Why Should Jesus Love Me?
dr Shrink

Baltimore, MD

#490693 Feb 19, 2013
lil whispers wrote:
<quoted text>
Code blue code blue Dr shrink,Dr Reality crash cart needed is a cor on the floor with patient ianso.His values are dieing.
explain more simple and clear about your label code?

have nice day lill?

“John 3:seventeen”

Since: Feb 07

God BELIEVES in YOU~

#490694 Feb 19, 2013
dr Shrink

Baltimore, MD

#490695 Feb 19, 2013
It aint necessarily so wrote:
<quoted text>
English isn't any of his languages.
you are not my lawyer.
I rather pee on you ,as to make my spokesan
Please?use proper behaviristic ethics and stop mention rascism and hateful nationalism(hitler style)
dr Shrink

Baltimore, MD

#490696 Feb 19, 2013
G_O_D wrote:
<quoted text>
Makes sense to me.
of course only to you?

“let's do this thang!”

Since: Aug 10

Location hidden

#490697 Feb 19, 2013
G_O_D wrote:
<quoted text>
You call obese people ungodly sinners and deny them their civil rights because you think over eating is a sin ?
BTW, gluttony is not a sin in the Bible. It was one of the "Seven Deadly Sins" introduced into Christianity by Pope Gregory a few centuries after Jesus was dead.
we all have alcoholic friends and family, but we love then still. are you an enabler of destructive addictions, a compassionate interventionist or just an insecure ass-kiss who's afraid to take an honest position?

Since: Mar 09

Location hidden

#490698 Feb 19, 2013
It aint necessarily so wrote:
<quoted text>
Nazi Germany was almost exclusively Christian. The Jews in Nazi Germany had about as much hope of German Christians taking a minority position against the immoral behavior of fellow Christians in uniform as I did in this thread.
I'm sure that we can make much better people than that. We need a better ideology than Christianity with its repeatedly failed moral system. Look at you.
What faith nazi Germany had to claim since Hitler claimed it had nothing to do with the conversation

And an old bitter retired doctor who didn't care about his patients and asks if people's mothers were whores and if they slept with sheep is going to lecture anyone on ethics?

A guy that will not only deny he made the denial but already is setting up his excuse claiming posts like these wouldn't be considered thinking someone is indoctrinated

IANS said

"It seems that way to you because you have been trained to think that way, a characteristically Christian way of thinking. You see the world principally as a decadent and dangerous place that is getting worse, even as it gets better. And you project your own Christian psychology of sitting by helplessly waiting to be rescued. It's so negative, passive and disabling.

I blame your church for teaching you to think this way."

http://www.topix.com/forum/topstories/T0N0LOR...

You are a bigot and a liar and self-blind. No honest person could read that above post and not conclude you feel Christians have been indoctrinated. But because you now need to defend your earlier lie you will stick with this lie. I have seen my share of liars on Topix but i think you top the list for someone who believes his own lies
dr Shrink

Baltimore, MD

#490699 Feb 19, 2013
It aint necessarily so wrote:
<quoted text>
I put this into Google translate, but it wasn't able to identify the language. Please advise. http://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php...
genius ego like yours???
and not able to make right english words
YOU ARE NOT MY STUDENT TO ADVICE YOU ANYTHING OR DEBATE ANYTHING WITH YOU,
just you are low ignorant atheistic piece of insultive primitive s...
dr Shrink

Baltimore, MD

#490700 Feb 19, 2013
Skombolis wrote:
<quoted text>
People see you are a liar and a bigot
What exactly do you think they would have to correct me on?
Do you think a single Christian in here doesn't remember you telling Juicy she got you all wrong when she said you felt all or most Christians are indoctrinated? Nobody is impressed with whatever dishonest technicality you want to try to use to deny it. They have seen you lie over and over again, denying an entire statement and finally claiming months later you denied it because within the sentence I said proof not evidence, even though proof is a higher standard and would have been in your favor that I said proof?
Do you think anyone with commons sense can't see when you claim Christians don't need to feel bad about those they hurt or make amends because they can ask the sky for forgiveness wasn't meant as a negative implication to Christians?
You have had some people in your little group lying for you for so long and covering your lies that you have actually started to believe you are honest and that you aren't a bigot.
Dude, you are one of the most bigoted, dishonest posters on Topix
Why do you think nobody Christian or non-Christians alike that reads in here other than the few (I don't don't know what to call them, maybe dependents) dependents that travel around with you has said anything? They can see you are a liar and a bigot clear as day yet you keep whining for more help as your dependents circling the wagons isn't enough
Learn to stand on your own two feet 'doctor' and take responsibility for your words
SURE HE IS LIAR AND BIGOT
I read all his post, his post sounds full of lies,insults,accusations and pretences

