I think you just implied that you're an idiot. No?
How did you get that from what I wrote? Try again.
"I disagree, maybe. Given Skom's ego, he probably believes that God has his back, and agrees with his mistakes."
The subject was whether Christians feel we need to make amends for our sins so long as we are forgiven. You said my pride would result in me thinking God agrees with my mistakes. The implication is I would no no incentive to make amends feeling God supported what I did.
So either i don't think it is a sin if i feel God supports it and the it has nothing to do with whether a Christian would feel they need to make amends for their sins since I wouldn't see it as a sin or I see it as a sin but think God supports me on it. And since the topix was is amends needed after receiving forgiveness and someone would only ask for forgiveness if they thought they sinned, it clearly can't be the first option
Sorry IANS jr, but you could save yourself a lot of time by simply standing behind your words instead of trying to find unbelievable and inapplicable technicalities to try to squirm out of them. But i understand why you would take that route since you are trying to come up with a defense for someone doing the same thing.
But since you are saying I don't follow correctly what IANS is saying, please tell me what he is saying "nope" too and what he claims he isn't going to keep correcting me on?
"You also said you don't rule out the possibility of a creator god (but would require proof)"
"Nope. I'm not going to continue to correct you any more."
Since he did say he believes it is possible creator gods exist but would require proof since he was making the point just because its possible doesn't mean he thinks it is and without proof wouldn't think they exist, please tell me what he was correcting me on?