be taken at your word, meaning excluded from positions of authority and responsibility.

None of us like that condescending doctrine, which says that everybody is a sinner, but that since Christians are forgiven, they are cleansed and somehow morally superior. He's turning that around on the Christian.

“Life may be sweeter for this”

Since: Nov 08

Fennario

#547077 Jun 16, 2013
RiversideRedneck wrote:
<quoted text>
Pssst..... Trifecta....
*whispers*
Over here.....
Can you drop the handicapped/normal/abnormal debate already?
The argument began with the justification of homophobia being in part due to gays being in the minority. Then somebody mentioned other examples of being in the minority that didn't deserve the same harsh judgment, such as blindness, left-handedness and genius.

This set off a series of comments trying to justify the negativity for gays using private and rigid definitions of relatively flexible words.

It's really a debate about nothing more than what words mean, not about what is true. The word "abnormal" was discussed. The same was attempted with the word "unnatural."

If abnormal means different from typical, then both the blind and geniuses are abnormal. If abnormal means undesirable, then of the two, only blindness is abnormal. If abnormal mean deviant or is a condemnation as when a Christian calls a homosexual abnormal, then neither the blind nor geniuses are abnormal.

In the end, everybody agreed that geniuses are good, blindness is undesirable but didn't demean the afflicted, it remained a standoff between the Christians and non-Christians about whether gays were an abomination worthy of eternal hellfire - right where the conversation started. That is why such discussions are always sterile - they're about the usage of words, not about what is true in the world.

“Life may be sweeter for this”

Since: Nov 08

Fennario

#547078 Jun 16, 2013
blind man n the bleachers wrote:
No, I am not great. My God is great
Don't be so humble. You are exactly as great as your god, and your god is exactly as great as you are. The same is true for your coprolaliac buddy.

“Life may be sweeter for this”

Since: Nov 08

Fennario

#547079 Jun 16, 2013
blind man n the bleachers wrote:
<quoted text>
There you go with your lies again.
To this you will respond with where did I lie. And post splice together different things I have said to try and make it look like you are telling the truth. So, I will skip that step and go right to proving you are a liar.
This was my post.
"Hahaha that's funny. You, I mean skom, once asked me if I admired dr shrink and if I wanted to be like him. The answer was and still is no. But, one thing I have come to admire. In this Topix world of make believe people. With the same person presenting themselves as people of opposing view points and different personas. Each so smart and the great defender of what ever it is they are supposed espouse. This person has created the simplest character. And wiped the floor with all of you. And not one person that I have seen, has been able to touch him. Or knock him off his square. This simple creativity, I admire. And if a person is able to sort through the rhetoric, you some times find some pretty good thoughts.
There, now that will stir up the masses :)"
You said: No wonder the Blind Man admires you so.
I said: You, I mean skom, once asked me if I admired dr shrink and if I wanted to be like him. The answer was and still is no.
You really do need to seek help for this habitual problem with having to tell a lie.
Have a good evening I AN S.
You said, "This simple creativity, I admire."

QED

You don't know what you wrote or what it means, do you?

“Life may be sweeter for this”

Since: Nov 08

Fennario

#547080 Jun 16, 2013
Skombolis wrote:
<quoted text>
I also had the sacraments at a young age and there was no talk of hell being the reason
And you said the Catholic church teaches children they are going to hell. Please give one example where you were told you are going to hell I realize I am asking someone who still won't admit if she believes the Bible or in Jesus but call it curiosity of what story you can make up.
What were the circumstances that you were told they are going to hell?
Virtually all children of believing Christians are threatened with hell. Why wouldn't they be?

If you don't remember, it is likely because the terror caused you to repress your memories. Such psychotrauma could account for your later self-destructive and antisocial tendencies.

“Life may be sweeter for this”

Since: Nov 08

Fennario

#547081 Jun 16, 2013
Skombolis wrote:
you would simply be dishonest even when showed the post.
We'll never know, will we? The three times you produced a post to support a claim you made about me, they each showed that you had misunderstood it. Why should anybody ever take your word for what a post meant? You don't remember hearing about hell. It's simply not credible that you didn't.

“Life may be sweeter for this”

Since: Nov 08

Fennario

#547082 Jun 16, 2013
Chris Clearwater wrote:
I see NO EXCUSE for anyone in a position of authority in the rcc or anywhere else to harm children its been way blown out for an agenda.[...] many times in the public schools here in Fl. a teacher will abuse children and its not reported even close to the same way it is if its in a church.
Poor picked on religion! Everybody is so unfair to the Catholic church. It's done nothing to be ashamed of. There's an agenda to make it look bad.

You say that you "see NO EXCUSE for anyone in a position of authority in the rcc or anywhere else to harm children" but couldn't finish your (run-on) sentence before you began making excuses for it. This is why we cannot expect the Catholics to clean up their own mess.

“Life may be sweeter for this”

Since: Nov 08

Fennario

#547083 Jun 16, 2013
Chris Clearwater wrote:
If he stops telling lies most of the postings will stop. Perhaps all of them. He is the face here of Christian hate. Any other group and it would be called on. Some groups and it leads to riots and killing.
More whiny victimhood. If you think that my criticisms are unfounded, rebut them. But please stop your incessant crying about how unfair the minority is.

I called your god the worst monster in all of fiction here at http://www.topix.com/forum/topstories/T0N0LOR... #. That post cataloged some of the psychpoathy of your god. Is that what you mean by my hatred? I'm calling your god hateful and you're calling me the same for pointing it out.