I also read your posts,mostly they sounds truthfuly and fit sometimes harsh words of Bible against such miserable atheistic creature,and trush diger from the past to fit his wicked agendas.

he is not able to take responsibilty for his word,because without of own honor person never respect own words directed against others

Have good day Skom
Adam

Frankfurt Am Main, Germany

#490701 Feb 19, 2013
AnnieJ wrote:
<quoted text>
<quoted text>
So do you not see any bigotry coming from the Christian side? Are some peoples post even though ugly and vile toward gays okay since they believe it to be God/Jesus inspired?
Most of you believe homosexuality is a sin...I get that whether I agree with that or not. Does that Bible tell you that that it is okay to stone them to death? The words that have been thrown around in here are just as or more so hurtful than if someone had hurled stones.
If it is okay...what is going on in here...then why the lesson..."Cast The First Stone"?
There are a couple of things about that story...
First Jesus stood up to an angry mob...took the risk to protect a woman that had sinned. That had to take some courage to stand up for what he perceived as "right" knowing that he too could have endured some of those stones.
Second...He did not say...Ye that have not committed the sin of adultery cast the first stone...it was “Let any one of you who is without sin be the first to throw a stone at her.”
Maybe some of those that are casting stones are without sin.
I understand why you see bigotry from the other side...you feel as if your faith is being threatened. Might sound strange...but I have seen it too.
I think about that quote...something like this...those who fight monsters need to be careful not to become monsters.
I think that is what has happened here...both sides need to look in to that abyss...and see what is staring back.
I understand...hard not to fall in to the mud when it is on our perspective side of the fence.
As I have read here...I don't want to become that monster that I fight...I don't want to look in to that abyss and see that I am no better than what I fight against...as much as I like to walk in mud puddles...I do not want to become covered with the muck.
There are many good Christians...non-Christians... straights and gays...that are just trying to make this world a little better than what they found it.
Oh well...I suppose this battle will continue...both sides vilifying the other...I think...
I will empty my bucket of stones...
It's too hard! Whether the woman standing in front of Jesus, thought about her situation? It was not good for her, because she had not come voluntarily to Jesus, but had been dragged before him. Not moved by compassion people had brought them to Jesus. An entanglement of guilt and hypocrisy surrounding the woman and Jesus. They had found an indictment against the ground, looking for a woman to Jesus. The question of the sinlessness of the accuser was answered in amazing ways. Suddenly she stood alone in front of Jesus. Adultery was occupied by the Jewish law with the death penalty. What this woman could expect other than the death sentence from Jesus' mouth?(Read 3.Mose 20.10; 5.Mose 22.22; Matth.5 0.17 to 20.) We do not know how she saw herself her fault. Perhaps she suffered and did not want to commit adultery, but sin had yet again gained power over them. Was made many people like it, that they want to stop sinning and they do not succeed anyway. Your good intentions will not help, they are always overwhelmed by the sin. It is really overwhelmed and under the power of sin can suffer greatly. Martin Luther describes it?... me my sin tormented night and day, in which I was born, I fell even more deeply of that, it was not my Guts alive, the sin possessed me.?(Read Röm.7 0.14 to 20.) When Luther wrote that song, he had previously recognized Jesus as the justice of God, who came into our world? To destroy the devil's work?. Therefore, he could begin his song with the words: Well rejoice, love gmein Christians, and let us jump merrily? Since the victory of Jesus on Calvary, the signs in the battle against sin to win. That we too experience.(Read Röm.7, 24.25; 1.Cor.15, 54b-57; 2.Kor.5 17)

