“Saved. ”

Since: Aug 12

Like Ice On planet Mercury

#489614 Feb 17, 2013
Whewe's the wist that says I'm swet myswelf up as a pwastor LL?

Since: Sep 10

Long Beach, CA

#489615 Feb 17, 2013
Qu_innocence wrote:
<quoted text>Yep... I hit a nerve. Oops! It's Yes not Yep!
Oh my goodness! Quill the wabbit! I mean...
I'm here to help.

“ IT'S A CHOICE !!!”

Since: Jun 12

Location hidden

#489616 Feb 17, 2013
dr Shrink wrote:
<quoted text>
good for you
GOD ALMIGHTY AND LORD
are 2 different meanings and 2 different HEAVENLY BEINGS
but a lot doesn't believe your beliefs and your Teddy Bear?

Thank you DS..
The LORD our God is one LORD.—Deuteronomy 6:4

*I'm not here to win a popularity contest... I only care what God thinks...:)

Since: Mar 09

Location hidden

#489617 Feb 17, 2013
Tide with Beach wrote:
<quoted text>EDITED FOR SPACE
So what? I have a circle of people that I keep up with on a more personal level. IANS is just one of those people. We also have conversations with a lot of the same people.
<quoted text>
I don't like to spread myself thin. When I get into a serious discussion, I like to be considerate, and make some effort.
<quoted text>
I'm fine addressing whatever you want to bring up.
So you dont want to spead yourself too thin is the reason? I actually would agree as it would be hard to put any serious time into defending anyone else with the time you dedicate to defending IANS.One might suggest another way not to spead yourself so thin is not to be so vested in defending another man on Topix and letting him speak for himself. Most people will defend a poster here and there. I dont know anybody else that spends so much time doing it for one poster that to do so for others would spread them thin. Just saying

Since: Sep 10

Long Beach, CA

#489618 Feb 17, 2013
Skombolis wrote:
<quoted text>
A little defensive eh Catcher?
You did post as to my whereabouts in another room, have claimed you are watching me, and invited others to come here. Those that have have all been in negative exchanges. It was hardly a stretch to think that may have been your intent
Although I didn't even challenge that point. I simply characterized the people who don't believe in God and defend each other and post in the same rooms as one another as a group. You really are going to try to make an issue out of the word 'group'?
Yeah it is amazing people would get the idea you guys are here for conflict
Not defensive, Skom.

It's called humor. Clementia understands; you can too, if you try.

In my view, it would behoove posters here to lighten up a bit. Makes life more enjoyable.

You take yourselves far to seriously.

And no, I'm not going to make an issue out of the word "group."

You drop it and I'll drop it.

“MEET ROSEMARY-She Seeks Home”

Since: Oct 10

With Established Harem

#489619 Feb 17, 2013
Qu_innocence wrote:
<quoted text>It is written ms. devil, "...because as He is, so are we in this world."
Get thee hence...
Le_le wrote:
<quoted text>
That didn't answer my question.
Where did it say to be prideful and intolerant
to your fellow man-
in His Name.. Where do you believe Jesus gave you this command
and this right to judge another human being, as you do?
.. arrogance. Pure, simple arrogance ..

“Saved. ”

Since: Aug 12

Like Ice On planet Mercury

#489620 Feb 17, 2013
Catcher1 wrote:
<quoted text>
I'm here to help.
No, you said that 'you're here to help' with false pretenses. You simply got goaded and that was a passive-aggressive way to vent. Just as you're in here under false pretenses imho.

“What's left to defend?”

Since: Jan 11

Freedom

#489621 Feb 17, 2013
Skombolis wrote:
That's a strange comparison but I understand why you are getting angry now. Embarrassment often leads to anger
I felt like I had to make it absurd before you would understand it.

And now, you're back to insulting me for exposing your poor conversation skills.
Skombolis wrote:
Your own words gave you away. You said it fortuitous that it happened to be IANS the things you were objecting to was to. Why was it fortuitous that it was IANS and not some other poster if your desire is simply to oppose on the issues and not to defend a certain poster?
I've read enough of IANS posts that I can assume certain things safely. It would have been the same if your slander were directed at Scaritual or Wilderide, and probably others.