Try rebutting it instead of continually posting your pissy whining.

“Life may be sweeter for this”

Since: Nov 08

Fennario

#547084 Jun 16, 2013
Mark wrote:
It is hard to please the Christian or their God
We must face that truth
It's impossible to please the Christians except by showing their religion the respect that it shows nobody. I refuse.

“Life may be sweeter for this”

Since: Nov 08

Fennario

#547085 Jun 16, 2013
Skombolis wrote:
Edit IANS
Here ya go, the exact post:
"I've highlighted a few egregious examples of poor judgment coming from you lately, as when you called Grace a liar. That was stupid, even if you believed it. She could be a potential ally and resource for you because she still cares about you. You are an idiot to throw that away for nothing in return.
http://www.topix.com/forum/topstories/T0N0LOR...

Like I have been saying all along. You thought it was stupid for me to speak out on ethical grounds even if i believed it to be true as it cost me a potential ally (or so you thought)
Grace and I patched things up.
Wrong.

Where did I say that you spoke out on ethical grounds? That was your perception of what you were doing, not mine.

Your comment would have been correct had you written that I thought that it was stupid to call Grace a liar even if you believed it because she could be a potential ally and resource since she still cared about you, and that you were an idiot to throw that away for nothing in return. Because that is what I actually posted.

But that is NOT what you claimed I said. You claimed that I said that "it was stupid for [you] to speak out on ethical grounds." I most assuredly said nothing of the sort. As soon as you inserted your own spin on what you were doing - taking an ethical position - and put them in my mouth, you went astray. That is what I rejected.

I do NOT affirm that you were speaking out on ethical grounds. In fact, I thought that you were doing the opposite: being unethical. You call everybody a liar, and I have repeatedly condemned your ethics for doing that, first back in November when you called me a liar based on one of your misunderstandings, and most recently at http://www.topix.com/forum/topstories/T0N0LOR...

You have misrepresented me every single time that you have paraphrased me. This is the fourth time that you have produced a quote, and the fourth time that I have demonstrated that fact. You don't seem to be capable of doing better. You don't even seem capable of recognizing that you are doing it even after being shown repeatedly - that or you don't care enough not to.

In either case, it's been well established that any claim you make about what another poster said will likely be in error. When you post a link to the quote, you can be rebutted with an analysis like this one. When you don't you should be rejected out of hand.

“Life may be sweeter for this”

Since: Nov 08

Fennario

#547086 Jun 16, 2013
Skombolis wrote:
The RCC no more made them a pedophile than the teacher's union made someone a pedophile.
Really? It's not just about creating pedophiles, which there is no doubt that the vow of celibacy does - so-called situational pedophilia. It's also about enabling the pedophiles with a massive, institutionalized cover-up that facilitates and emboldens them. Check it out:

BENEFITS OF THE PRIESTHOOD SYNDICATE OVER FREELANCE PEDOPHILIA :

[1] Procurement - the church brings the little rosy-cheeked angels right to you! And in dresses!

[2] Condoning - the clergy are experts at looking the other way.

[3] Terrorism - each little angel come preprogrammed to fear damnation. This shuts most of them up just to threaten them.

[4] Trashing the victim - if you are accused, you get a press release from the local diocese saying that the boy is a liar who is acting out in rebellion against god.

[5] Cash settlement - the church will pay the family to shut up, usually in secret; the priest admits nothing.

[6] Relocation program - if you can't shut the boys up with threats of hell, trashing them in the press or with hush money, they'll spirit you off to another parish to begin again. Nobody needs to know!

[Is this great for pedophiles or what? But wait! There's more!]

[7] Stonewalling - if a police investigation ensues, they get no help, and nobody makes the church help because - wait for it - it's the church! Subpoenas are for freelancing suckers. With the RCC, there will be more stonewalling, and perhaps no case!

[8] Bottomless defense fund - if you have to go to court, a lawyer is provided.

[9] Safe harbor - if none of the above works, you'll be spirited off to the Vatican - a political state - for sanctuary. Here's the pedophile Cardinal Law in the Vatican, already working his way up the ladder there: http://www.snapnetwork.org/news/vatican/Vatic...

Can any non-RCC priest pedophiles compete with this nine-point plan? Hell no. If they pork a kidand get caught, they end up in jail, and on some online pedophile watch list. That's for suckers! Become a priest and let the Whore of Babylon get you a boy.

Regarding pedophile teachers compared to priests:

[1] They undoubtedly at a far lower rate commit their crimes for far fewer years with far fewer victims each.

[2] Their employers don't obstruct justice for them, and certainly not with the assistance of an international syndicate with bottomless pockets, most of about a billion supporters and sympathizers, and a political state of its own.

[3] We need teachers.

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Top Stories Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
Should Black People Forgive White People for Sl... (Jun '07) 2 min gundee123 4,998
The Christian Atheist debate (Jun '15) 3 min Bongo 70,733
News Reason to cringe: Female voters react to Trump 6 min JohnInLa 18
Does watching interracial porn excite you (Mar '12) 10 min mmmmm 11
Poll Was 9/11 a conspiracy?? (Oct '07) 19 min Blink 282,971
Play "end of the word" part 2 (Dec '15) 19 min Poppyann 3,026
News Roman Catholic church only true church, says Va... (Jul '07) 21 min truth 658,652
Prove there's a god. (Mar '08) 29 min Brian_G 974,713
More from around the web