Since: Mar 09

Location hidden

#490702 Feb 19, 2013
dr Shrink wrote:
<quoted text>
SURE HE IS LIAR AND BIGOT
I read all his post, his post sounds full of lies,insults,accusations and pretences
I also read your posts,mostly they sounds truthfuly and fit sometimes harsh words of Bible against such miserable atheistic creature,and trush diger from the past to fit his wicked agendas.
he is not able to take responsibilty for his word,because without of own honor person never respect own words directed against others
Have good day Skom
Have a good one Shrink

I mean t to respond to your post the other day but ran out of time but i agree, I have seen many people come out of prison for the better

Unfortunately not nearly enough as the system is designed for high recidivism and unless someone has a great support system in place (family and/or friends) they are probably going to fail and jails are designed to be punitive not rehabilitative. Even for those who just want vengeance it is in their own interests for jails to be rehabilitative

But even in the midst of the chaos there are people who have found Jesus. And they don't use it as currency or talk about it to those making decisions about their lives (the ones that are sincere imo) as the new-found peace is obvious in their mannerisms.

I know there are Christian bigots and they want to broad-brush millions upon millions of people because of some that probably use the faith more as political currency than true belief or just some who have stumbled terribly but most people understand that people are people. And some people their faith has helped them to be better people. other people continued as they would have anyway. There are very few people in the U.S. that I would say are worse off because of faith. Maybe under 3% and even that may be very high as i personally know of one person who I can say it has had a negative influence in their life as imo they don't live their faith but are ruled by it and live in like paranoia and fear and with blinders on

Anyway if in the worst places in society people can find Christ I am not worried about the ramblings of prejudiced people. Like most prejudiced people, they are marginalized by the decent majority of society, believers and unbelievers alike

“Quo Vadis”

Since: Feb 08

Location hidden

#490703 Feb 19, 2013
It aint necessarily so wrote:
It's not private.

Well it should be.
It aint necessarily so wrote:
You're as welcome to my opinion of you as anybody else.
Sorry, invitation denied.
It aint necessarily so wrote:
You think
Yes I do, and my thinking isn't as skewed as yours either.
It aint necessarily so wrote:
...I said or implied that?
Yes, you just did. I do a lot of thinking but I don't like procrastinating.
It aint necessarily so wrote:
Go on.
Yes, I will. I'm glad you enjoy what I have to say.
It aint necessarily so wrote:
"Limp"?

Not at all, but "limp" does describe your 'ideas' thus far. When are we going to see these "brilliant" ideas of yours?
It aint necessarily so wrote:
In what way can the word "limp" be applied to an argument?
It was just applied,m or are you not seeing properly?
It aint necessarily so wrote:
"Inhumanely"?

"Limp" cannot be applied inhumanely, or at least not to my understanding.
It aint necessarily so wrote:
Nice choice.
Thanks, I know. I'm glad you're a fan.
It aint necessarily so wrote:
Are you confusing osteoporosis with pathological compression fractures and kyphosis?
No I'm not. You just decided to add that. Maybe you have been confused for a long time.
It aint necessarily so wrote:
I think so.
I think so too.
It aint necessarily so wrote:
How can we possibly communicate given this difference of opinion about what words mean?
I don't know. Maybe we shouldn't.
:)
It aint necessarily so wrote:
Let's see.
Why the change of heart?
It aint necessarily so wrote:
I don't care what about what you believe because of your religion.
You really sound confused now. You want to communicate with me yet you don't care about what I believe because of some religion. Interesting.
It aint necessarily so wrote:
Do tell.
I just did. I said you sound confused. Want me to repeat it once more?
It aint necessarily so wrote:
You don't mind if I take the liberty....?
You have taken too many already. I think about now you should head to the back of the line.

CS.