The trigger was when you call someone a liar and bigot based on your incorrect misrepresentation of that person's words. I would have jumped on that no matter who it was.

It was most fortuitous that it was IANS, because I know he's not going to let you off the hook. I don't know when I'll have time to post, so it's just nice to know that someone is going to be babysitting you.(That was a jab, by the way)
Skombolis wrote:
The reason it was fortuitous is because you want to defend IANS every chance you get and this gave you what you see as an excuse.
Does repetition make it true?

It's almost like you're indoctrinating yourself.
Skombolis wrote:
Like I said, people (and often the same people) have been in equally similar exchanges with others in your group and you might once in a while respond once or not at all. But when someone confronts IANS than like clockwork here comes IANS Jr responding to every post not only to him but to IANS or about IANS. Heck you defend him more than he defends himself.
You've incorrectly paraphrased me, and insulted me. Yet, I'm not even defending myself. I don't care. I hope you continue. It serves my purposes better if you do.
Skombolis wrote:
Keep looking for those fortuitous opportunities to claim you are jumping in on merit and not out of a desire to defend IANS while disguising it as merit. And who knows, maybe one day you will be able to admit to yourself why it is so important to you to do this. I personally think you look up to him AND want his approval. I am simply suggesting you don't sacrifice your self-respect in pursuit of that goal
I do look up to him. So? You claiming some kind of obsession isn't just bordering on delusional, it is delusional. You need to stop this before it gets out of hand. And keep in mind, it serves my purposes better if you don't. I guess I haven't really decided yet if I want you to recognize your failures or not.

It's a good show either way.
dr Shrink

Baltimore, MD

#489622 Feb 17, 2013
Snevaeh legna wrote:
<quoted text>
Thank you DS..
The LORD our God is one LORD.—Deuteronomy 6:4
*I'm not here to win a popularity contest... I only care what God thinks...:)
I also am not here to be popular,or debates

but Deut 6;4 is english mistaken translation
because THE HaShem(Adoani) G-D YAHVEH IS ONE-proper hebrew transaltion

The Lord is not above the Supreme Ruler King of Kings

Also G-D Yahveh (YHVH) IS GOD FATHER,and Lord of Lords under command of HaShem is Jesus Christ Lord of Lords

there is not such claim as one or trinity

Bible always teach about Father greater from His Son-first begotten of all creations before creation of existing world

children of God don't have any part in world christian contests,debates,discussions about sealed Gods Plan,not able to achieve changes by specualtive arguesmcontentions,or insults

May God richly bless you

Since: Mar 09

Location hidden

#489623 Feb 17, 2013
Tide with Beach wrote:
<quoted text>
If this was a case of me just defending a friend, I'd be asking him just exactly what would be wrong with that.
It's not like I don't do that. This just isn't one of those times.
I agree with what IANS has been doing lately. I've wanted to do it myself ever since I "met" Skom.
It's a lesson about accountability. Skom walked right into it.
How can this be truthful? If you have wanted to challenge me on merit since you have met me then stands to reason you feel you have seen that as something that needs to be done based on my behavior. So you would have had plenty of chances to do so. The only time you have and to such a degree is when it has to do with IANS.All someone has to do is look at your arguments like jab is diff than slam or that the implication wasnt negative or pretending not to understand what it means for your perceptions to be colored by your friendship to see the extent merit has to do with it. It is ok to admit IANS means a lot to you
dr Shrink

Baltimore, MD

#489624 Feb 17, 2013
Happy Lesbo wrote:
Qu_innocence wrote:
<quoted text>It is written ms. devil, "...because as He is, so are we in this world."
Get thee hence...
<quoted text>
.. arrogance. Pure, simple arrogance ..
arogance is powerful weapon self defense own authority,power,and underestimate other more inteligent values

your arogance also disqualify you as normal poster with whom without of bias,someone could exchange smart thoughts of our knowledges
dr Shrink

Baltimore, MD

#489625 Feb 17, 2013
Catcher1 wrote:
<quoted text>
Not defensive, Skom.
It's called humor. Clementia understands; you can too, if you try.
In my view, it would behoove posters here to lighten up a bit. Makes life more enjoyable.
You take yourselves far to seriously.
And no, I'm not going to make an issue out of the word "group."
You drop it and I'll drop it.
humor you can keep around your own living enviroment.
printed words are not humor, because doesn't express attituded of your goodness or wicked character

“The eye has it...”

