Why Should Jesus Love Me?

“"None shall pass"”

Since: Jul 11

There

#541799 May 31, 2013
Mark wrote:
<quoted text>
I just reacted to the things you utter and the picture this creates with me......
WOW!

That is the exact thing the Christians do with the Bible!

Congratulations, you are as ignorant as a they are.

“"None shall pass"”

Since: Jul 11

There

#541800 May 31, 2013
Mark wrote:
<quoted text>
.... there is no basis of discussion.....
Then STFU.

“"None shall pass"”

Since: Jul 11

There

#541801 May 31, 2013
hick-up wrote:
<quoted text>
If G is correct in that, "A person is not born with ANY sexual preference. Sexual desires do not develop until later in life.", it would have to be the same for both heterosexuals as well as homosexuals. Would it not?
I thought you were agreeing with G.
I don't know. I've always liked girls.
You remember when you were born ?

ROFLMAO

hick-up

“squuuze me”

Since: Feb 09

Florida, USA

#541802 May 31, 2013
G_O_D wrote:
<quoted text>
Nor is the heterosexual.
So then ...sexual preference is learned behavior?

If not, what other choices might exist?

I'm not looking to cause a thing here ...just asking questions, gathering and processing information.
Bongo

Bronx, NY

#541803 May 31, 2013
Skombolis wrote:
<quoted text>
There he goes again!
I am paranoid about something I never brought up and couldn't care less about!
And of course not one word in response to the actual post or any explanation on why someone who criticizes the faith now would call on people to be better Christians or why my response must have been peaceful
You are like some sort of mega-genius when it comes to lawyering huh Catcher? What I can't figure out if how you have any time to play on the Internet let alone all day every day. I mean you have Johnny Cochran's famous "if it doesn't fit you must acquit". Your catch phrases of "you're weird" and "DUDE" are gonna be just as famous some day, you wait and see
~snicker
He is just a garden variety cum laude grad. Hes probably a omnifutant rapesuck too.

“MEET KIKI -She Seeks Home”

Since: Oct 10

With Established Harem

#541804 May 31, 2013
trifecta1 wrote:
Are you comparing being born Gay with Cancer? what does being left or right hand or does a infant love its mother have to do with your argument?? it's natural for a baby to love it's mother. you see that in the animal kingdom. you can tell probably within 1yr if a baby is left handed or not, what's your point?
.. you do not want to see any correlation ..

.. for instance, newborn babies do not love, their world consists of me, me and me. At one point, they realize there are other people in their world and begin to bond ..
trifecta1 wrote:
So because he is not a Christian he is not mellow and logical???
.. huh ??..
trifecta1 wrote:
Maybe he challenged you because position isn't logical, ever think of that?
.. HU's statement was a strawman's fallacy since nobody knows how a newborn will develop, what diseases they will acquire or if they'll by left or right handed ..

.. you will continue to insist you are correct because, regardless of the evidence, that's what you do ..

“"None shall pass"”

Since: Jul 11

There

#541805 May 31, 2013
Mark wrote:
<quoted text>
....
We have no original texts, not one!. That is very telling. All the oldest texts are from after Nicea......
You don;t know much. You are wrong.

We have copies of the Old Testament from 200 BC and many pre-nicean Christian manuscripts canonical and non-canonical.

Where did you get your degree in history ?

Since: Mar 09

Location hidden

#541806 May 31, 2013
Catcher1 wrote:
<quoted text>
Dude!
You should have retained me to defend you.
You might have avoided prison time.
LOL

While i am sure you were available as you don't ever appear to be working, I don't think your arguments of "dude" were going to be of any help!

The problem wasn't the lawyer, it was a witness changing his testimony after two years and the prosecutors not turning over the change in what is an ongoing discovery process and then calling him to the stand last in order to best sandbag the case.

Although if you were the attorney, by far you would have made things worse. I probably would still be locked up as you would be arguing the prosecutions case for him as you seem to do with every every argument you engage in on Topix. You say something stupid and then either have no defense or give someone the information to prove what you said makes no sense!