Since: Oct 12

Location hidden

#490704 Feb 19, 2013
dr Shrink wrote:
<quoted text>
explain more simple and clear about your label code?
have nice day lill?
Dr shrink telephone in patients rooms have intercom systems on them when one makes rounds appromiately every thirty minutes to check patients on floor called bed checks and some places have a botton on the walls just for calling a code blue.When doin this one makes a visual assement of each patient.(If patient appears to be sleeping state)check the chest visual for respirations if none check pulse in neck area if neither pick up phone and announce code blue.Stay with patient and start cpr right away.Crew locates a doctor while others bring in crash cart which holds meds and equiptment.Hope this helps to understand the code blue system.It has saved alot of lifes.
Adam

Frankfurt Am Main, Germany

#490705 Feb 19, 2013
Continue previous comment

Regarding homosexuals here two examples.

Homosexual acts are an abomination to God. 18:22

If a man has sex with another man, kill them both. 20:13

The Hadith and homosexuality: The Hadith are collections of sayings attributed to Prophet Muhammad. Many Hadiths (ahadith) discuss liwat (sexual intercourse between males). Two examples are:

"When a man mounts another man, the throne of God shakes."

"Kill the one that is doing it and also kill the one that it is being done to." (in reference to the active and passive partners in gay sexual intercourse)

When we have a conflict with the Quran/Thorah, the laws of Moses, which is the word of God verbatim, we do not ask where the Quran or the Thorah went wrong but rather why are we, limited beings, in conflict with the wisdom of the absolute, God Almighty.

“Ditat Deus”

Since: Jul 12

Location hidden

#490706 Feb 19, 2013
Skombolis wrote:
<quoted text>
LOL
IANS is going to tell everybody the rules of knowing the future
Tell me IANS, what scientific method did you use to determine someone knowing the future choices someone else will make eliminates their free will even though they look at the choices they made AFTER they made them by looking into the future?
It is such simple concepts like these that are hilarious to listen to you guys try to argue against the Bible with.
So do you believe if someone on Earth right now knows the future but doesn't tell anyone that him having that knowledge means none of us have free will?
Pay attention, it simply means someone can see what CHOICES we made on the days we made them. We still have free will and the ability to make any choice we wanted and whatever choice we picked would be what someone who could see into the future would see
They didn't dictate our choices thus making them predestined, they simply would have the ability to see what we chose
I don't think the "free thinkers" can think straight. I don't think they understand that God doesn't literally "see into out future", as God doesn't experience a past, present or future. It's all the same to Him.

“Quo Vadis”

Since: Feb 08

Location hidden

#490707 Feb 19, 2013
Black Thunder 42 wrote:
<quoted text>That is (as I read it) your perception. Please take care that it is not "induced" and lacking in total truth, rather than honest deduction.
It is not induced. The great whore that sitteth upon the beast that tramples many nations underfoot will eventually receive her deathly blow. After she and the likes of people such as Hernan Cortez and the reast have butchered people throughout early Christendom (Christian Kingdom), not just for reasons of converting the heathen to Christianity, but to her specific brand of Christianity. Now to make up for her sins, her and her loose daughters are now seeking to right their wrongs but accepting heathens and pagans who have no desire of changing.

She has wrought wicked traditions upon mankind like sun worship, Christ Mass, worship of the virgin mother, idolatry, defiling the temple by bring the dead into the church for funerals, trinity doctrine, worship of the cross and the list goes on and on and on. There will not be enough time for the church to be removed and replaced by a secular heathen rabble. The age of the Gentiles has almost come to an end and it be about time my friend, that the sheep will be separated from teh Goat of mendes (Baphomet or Azazel the Fallen Malak).

Shalom Mr. BT42!

Andrew (CS).
Adam

Frankfurt Am Main, Germany

#490708 Feb 19, 2013
Continue previous comment

This means that only those who have never violated against any rule have the right to judge other people.

And considering the fact that we probably spend a lifetime beeing pride,ignorant,income, Haughty, immoderate, lewdness, envy, vanity, greedy or angry words to be the simplest, that no one has the right to judge others.