Since: May 09

Russell's Teapot

#489626 Feb 17, 2013
Skombolis wrote:
<quoted text>
He is friends with a group of people on Topix from what I have seen
I have also seen his other friends in pretty wild conflicts where Tide barely says anything if at all
So why does he do so disproportionately so much with IANS?
If IANS means so much more to him than his other friends on Topix and he feels the need to defend anything said to him on Topix then so be it. Why not let him say that? He is currently denying it has anything to do with that and is based on merit. Personally I think it is abandonment issues or hero-worship but it may be his friendship with IANS Although the disproportionate responses would suggest then he sees IANS as his 'best Topix friend"
So do you think Tide is lying to me and he really is defending IANS because they are friends and not simply because he objected to what was said to him? I personally think his feelings for IANS plays a big role as well. Thank you for suggesting his defense of IANS is motivated by friendship. What I have been saying isn't that much different. For the friendship of another man on Topix to warrant such special consideration over others there must be a reason.
Your post was more helpful than you probably realized it was going to be
Thank you
I think you're focused upon a subject that relates to you.

Your inability to comprehend what is being said.

Instead of addressing the issue as it relates to you, you're attempting to divert that focus away from your inability to do that by casting aspersions concerning what motivates the person or persons who are involved with a conversation pointing out your mistake, which, I've gotta say, has been stated clearly by those people.

So what if Tide also points out what has been brought to light by another?

I've done the same thing on behalf of many people, Tide and IANS included.They and others have done the same for me. I've done it on this thread, and the comments spoke of your inability, or lack of ability, or maybe it's just the lack of a desire to really address what's been said, so you divert by any means possible.

The words people use, people choose for many reasons, and those reasons may vary, but I know that as far as it concerns IANS, Tide, myself and many others, they are chosen to communicate precisely what they mean, and the meaning is important and it isn't up for you to decide what the person intended, especially when the person has clarified just exactly what it — those words, that sentence, that paragraph — did mean.

I said it was done for friendship, and what did you do? You decided that friendship means that a person must act a certain way, or it must not mean friendship, it means something else, what was it you said?
Skombolis wrote:
I personally think his feelings for IANS plays a big role as well. Thank you for suggesting his defense of IANS is motivated by friendship. What I have been saying isn't that much different. For the friendship of another man on Topix to warrant such special consideration over others there must be a reason.
See? You took what I said, and added something that wasn't implied, as a matter of fact, I said what I meant.

Now, what did I say concerning friendship?
Skombolis wrote:
Maybe it's called friendship. Unmotivated by any gain or advantage, or perceived benefit, and only for that reason. Friendship.
There's your problem. You do not comprehend what you read, and in your incomprehension, it becomes something else unrelated to what was said.

Do not place what friendship means to you as it applies to "another man", on what other people think of when they think of friendship, be it a man or woman.

It isn't what you think it means, no matter how bad you want it to be so.

Or how much you just can't comprehend it, or is it that you just don't want to?

Because that would be admitting you were wrong.

Since: Mar 09

Location hidden

#489627 Feb 17, 2013
Catcher1 wrote:
<quoted text>
Not defensive, Skom.
It's called humor. Clementia understands; you can too, if you try.
In my view, it would behoove posters here to lighten up a bit. Makes life more enjoyable.
You take yourselves far to seriously.
And no, I'm not going to make an issue out of the word "group."
You drop it and I'll drop it.
That is fine by me. We have been managing to avoid some of the pointless fighting over little stuff and stay civil and I would prefer to continue that. I have n o problem with having a lottle fun either. After all this just the internet and if we cant have fun here there is little point in posting

“The eye has it...”

Since: May 09

Russell's Teapot

#489628 Feb 17, 2013
Skombolis wrote:
<quoted text>How can this be truthful? If you have wanted to challenge me on merit since you have met me then stands to reason you feel you have seen that as something that needs to be done based on my behavior. So you would have had plenty of chances to do so. The only time you have and to such a degree is when it has to do with IANS.All someone has to do is look at your arguments like jab is diff than slam or that the implication wasnt negative or pretending not to understand what it means for your perceptions to be colored by your friendship to see the extent merit has to do with it. It is ok to admit IANS means a lot to you
Diversion.