You shingle should read

"defend yourself dude, you can't do any worse"

or maybe

"Need a lawyer? Check Topix 24/7 and look for Catcher. I will treat you like you are my only client...because you will be"

:)

“"None shall pass"”

Since: Jul 11

There

#541807 May 31, 2013
hick-up wrote:
<quoted text>
So then ...sexual preference is learned behavior?
If not, what other choices might exist?
I'm not looking to cause a thing here ...just asking questions, gathering and processing information.
There are many factors involved.

the simple answer is no one knows why anyone "falls in love" with any one else nor why anyone wants to have sex with anyone else.

If they did, the Christians would have found a "cure" for homosexuality (beyond brainwashing).

hick-up

“squuuze me”

Since: Feb 09

Florida, USA

#541808 May 31, 2013
Happy Lesbo wrote:
<quoted text>
.. nope. Is a person born with cancer?
This is a good read HL ...check it out.
http://www.cbc.ca/news/background/cancer/canc...
Is an infant left or right handed? Does a newborn loves its mother ??..
.. just surprised because HU seems to be a pretty mellow, logical guy ..
Thanx!

hick-up

“squuuze me”

Since: Feb 09

Florida, USA

#541809 May 31, 2013
G_O_D wrote:
<quoted text>
You remember when you were born ?
ROFLMAO
huh???

“let's do this thang!”

Since: Aug 10

Location hidden

#541810 May 31, 2013
trifecta1 wrote:
<quoted text>well said.
thanks:)

receiving advice on sexuality from a homosexual is like hiring an obese glutton as a personal trainer.

(altho, i'm sure they give some enthusiastic head!;)

“"None shall pass"”

Since: Jul 11

There

#541811 May 31, 2013
hick-up wrote:
<quoted text>huh???
You wrote that you ALWAYS liked girls.

That means you remember liking girls from the moment of birth, if not earlier.

Do you remember liking girls before you were conceived , too ? That would be interesting to read. LOL

Since: Mar 09

Location hidden

#541812 May 31, 2013
hick-up wrote:
<quoted text>
So then ...sexual preference is learned behavior?
If not, what other choices might exist?
I'm not looking to cause a thing here ...just asking questions, gathering and processing information.
You are asking fair questions

The argument HL is agreeing with would be one that the only logical conclusion would be that sexual attraction is learned behavior and based in part on environment and socialization

I have seen studies where sexual preference can be determined as early as 3 years old and it ended up being the case. Something to do with how they socialize with same sex children. There is also an ongoing debate on whether basically there is a "gay gene"

Some scientists says its nonsense, others aren't so sure. The gay community is scared this kind of study could lead to genocide of the gay community.

Point is, there are a lot of theories and not a lot of facts. But what evidence are they presenting to support the conclusion people are born with no sexual preference? To me, that is arguing against people are born gay or straight. I personally think people are born with preference but due to socialization and maturity of the brain, they simply don't understand their own predisposition enough to act on it during earlier stages in life. But if people are born sexually neutral so-to-speak when it comes to orientation, then what other factors could it be other than environment and socialization?

Again I don't agree but that is the argument they are making so I understand why you are asking questions.

“"None shall pass"”

Since: Jul 11

There

#541813 May 31, 2013
Skombolis wrote:
<quoted text>
You are asking fair questions
The argument HL is agreeing with would be one that the only logical conclusion would be that sexual attraction is learned behavior and based in part on environment and socialization
I have seen studies where sexual preference can be determined as early as 3 years old and it ended up being the case. Something to do with how they socialize with same sex children. There is also an ongoing debate on whether basically there is a "gay gene"
Some scientists says its nonsense, others aren't so sure. The gay community is scared this kind of study could lead to genocide of the gay community.
Point is, there are a lot of theories and not a lot of facts. But what evidence are they presenting to support the conclusion people are born with no sexual preference? To me, that is arguing against people are born gay or straight. I personally think people are born with preference but due to socialization and maturity of the brain, they simply don't understand their own predisposition enough to act on it during earlier stages in life. But if people are born sexually neutral so-to-speak when it comes to orientation, then what other factors could it be other than environment and socialization?
Again I don't agree but that is the argument they are making so I understand why you are asking questions.
Well said, Skom. Thanks!