“Quo Vadis”

Since: Feb 08

Location hidden

#490709 Feb 19, 2013
dr Shrink wrote:
<quoted text>
if old women fake chrsitinity Babilon Great will be destroyed,
for sure after her goes in the next raw those whose life is full of immorality and nasty godless filth
they never escape .nobody is able to escape or live without of Gods YAHVEH Breath
Agreed.
Adam

Frankfurt Am Main, Germany

#490710 Feb 19, 2013
The story of prophet Lot, on whom be peace, finds mention in several Qur'anic passages, especially Chapter 26:160-175 which reads: "The people of Lut rejected the apostles. Behold, their brother Lut said to them: "Will ye not fear (God)? "I am to you an apostle worthy of all trust. "So fear God and obey me. "No reward do I ask of you for it: my reward is only from the lord of the Worlds. "Of all the creatures in the world, will ye approach males, "And leave those whom God has created for you to be your mates? Nay, ye are a people transgressing (all limits)!" They said: "If thou desist not, O Lut! thou wilt assuredly be cast out!" He said: "I do detest your doings." "O my Lord! deliver me and my family from such things as they do!" So We delivered him and his family,- all Except an old woman who lingered behind. But the rest We destroyed utterly. We rained down on them a shower (of brimstone): and evil was the shower on those who were admonished (but heeded not)! Verily in this is a Sign: but most of them do not believe. And verily thy Lord is He, the Exalted in Might Most Merciful."

From these passages we learn that God saved Lot and the righteous ones of his family, and rained on the rest a shower of brimstone, so they were utterly destroyed. This is mentioned in the Qur'an not only for the sake of information, but mainly to serve as a warning to anyone who dares to repeat such acts.

Since: Mar 09

Location hidden

#490711 Feb 19, 2013
RiversideRedneck wrote:
<quoted text>
I don't think the "free thinkers" can think straight. I don't think they understand that God doesn't literally "see into out future", as God doesn't experience a past, present or future. It's all the same to Him.
Right

God would have access to the entire time-line and can see things as they occur

I try to make it easier to understand by putting it in human terms such as looking into the future is really taking a point in time and then looking backwards to see what choices someone already made. Someone looking into the future at past events (even if they have yet to occur in our present time) is no different than someone in present time looking into the past

Tomorrow if someone could see I ordered chicken for lunch and not a hamburger they can't claim by them seeing that I have no free will and had to have ordered chicken. Had i ordered a hamburger that is what they would see. And for someone to say I have no choice but to order chicken, that is based on the fact that they already saw me do it and that event already took place for all practical purposes for someone looking into the future. So of course i can't make another choice once I already made one any more than I can go into the past and make different choices.

It should be easy to understand God can see the whole timeline but for some reason this conversation keeps coming up. Maybe people are too influenced by thinking it will somehow disprove God because someone knowing the future doesn't even come close to taking away free-will. And if anything if they told someone it would make the future fluid. If they tell nobody then people simply chose what they decide to choose and someone is capable of seeing that

(T) Peace

“Quo Vadis”

Since: Feb 08

Location hidden

#490712 Feb 19, 2013
Knowledge wrote:
<quoted text>
I suppose I must have missed something. I do not read all of the posts....Who do you serve, what name was stricken from the Bible? It was not I hope I spell this correctly Yeheshewa?
Yahshua means; the salvation of Yahweh. The ben (or son) bears the name of His father. Some spell it Yashua and some say Yeshua > the Messianic Jews normally say it that way, and then others say Yehoshua or Yoshua, but the latter is just Hebrew for Joshua.

Yahshua
Yahweh Elohiym (Tzedikanu = Righteous Office, Raffa = Office of Healing, Tzevaot = Office of Defense, Protection and War, Shalom = Peace and Comfort).

Shalom!

Andrew (CS).

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Top Stories Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
Prove there's a god. (Mar '08) 4 min Stilgar Fifrawi 864,667
*** All Time Favorite Songs *** (Dec '10) 6 min middleman1 2,777
News Roman Catholic church only true church, says Va... (Jul '07) 8 min Tony17 599,645
The Christian Atheist debate 1 hr Rosa_Winkel 2,002
Poll If you're Christain what kind are you? (Oct '07) 2 hr RiccardoFire 6,463
gay bottom in gurgaon (May '14) 2 hr Raje 449
Jehovah's Witnesses are true disciple of Jesus ... (Mar '07) 2 hr GREAT DAY OF ARMA... 40,874
More from around the web