Since: Sep 10

Long Beach, CA

#489629 Feb 17, 2013
Qu_innocence wrote:
<quoted text>No, you said that 'you're here to help' with false pretenses. You simply got goaded and that was a passive-aggressive way to vent. Just as you're in here under false pretenses imho.
Thanks for the diagnosis, Pastor.

Now go prey.

“What's left to defend?”

Since: Jan 11

Freedom

#489630 Feb 17, 2013
Skombolis wrote:
<quoted text>
He is friends with a group of people on Topix from what I have seen
I have also seen his other friends in pretty wild conflicts where Tide barely says anything if at all
So why does he do so disproportionately so much with IANS?
If IANS means so much more to him than his other friends on Topix and he feels the need to defend anything said to him on Topix then so be it. Why not let him say that? He is currently denying it has anything to do with that and is based on merit. Personally I think it is abandonment issues or hero-worship but it may be his friendship with IANS Although the disproportionate responses would suggest then he sees IANS as his 'best Topix friend"
So do you think Tide is lying to me and he really is defending IANS because they are friends and not simply because he objected to what was said to him? I personally think his feelings for IANS plays a big role as well. Thank you for suggesting his defense of IANS is motivated by friendship. What I have been saying isn't that much different. For the friendship of another man on Topix to warrant such special consideration over others there must be a reason.
Your post was more helpful than you probably realized it was going to be
Thank you
My Topix best friend is River Tam.

My posting behavior seems disproportionate because it is. I rarely post this much. I might be responding this much because YOU keep replying to me. That's rare. I'd rather this conversation go ten times faster. I don't really like getting involved in discussions that spread out over weeks, like a slow drip. That's part of the reason. The main reason is, I care about accountability. I care about accuracy. And yes, I even care about a friend of mine being insulted for invalid reasons. But that happens every single day. The reasons for my posting behavior are varied, and complex. Nobody knows better than I do, so let me tell you, if that's alright. I'm not going to lie. I have no reason to.

When are you going to own up for your mistakes? This has been a good distraction so far, but I haven't forgotten.

“Jesus is coming soon”

Since: Nov 09

Location hidden

#489631 Feb 17, 2013
Juicylu wrote:
<quoted text>
Much better...now. I've been busy picking debris out of my eyes, then washing them, check 'em out OO
<3
Yeap, they look bright eyed and bushy tailed, lol.
dr Shrink

Baltimore, MD

#489632 Feb 17, 2013
Catcher1 wrote:
<quoted text>
Clementine, now I'm going to be accused of luring you over here.
Aren't you a member of my "group"?
Shoo!
what group leader you are?

if you would try to be my leader,
I am quiet sure at first you would have to lick my toes, and chalenge my bizzare deabates with you destroing you like old sneaker after 12 seasons of football games

SO?"leader" start play games with your own dr Shrink,
only always keep close mouth,because dr Shrink at first throw psychotic pills at your mouth to make you complete unaware of daily reality
dr Shrink

Baltimore, MD

#489633 Feb 17, 2013
Catcher1 wrote:
<quoted text>
Thanks for the diagnosis, Pastor.
Now go prey.
guy is not pastor
only ministerial servant of pastor church,serving before pastor altar, holding holy grall( water mixed with moon shine called holy water-blood christ)

also
always post THE TRUTH BECAUSE THE TRUTH IS ALSO ABLE TO SET YOU FREE

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Top Stories Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
Wake up, Black America!! (Sep '13) 1 min Johnny 4,858
Prove there's a god. (Mar '08) 3 min pusherman_ 777,750
Gay snapchat names 10 min Jjaakkee135 168
Roman Catholic church only true church, says Va... (Jul '07) 15 min guest 560,328
Moses never existed 25 min Hidingfromyou 812
Play "end of the word" (Jan '11) 1 hr lixing001 5,153
Who's the best fighter: Jackie Chan, Bruce Lee,... (Jan '08) 1 hr brenIam 515
Why I’m no longer a Christian (Jul '08) 3 hr Kaitlin the Wolf ... 441,810
Was 9/11 a conspiracy?? (Oct '07) 3 hr onemale 265,403
More from around the web