trifecta1, I am wondering whether you have seen something that several here have attempted to state. When you make that first statement you are making several logical errors, the most important of which is "begging the question" which is classified in logic as a logical error.too bad imo. You will get your evidence of God, I have no doubt about that. But it may not help you, because by then it would have been too late.<quoted text>Ya never know. I wish you the best though.
At the risk of telling you something you already know, which I have told on topix many times, as have many others,'begging the question' is not logically correct, because it makes the assumption that what one is attempting to show by their "givens" which would lead to their "proof" has already occurred before they showed that it was true.
Your stating that I will find out at some point what I don't believe now, is assuming that what I will find out is a given, which is not true, but which you are attempting to establish is true, by whatever you provide here as evidence of it being true.
Yes, if you are correct in what you believe, then supposedly I will find out at some point, however if you are not correct, then I won't find out that you ARE correct because it simply would not be correct.
Yes, I see that you did put "too bad imo" at the beginning of that post, but the rest was a logical error.
You could be right, but assuming that, without establishing it, which no human being has yet done, and came back to tell us about it, is still "begging the question".