1. You were the first to indulge in name calling and condemnation.
2. You now claim the Word already condemned IAN.
3. Though highly unlikely, IAN may become a born-again Christian tomorrow, believe exactly like you do and, according to your belief system, the Word would not condemn him.
.. using this logic, it seems your condemnation, underscored by name-calling, is back on you, not the Word ..
.. when faced with logic, do you always pull the Joker Wild Discernment Card out of the deck ??..<quoted text>No sir, like your friend you too lack an understanding and discernment of scripture, your reasoning of IANS becoming a believer is based off of a big IF, and IF indeed such happens for him in his lifetime then that would be a wonderful thing for another soul saved unto Christ, but until such time everything that I and others have pointed out in his character but naturally and spiritually stands as assessed.
.. please try again. YOU condemned IAN, called him names, not the Word (Jesus). My hat is off to you - you're one powerful man, Miss ..
WOULD ANY CHRISTIAN LIKE TO RESPOND TO MY POST?(Above)
WOULD ANY CHRISTIAN LIKE TO EXPLAIN WHY LAWEST HAS THE RIGHT TO CONDEMN IAN TO HELL?
DID ANYONE NOTICE LAWEST STARTED THE INSULTS?