I will continue evaluating information to the best of my abilities.Tide....you have already been given the context and the chance to explain how it would mitigate anything and stood by your claim its not bigotry.
So far, you've been going after bigotry when you haven't even demonstrated an unfair prejudice.
I asked for brand new fictional context so that I could properly evaluate the analogies you provided.You just are asking for information already provided and discussed simply to try to run the conversation in a circle and pretend you already didnt define bigotry.
If you're talking about the context surrounding something IANS said, be very specific.
My advice to you is to drop the analogies and just focus on what was actually said.
I'm so surprised!Youe excuses are transparent and just another reason your honesty is lacking. You have already given an example of context and claimed so long as someone actually fits a characteristic that it isnt bigotry to include that characteristic as an insult.
That is not what I claimed.
Ha.You are embarassing yourself. I can just stand back and let you continue