“I.Spirit.Son.God”

Since: Jan 12

Location hidden

#541814 May 31, 2013
Happy Lesbo wrote:
<quoted text>
.. you do not want to see any correlation ..
.. for instance, newborn babies do not love, their world consists of me, me and me. At one point, they realize there are other people in their world and begin to bond ..
<quoted text>
.. huh ??..
<quoted text>
.. HU's statement was a strawman's fallacy since nobody knows how a newborn will develop, what diseases they will acquire or if they'll by left or right handed ..
.. you will continue to insist you are correct because, regardless of the evidence, that's what you do ..
you no have any evidence oy! that's why I know I'm correct.

It's not any kind of fallacy to know a baby will develop a liking for solid food. A baby will develop speech. A baby will develop the ability to crawl and to walk. So we do have the ability to know how a baby will develop---[naturally]. Development of attraction to the opposite is as natural as learning how to walk. If a baby never develops to walking, there is something wrong. And if a baby grows to develop an attraction to the same sex, there is something [Wrong].

“I.Spirit.Son.God”

Since: Jan 12

Location hidden

#541815 May 31, 2013
waaasssuuup wrote:
<quoted text>
thanks:)
receiving advice on sexuality from a homosexual is like hiring an obese glutton as a personal trainer.
(altho, i'm sure they give some enthusiastic head!;)
iyai!!

Catcher1

Since: Sep 10

Fremont, CA

#541816 May 31, 2013
Skombolis wrote:
<quoted text>
LOL
While i am sure you were available as you don't ever appear to be working, I don't think your arguments of "dude" were going to be of any help!
The problem wasn't the lawyer, it was a witness changing his testimony after two years and the prosecutors not turning over the change in what is an ongoing discovery process and then calling him to the stand last in order to best sandbag the case.
Although if you were the attorney, by far you would have made things worse. I probably would still be locked up as you would be arguing the prosecutions case for him as you seem to do with every every argument you engage in on Topix. You say something stupid and then either have no defense or give someone the information to prove what you said makes no sense!
You shingle should read
"defend yourself dude, you can't do any worse"
or maybe
"Need a lawyer? Check Topix 24/7 and look for Catcher. I will treat you like you are my only client...because you will be"
:)
From what you say here, the prosecutor committed a "Brady" violation (Brady v. Maryland, look it up), or suborned perjury, and your lawyer provided ineffective assistance by allowing it. Easy dismissal, unless your narrative is incomplete or incorrect.

Since: Mar 09

Location hidden

#541817 May 31, 2013
Happy Lesbo wrote:
<quoted text>
.. you do not want to see any correlation ..
.. for instance, newborn babies do not love, their world consists of me, me and me. At one point, they realize there are other people in their world and begin to bond ..
<quoted text>
.. huh ??..
<quoted text>
.. HU's statement was a strawman's fallacy since nobody knows how a newborn will develop, what diseases they will acquire or if they'll by left or right handed ..
.. you will continue to insist you are correct because, regardless of the evidence, that's what you do ..
Not knowing is different than not existing.

And you are actually arguing against "born-gay" repeatedly

If someone gets a disease later in life, then they were not born with that disease

If someone is not naturally left-handed or right-handed then they become so through learned behavior

Everything you say is arguing against being born-gay

So don't blame hu for trying to figure out what it is you are saying or why. And it has nothing to with what kind of guy he is. You are making arguments against yourself. That may prove to be confusing to some.

“"None shall pass"”

Since: Jul 11

There

#541818 May 31, 2013
trifecta1 wrote:
<quoted text>....
It's not any kind of fallacy to know a baby will develop a liking for solid food. A baby will develop speech. A baby will develop the ability to crawl and to walk......
That IS a fallacy.

Many are born unable to do those things, some develop those things as they grow up.

Are you saying that babies choose to be born blind, crippled and other birth defects ?

BTW, babies are not born to eat solid food, dummazz. They survive on la liquid diet until (and if) they grow teeth.

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Top Stories Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
News Plurality of Americans think Trump is failing (Mar '17) 3 min Quirky 51,447
Prove there's a god. (Mar '08) 12 min Big Al 991,834
Missing Teen - Brittany Crenshaw (Aug '12) 4 hr Denise moody 24
How many MILLIONS of MEXICAN MEN R N in U.S. IL... 7 hr Doctor REALITY 6
Allah is Satan hiding behind the name 7 hr Doctor REALITY 9
servpro sucks (Apr '08) 8 hr Picnic 38
News Roman Catholic church only true church, says Va... (Jul '07) 9 hr Holy dr Shrink 693,103
More from around the web