Maybe I didn't make clear that my comment addressed coercion of minor children within a family, to accept a consensual incestuous relationship >once they reach adulthood<.Are u kidding me? Im not at home so I cant link it. You said incest with consensual adults is different than consensual gay sex when Riverside said you were a hypocrite for not accepting all or nothing and one of the reasons you listed was because they were more likely to try to coerce a minor.
That would be different than consensual adult sex between non family members - since that wouldn't involve incest.
Let me look that up for you - right now.
Here's the conversation with Ar Ar:
RiversideRedneck wrote: What a minute here. I see... "Consenting adults" is fine as long as they aren't related, right?
Correct, and for the reasons I've stated previously
RiversideRedneck wrote: You're a hypocrite, dude.
http://www.topix.com/forum/topstories/topstor...No, I'm not a hypocrite. You're comparing something that isn't related. Same sex relations between consenting adults does not run the risk of increased birth defects, nor does it have the possibility of adult family members coercing or putting undue pressures upon minor children within the family to participate in an incestuous relationship once they reach adulthood.
OH WAIT, I DID SAY AND SPECIFY EXACTLY THAT.
Your misunderstanding was due to your inability to comprehend what I did say.
Ar Ar got it.
I didn't respond to your post, because you were blathering on about what I understood to be your lack of comprehension about what I said.You said it yesterday, I posted you about it and G posted about it.
I didn't see a post from G_O_D to myself concerning that post you are referencing.
Here's the post you made to myself:
http://www.topix.com/forum/topstories/topstor...Undue pressure on minors then would have nothing to do with consensual adult relationships and there is no more a correlation between incest and pedopholia then there is between being gay and being a pedophile. Just because someone is attracted to a family member doesnt mean they want to rape children any more than being gay means a man wants to rape boys. And there are laws against gay marriage. A homosexual incestual relationship runs no risk of offspring. Ironically I agree with some of your positions but your arguments hurt way more than they help if you want to link adult consentual relationships and child rape or go by whats legal
See? You were blathering about things that > you thought I said< that I didn't say.
I didn't respond because, honestly, I thought:
"Holy crap, he couldn't follow instructions on how to strike a match."
You mean the game of trying to decipher just exactly what it is that you don't understand and respond to?how many of you play these games?
No, I didn't remember a post you claimed I made - that I didn't make.I guarantee every person who posted yesterday and read all the posts would remember but u dont remember ur own post
That post existed only in your mind.
You mean the post I ignored that you made, since it was in error and I didn't want to highlight your babbling misunderstanding, and lack of comprehension.or the reply I posted to u directly addressing that point?
Yeah, it's a pretty compassionate approach, and for myself, I don't like to highlight another persons incomprehension too much. But in this instance, you left me no other choice.Gotta love these new humanist ethics
Do we need to beat this particular horse any longer?
One of my Drill Sergeants used to say:
"Every so often, you gotta pay the piper, and today that's me"